The Influence of Age, Gender, Health-Related Behaviors, and Other Factors on Occupationally Relevant Health Complaints of Singers.

OBJECTIVES: Professional singers' careers are usually associated with health-relevant factors that they themselves may or may not be able to influence. We have therefore investigated the effect of modifiable health-related behaviors and non-modifiable factors on singers' occupational health. METHODS: In an explorative, questionnaire-based study, self-reported, occupationally relevant health complaints and behaviors, along with singer-specific characteristics, were surveyed from 349 professional singers and voice teachers (116 men, 233 women; age 18-73 years) and the influence of age, gender, duration of daily and lifelong singing, voice category, and health-related behaviors (smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity) on occupationally relevant health complaints were analyzed using bi- and multivariate statistical methods. RESULTS: Singers reported less risky alcohol consumption (5.4% versus ≈15%) and smoking (15.5% versus 29.7%) than the general population, and too little physical activity was described in two thirds of both populations. After controlling for multiple testing, no effect was found for these behaviors, the time spent singing daily, gender, or voice categories on singers' complaints. Health complaints were significantly fewer for males (P < .001) and older women and were reported more frequently for higher-pitched male voices, a trend not found in females. CONCLUSION: Singers seem to smoke and drink less than members of the general population. These factors did not affect their complaints. Female singers described more work-related health complaints than males, a finding that corresponds to women in the general population. Older singers reported fewer complaints than younger singers, possibly because of selection effects or older singers acquiring strategies to avoid health-damaging behavior.

The cepstral spectral index of dysphonia, the acoustic voice quality index and the acoustic breathiness index as novel multiparametric indices for acoustic assessment of voice quality.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The objective assessment of voice quality using acoustic measures is an important pillar of voice diagnostics. This article reviews three recent acoustic measures and their clinical use in phoniatrics and laryngology. RECENT FINDINGS: Two acoustic parameters, the cepstral spectral index of dysphonia (CSID) and the acoustic voice quality index (AVQI), have gained importance as validated multiparametric indices in the objective assessment of hoarseness because they include both continuous speech and sustained vowels. The acoustic breathiness index (ABI), another multiparametric index, assesses breathiness admixture during phonation and identifies it robustly, unaffected by other characteristics of dysphonia such as roughness. SUMMARY: Acoustic measurements are useful diagnostic tools when used correctly with an appropriate recording system, consideration of environment and use of software programs. CSID, AVQI and ABI objectively improve the detection of voice quality abnormalities. In addition to their proven validity, their application is simple and their usability for clinicians is high.

Gender-specific reference ranges of the vocal extent measure in young and healthy adults.

Objective: The recently developed vocal extent measure (VEM) quantifies a patient's vocal capacity as documented in the voice range profile (VRP). This study presents the first reference ranges of the VEM for young subjects without voice complaints. Furthermore, this study investigates the influence of gender on the VEM as well as the correlation of the VEM with the dysphonia severity index (DSI).Patients and methods: Reference ranges were captured by combining a retrospective analysis of subjects who received a medical fitness certificate of a healthy voice (n = 135) and a prospective analysis of adult volunteers without voice complaints (n = 67). Every participant obtained a standardized voice assessment comprising videolaryngostroboscopy, auditory-perceptual analysis, acoustic analysis, VRP, and the Voice Handicap Index (VHI-9i).Results: A total of 202 subjects were recruited and investigated. Due to our stringent selection criteria, 51 participants had to be excluded from further analysis. The remaining data of 151 participants (52 males, 99 females), aged 18-39 years (mean 24, SD 5), were analysed in more detail. The mean of the VEM amounted to 123.7 (SD 12.6) for males and 114.4 (SD 13.3) for females. The values differed significantly between both sexes and correlated significantly with the corresponding DSI values.Conclusion: By introducing the first reference values, this study represents the next step of implementing the VEM in daily phoniatric diagnostics. These values serve as a basis to interpret the VEM regarding the degree of severity of voice disorders and to evaluate treatment success.