Applicability of a Host-mediated In Vivo/In Vitro Model in Screening for the Carcinogenic Potential of Chemicals.

Based on a publication of Tomasetti and Vogelstein in 2015, in which the risk of cancer development is postulated to be just one-third caused by genetic predisposition and environmental factors, it seemed worth focusing again on the value of test systems for screening chemicals for their carcinogenicity. This review aims to firstly summarize data on a host-mediated in vivo/in vitro assay developed by our working group to screen the tumorigenic potential of chemicals. Subsequently, in this article the importance and advantages of host-mediated in vivo/in vitro assays in general have been compared with in vivo and in vitro tests. The applicability of the host-mediated in vivo/in vitro assay system within broad screening strategies is discussed. The main intention of this review is to stimulate developments of newer approaches in the field of carcinogenic testing.

First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation.

AIMS: First-line ablation prior to antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy is an option for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); however, the optimal ablation technique, radiofrequency (RF), or cryoballoon (CB) has to be determined. METHODS AND RESULTS: The FREEZE Cohort Study compares RF and CB ablation. Treatment-naïve patients were documented in the FREEZEplus Registry. Periprocedural data and outcome were analysed. From 2011 to 2014, a total of 373/4184 (8.9%) patients with PAF naïve to AAD were identified. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed with RF (n = 180) or CB (n = 193). In the RF group, patients were older (65 vs. 61 years, P < 0.01) compared with the CB group. The procedure time was significantly shorter and radiation exposure higher in the CB group. Major adverse events occurred in 1.6% (CB) and 3.7% (RF) of patients (P = 0.22). AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence until discharge was 4.5% (RF) and 8.5% (CB, P = 0.2). Follow-up (FU) ≥12 months was available in 99 (RF) and 107 (CB) patients. After 1.4 years of FU, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) was 61% (RF) and 71% (CB, P = 0.11). In the RF group, more patients underwent cardioversion, and a trend for more repeat ablations was observed. Persistent phrenic nerve palsy was observed in one patient treated by CB. CONCLUSION: First-line ablation for PAF is safe and effective with either RF or CB. The procedure was faster with the CB, but the radiation exposure was higher. Although there was a trend for more recurrences and complications in the RF group, a more favourable risk profile in patients undergoing CB ablation might have biased the results. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01360008.