Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 22(3): 341-348, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34843662

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mass indoor gatherings were banned in early 2020 to prevent the spread of SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to assess, under controlled conditions, whether infection rates among attendees at a large, indoor gathering event would be similar to those in non-attendees, given implementation of a comprehensive prevention strategy including antigen-screening within 3 days, medical mask wearing, and optimised ventilation. METHODS: The non-inferiority, prospective, open-label, randomised, controlled SPRING trial was done on attendees at a live indoor concert held in the Accor Arena on May 29, 2021 in Paris, France. Participants, aged 18-45 years, recruited via a dedicated website, had no comorbidities, COVID-19 symptoms, or recent case contact, and had had a negative rapid antigen diagnostic test within 3 days before the concert. Participants were randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to the experimental group (attendees) or to the control group (non-attendees). The allocation sequence was computer-generated by means of permuted blocks of sizes three, six, or nine, with no stratification. The primary outcome measure was the number of patients who were SARS-CoV-2-positive by RT-PCR test on self-collected saliva 7 days post-gathering in the per-protocol population (non-inferiority margin <0·35%). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04872075. FINDINGS: Between May 11 and 25, 2021, 18 845 individuals registered on the dedicated website, and 10 953 were randomly selected for a pre-enrolment on-site visit. Among 6968 who kept the appointment and were screened, 6678 participants were randomly assigned (4451 were assigned to be attendees and 2227 to be non-attendees; median age 28 years; 59% women); 88% (3917) of attendees and 87% (1947) of non-attendees complied with follow-up requirements. The day 7 RT-PCR was positive for eight of the 3917 attendees (observed incidence, 0·20%; 95% CI 0·09-0·40) and three of the 1947 non-attendees (0·15%; 0·03-0·45; absolute difference, 95% CI -0·26% to 0·28%), findings that met the non-inferiority criterion for the primary endpoint. INTERPRETATION: Participation in a large, indoor, live gathering without physical distancing was not associated with increased SARS-CoV-2-transmission risk, provided a comprehensive preventive intervention was implemented. FUNDING: French Ministry of Health. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Eventos de Massa , Programas de Rastreamento , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , Adulto , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Saliva/citologia
2.
Clin Exp Ophthalmol ; 38(4): 346-52, 2010 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21077280

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To compare the effects of different doses of bevacizumab with both saline and dexamethasone on inflammatory angiogenesis in the rat cornea induced by small chemical lesions. METHODS: Corneal chemical cauterization was performed on 24 rats. Animals were divided randomly into six groups and received a daily subconjunctival injection for 7 days of: balanced salt solution 0.1 mL or dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day or bevacizumab 2.5 mg/day, 3.75 mg/day, 5.0 mg/day or bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day + dexamethasone phosphate 4 mg/day. Clinical examination under slitlamp was performed daily for 7 days to evaluate corneal opacity and vessel size evolution. Computer assisted quantitative image analysis was used to measure the total corneal area covered by neovascularization. RESULTS: At final examination, the dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups showed a significant lowering in corneal opacity score as compared with control (P = 0.024, P = 0.006 and P = 0.013, respectively). Also, a significant reduction on new vessels size score was observed. Surface of corneal neovascularization was significantly reduced in dexamethasone, bevacizumab 5.0 mg/day and dexamethasone + bevacizumab groups compared with control (P =0.045, P = 0.047 and P = 0.044, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates the ability of a 5.0 mg/day bevacizumab subconjunctival injection, in monotherapy or associated with dexamethasone, to cause a short-term involution of corneal neovascularization after corneal alkali burn. Combination of both of these treatments may have advantages to monotherapy approaches.


Assuntos
Álcalis/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Angiogênese/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Queimaduras Químicas/prevenção & controle , Córnea/irrigação sanguínea , Dexametasona/administração & dosagem , Queimaduras Oculares/prevenção & controle , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Neovascularização Patológica/prevenção & controle , Animais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Bevacizumab , Vasos Sanguíneos/patologia , Queimaduras Químicas/complicações , Queimaduras Químicas/patologia , Cicatriz/etiologia , Túnica Conjuntiva , Córnea/patologia , Opacidade da Córnea/etiologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Queimaduras Oculares/etiologia , Queimaduras Oculares/patologia , Injeções Intraoculares , Masculino , Neovascularização Patológica/etiologia , Ratos , Ratos Endogâmicos BN , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA