Design and recognition of cucurbituril-secured platinum-bound oligopeptides.

Platinum terpyridyl complexes, stacked on top of one another and secured as dimers with cucurbit[8]uril (CB[8]) in aqueous medium, were functionalized quantitatively and in situ with a pair of pentapeptides Phe-(Gly)3-Cys by grafting their cysteine residues to the Pt centers. The resulting CB[8]·(Pt·peptide)2 assemblies were used to target secondary hosts CB[7] and CB[8] via their pair of phenylalanine residues, again in situ. A series of well-defined architectures, including a supramolecular "pendant necklace" with hybrid head-to-head and head-to-tail arrangements inside CB[8], were obtained during the self-sorting process after combining only 3 or 4 simple building units.

Impact of Disease and Treatment Response in Drug-Drug Interaction Studies: Osimertinib and Simvastatin in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

A phase I, open-label study (NCT02197234) assessed the effects of osimertinib on simvastatin exposure in patients with advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer and disease progression post-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. Here, we report on a retrospective analysis of two patients (patients 1 and 2) who had liver metastases and high simvastatin exposure prior to osimertinib treatment, which changed following treatment. Patients received single oral doses of simvastatin 40 mg on day (D) 1 and D31, and osimertinib 80 mg once daily on D3-32. At baseline, both patients had abnormal liver function tests (LFTs; Child-Pugh scores of 6 and 8, respectively), significant liver metastasis, and, after a single simvastatin dose, had higher (~ 10-fold) exposure compared with all other patients. Following 31 days of continuous osimertinib treatment, simvastatin exposures (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to infinity (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax )) and LFTs, such as alanine transaminase, aspartate aminotransferase, and bilirubin normalized to population mean values. Additionally, ~ 50% and ~ 80% reductions in liver metastases were observed on computed tomography scans in patients 1 and 2, respectively. High simvastatin exposure on D1 likely resulted from impairment of hepatic first pass metabolism due to liver metastases. Reduction in hepatic disease burden due to osimertinib treatment likely resulted in liver function returning to normal levels.

Determination of phenolic compounds by MALDI-TOF and essential oil composition by GC-MS during three development stages of Origanum majorana L.

This study aimed to investigate the effect of the maturation process of sweet marjoram (Origanum majorana L.) on essential oil composition, the phenolic profile of ethanolic extract and their antioxidant capacities. The essential oil composition was studied at three stages of maturity by GC-MS. Thirty compounds were detected representing 100% of the total essential oil. p-Menth-1-en-4-ol was the major compound (37.15-76.94%) followed by cyclohexanol-3,3,5 trimethyl (5.41-15.99%) and α-terpineol (0.94-11.34%). During the maturation process, an accumulation of oxygenated monoterpenes was observed. The phenolic composition was studied using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight. The analysis showed the presence of short flavonoid monomers at all stages of maturation. The antioxidant capacity of ethanolic extracts and essential oils was evaluated using the DPPH assay, iron chelating power and reducing power assay. The highest phenolic content and antioxidant capacity were found at flowering stage. These findings on essential oil composition, phenolic profile and antioxidant capacity of O. majorana at three different stages of development provide more information on how these secondary metabolites are accumulated.

Food Effect Study Design With Oral Drugs: Lessons Learned From Recently Approved Drugs in Oncology.

Evaluation of the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of oral oncology drugs is critical to drug development, as food can mitigate or exacerbate toxicities and alter systemic exposure. Our aim is to expand on current US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance and provide data-driven food-effect study design recommendations specific to the oncology therapeutic area. Data for recently approved small-molecule oncology drugs was extracted from the clinical pharmacology review in the sponsor's FDA submission package. Information on subject selection, meal types, timing of the study relative to the pivotal trial, and study outcomes was analyzed. The number of subjects enrolled ranged from 12 to 60, and the majority of studies (19 of 29) were conducted in healthy volunteers. Using AstraZeneca cost data, healthy volunteer studies were estimated to cost 10-fold less than cancer patient studies. Nine of 29 (31%) studies included meals with multiple levels of fat content. Analysis of a subset of 16 drugs revealed that final results for the food-effect study were available before the start of the pivotal trial for only 2 drugs. Conducting small food-effect studies powered to estimate effect, rather than confirm no effect, with only a standardized high-fat meal according to FDA guidance may eliminate unnecessary studies, reduce cost, and improve efficiency in oncology drug development. Starting food-effect studies as early as possible is key to inform dosing in pivotal trials.

Evaluation of classical clinical endpoints as surrogates for overall survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint blockers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Classical clinical endpoints [e.g., objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS)] may not be appropriate for immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs). We evaluated correlations between these endpoints and overall survival (OS) for surrogacy. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of solid tumors patients treated with ICBs published between 01/2005 and 03/2017, and congress proceedings (2014-2016) were included. Arm-level analyses measured 6-month PFS rate to predict 18-month OS rate. Comparison-level analyses measured ORR odds ratio (OR), DCR OR, and 6-month PFS hazard ratio (HR) to predict OS HR. A pooled analysis for single-agent ICBs and ICBs plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy was conducted. Studies of single-agent ICBs vs chemotherapy were separately analyzed. RESULTS: 27 RCTs involving 61 treatment arms and 10,300 patients were included. Arm-level analysis showed higher 6- or 9-month PFS rates predicted better 18-month OS rates for ICB arms and/or chemotherapy arms. ICB arms had a higher average OS rate vs chemotherapy for all PFS rates. Comparison-level analysis showed a nonsignificant/weak correlation between ORR OR (adjusted R2 = - 0.069; P = 0.866) or DCR OR (adjusted R2 = 0.271; P = 0.107) and OS HR. PFS HR correlated weakly with OS HR in the pooled (adjusted R2 = 0.366; P = 0.005) and single-agent (adjusted R2 = 0.452; P = 0.005) ICB studies. Six-month PFS HR was highly predictive of OS HR for single-agent ICBs (adjusted R2 = 0.907; P < 0.001), but weakly predictive in the pooled analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.333; P = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS: PFS was an imperfect surrogate for OS. Predictive value of 6-month PFS HR for OS HR in the single-agent ICB analysis requires further exploration.

Population exposure-safety analysis of cediranib for Phase I and II studies in patients with cancer.

AIMS: A multistudy analysis of cediranib, a potent, selective inhibitor of all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-1, -2 and -3), was conducted to establish population exposure-safety models for the relationship of cediranib exposure to the safety endpoints, diastolic and systolic blood pressure (DBP and SBP) and diarrhoea in cancer patients. These models were applied to predict safety outcomes for different cediranib dose regimens. METHODS: Models for hypertension and diarrhoea were constructed based on data from 10 Phase I and three Phase II studies comprising 631 cancer patients following cediranib once-daily oral dosing. Daily DBP and SBP were simultaneously characterized using indirect response models for predicted cediranib concentration-time courses, while daily diarrhoea events were modelled as ordered categorical variables with a proportional odds model with a Markov element for predicted average cediranib concentrations. RESULTS: For 20 mg cediranib once-daily oral administration, the mean increase in DBP and SBP was predicted to be 7 (95% CI 3-13) and 8 mmHg (95% CI 3-16), respectively, while the probability of mild diarrhoea, but not the severity, was predicted to increase over time. Severe diarrhoea was predicted to be resolved rapidly upon discontinuation of cediranib treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Maximum blood pressure increase was observed within the first few days of cediranib treatment, consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of cediranib reaching steady state in about 5 days. The probability of diarrhoea increased with cediranib concentration but was far more dependent on the status of diarrhoea predicted on the previous day.

Harnessing Meta-analysis to Refine an Oncology Patient Population for Physiology-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Drugs.

Certain oncology compounds exhibit fundamental pharmacokinetic (PK) disparities between healthy and malignant conditions. Given the effects of tumor-associated inflammation on enzyme and transporter expression, we performed a meta-analysis of CYP- and transporter-sensitive substrate clinical PK to quantitatively compare enzyme and transporter abundances between healthy volunteers (HV) and cancer patients (CP). Hepatic and intestinal CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 abundance were subsequently adjusted via Simcyp's sensitivity analysis tool. Of the 11 substrates we investigated, seven displayed marked exposure differences >1.25-fold between CP and HV. Although CP studies are limited, meta-analysis-based reduction in CYP1A2, CYP2C19, and CYP3A4 enzyme abundances in a virtual oncology population effectively captures CP-PK for caffeine, theophylline, midazolam, simvastatin, omeprazole, and a subset of oncology compounds. These changes allow extrapolation from HV to CP, enhancing predictive capability; therefore, conducting simulations in this CYP-modified oncology (MOD-CP) population provides a more relevant characterization of CP-PK.

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Evaluate the Systemic Exposure of Gefitinib in CYP2D6 Ultrarapid Metabolizers and Extensive Metabolizers.

Gefitinib is a selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase and is used for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations. Gefitinib is metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. This analysis compared the systemic exposure of gefitinib after oral administration in CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers (UM) vs extensive metabolizers (EM). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling was conducted using a population-based simulator. The model was calibrated using itraconazole-gefitinib clinical drug-drug interaction data and validated with gefitinib data in CYP2D6 EM vs poor metabolizers (PM). System components of the PBPK model were evaluated using published clinical metoprolol pharmacokinetic data in CYP2D6 UM, EM, and PM. Our PBPK model predicted a gefitinib geometric least-squares mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 264 hours (AUC(0-264) ) ratio in the presence vs absence of itraconazole of 1.85, similar to the ratio of 1.78 from clinical study data. Predicted and observed metoprolol geometric least-squares mean AUC(0-24) ratios in UM vs EM were also similar (0.46 and 0.55, respectively), suggesting that system components related to CYP2D6 in the PBPK model were properly established. In addition, the PBPK model also captured gefitinib pharmacokinetic profiles in CYP2D6 polymorphic populations. The final PBPK model predicted a decrease in gefitinib AUC of ∼39% in CYP2D6 UM vs EM. Such changes in exposure will have limited impact as the reduced exposure is still above gefitinib's in vitro IC90 for EGFR activating mutations in NSCLC patients.

Population pharmacokinetic and exposure simulation analysis for cediranib (AZD2171) in pooled Phase I/II studies in patients with cancer.

AIMS: A population pharmacokinetic (PK) model was developed for cediranib to simulate cediranib exposure for different doses, including comedication with strong uridine glucuronosyl transferase/P-glycoprotein inducers such as rifampicin, in cancer patients. METHODS: Plasma concentrations and covariates from 625 cancer patients after single or multiple oral cediranib administrations ranging from 0.5 to 90 mg in 19 Phase I and II studies were included in the analysis. Stepwise covariate modelling was used to develop the population PK model. The final model was used to simulate cediranib exposure in cancer patients to evaluate cediranib target coverage and the need for dose adjustment for covariates or coadministration with rifampicin. RESULTS: A two-compartment model with sequential zero- and first-order absorption and first-order elimination adequately described the cediranib concentration-time courses. Body weight and age were identified as having statistically significant impact on cediranib PK, but only <21% impact on AUC and maximum concentrations. Simulated lower bounds of 90% prediction interval or median of unbound cediranib concentrations after cediranib 15 or 20 mg exceeded the IC50 for vascular endothelial growth factor receptors-1, -2 and -3. Exposures of cediranib 20 or 30 mg with coadministration of rifampicin were comparable to those of 15 or 20 mg, respectively, without coadministration. CONCLUSIONS: No covariate was identified to require dose adjustment for cediranib. Cediranib exposure following 15 or 20 mg daily dose administration is adequate overall for inhibition of in vitro estimated vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, -2 and -3 activities. An increase in cediranib dose may be needed for cediranib coadministered with strong uridine glucuronosyl transferase/P-glycoprotein inducers such as rifampicin.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cediranib.

Cediranib potently and selectively inhibits all three vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR-1, -2 and -3), and clinical studies have shown that it is effective in patients with ovarian cancer at a dose of 20 mg/day. Cediranib is absorbed moderately slowly; a high-fat meal reduced the cediranib area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) by 24% and maximum plasma concentration (C max) by 33%. Cediranib binds to serum albumin and α1-acid glycoprotein; protein binding in human plasma is approximately 95%. The cediranib AUC and C max increase proportionally with dose from 0.5 to 60 mg, and cediranib has linear pharmacokinetics (PK) over time. Cediranib is metabolized via flavin-containing monooxygenase 1 and 3 (FMO1, FMO3) and uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A4. Cediranib and its metabolites are mainly excreted in faeces (59%), with <1% of unchanged drug being excreted in urine. The apparent oral clearance is moderate and the mean terminal half-life is 22 h. Cediranib is a substrate of multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1) protein (also known as P-glycoprotein [P-gp]). Coadministration with ketoconazole, a potent P-gp inhibitor, increases cediranib AUC at steady-state (AUCss) in patients by 21%, while coadministration with rifampicin, a potent inducer of P-gp, decreases cediranib AUCss by 39%. Administration of cediranib with chemotherapies demonstrated minimal PK impact on each other. No dose adjustment is recommended for patients with mild or moderate hepatic or renal impairment, and no dose adjustment is needed on the basis of age and body weight. A pooled analysis at doses of 0.5-60 mg showed no significant increase in QTc intervals. Increases in blood pressure and the incidence of diarrhoea were associated with increased cediranib dose and systemic exposure.

Model-based clinical pharmacology profiling of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

AIM: Ipilimumab is a fully human, monoclonal antibody that blocks cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4. The objective of the present study was to characterize the clinical pharmacology profile of ipilimumab using a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) approach. METHODS: The PPK model was developed using 2095 ipilimumab serum concentration values from 499 patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma from four phase II studies, with ipilimumab doses ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg kg(-1) . The structural PK model was determined by developing a base PPK model. The effect of covariates on model parameters was assessed by a full covariate model, which incorporated all pre-specified covariate-parameter relationships into the base model. The final model was developed by backward elimination, followed by exclusion of covariates determined not to be of clinical relevance to ipilimumab, and was rigorously validated against both internal and external datasets. RESULTS: Ipilimumab PK was linear and time-invariant, with dose-proportional exposures over the available dose range, yielding a terminal half-life of approximately 15 days. Clearance of ipilimumab increased with increasing body weight and baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase concentrations, but was not affected by age, gender, concomitant budesonide, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status or prior systemic anticancer therapy. Furthermore, ipilimumab exposure was not affected by moderate renal impairment or mild hepatic impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Ipilimumab concentration-time data were well described by a linear, two compartment, zero order i.v. infusion model. The model confirms that a body weight-normalized dosing regimen is appropriate for ipilimumab therapy in patients with advanced melanoma.

Randomized phase I pharmacokinetic study of ipilimumab with or without one of two different chemotherapy regimens in patients with untreated advanced melanoma.

We describe a randomized three-arm phase I study of ipilimumab administered alone (I group) or in combination with dacarbazine (D group) or carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP group) in patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma. The primary objective was to estimate the effect of ipilimumab on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dacarbazine and paclitaxel and, conversely, to estimate the effects of dacarbazine and carboplatin/paclitaxel on the PK of ipilimumab. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the safety and anti-tumor activity of ipilimumab when administered alone or with either dacarbazine or carboplatin/paclitaxel, and assessment of pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of ipilimumab on the immune system when administered alone or with either of the two chemotherapies. Ipilimumab was administered at a dose of 10 mg/kg intravenously (IV) every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses. Patients in the D group received dacarbazine 850 mg/m(2) IV every 3 weeks. Patients in the CP group received paclitaxel 175 mg/m(2) IV and carboplatin [AUC=6] IV every 3 weeks. Starting at week 24, patients without dose-limiting toxicities were eligible to receive maintenance ipilimumab at 10 mg/kg every 12 weeks until disease progressed or toxicity required discontinuation. Of 59 randomized patients, 18 (30.5%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. Response rates by modified WHO criteria were 29.4% (I group), 27.8% (D group), and 11.1% (CP group). No major PK or PD interactions were observed when ipilimumab was administered with dacarbazine or with the carboplatin/paclitaxel combination. This study demonstrated that ipilimumab can be combined safely with two chemotherapy regimens commonly used in advanced melanoma.

Exposure-response relationships of the efficacy and safety of ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma.

PURPOSE: This retrospective analysis was conducted to characterize ipilimumab exposure-response relationships for measures of efficacy and safety in patients with advanced melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Data were pooled from 498 patients who received ipilimumab monotherapy at 0.3, 3, or 10 mg/kg in 1 of 4 completed phase II clinical trials. The relationships between steady-state ipilimumab trough concentration (Cminss), complete or partial tumor response (CR or PR), and safety [immune-related adverse events (irAEs)] were described by logistic regression models. The relationship between exposure and overall survival was characterized using a Cox proportional-hazards model. RESULTS: The steady-state trough concentration of ipilimumab was found to be a significant predictor of a CR or PR (P < 0.001). Model-based estimates indicate that the probabilities of a CR or PR at median Cminss for the 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/kg groups were 0.6%, 4.9%, and 11.6%, respectively. Overall survival at the median Cminss for ipilimumab at 0.3 mg/kg was estimated to be 0.85- and 0.58-fold lower relative to that at the median Cminss for 3 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Model-based estimates indicate that the probabilities of a grade 3 or more irAE at the median Cminss for the 0.3, 3, and 10 mg/kg doses were 3%, 13%, and 24%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Higher doses of ipilimumab produce greater Cminss that may be associated with increased tumor responses, longer survival, and higher rates of irAEs. The efficacy and safety of ipilimumab at 3 versus 10 mg/kg in patients with advanced melanoma is being evaluated in an ongoing phase III trial.

The effects of liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of brivanib, a dual inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases.

PURPOSE: Hepatic impairment may impede tyrosine kinase inhibitor metabolism. This phase I study compared the pharmacokinetics of brivanib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and varying levels of hepatic impairment with those with non-HCC malignancies and normal liver function. METHODS: Patients were assigned to the following groups: Groups A, B, and C (HCC plus mild, moderate, or severe hepatic impairment, respectively) and Group D (non-HCC malignancy and normal hepatic function). Brivanib alaninate (brivanib prodrug) doses were 400 mg in Groups A, B, and D and 200 mg in Group C. Brivanib exposure was determined on day 1 (single dose) and day 28 (multiple doses). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients participated in the study. After a single brivanib alaninate dose, brivanib exposure was comparable between Groups A, B, and D. Area under the concentration-time curve was 50 % higher in Group C versus Group D. There were not enough data to draw conclusions on multiple doses. Safety profile in Groups A, B, and D was consistent with previous brivanib monotherapy experience. Tolerability could not be assessed in Group C because of dose interruptions and discontinuations, generally due to the disease natural history. CONCLUSIONS: Brivanib exposure was similar in patients with HCC and mild or moderate hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh [CP] A or B status) and those with non-HCC malignancies and normal hepatic function, suggesting dose adjustment is unnecessary with CP A or B status. Experience with HCC and severe hepatic impairment (CP C status) is insufficient to recommend brivanib use in this population.

Inhibitory effect of ketoconazole on the pharmacokinetics of a multireceptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor BMS-690514 in healthy participants: assessing the mechanism of the interaction with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic simulations.

BMS-690514, a selective inhibitor of the ErbB and vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, has shown antitumor activity in early clinical development. The compound is metabolized by multiple enzymes, with CYP3A4 responsible for the largest fraction (34%) of metabolism. It is also a substrate of P-glycoprotein (P-gp) in vitro. To assess the effect of ketoconazole on BMS-690514 pharmacokinetics, 17 healthy volunteers received 200 mg BMS-690514 alone followed by 100 mg BMS-690514 with ketoconazole (400 mg once daily for 4 days). The AUC(∞) of 100 mg BMS-690514 concomitantly administered with ketoconazole was similar to that of 200 mg BMS-690514 alone. The dose-normalized C(max) and AUC(∞) of BMS-690514 from the 100-mg BMS-690514/400-mg ketoconazole treatment increased by 55% and 127%, respectively, relative to those from 200 mg BMS-690514 alone. Prediction of the drug-drug interaction (DDI) using a population-based simulator (Simcyp) indicated that, in addition to CYP3A4 inhibition, the inhibition of P-gp by ketoconazole in the intestine, liver, and kidneys must be invoked to fully account for the DDI observed. This finding suggests that the inhibition of P-gp by ketoconazole, along with its effect on CYP3A4, needs to be considered when designing a DDI study of ketoconazole with a victim drug that is a dual substrate.

