The Impact of a Pharmacist-Led Intravenous to Oral Switch of Metronidazole: A Before-and-After Study.

(1) Background. Intravenous (IV) to oral switch (IVOS) of antibiotics can reduce the length of hospitalisation, risk of IV catheter complications, and hospital costs. Pharmacists can play an instrumental role in implementing an IVOS initiative. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led IVOS of metronidazole. (2) Method. This was an observational study conducted in a New Zealand hospital. During a 3-month intervention period, pharmacists identified patients receiving IV metronidazole; then initiated an IVOS for patients who met the criteria. The comparator groups were patients who were not switched by pharmacists in the post-intervention (post-IVOS) group, or patients treated with either IV or oral metronidazole prior to the intervention (pre-IVOS). Primary outcome measures were switch rate and duration of IV metronidazole treatment. Secondary outcome measures were readmission and/or repeat surgery within 90 days of discharge and the length of hospital stay. (3) Results. In total, 203 patients were included: 100 in the pre-IVOS and 103 in the post-IVOS groups. Pharmacists switched 63/93 (67.7%) of eligible patients to oral metronidazole in the post-IVOS period. Only 9/89 (10.1%) of IVOS eligible patients were switched in the pre-IVOS group. In the post-IVOS group, the mean duration of IV metronidazole treatment in patients switched by pharmacists was shorter than in those who were not switched by pharmacists (2.5 ± 2.8 days vs. 4.8 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.012). No significant difference was found in readmission or repeat surgery within 90 days of discharge for patients switched by pharmacists versus patients who were not switched by pharmacists. (4) Conclusion. Our data have demonstrated successful implementation of the hospital-approved pharmacist-led IVOS service.

Primary medication non-adherence to analgesics and antibiotics at Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department.

AIM: To measure primary medication non-adherence to antibiotics, paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients discharged from Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department (CMH-ED). METHOD: A retrospective observational study based on 1,600 discharged patients' data collected between 28 April-6 May and 28 July-9 August 2014. Data were included for patients who were residents within the Auckland Regional Public Health Service boundaries, presented to CMH-ED and were discharged with a prescription. RESULTS: Of 992 patients, 48.5% did not have at least one medication on their discharge prescription filled. Patients were mostly born in New Zealand (66.5%), of Pacific Island descent (42.8%), living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas (78.1%) and under 10 years of age (32.6%). Filling rates significantly increased with >1 prescribed item (p≤0.01). NSAIDs were significantly more likely to be filled compared with paracetamol (59.9% vs 51.3%, p=0.034); antibiotics were significantly more likely to be filled than all other medicines (80.4%, p<0.001). The most significant predictors for non-adherence when accounting for number and types of medications were patients 10-44 years (p<0.05) and smokers (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Age, smoking and number of prescribed medications were predictors of non-adherence to medication type. Further research is warranted to assess whether changes to prescription co-payments affect the rate of nonadherence.

Ethnic Variations in the Quality Use of Medicines in Older Adults: Maori and Non-Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand.

In Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), ethnic inequities in health outcomes exist. Non-Maori experience better access to healthcare than Maori, including access to the quality use of medicines. Quality medicines use requires that medicines provide maximal therapeutic benefit with minimal harm. As older adults are more at risk of harm from medicines, and, because inequities are compounded with age, Maori older adults may be at more risk of medicines-related harm than younger and non-Maori populations. This narrative review examined ethnic variation in the quality use of medicines, including medicines utilisation and associated clinical outcomes, between Maori and non-Maori older adult populations in NZ. The review was structured around prevalence of medicine utilisation by medicine class and in particular disease states; high-risk medicines; polypharmacy; prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP); and association between PIP and clinical outcomes. 22 studies were included in the review. There is ethnic variation in the access to medicines in NZ, with Maori older adults often having reduced access to particular medicine types, or in particular disease states, compared with non-Maori older adults. Maori older adults are less likely than non-Maori to be prescribed medicines inappropriately, as defined by standardised tools; however, PIP is more strongly associated with adverse outcomes for Maori than non-Maori. This review identifies that inequities in quality medicines use exist and provides a starting point to develop pro-equity solutions. The aetiology of inequities in the quality use of medicines is multifactorial and our approaches to addressing the inequitable ethnic variation also need to be.

