Quantifying changes in shoulder orientation between the prone and supine positions from magnetic resonance imaging.

BACKGROUND: Predicting breast tissue motion using biomechanical models can provide navigational guidance during breast cancer treatment procedures. These models typically do not account for changes in posture between procedures. Difference in shoulder position can alter the shape of the pectoral muscles and breast. A greater understanding of the differences in the shoulder orientation between prone and supine could improve the accuracy of breast biomechanical models. METHODS: 19 landmarks were placed on the sternum, clavicle, scapula, and humerus of the shoulder girdle in prone and supine breast MRIs (N = 10). These landmarks were used in an optimization framework to fit subject-specific skeletal models and compare joint angles of the shoulder girdle between these positions. FINDINGS: The mean Euclidean distance between joint locations from the fitted skeletal model and the manually identified joint locations was 15.7 mm ± 2.7 mm. Significant differences were observed between prone and supine. Compared to supine position, the shoulder girdle in the prone position had the lateral end of the clavicle in more anterior translation (i.e., scapula more protracted) (P < 0.05), the scapula in more protraction (P < 0.01), the scapula in more upward rotation (associated with humerus elevation) (P < 0.05); and the humerus more elevated (P < 0.05) for both the left and right sides. INTERPRETATION: Shoulder girdle orientation was found to be different between prone and supine. These differences would affect the shape of multiple pectoral muscles, which would affect breast shape and the accuracy of biomechanical models.

Computational models for generating microvascular structures: Investigations beyond medical imaging resolution.

Angiogenesis, arteriogenesis, and pruning are revascularization processes essential to our natural vascular development and adaptation, as well as central players in the onset and development of pathologies such as tumoral growth and stroke recovery. Computational modeling allows for repeatable experimentation and exploration of these complex biological processes. In this review, we provide an introduction to the biological understanding of the vascular adaptation processes of sprouting angiogenesis, intussusceptive angiogenesis, anastomosis, pruning, and arteriogenesis, discussing some of the more significant contributions made to the computational modeling of these processes. Each computational model represents a theoretical framework for how biology functions, and with rises in computing power and study of the problem these frameworks become more accurate and complete. We highlight physiological, pathological, and technological applications that can be benefit from the advances performed by these models, and we also identify which elements of the biology are underexplored in the current state-of-the-art computational models. This article is categorized under: Cancer > Computational Models Cardiovascular Diseases > Computational Models.

QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results.

Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Developing scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS.

An automated computational biomechanics workflow for improving breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.

Clinicians face many challenges when diagnosing and treating breast cancer. These challenges include interpreting and co-locating information between different medical imaging modalities that are used to identify tumours and predicting where these tumours move to during different treatment procedures. We have developed a novel automated breast image analysis workflow that integrates state-of-the-art image processing and machine learning techniques, personalized three-dimensional biomechanical modelling and population-based statistical analysis to assist clinicians during breast cancer detection and treatment procedures. This paper summarizes our recent research to address the various technical and implementation challenges associated with creating a fully automated system. The workflow is applied to predict the repositioning of tumours from the prone position, where diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging is performed, to the supine position where treatment procedures are performed. We discuss our recent advances towards addressing challenges in identifying the mechanical properties of the breast and evaluating the accuracy of the biomechanical models. We also describe our progress in implementing a prototype of this workflow in clinical practice. Clinical adoption of these state-of-the-art modelling techniques has significant potential for reducing the number of misdiagnosed breast cancers, while also helping to improve the treatment of patients.