Metabolic chiral inversion of brivanib and its relevance to safety and pharmacology.

Brivanib alaninate is an orally administered alanine prodrug of brivanib, a dual inhibitor of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathways. It is currently in clinical trials for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal cancer. Brivanib has a single asymmetric center derived from a secondary alcohol. The potential for chiral inversion was investigated in incubations with liver subcellular fractions and in animals and humans after oral doses of brivanib alaninate. Incubations of [¹4C]brivanib alaninate with liver microsomes and cytosols from rats, monkeys, and humans followed by chiral chromatography resulted in two radioactive peaks, corresponding to brivanib and its enantiomer. The percentage of the enantiomeric metabolite relative to brivanib in microsomal and cytosolic incubations of different species in the presence of NADPH ranged from 11.6 to 15.8 and 0.8 to 3.1%, respectively. The proposed mechanism of inversion involves the oxidation of brivanib to a ketone metabolite, which is subsequently reduced to brivanib and its enantiomer. After oral doses of brivanib alaninate to rats and monkeys, the enantiomeric metabolite was a prominent drug-related component in plasma, with the percentages of area under the curve (AUC) at 94.7 and 39.7%, respectively, relative to brivanib. In humans, the enantiomeric metabolite was a minor circulating component, with the AUC <3% of brivanib. Pharmacological studies indicated that brivanib and its enantiomer had similar potency toward the inhibition of VEGF receptor-2 and FGF receptor-1 kinases. Because of low plasma concentration in humans, the enantiomeric metabolite was not expected to contribute significantly to target-related pharmacology of brivanib. Moreover, adequate exposure in the toxicology species suggested no specific safety concerns with respect to exposure to the enantiomeric metabolite.

Lack of effect of brivanib on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a CYP3A4 substrate, administered intravenously and orally in healthy participants.

Brivanib alaninate is the orally available prodrug of brivanib, a dual inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor signaling pathways that is under therapeutic investigation for various malignancies. Brivanib alaninate inhibits CYP3A4 in vitro, and thus there is potential for drug-drug interaction with CYP3A4 substrates, such as midazolam. The present study evaluated pharmacokinetic parameters and safety/tolerability upon coadministration of brivanib alaninate and midazolam. Healthy participants received intravenous (IV) or oral midazolam with and without oral brivanib alaninate. Blood samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were collected up to 12 hours after midazolam and up to 48 hours after brivanib alaninate. Twenty-four participants were administered study drugs; 21 completed the trial. No clinically relevant effect of brivanib alaninate on the overall exposure to midazolam following IV or oral administration was observed. Orally administered brivanib alaninate was generally well tolerated in the presence of IV or oral midazolam. The lack of a pharmacokinetic interaction between brivanib and midazolam indicates that brivanib alaninate does not influence either intestinal or hepatic CYP3A4 and confirms that brivanib alaninate may be safely coadministered with midazolam and other CYP3A4 substrates.

Lack of food effect on single-dose pharmacokinetics of brivanib, and safety and efficacy following multiple doses in subjects with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Brivanib alaninate, an orally available prodrug of brivanib, is currently under evaluation for the treatment of several malignancies. This study aimed to (1) investigate effects of a high-fat meal on single-dose pharmacokinetics of brivanib in subjects with advanced/metastatic solid tumors and (2) assess the safety and preliminary efficacy of single and multiple doses of brivanib alaninate in this population. METHODS: A two-part study was conducted consisting of a single-dose phase (Part A) and a multiple-dose phase (Part B). In Part A, subjects received a single dose of brivanib alaninate (800 mg) either in a fasting state or following ingestion of a high-fat meal (approximately 951 kcal [15% protein, 33% carbohydrate, 52% fat]); serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis up to 48 h post-dosing. In Part B, subjects received brivanib alaninate (800 mg) once daily until discontinuation. Throughout both phases, subjects were evaluated for adverse events (AEs) and best clinical response. RESULTS: No clinically significant differences in brivanib exposure were observed between fed and fasting subjects in Part A; C (max) was unchanged and AUC(INF) decreased marginally when administered in a fed versus fasted state. In Part A, the incidence of treatment-emergent AEs was broadly similar in a fed or fasted state. Brivanib alaninate was generally well tolerated throughout the study and showed preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. CONCLUSIONS: Consumption of a high-fat meal had no significant effect on brivanib pharmacokinetics. The study further demonstrates the acceptable safety/tolerability profile and antitumor potential of brivanib in patients with advanced malignancies.

