Spontaneous pneumomediastinum secondary to electronic cigarette use.

Vaping, the use of electronic cigarettes, involves different mechanics than conventional combustion cigarettes. Consumers who vape tend to overinhale and then forcefully exhale to eliminate the vapor, which is usually produced in much greater quantity than generated by a regular cigarette. Effectively, they are performing an exaggerated Valsalva maneuver. This can increase their risk for developing potential spontaneous pneumomediastinum. Here we present a case of spontaneous pneumomediastinum secondary to electronic cigarette use.

Tracheal resection for tracheal stenosis.

Anatomically, patients with refractory tracheal stenosis benefit from tracheal resection, depending on the medical comorbidities or challenging tracheal anatomy, which is often the reason for denial of this option in these patients. We evaluated 15 patients undergoing tracheal resection at our institution from May 2016 through December 2017. Eleven patients had a history of previous tracheostomy, six in place at the time of resection. One had idiopathic stenosis with no known comorbidities. Major comorbidities included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. One had a left ventricular assist device, and one was a lung transplant recipient. All had primary resection through the cervical approach with a median length of 3.5 cm. Fourteen patients were eventually decannulated. One patient had re-resection 1 year later for recurrent stenosis. Twelve were alive at a median follow-up of 15 months with patent airways. In conclusion, tracheal stenosis patients have significant comorbidities that increase the risks after resection. However, these patients should still be considered for surgery for an improved quality of life and eventual resolution of severe stenosis.

Postpneumonectomy Bronchopleural Fistula Closure With Biologic Mesh and Diaphragm Flap.

A 77-year-old man with clinical stage II squamous cell carcinoma underwent right intrapericardial pneumonectomy. After an initially uneventful course he was readmitted with right-sided empyema, bronchopleural fistula, and pulmonary embolus. This was managed with initial resuscitation and anticoagulant agents, followed by debridement and closure of the fistula with biologic mesh reinforced with a pedicled diaphragm muscle flap.

Routine venous thromboembolism screening after pneumonectomy: The more you look, the more you see.

OBJECTIVES: Symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) after pneumonectomy is associated with poor prognosis. We describe a new care pathway for patients undergoing pneumonectomy in which asymptomatic lower-extremity VTE screening was performed to determine if it increases VTE detection and potentially decreases sequelae. METHODS: 112 patients underwent pneumonectomy from 2006 to 2013 at Cleveland Clinic and were enrolled in a care pathway that included VTE prophylaxis and routine, predischarge, lower-extremity VTE screening. These data were contrasted with a previously published cohort of 336 patients (1990-2001) who underwent pneumonectomy without routine VTE screening. RESULTS: 10 of 112 patients (8.9%) had VTE detected by screening before discharge. An additional 4 patients (3.6%) with a negative predischarge screen developed symptomatic VTE within 30 days. Six patients (5.4%) developed VTE after pneumonectomy beyond the first 30 days. Prevalence of in-hospital VTE in the screened cohort was significantly higher than that of the non-screened cohort (3.0%; P = .008). Similarly, VTE within 30 days in the screened cohort (13%) was significantly higher than in the nonscreened cohort (5.0%; P = .007). In both cohorts, a peak was observed approximately 6 days after pneumonectomy and plateaued after 30 days. The presence of a VTE portended worse long-term survival: 66% at 1 year versus 85% for those not developing a VTE. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of VTE after pneumonectomy is higher than previously thought. The risk of developing a VTE peaks at 6 days after pneumonectomy, and remains increased until 30 days, suggesting a need for additional screening or longer prophylaxis.

Expanding the donor pool: donation after cardiac death.

Lung transplantation (LTx) is the definitive treatment of patients with end-stage lung disease. Availability of donor lungs remains the primary limitation and leads to substantial wait-list mortality. Efforts to expand the donor pool have included a resurgence of interest in the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) lungs. Unique in its physiology, lung viability seems more tolerant to the variable durations of ischemia that occur in DCD donors. Initial experience with DCD LTx is promising and, in combination with ex vivo lung perfusion systems, seems a valuable opportunity to expand the lung donor pool.

Too high for transplantation? Single-center analysis of the lung allocation score.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies using United Network for Organ Sharing data suggest that lung transplantation in patients with high lung allocation scores (LAS) may lead to organ and resource wastage. Therefore, to determine whether a LAS cutoff value should be considered, we evaluated the relation of LAS to waitlist and posttransplant mortality in our center to determine if it could identify patients for whom listing for transplantation may be futile. METHODS: From May 1, 2005 to July 1, 2010, 537 adults were listed and 426 underwent primary lung transplantation at our institution. Endpoints were mortality before and after lung transplantation. The relationships of LAS at listing to waitlist mortality and of pretransplant LAS to posttransplant mortality were both analyzed by multiphase hazard function methodology. RESULTS: Higher LAS was strongly associated with waitlist mortality (p<0.0001), with the highest quartile (LAS ranging from 47 to 95) experiencing 75% mortality within a year of listing. Although early (p=0.05), but not late (p=0.4), posttransplant survival was associated with higher LAS at transplantation, once other clinical characteristics predictive of early mortality were accounted for, neither waitlist nor pretransplant LAS was independently related to posttransplant mortality (p=0.12). CONCLUSIONS: Higher LAS strongly predicts higher mortality on the lung transplantation waitlist, underscoring the value of LAS in prioritizing patients with the highest scores for transplantation. Early posttransplant mortality is modestly higher with higher pretransplant LAS, but the data of our center do not suggest a value above which transplantation should be denied as futile. This suggests that donor organs and resources are not being wasted.

