Targeting GLI1 and BAX by nanonoscapine could impede prostate adenocarcinoma progression.

Prostate cancer as a critical global health issue, requires the exploration of a novel therapeutic approach. Noscapine, an opium-derived phthalide isoquinoline alkaloid, has shown promise in cancer treatment thanks to its anti-tumorigenic properties. However, limitations such as low bioavailability and potential side effects have hindered its clinical application. This study introduces nanonoscapine as a novel medication to overcome these challenges, leveraging the advantages of improved drug delivery and efficacy achieved in nanotechnology. We monitored the effects of nanonoscapine on the androgen-sensitive human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line, LNCaP, investigating its impact on GLI1 and BAX genes' expressions, crucial regulators of cell cycle and apoptosis. Our findings, from MTT assays, flow cytometry, and gene expression analyses, have demonstrated that nanonoscapine effectively inhibits prostate cancer cell proliferation by inducing G2/M phase arrest and apoptosis. Furthermore, through bioinformatics and computational analyses, we have revealed the underlying molecular mechanisms, underscoring the therapeutic potential of nanonoscapine in enhancing patient outcomes. This study highlights the significance of nanonoscapine as an alternative or adjunct treatment to conventional chemotherapy, warranting further investigation in clinical settings.

Update on immune-based therapy strategies targeting cancer stem cells.

Accumulating data reveals that tumors possess a specialized subset of cancer cells named cancer stem cells (CSCs), responsible for metastasis and recurrence of malignancies, with various properties such as self-renewal, heterogenicity, and capacity for drug resistance. Some signaling pathways or processes like Notch, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), Hedgehog (Hh), and Wnt, as well as CSCs' surface markers such as CD44, CD123, CD133, and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) have pivotal roles in acquiring CSCs properties. Therefore, targeting CSC-related signaling pathways and surface markers might effectively eradicate tumors and pave the way for cancer survival. Since current treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation therapy cannot eradicate all of the CSCs and tumor relapse may happen following temporary recovery, improving novel and more efficient therapeutic options to combine with current treatments is required. Immunotherapy strategies are the new therapeutic modalities with promising results in targeting CSCs. Here, we review the targeting of CSCs by immunotherapy strategies such as dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-engineered immune cells, natural killer-cell (NK-cell) therapy, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), checkpoint inhibitors, and the use of oncolytic viruses (OVs) in pre-clinical and clinical studies. This review will mainly focus on blood malignancies but also describe solid cancers.

Effects of Lipopolysaccharide from Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli on Gene Expression Levels of Toll-like Receptors and Inflammatory Cytokines in Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

BACKGROUND: Periodontal diseases originate from a group of oral inflammatory infections initiated by oral pathogens. Among these pathogens, Gram-negative bacteria such as p. gingivalis play a major role in chronic periodontitis. P. gingivalis harbours lipopolysaccharide (LPS) which enables it to attach to TLR2. OBJECTIVES: Evaluating the effects of P. gingivalis and E. coli LPS on the gene expression of TLRs and inflammatory cytokines in human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). METHODS: We evaluated the expression level of TLR2, TLR4, IL-6, IL-10, and 1L-18 in hDPSCs treated with 1µg/mL of P. gingivalis lipopolysaccharide and E. coli LPS at three different exposure times using Real-time RT-PCR. RESULT: The test group treated with P. gingivalis LPS showed a high level of TLR4 expression in 24 hours exposure period and the lowest expression in 48 hours of exposure time. In the case of IL-10, the lowest expression was in the 24 hours exposure period. Although in the E.coli LPS treated group, IL-10 showed the highest expression in 24 and lowest in 48 hours exposure period. Moreover, IL-18 in P. gingivalis LPS treated group showed a significant difference between 6, 24, and 48-time periods of exposure, but not in the E. coli LPS treated group. CONCLUSION: Both types of LPS stimulate inflammation through TLR4 expression. P. gingivalis LPS performs more potentially than E. coli in terms of stimulating inflammation at the first 24 hours of exposure. Nevertheless, our study confirmed that increasing P. gingivalis and/or the E.coli LPS exposure time, despite acting as an inflammatory stimulator, apparently showed anti-inflammatory properties.