The effect of sex inequality on solid organ transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Sex disparities are related to biological differences, which may have significant impact on patient and allograft outcomes. The aim was to investigate the impact of sex on clinical and safety outcomes after solid organ transplantation (SOT). METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Observational studies comparing females vs. males after SOT were considered for inclusion after a systematic search of the Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases conducted from 2016 to 2021. Primary outcome was mortality. PROSPERO register number: CRD42021282615. RESULTS: After retrieving 1103 studies, 22 observational studies (1,045,380 subjects) were finally deemed eligible for inclusion. Females accounted 36.3% of SOT recipients, but presented significantly lower mortality (odds ratio (OR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.83-0.92, I2=78%). In subgroup analyses, mortality was significantly lower in females undergoing liver (OR: 0.89 95%CI: 0.86-0.92, I2=0%) or kidney transplantation (OR: 0.82 95%CI: 0.76-0.89, I2=72%). Male sex was consistently reported as a protective factor against hospital readmission. Among the outcomes, allograft dysfunction was influenced by a combination of donor-recipient sex and age. Data on overall infections were inconclusive. Several reports suggest a higher risk of malignancy among males. CONCLUSIONS: Females represent one-third of SOT recipients but have higher survival rates than males after liver and kidney transplantation. The impact on graft dysfunction was heterogeneous. While further research is warranted, our findings should encourage clinicians and researchers to consider sex as a factor when taking decisions regarding SOT management.

Ribavirin for Treatment of Subjects with Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Related Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-associated diseases have caused an estimated 1.8 million hospital admissions and 40,000 deaths among children. RSV can cause lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in all age groups, adults with comorbidities, and immunocompromised patients. The aim was to summarize the evidence concerning efficacy and safety of ribavirin in subjects diagnosed with RSV associated with LRTI. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Eligible studies were observational (> 10 subjects) and randomized-controlled trials of subjects with aerosol/oral ribavirin for RSV-LRTI. Comparator was supportive care or placebo. Systematic search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted between January 2001 and January 2022. PROSPERO register number: CRD42022308147. RESULTS: After retrieving 907 studies, 10 observational studies and 1 randomized controlled trial were included (4/11 high quality of evidence). Seven studies included subjects with haematological malignancy/stem cell transplant, two lung transplants, and two healthy individuals. A total of 788 subjects diagnosed with RSV infection were included; 14.3% of them presented with only LRTI. Among 445 subjects treated with ribavirin, 195 (43.8%) received an aerosolized formulation. Pooled meta-analysis showed no differences in mortality [risk ratio (RR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.28-1.42] in all subjects treated with aerosol/oral ribavirin compared to supportive care. In subgroup analysis, mortality was significantly lower in haematological subjects (RR: 0.32; 95% CI: 0.14-0.71), but did not differ significantly in lung transplant recipients (RR: 0.89; 95% CI 0.31-2.56). Oral ribavirin (vs. supportive care) was associated with increased viral clearance (RR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.35-4.99). Seventeen adverse events were reported among 119 subjects, but none were severe. CONCLUSION: Ribavirin should be considered for treatment of RSV-LRTI in haematological subjects. There is a lack of evidence to support its use in lung transplant recipients. Oral formulation appears to be an easier, safe, and cost-effective alternative to aerosolized ribavirin. Further advances needs to focus on newer antivirals.