The Diaphragmatic Initiated Ventilatory Assist (DIVA) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial comparing rates of extubation failure in extremely premature infants undergoing extubation to non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist versus non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Invasive mechanical ventilation contributes to bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), the most common complication of prematurity and the leading respiratory cause of childhood morbidity. Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) may limit invasive ventilation exposure and can be either synchronized or non-synchronized (NS). Pooled data suggest synchronized forms may be superior. Non-invasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NIV-NAVA) delivers NIV synchronized to the neural signal for breathing, which is detected with a specialized catheter. The DIVA (Diaphragmatic Initiated Ventilatory Assist) trial aims to determine in infants born 240/7-276/7 weeks' gestation undergoing extubation whether NIV-NAVA compared to non-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NS-NIPPV) reduces the incidence of extubation failure within 5 days of extubation. METHODS: This is a prospective, unblinded, pragmatic, multicenter phase III randomized clinical trial. Inclusion criteria are preterm infants 24-276/7 weeks gestational age who were intubated within the first 7 days of life for at least 12 h and are undergoing extubation in the first 28 postnatal days. All sites will enter an initial run-in phase, where all infants are allocated to NIV-NAVA, and an independent technical committee assesses site performance. Subsequently, all enrolled infants are randomized to NIV-NAVA or NS-NIPPV at extubation. The primary outcome is extubation failure within 5 days of extubation, defined as any of the following: (1) rise in FiO2 at least 20% from pre-extubation for > 2 h, (2) pH ≤ 7.20 or pCO2 ≥ 70 mmHg; (3) > 1 apnea requiring positive pressure ventilation (PPV) or ≥ 6 apneas requiring stimulation within 6 h; (4) emergent intubation for cardiovascular instability or surgery. Our sample size of 478 provides 90% power to detect a 15% absolute reduction in the primary outcome. Enrolled infants will be followed for safety and secondary outcomes through 36 weeks' postmenstrual age, discharge, death, or transfer. DISCUSSION: The DIVA trial is the first large multicenter trial designed to assess the impact of NIV-NAVA on relevant clinical outcomes for preterm infants. The DIVA trial design incorporates input from clinical NAVA experts and includes innovative features, such as a run-in phase, to ensure consistent technical performance across sites. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov , trial identifier NCT05446272 , registered July 6, 2022.

The effect of bethanechol on tracheobronchomalacia in preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Bethanechol has demonstrated improvement in trachealis tone in animal models, but no trials have studied efficacy in infants. This study aimed to examine if bethanechol improves a standardized pulmonary severity score (PSS) in infants with severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia with a diagnosis of tracheobronchomalacia (TBM). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study evaluated cases treated with bethanechol matched with controls who did not receive bethanechol. TBM was diagnosed by dynamic computography. Daily PSS was recorded for each infant from 40 to 55 weeks post-menstrual age. RESULTS: Cases' mean PSS change was 21% lower than the controls' mean PSS change pre- and post-bethanechol (95% CI -40%, -2%) by paired t-test (p = 0.03). Matched differences (controls' PSS - cases' PSS) demonstrated greater mean PSS difference post-bethanechol compared to pre-bethanechol 0.17, (95% CI 0.05, 0.29) by paired t-test (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Infants with TBM treated with bethanechol compared to those not treated had a lower PSS reflecting improved respiratory status.

Dynamic computed tomography for evaluation of tracheobronchomalacia in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Dynamic computed tomography (dCT) gives real-time physiological information and objective descriptions of airway narrowing in tracheobronchomalacia (TBM). There is a paucity of literature in the evaluation of TBM by dCT in premature infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The aim of this study is to describe the findings of dCT and resultant changes in management in premature infants with TBM. METHODS: A retrospective study of 70 infants was performed. Infants included were <32 weeks gestation without major anomalies. TBM was defined as ≥50% expiratory reduction in cross-sectional area with severity defined as mild (50%-75%), moderate (≥75%-90%), or severe (≥90%). RESULTS: Dynamic CT diagnosed malacia in 53% of infants. Tracheomalacia was identified in 49% of infants with severity as 76% mild, 18% moderate, and 6% severe. Bronchomalacia was identified in 43% of infants with varying severity (53% mild, 40% moderate, 7% severe). Resultant management changes included PEEP titration (44%), initiation of bethanechol (23%), planned tracheostomy (20%), extubation trial (13%), and inhaled ipratropium bromide (7%). CONCLUSION: Dynamic CT is a useful noninvasive diagnostic tool for airway evaluation of premature infants. Presence and severity of TBM can provide actionable information to guide more precise clinical decision making.

Work of Breathing in Premature Neonates: Noninvasive Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist versus Noninvasive Ventilation.

BACKGROUND: We tested whether work of breathing in premature newborns estimated by phase angle (θ) by using respiratory inductance plethysmography is decreased during neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) noninvasive ventilation (NIV) versus NIV alone. METHODS: NAVA NIV and NIV were applied in random order while using respiratory inductance plethysmography to measure the phase angle. RESULTS: Patient-ventilator asynchrony was decreased during NAVA NIV; however, the phase angle was not different between the modes. A large number of repeated assists with switches to backup were found when using NAVA NIV. Results of the analysis indicated these were due to the apnea alarm limit set during NAVA NIV. CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in patient-ventilator synchrony supports the hypothesis that work of breathing may be decreased with NAVA NIV; however, we were unable to demonstrate this with our study design. Short apnea time settings with NAVA NIV led to a large number of switches to backup and repeated assists during the same neural effort. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration NCT02788110.).