A phase II trial of induction epirubicin, oxaliplatin, and fluorouracil, followed by surgery and postoperative concurrent cisplatin and fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.

INTRODUCTION: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy improves local control in patients with locoregionally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Distant failure remains common, however, suggesting potential benefit from additional chemotherapy. This phase II study investigated the addition of induction chemotherapy to surgery and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: Patients with cT3-4 or N1 or M1a (American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition) adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ were eligible. Induction chemotherapy, with epirubicin 50 mg/m/d, oxaliplatin 130 mg/m/d, and fluorouracil 200 mg/m/d continuous infusion for 3 weeks, was given every 21 days for three courses, followed by surgery. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy consisted of 50 to 55 Gy at 1.8 to 2.0 Gy/d and two courses of cisplatin (20 mg/m/d) and fluorouracil (1000 mg/m/d) during weeks 1 and 4 of radiotherapy. RESULTS: Between February 2008 and January 2012, 60 evaluable patients enrolled. Resection was accomplished in 54 patients (90%) and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in 48 (80%) patients. Toxicity included unplanned hospitalization in 18% of patients during induction chemotherapy and 19% of patients during adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. There was one chemotherapy-related and two postoperative deaths. With a median follow-up of 43 months, the projected 3-year locoregional control is 88%, distant metastatic control 46%, relapse-free survival 41%, and overall survival 47%. Symptomatic response to chemotherapy and the percentage of remaining viable tumor at surgery proved the strongest predictors of survival and distant control. CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy, surgery, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy are feasible and produce outcomes similar to other multimodality treatment schedules in locoregionally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ. Symptomatic response and less residual tumor at surgery were associated with improved outcomes.

Robotic surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.

BACKGROUND: Open cervical parathyroidectomy is the standard of care for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP). However, in patients with a history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation, the cosmetic result may sometimes be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, in the presence of mediastinal glands, a more morbid approach is sometimes necessary, involving a sternal split or thoracotomy. Robotic parathyroidectomy, either transaxillary or transthoracic, could be an alternative in both settings. METHODS: Between 2008 and 2013, 14 patients with PHP and a well-localized single adenoma underwent robotic transaxillary cervical (TAC) (n = 8) or transthoracic mediastinal (TTM) (n = 6) parathyroidectomy at an academic tertiary medical center and their outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: All 14 operations were completed successfully as planned. For TAC and TTM parathyroidectomies, mean operative time was 184 and 168 min, respectively. With the exception of one TTM patient, intraoperative PTH determination indicated a >50 % drop in all patients 10 min after excision and no patients presented with recurrent disease on follow-up. Average length of hospital stay was 1 day after TAC parathyroidectomy and 2.2 days after TTM. On a visual analog pain scale (0-10), average pain scores after TAC were 6/10 on postoperative day 1 and 1/10 on day 14, compared to 7.7/10 and 1.5/10, respectively, after TTM. Complications included development of seroma in 1 patient in the TAC group and pericardial and pleural effusion in 1 patient in the TTM cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study shows that robotic TAC and TTM parathyroidectomy are feasible in selected PHP patients with preoperatively well-localized disease. Although the TAC approach offers a potential cosmetic benefit in patients with a history of keloid or hypertrophic scar formation, a more generalized use cannot be recommended based on current evidence. The robotic TTM approach presents a minimally invasive alternative to resections previously performed through thoracotomy and sternotomy.

Esophagopulmonary fistula and left lung abscess after transoral incisionless fundoplication.

Endoscopic treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is emerging as an alternative to open, laparoscopic, or robotic antireflux surgical procedures. Early transoral devices failed because of poor efficacy and serious adverse events. In recent trials the EsophyX device has demonstrated acceptable safety and a reasonable efficacy profile. We present the case of a woman who experienced a distal esophageal perforation and esophagopulmonary fistula after treatment for GERD with the EsophyX device. Although considered minimally invasive, endoscopic procedures for GERD treatment can have significant deleterious consequences, and early recognition of these complications is vital to limit associated morbidity.

