Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Crohns Colitis ; 14(12): 1680-1686, 2020 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32413102

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Both peripheral and axial spondyloarthritis [SpA] occur in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] and represent the commonest extra-intestinal manifestation. We aimed to develop an easy and quick questionnaire through psychometric analysis, to identify peripheral and axial SpA in IBD patients within an integrated combined multidisciplinary rheumatological-gastroenterology clinic. METHODS: Initially, SpA-IBD experts generated a 42-item list covering SpA manifestations including spinal, articular, and entheseal involvement. The new questionnaire was administered before routine clinical IBD assessment. On the same day, rheumatological assessment, blinded to both history and questionnaire results, was performed to explore the presence of the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society [ASAS] criteria for SpA, diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia [FM], and non-specific low back pain [NSLB]. Factorial analysis of questionnaire items to identify the main factors-receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves for sensitivity/specificity and Youden index for cut-off-were performed. RESULTS: Of the 181 consecutive patients, 56 met the ASAS SpA criteria [prevalence of 30%] with 10 new cases detected [5.5%: seven peripheral and three axial]. Through the psychometric and factorial analysis, we selected 14 items for the final questionnaire [named IBIS-Q]. The IBIS-Q was quick and performed well for detection of axial SpA and peripheral SpA (area under the curve [AUC] 0.88 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.830.93). A cut-off of three positive questions had a sensitivity 93% and specificity 77% for SpA patient identification. CONCLUSIONS: The IBIS-Q is a useful and simple tool to use in IBD clinics for SpA detection, with a good statistical performance. Further studies are needed to validate it.


Assuntos
Artrite/diagnóstico , Espondiloartrite Axial/diagnóstico , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Adulto , Artrite/classificação , Artrite/epidemiologia , Espondiloartrite Axial/classificação , Espondiloartrite Axial/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Curva ROC , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
Clin Rheumatol ; 39(11): 3383-3392, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32418040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of steroid injection (local treatment, LT) into the digital flexor tendon sheath of dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients as compared with systemic treatment (ST). METHODS: Forty-six PsA patients with a total of 73 dactylitic fingers were assessed in an observational, multicentre, prospective study by the Leeds Dactylitis Index basic (LDI-b) score and evaluated for local pain (visual analogue scale-VAS pain) and functional impairment (VAS-FI). Steroid injection was proposed to all patients. Patients refusing LT were treated with oral NSAIDs. Both the groups continued baseline csDMARDs and/or corticosteroids therapy. The clinical outcomes were measured at baseline, 1 month (T1) and 3 months (T3). RESULTS: The reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-FI and LDI-b values was statistically significant higher in the LT group (24 patients, 38 dactylitic fingers) as compared with the ST group (22 patients, 35 dactylitic fingers), both at T1 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p = 0.008, respectively) and at T3 (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). A clinically meaningful treatment response (defined as a contemporary reduction of at least 5 points in VAS-pain and VAS-FI or as values of VAS-pain and VAS-FI were both ≤ 2) was observed at T1 in 33 (87%) digits in LT group and in 6 (17%) digits in ST group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference (94% vs 31%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: For the first time, we show the effectiveness of steroid injection into the digital flexor tendon sheath in improving clinical aspects of hand psoriatic dactylitis. Key Points • Therapy with steroid injection (local treatment, LT), into the digital flexor tendon sheath for the treatment of active dactylitis in psoriatic arthritis patients, is more effective when compared with systemic treatment (ST) alone. • The reduction of VAS-pain, VAS-functional impairment (VAS-FI) and Leeds Dactylitis Index basic values was statistically significant higher in the LT group as compared with the ST group, both at T1and at T3. • A clinically meaningful response was observed at T1 in 87% of digits of patients treated with steroid injection and in 17% of digits of the systemic treatment group (p < 0.001). At T3, clinical response improved significantly in both the groups, with significant difference. • For the first time, findings from this study show that the use of steroid injections into the digital flexor tendon sheath for psoriatic dactylitis could be an effective and safe first-line therapy for psoriatic dactylitis.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica , Artrite Psoriásica/tratamento farmacológico , Mãos , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Esteroides , Tendões
3.
Rheumatology (Oxford) ; 59(10): 2857-2863, 2020 Oct 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32068873

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Joint pain is common in subjects with IBD and is linked to several factors including SpA, drug therapy, concomitant OA or FM. The primary aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of primary FM and concomitant FM and SpA in a cohort of patients with IBD utilizing clinical and US assessment. METHODS: A total of 301 consecutive cases with IBD attending two IBD Units were assessed by a rheumatologist for Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria fulfilment for SpA or the 2010 ACR criteria for FM. Some 158 cases also had US entheseal examination on large insertions in the upper and lower limbs. RESULTS: Thirty-seven IBD patients (12%) met the ACR criteria for primary FM with 9% presenting with primary FM and 3.3% presenting with concomitant FM and SpA. Meeting FM criteria was not related to smoking, sedentary job, BMI or the presence of psoriasis. FM patients presented higher Leeds Enthesitis Index, BASDAI and BASFI scores than SpA patients. At US examination, patients who satisfied the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society criteria for SpA had significantly higher mean enthesis or patient power Doppler positive as compared with the IBD and FM group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found that FM occurred in 12% of SpA patients and in this setting SpA disease activity indices performed poorly. US examination in a large patient subgroup showed a promising discriminating capacity between FM and SpA in IBD patients.


Assuntos
Fibromialgia/epidemiologia , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Espondilartrite/epidemiologia , Adulto , Colite Ulcerativa/complicações , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/complicações , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Fibromialgia/diagnóstico , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/complicações , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Psoríase/epidemiologia , Fumar/epidemiologia , Espondilartrite/diagnóstico , Ultrassonografia
4.
Front Pharmacol ; 10: 1497, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920675

RESUMO

Background: Few studies have evaluated the effectiveness of adalimumab in the real-life setting in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Objective: To evaluate the 2-year retention rate of adalimumab in PsA patients. Potential baseline parameters influencing persistence on treatment were also evaluated. Methods: PsA patients from 16 Italian Rheumatology Units treated with adalimumab as first- or second-line biological therapy were retrospectively evaluated. Adalimumab retention rate was evaluated at 12 and 24 months. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between predictor variables and adalimumab retention rate. Results: From 424 patients (53.5% male, aged 48.3 ± 12.8 years) who started treatment with adalimumab, 367 (86.6%) maintained treatment for 12 months and 313 (73.8%) for 2 years. At 24-months, Disease Activity in PsA (DAPSA) remission (defined as ≤4) and Low Disease Activity (LDA) (≤14) were achieved in 22.8% and 44.4% of patients, respectively. Adalimumab treatment significantly decreased the number of tender (7.0 ± 5.7 at baseline vs. 2.3 ± 3.5 at 24 months, p < 0.001) and swollen joints (2.7 ± 2.8 at baseline vs. 0.4 ± 0.9 at 24 months, p < 0.001), DAPSA (25.5 ± 10.9 at baseline vs. 11.0 ± 8.4 at 24 months, p < 0.001), PASI (5.3 ± 5.7 at baseline vs. 2.7 ± 2.8 at 24 months, p < 0.001) and CRP (3.8 ± 6.3 at baseline vs. 1.2 ± 1.7 at 24 months, p < 0.001). Among a range of laboratory and clinical variables, only female gender was associated with improved adalimumab persistence at 24 months (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.2-3.2, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Independent of a range of predictor variables, adalimumab was shown to be effective, while maintaining a high retention rate after 2 years in PsA patients.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA