Streptozotocin induces renal proximal tubular injury through p53 signaling activation.

Streptozotocin (STZ), an anti-cancer drug that is primarily used to treat neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) in clinical settings, is incorporated into pancreatic ß-cells or proximal tubular epithelial cells through the glucose transporter, GLUT2. However, its cytotoxic effects on kidney cells have been underestimated and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. We herein demonstrated that DNA damage and subsequent p53 signaling were responsible for the development of STZ-induced tubular epithelial injury. We detected tubular epithelial DNA damage in NET patients treated with STZ. Unbiased transcriptomics of STZ-treated tubular epithelial cells in vitro showed the activation of the p53 signaling pathway. STZ induced DNA damage and activated p53 signaling in vivo in a dose-dependent manner, resulting in reduced membrane transporters. The pharmacological inhibition of p53 and sodium-glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) mitigated STZ-induced epithelial injury. However, the cytotoxic effects of STZ on pancreatic ß-cells were preserved in SGLT2 inhibitor-treated mice. The present results demonstrate the proximal tubular-specific cytotoxicity of STZ and the underlying mechanisms in vivo. Since the cytotoxic effects of STZ against ß-cells were not impaired by dapagliflozin, pretreatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor has potential as a preventative remedy for kidney injury in NET patients treated with STZ.

Neurally mediated syncope manifesting during atrial fibrillation: a case report.

A 64-year-old male was admitted to hospital because of repeated episodes of syncope and palpitation. Ambulatory monitoring revealed paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) as the cause of palpitation; he did not have structural heart disease. The induction of AF by rapid pacing (50 Hz for 1 s) in an upright position provoked syncope with a vasodepressor response. Atropine sulfate blocked the induction of syncope. The possible etiology was neurally mediated syncope that manifested only during AF, which suggests that the abnormal vagal activity during AF in this case exaggerated the vasodepessor response while upright.