Comparative study of bronchial artery revascularization in lung transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Restoring dual blood supply to transplanted lungs by bronchial artery revascularization (BAR) remains controversial. We compared outcomes after lung transplantation performed with and without BAR. METHODS: From December 2007 to July 2010, 283 patients underwent transplantation; 187 were 18 years or older, without previous or concomitant cardiac surgery. Of these patients, 27 underwent BAR in a pilot study to test success, safety, effectiveness, and teachability. A propensity score was generated to match BAR patients and 54 routine non-BAR patients. Follow-up was 1.3 ± 0.68 years. RESULTS: BAR was angiographically successful in 26 (96%) of 27 patients. BAR and non-BAR patients had similar skin-to-skin time (P = .07) and postoperative hospital stays (P = .2), but more reoperations for bleeding (P = .002). Tracheostomy was performed in 9 (33%) of 27 BAR and 10 (19%) of 54 non-BAR patients (P = .2, log-rank). One BAR (3.7%) and 4 non-BAR (7.4%) patients required extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (P = .7). Airway ischemia was observed in 1 BAR (3.7%) versus 12 non-BAR (22%) patients (P = .03); anastomotic intervention was required in no BAR versus 8 non-BAR (15%) patients (P = .04). Hospital mortality was 1 of 27 versus 2 of 54 (P = .9). BAR patients had lower early biopsy tissue rejection grades (P = .008) and fewer pulmonary (P < .04) and bloodstream (P < .02) infections. Forced 1-second expiratory volume was similar (P > .2); 3 BAR versus 9 non-BAR patients developed bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) (P = .14, log-rank). During follow-up, 4 BAR and 8 non-BAR patients died (P = .6, log-rank). CONCLUSIONS: BAR is safe, with comparable early outcomes. Benefits of BAR include reduced airway ischemia and complications, lower biopsy tissue grades, fewer infections, and delay of BOS. A multicenter study is needed to establish these benefits.

Impact of nutritional state on lung transplant outcomes.

BACKGROUND: When high-risk lung transplant candidates are evaluated, nutritional state is often neglected. We evaluated the prevalence of markers reflecting pre-transplant malnutrition and their association with post-operative complications and death. METHODS: From January 2005 to July 2010, 453 patients underwent primary lung transplantation at our institution. Pre-operative nutrition-related variables, including body mass index and weight/height ratio, reflecting cachexia, and albumin, total protein, immunoglobulins, and absolute lymphocyte count were considered in identifying risk factors for time-related major post-operative complications (renal failure requiring dialysis, respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy), pulmonary or bloodstream infections, and death. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients had BMI <18.5 kg/m(2), 41 had a weight/height ratio ≤ 0.3, 102 had albumin <3.5 g/dl, 110 had total protein <6 g/dl, and 112 had an absolute lymphocyte count <1,000/µl, indicative of a malnourished state. At 6 months, 30% had experienced pulmonary infection, with lower total serum protein concentration an important risk (p = 0.02). One-year actuarial mortality was 15%; risk factors included lower serum albumin (p = 0.004), particularly when <3 g/dl. In contrast, variables reflecting nutritional state were not statistically significantly correlated with dialysis, respiratory failure requiring tracheostomy, or bloodstream infections. CONCLUSION: Although malnutrition is uncommon in lung transplant patients, those at extremes of low serum albumin and total protein have worse survival and increased risk of post-operative infection. Strategies to improve nutrition of these high-risk candidates awaiting lung transplantation should be developed.

Intramucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma: primum non nocere.

OBJECTIVES: Intramucosal esophageal cancer treatment is evolving. Less-invasive therapies have emerged, necessitating review of safety, effectiveness, and determinants of long-term outcome after esophagectomy to clarify the role of this traditional, maximally invasive, and potentially harmful therapy. METHODS: From January 1983 to January 2011, 164 patients underwent esophagectomy alone for intramucosal adenocarcinoma. Cancers were subdivided by depth of invasion: lamina propria 50 (30%) and muscularis mucosa 114 (70%; inner 42 [26%], middle 16 [10%], and outer 56 [34%]). We assessed complications and esophagectomy-related mortality (safety) and cancer recurrence (effectiveness), and identified determinants of long-term outcomes. RESULTS: Barrett esophagus (P = .005), larger cancers (P < .001), worse histologic grade (P < .001), lymphovascular invasion (P < .001), and overstaging (P = .02) were associated with deeper cancers. One patient had regional lymph node metastases (0.6%). Seventy-five patients (46%) had complications. Seven of 9 deaths within 6 months were esophagectomy related, 6 from respiratory failure. Seven patients had recurrence, all within 4 years. Five-, 10-, and 15-year survivals were 82%, 69%, and 60%, respectively, which were similar to those of a matched general population. Determinants of late mortality were older age (P = .004), poorer lung function (P < .0001), longer cancer (P = .04), postoperative pneumonia (P = .06), cancer recurrence (P < .0001), and second cancers (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Survival after esophagectomy for intramucosal adenocarcinoma is excellent, determined more by patient than cancer characteristics. Patient selection and respiratory function are crucial to minimize harm. Considering the outcome of emerging therapies, esophagectomy should be reserved for patients with a long intramucosal adenocarcinoma or those in whom endoscopic therapies fail or are inappropriate.