Primary medication non-adherence at Counties Manukau Health Emergency Department (CMH-ED), New Zealand: an observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To measure primary medication non-adherence (failure to fill prescription medicines) in patients discharged from the emergency department (ED), and to determine whether sociodemographic factors, smoking status and access to a general practitioner affect prescription filling. Little is known about primary medication non-adherence in EDs, and less so in New Zealand (NZ). Identifying reasons for non-adherence will enable development of strategies to improve adherence and reduce morbimortality. DESIGN AND SETTING: An observational study based on patient data from the ED of a large public hospital in South Auckland, NZ. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 1600 patients discharged between 28 April-6 May and 28 July-9 August 2014. Data were included if patients were residents within the Auckland Regional Public Health Service boundaries, admitted to ED and discharged with a prescription. Data were excluded if patients were admitted to another ward, transferred to another hospital or left the ED without seeing a doctor. RESULTS: 992 patients were included in the study, the majority were under 10 years (32.6%), of Pacific Island descent (42.8%), NZ-born (67.7%) and living in the most socioeconomically deprived areas (78.1%). Almost 50% of patients failed to fill all prescription medications. Simple linear regression analysis indicated that non-adherence was significant for those 10-24 years (n=236; adherence=47.2%; p<0.05), of NZ Maori ethnicity (n=175; 51.3%; p=0.01), unemployed (n=77; 46.8%; p<0.01), homemakers (n=66; 45.7%; p<0.01), students (n=228; 55.6%; p<0.05) and cigarette smokers (n=139; 50.3%; p<0.01). Following multivariable analysis, the strongest predictors for non-adherence were those aged between 10 and 17 years (n=116; p<0.01), the unemployed (n=77; p=0.01) and homemakers (n=66; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Age and occupation were the greater predictors of non-adherence; however, no other significant differences were found. Since this study, changes to prescription co-payments have been made. Further research is warranted to assess whether this change has more recently affected the rates of non-adherence.

Pharmacists' views on and experiences with bowel cancer screening kits in Auckland, New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the views of New Zealand pharmacists on bowel cancer screening, particularly with regards to faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) kits, self-perceived knowledge on FOBT kits and barriers, motivators and experiences with selling and counselling consumers with respect to FOBT kits. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted face to face or by telephone with 20 community pharmacists in the Auckland region. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and data were coded and analysed using NVivo software to identify key themes. KEY FINDINGS: Participant pharmacists believed that they were well placed to provide advice on FOBT kits to consumers. Barriers to selling the kits included cost and perceived lack of test sensitivity of the kits, poor consumer demand, pharmacists' lack of training and information, and a belief that selling FOBT kits was outside the pharmacists' scope of practice. Motivators to selling the kits included customer convenience, ease of use, confidence in the kits and embracing new roles for pharmacists. Pharmacists were concerned that use of the kits may increase the burden on the public health system through customer anxiety over test results; however, they agreed that there was a need for bowel cancer screening and awareness and that people concerned about bowel cancer should make visiting their general practitioner a priority. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacists' views were mixed. Pharmacists' training and competence with respect to the provision of bowel cancer kits, and how a bowel cancer screening service can be developed to optimise public health outcomes, need to be addressed.

Potentially inappropriate medication use: the Beers' Criteria used among older adults with depressive symptoms.

INTRODUCTION: The ageing population means prescribing for chronic illnesses in older people is expected to rise. Comorbidities and compromised organ function may complicate prescribing and increase medication-related risks. Comorbid depression in older people is highly prevalent and complicates medication prescribing decisions. AIM: To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication use in a community-dwelling population of older adults with depressive symptoms. METHODS: The medications of 191 community-dwelling older people selected because of depressive symptoms for a randomised trial were reviewed and assessed using the modified version of the Beers' Criteria. The association between inappropriate medication use and various population characteristics was assessed using Chi-square statistics and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: The mean age was 81 (±4.3) years and 59% were women. The median number of medications used was 6 (range 1-21 medications). The most commonly prescribed potentially inappropriate medications were amitriptyline, dextropropoxyphene, quinine and benzodiazepines. Almost half (49%) of the participants were prescribed at least one potentially inappropriate medication; 29% were considered to suffer significant depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale ≥5) and no differences were found in the number of inappropriate medications used between those with and without significant depressive symptoms (Chi-square 0.005 p=0.54). DISCUSSION: Potentially inappropriate medication use, as per the modified Beers' Criteria, is very common among community-dwelling older people with depressive symptoms. However, the utility of the Beers' Criteria is lessened by lack of clinical correlation. Ongoing research to examine outcomes related to apparent inappropriate medication use is needed.

Could the polypill improve adherence? The patient perspective.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple medications are recommended for the management of ischaemic heart disease. Unfortunately, increasing the number of medicines reduces adherence to medicines therapy. The concept of a polypill with a fixed dose combination of the common cardiovascular medicines (aspirin, statin, two blood pressure-lowering medicines) has been promoted. Patient perceptions about this concept have not been explored. METHODS: People taking at least three cardiovascular medicines were interviewed using a semi-structured interview about their views on a polypill that could reduce the number of tablets they would need to take. FINDINGS: The participants considered that the polypill would be very convenient, especially when travelling and would reduce the pill burden. If the polypill was subsidised by the government, they would have reduced dispensing fee costs. There were concerns around the inflexibility of dosing of individual components of the polypill, and some concerns about safety and efficacy. Medical practitioners were identified as having an important role in influencing participants about the acceptability of the polypill. CONCLUSION: Generally the concept of the polypill was acceptable to participants, primarily because of the convenience and reduced number of tablets required daily. There were concerns about whether the polypill would be as effective and safe as the individual medicines.