Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 21(1): 235, 2021 May 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34022802

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterised by gastrointestinal (GI) and psychological symptoms (e.g., depression, anxiety, and somatization). Depression and anxiety, but not somatization, have already been associated with altered intestinal barrier function, increased LPS, and dysbiosis. The study aimed to investigate the possible link between somatization and intestinal barrier in IBS with diarrhoea (IBS-D) patients. METHODS: Forty-seven IBS-D patients were classified as having low somatization (LS = 19) or high somatization (HS = 28) according to the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R), (cut-off score = 63). The IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) and the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaires were administered to evaluate GI symptoms. The intestinal barrier function was studied by the lactulose/mannitol absorption test, faecal and serum zonulin, serum intestinal fatty-acid binding protein, and diamine oxidase. Inflammation was assessed by assaying serum Interleukins (IL-6, IL-8, IL-10), and tumour necrosis factor-α. Dysbiosis was assessed by the urinary concentrations of indole and skatole and serum lipopolysaccharide (LPS). All data were analysed using a non-parametric test. RESULTS: The GI symptoms profiles were significantly more severe, both as a single symptom and as clusters of IBS-SSS and GSRS, in HS than LS patients. This finding was associated with impaired small intestinal permeability and increased faecal zonulin levels. Besides, HS patients showed significantly higher IL-8 and lowered IL-10 concentrations than LS patients. Lastly, circulating LPS levels and the urinary concentrations of indole were higher in HS than LS ones, suggesting a more pronounced imbalance of the small intestine in the former patients. CONCLUSIONS: IBS is a multifactorial disorder needing complete clinical, psychological, and biochemical evaluations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03423069 .


Assuntos
Gastroenteropatias , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável , Ansiedade , Diarreia/etiologia , Humanos , Síndrome do Intestino Irritável/complicações , Inquéritos e Questionários
2.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 51(2): 136-144, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27092429

RESUMO

GOALS: The goals of the study were to investigate in both postprandial distress syndrome (PDS) and epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) the gastric electrical activity and the gastric emptying (GE) time together with the circulating concentrations of motilin, somatostatin, corticotrophin-releasing factor, and neurotensin, and to establish whether the genetic variability in the neurotensin system genes differs between these 2 categories of functional dyspepsia (FD). BACKGROUND: The current FD classification is based on symptoms and it has been proven not to be completely satisfying because of a high degree of symptom overlap between subgroups. STUDY: Gastric electrical activity was evaluated by cutaneous electrogastrography: the GE time by C-octanoic acid breast test. Circulating concentrations of gut peptides were measured by a radioimmunoassay. NTS 479 A/G and NTSR1 rs6090453 SNPs were evaluated by PCR and endonuclease digestion. RESULTS: Fifty-four FD patients (50 female/4 male) were studied. Using a symptom questionnaire, 42 patients were classified as PDS and 12 as EPS, although an overlap between the symptom profiles of the 2 subgroups was recorded. The electrogastrographic parameters (the postprandial instability coefficient of dominant frequency, the dominant power, and the power ratio) were significantly different between the subgroups, whereas the GE time did not differ significantly. In addition, EPS was characterized by a different gut peptide profile compared with PDS. Finally, neurotensin polymorphism was shown to be associated with neurotensin levels. This evidence deserves further studies in consideration of an analgesic role of neurotensin. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of gut peptide profiles could represent an interesting tool to enhance FD diagnosis and overcome limitations due to a distinction based solely on symptoms.


Assuntos
Dor Abdominal/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Peptídeos/sangue , Período Pós-Prandial/fisiologia , Avaliação de Sintomas/métodos , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/fisiopatologia , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/sangue , Hormônio Adrenocorticotrópico/genética , Adulto , Idoso , Caprilatos/análise , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Dispepsia/complicações , Dispepsia/fisiopatologia , Condutividade Elétrica , Feminino , Esvaziamento Gástrico/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motilina/sangue , Motilina/genética , Neurotensina/sangue , Neurotensina/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Somatostatina/sangue , Somatostatina/genética , Estômago/fisiopatologia , Síndrome , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA