Body Height of MPS I and II Patients after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: The Impact of Dermatan Sulphate.

INTRODUCTION: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) comprises one of the two main treatment regimens for patients with mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS). There is a scarcity of literature concerning the process of growth in children with Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) and Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS II) after HSCT. The aim of this manuscript was to evaluate the therapeutic effect of HSCT on the heights of patients with MPS I and MPS II. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was an observational, single-center study on patients with MPS I and II treated with HSCT. RESULTS: 6 MPS patients, including 4 MPS I and 2 MPS II, underwent HSCT at a median age of 2 years. All patients are alive to date, with a median age of 7.7 years (range 5.5-12 years) at the last follow-up. In both (MPS I and MPS II) groups of patients treated with HSCT, the growth rate was higher than in untreated patients and was found to be in line with the population norm. In both MPS I and MPS II patients who were treated with HSCT, normalization of urinary GAG excretion was observed. Additionally, no bands of DS and HS in GAG electrophoresis were visible. CONCLUSIONS: Both MPS I and MPS II patients presented height gain after HSCT compared to the curves of untreated patients. The absence of dermatan sulphate after HSCT could lead to normal growth in bone length.

Spinal cord compression in Maroteaux-Lamy syndrome: case report and review of the literature with effects of enzyme replacement therapy.

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this report is to review the literature regarding spinal cord compression in mucopolysaccharidosis type VI (MPS VI), to discuss the possible impact of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) and to stress the necessity of timely surgical intervention. A 9.5-year-old female patient with severe MPS VI had been receiving ERT since the age of 7. After 2.5 years of treatment, she developed craniovertebral canal stenosis with spinal cord compression and cervical myelopathy. CONCLUSIONS: (1) baseline cervical spine evaluation and regular neurological assessment should be performed in all MPS VI patients, (2) detailed neurological observation should be conducted in patients treated with ERT, especially in the period of improvement in the osteoarticular system, as ERT fails to prevent cervical myelopathy and (3) surgical decompression is required and in order to achieve a satisfying outcome it might be crucial to perform surgery at an early age.