Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 15(5): e38809, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37303381

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Dental infections, which are the main cause of tooth loss, are known to be caused by bacteria. However, recent research suggests that other organisms, such as viruses, may also play a role. In this study, we aim to detect the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV)-16 and assess its prevalence in tissues infected with various dental infections, including aggressive and chronic periodontitis, pericoronitis, and periapical infection, as well as healthy gingival tissues, saliva, and gingival crevicular fluid, for comparison. METHODS: A cross-sectional study including 124 adult healthy patients presenting with dental infections requiring dental extractions were conducted to assess the prevalence of HPV-16 in saliva, infected, and healthy tissues using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests. Samples were collected and a categorical scale was used for the prevalence. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square for the prevalence of HPV-16. RESULTS: Among the HPV-16-positive PCR cases, the prevalence of HPV-16 was highest in periapical infection tissues as compared to chronic periodontitis, aggressive periodontitis, pericoronitis, and control tissues. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HPV-16 in periapical infection samples was the highest among the studied dental infection samples. Thus, a primary conclusion can be drawn about the presence of an association between HPV-16 and the occurrence of periapical infection.

2.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0282276, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37115776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa are difficult to treat with a significant cost and burden. In Lebanon, P. aeruginosa is one of the most common organisms in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). P. aeruginosa has developed widespread resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents such as fluoroquinolones and carbapenems. We aimed at identifying risk factors associated for P. aeruginosa infections as well as identifying independent risk factors for developing septic shock and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study design where we included patients with documented P. aeruginosa cultures who developed an infection after obtaining written consent. Two multivariable regression models were used to determine independent predictors of septic shock and mortality. RESULTS: During the observed period of 30 months 196 patients were recruited. The most common predisposing factor was antibiotic use for more than 48 hours within 30 days (55%). The prevalence of multi-drug resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa was 10%. The strongest predictors of mortality were steroid use (aOR = 3.4), respiratory failure (aOR = 7.3), identified respiratory cultures (aOR = 6.0), malignancy (aOR = 9.8), septic shock (aOR = 18.6), and hemodialysis (aOR = 30.9). CONCLUSION: Understanding resistance patterns and risk factors associated with mortality is crucial to personalize treatment based on risk level and to decrease the emerging threat of antimicrobial resistance.


Assuntos
Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica , Infecções por Pseudomonas , Choque Séptico , Humanos , Infecções por Pseudomonas/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Choque Séptico/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Pneumonia Associada à Ventilação Mecânica/epidemiologia , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana Múltipla , Estudos Retrospectivos
3.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 16(12): 1906-1913, 2022 12 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36753659

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of periodontitis, pericoronitis, and periapical infections has been well-established. However, the variation in the severity and prognosis of these lesions could suggest a potential role of other microorganisms, such as viruses and fungi. This study aims to evaluate the presence of adenovirus, human papillomavirus-16, Epstein-Barr virus, Candida, and non-Candida fungi in these infections. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional study including 120 healthy adult patients presenting with dental infections requiring dental extractions were conducted to assess the prevalence and the relative quantity of viruses and fungi in saliva, infected, and healthy tissues using quantitative polymerase chain reaction tests. Samples were collected, and a categorical scale was used for the prevalence and a continuous scale for the relative quantification. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square for the prevalence and Wilcoxon rank test for the relative quantification. RESULTS: Except for the Epstein-Barr virus and Candida, the presence of viruses and fungi was significantly associated with dental infections. Adenovirus showed an association with pericoronitis, while human papilloma virus-16 exhibited an association with periapical infections. Non-Candida fungi, on the other hand, showed a positive association with all infected tissues and saliva as compared to healthy control lesions except for periapical infections. CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, viruses and fungi were found to be prevalent in dental infections. However, their associations with those infections vary depending on the types of viruses or fungi involved and the category of dental infections.


Assuntos
Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr , Periodontite Periapical , Pericoronite , Humanos , Adulto , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Citomegalovirus , Periodontite Periapical/patologia , Fungos , Candida/genética , Adenoviridae
4.
J Infect Dev Ctries ; 15(11): 1701-1707, 2021 11 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34898499

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Most hospitals rely on rapid antigen-detection kits for the diagnosis of rotavirus infection. Several small studies reviewed the sensitivity and specificity of some of these kits. These studies showed discrepancy in results obtained for sensitivity and specificity that varied according to the type of kit used, area of study, and type of test used as standard for diagnosis of rotavirus infection. The objective of the study is to determine the sensitivity and specificity of five commonly used rotavirus immunoassay kits in comparison to RT-PCR as standard. METHODOLOGY: Stool samples (N = 1,414) collected from children under 5 years of age hospitalized with gastroenteritis were tested for rotavirus by immunoassay kits and RT-PCR in a prospective hospital-based surveillance study conducted at 7 centers in Lebanon. Concordance and discrepancy between the two methods was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity, using RT-PCR as the "gold standard". RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity were respectively 95.08% and 86.62% for the SD Bioline® (Standard Diagnostics, Inc, South Korea) kit calculated on 645 samples, 65.86% and 45.90% for the VIROTECT® (Trinity Biotech, Ireland) kit calculated on 327 samples, 83.9% and 64.2% for the Rota-Strip (C-1001) (Coris Bioconcept, Belgium) calculated on 95 samples, 52.3% and 10.9% for the Acon® (Acon Laboratories, Inc, California, USA) kit calculated on 122 samples, 68.1% and 20% for the VIKIA® Rota-Adéno (Biomerieux, France) kit calculated on 32 samples. CONCLUSION: A wide discrepancy was detected between the calculated and advertised sensitivity and specificity for most of the kits.


