Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendations for the Assessment and Monitoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations for the assessment of people with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Canada. METHODS: Recommendations were developed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. The Canadian SLE Working Group (panel of Canadian rheumatologists and a patient representative from Canadian Arthritis Patient Alliance) was created. Questions for recommendation development were identified based on the results of a previous survey of SLE practice patterns of members of the Canadian Rheumatology Association. Systematic literature reviews of randomized trials and observational studies were conducted. Evidence to Decision tables were prepared and presented to the panel at 2 face-to-face meetings and online. RESULTS: There are 15 recommendations for assessing and monitoring SLE, with varying applicability to adult and pediatric patients. Three recommendations focus on diagnosis, disease activity, and damage assessment, suggesting the use of a validated disease activity score per visit and annual damage score. Strong recommendations were made for cardiovascular risk assessment and measuring anti-Ro and anti-La antibodies in the peripartum period and conditional recommendations for osteoporosis and osteonecrosis. Two conditional recommendations were made for peripartum assessments, 1 for cervical cancer screening and 2 for hepatitis B and C screening. A strong recommendation was made for annual influenza vaccination. CONCLUSION: These are considered the first guidelines using the GRADE method for the monitoring of SLE. Existing evidence is largely of low to moderate quality, resulting in more conditional than strong recommendations. Additional rigorous studies and special attention to pediatric SLE populations and patient preferences are needed.

MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints for spondyloarthritis: influence on clinical diagnostic confidence and patient management.

PURPOSE: To quantify the effect of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints on clinical diagnostic confidence and to determine if MR imaging affects treatment of patients with axial spondyloarthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study was approved by the research ethics board and included 55 consecutive patients referred by three rheumatologists for MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints. Measures of diagnostic confidence for clinical features (inflammatory back pain, mechanical back pain, muscular back pain, radicular back pain, spondylitis, sacroiliitis, and other) and overall diagnoses were made by using a Likert scale both before and after MR imaging. Proposed treatment was similarly recorded before and after MR imaging interpretation. The McNemar test was performed to determine the change in diagnostic confidence and consequent effect on patient treatment. RESULTS: Diagnostic confidence for specific clinical features improved significantly after MR imaging for inflammatory back pain (14% vs 76%, before vs after; P < .001), mechanical back pain (4% vs 49%, P < .001), spondylitis (7% vs 76%, P < .001) and sacroiliitis (9% vs 87%, P < .001). Confidence for overall diagnoses also improved significantly after MR imaging for ankylosing spondylitis (29% vs 80%, P < .001), undifferentiated spondyloarthritis (58% vs 93%, P < .001) and osteoarthritis (29% vs 64%, P < .001). Of the 23 patients for whom tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor (TNFi) therapy was recommended before MR imaging, 12 (52%) were prescribed TNFi therapy after MR imaging. Of the 32 patients for whom TNFi therapy was not recommended before MR imaging, 10 (31%) patients were prescribed TNFi therapy after MR imaging. Overall, 22 (40%) patients had a change in treatment recommendation regarding TNFi therapy after MR imaging. CONCLUSION: MR imaging of the spine and sacroiliac joints significantly influences the diagnostic confidence of rheumatologists regarding clinical features and overall diagnoses of axial spondyloarthritis, and consequently significantly affects treatment plans.