Metabolism and disposition of [14C]brivanib alaninate after oral administration to rats, monkeys, and humans.

Brivanib [(R)-1-(4-(4-fluoro-2-methyl-1H-indol-5-yloxy)-5-methylpyrrolo[1,2,4]triazin-6-yloxy)propan-2-ol, BMS-540215] is a potent and selective dual inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling pathways. Its alanine prodrug, brivanib alaninate [(1R,2S)-2-aminopropionic acid 2-[4-(4-fluoro-2-methyl-1H-indol-5-yloxy)-5-methylpyrrolo[2,1-f][1,2,4]triazin-6-yloxy]-1-methylethyl ester, BMS-582664], is currently under development as an oral agent for the treatment of cancer. This study describes the in vivo biotransformation of brivanib after a single oral dose of [(14)C]brivanib alaninate to intact rats, bile duct-cannulated (BDC) rats, intact monkeys, BDC monkeys, and humans. Fecal excretion was the primary route of elimination of drug-derived radioactivity in animals and humans. In BDC rats and monkeys, the majority of radioactivity was excreted in bile. Brivanib alaninate was rapidly and completely converted via hydrolysis to brivanib in vivo. The area under the curve from zero to infinity of brivanib accounted for 14.2 to 54.3% of circulating radioactivity in plasma in animals and humans, suggesting that metabolites contributed significantly to the total drug-related radioactivity. In plasma from animals and humans, brivanib was a prominent circulating component. All the metabolites that humans were exposed to were also present in toxicological species. On the basis of metabolite exposure and activity against VEGF and FGF receptors of the prominent human circulating metabolites, only brivanib is expected to contribute to the pharmacological effects in humans. Unchanged brivanib was not detected in urine or bile samples, suggesting that metabolic clearance was the primary route of elimination. The primary metabolic pathways were oxidative and conjugative metabolism of brivanib.

Metabolism, excretion, and pharmacokinetics of oral brivanib in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, mass balance, metabolism, routes and extent of elimination, and safety of a single oral dose of (14)C-labeled brivanib alaninate and the safety and tolerability of brivanib after multiple doses in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. This was a two-part, single-center, open-label, single oral-dose (part A) followed by multiple-dose (part B) study in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. In part A, patients received a single dose of [(14)C]brivanib alaninate and in part B patients received 800 mg of nonradiolabeled brivanib alaninate every day. Four patients (two white, two black: two with non-small-cell lung cancer, one with ovarian cancer, and one with renal cell carcinoma) were treated in both parts. The median time to reach the maximal plasma concentration of brivanib was 1 h, geometric mean maximal plasma concentration was 6146 ng/ml, mean terminal half-life was 13.8 h, and geometric mean apparent oral clearance was 14.7 l/h. After a single oral dose of [(14)C]brivanib alaninate, 12.2 and 81.5% of administered radioactivity was recovered in urine and feces, respectively. Brivanib alaninate was completely converted to the active moiety, brivanib, and the predominant route of elimination was fecal. Renal excretion of unchanged brivanib was minimal. Brivanib was well tolerated; fatigue was the most frequent adverse event occurring in all patients and the most frequent treatment-related adverse event in three (75%). The best clinical response in one patient was stable disease; the other three had progressive disease. Brivanib alaninate was rapidly absorbed and extensively metabolized after a single 800-mg oral dose; the majority of drug-related radioactivity was excreted in feces.