Assuntos
Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Imunoensaio/normas , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/normas , Infecções por Rotavirus/diagnóstico , Pré-Escolar , Fezes/virologia , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Lactente , Estudos Prospectivos , Kit de Reagentes para Diagnóstico/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo Real , Rotavirus , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
5.
Front Immunol ; 12: 672752, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34040613

RESUMO

Objective: We recently demonstrated that EBV DNA is correlated with proinflammatory responses in mice and in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients; hence, we utilized an RA mouse model to examine whether EBV DNA enhances the risk and severity of arthritis and to assess its immunomodulatory effects. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were treated with collagen (arthritis-inducing agent), EBV DNA 6 days before collagen, EBV DNA 15 days after collagen, Staphylococcus epidermidis DNA 6 days before collagen, EBV DNA alone, or water. Mice were then monitored for clinical signs and affected joints/footpads were histologically analysed. The relative concentration of IgG anti- chicken collagen antibodies and serum cytokine levels of IL-17A and IFNϒ were determined by ELISA. The number of cells co-expressing IL-17A and IFNϒ in joint histological sections was determined by immunofluorescence. Results: The incidence of arthritis was significantly higher in mice that received EBV DNA prior to collagen compared to mice that only received collagen. Similarly, increased clinical scores, histological scores and paw thicknesses with a decreased gripping strength were observed in groups treated with EBV DNA and collagen. The relative concentration of IgG anti-chicken collagen antibodies was significantly increased in the group that received EBV DNA 6 days prior to collagen in comparison to the collagen receiving group. On the other hand, the highest number of cells co-expressing IFNϒ and IL-17A was observed in joints from mice that received both collagen and EBV DNA. Conclusion: EBV DNA increases the incidence and severity of arthritis in a RA mouse model. Targeting mediators triggered by viral DNA may hence be a potential therapeutic avenue.


Assuntos
Artrite Experimental/imunologia , Artrite Reumatoide/imunologia , DNA Viral/imunologia , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/imunologia , Animais , Artrite Experimental/patologia , Artrite Experimental/virologia , Artrite Reumatoide/patologia , Artrite Reumatoide/virologia , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/complicações , Feminino , Herpesvirus Humano 4 , Incidência , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL
6.
J Med Liban ; 50(4): 157-62, 2002.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15298475

RESUMO

We did a comparative analysis between DNA-based subtypes and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles on Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus parainfluenzae, isolated from multiple tonsillar sites per individual from patients with chronic recurrent tonsillitis and/or tonsillar idiopathic hypertrophy and undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. A total of eighty-eight Haemophilus isolates were obtained aseptically from the surface and core of tonsils and/or adenoids of 32 out of 60 patients and identified at the species level by the X and V factors and the API NH Kit. The H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates as well as ATCC strains were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility using a panel of antimicrobial agents. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) was done on extracted DNA from all Haemophilus isolates and ATCC strains, using one 10 mer and one 18 mer primers to subtype the two species. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing data have shown a variation in generated susceptibility patterns to tested antimicrobial agents among H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae isolates. This variation was demonstrated too among isolates obtained from different tonsillar sites (core and surface) in a single patient. RAPD analysis identified 58/88 (66%) different RAPD patterns. Variations in RAPD patterns among H. influenzae and H. parainfluenzae were also observed in isolates obtained from different tonsillar sites of the same individual. A correlation between RAPD patterns and antimicrobial susceptibility data, have shown: 1) the predominance of one strain (RAPD pattern) of either Haemophilus species among isolated organisms per patient, and exhibiting different antimicrobial susceptibility profiles or 2) the existence of multiple strains (RAPD patterns) of either Haemophilis species per patient, and showing either a single or multiple antimicrobial susceptibility profile(s). These observations question the validity of swab cultures obtained from a single tonsillar site per patient, for detection, identification and determination of antimicrobial profiles of the etiology of tonsillitis, since swab specimens taken from only one site may or may not reflect the etiology of infection.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , DNA Bacteriano/análise , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Haemophilus influenzae/efeitos dos fármacos , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/efeitos dos fármacos , Adenoidectomia , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Haemophilus influenzae/genética , Haemophilus influenzae/isolamento & purificação , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/genética , Haemophilus parainfluenzae/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Tonsilectomia , Tonsilite/microbiologia , Tonsilite/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA