RESUMO
Vaccination against rabies and routine antibody testing of subjects participating in programs for the surveillance and control of rabies in animals is strongly recommended. The scope of this study is to describe the antibody level as measured by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) after primary and booster intramuscular vaccination with a purified vero-cell rabies vaccine (PVRV) in high-risk professionals and to determine the influence of an array of factors on antibody level, that is, time elapsed since primary immunization series and booster dose, sex, age, pathologic conditions, high-risk occupation, and peak antibody level after initial scheme and booster dose. A primary series of three doses of PVRV was administered and a commercial ELISA was recommended 14 days postimmunization with continuous repetition at 6 months and yearly intervals for the laboratory personnel and the rest of the professionals, respectively. The protective antibody titer was defined as a minimum of 0.5 equivalent units/mL (EU/mL) (seroconvertion) and a booster dose was applied if the titer was determined nonprotective. The seroconversion rate (SCR) after primary vaccination was 100%, with a geometric mean titer (GMT) of 2.90 EU/mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 1.85-3.45). After booster vaccination due to nonprotective titer, the SCR was 100% and the GMT increased by 678% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 514-887) reaching 4.25 EU/mL (IQR: 4.00-4.60), 2.5 times higher than the GMT elicited by the primary vaccine scheme in the respective recipients. The titer dropped by 1.20% per month (95% CI: 0.52-1.89) regardless of booster administration or any other factor. Women had 51% higher titer compared with men (95% CI: 6-116). High-risk professionals should be verified for adequate antibody titers, but routine administration of a single booster dose of PVRV 1 year after the primary series could be considered; more evidence is needed to support the benefit in terms of immunity and logistics.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Exposição Ocupacional/prevenção & controle , Vacina Antirrábica/imunologia , Vírus da Raiva/imunologia , Raiva/prevenção & controle , Animais , Animais Selvagens , Raposas/virologia , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Vigilância da População , Profilaxia Pré-Exposição , Vacina Antirrábica/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Risco , Vacinação , Médicos VeterináriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Main aim of this study was to evaluate circulating selenoprotein P (SEPP) levels in patients with simple steatosis (SS) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) compared with healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD (15 with SS, 10 with borderline NASH, 6 with definite NASH) and 27 matched controls without NAFLD were enrolled. Serum SEPP levels and liver function tests plus biochemical parameters were measured with ELISA and standard methods, respectively. Homeostatic model of assessment - insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated. RESULTS: SEPP levels were statistically different between groups (p-value for trend=0.043). In pairwise comparisons, SEPP was lower in definite NASH compared with controls (p=0.029), but not SS (p=0.18) or borderline NASH (p=0.35). SEPP was not different between controls, SS and borderline NASH. The unadjusted trend between the controls, SS and NASH patients remained essentially unchanged after adjustment for age, sex, log(ALT) and waist circumference, but it marginally lost significance when log(HOMA-IR) entered into the model. SEPP levels were not different between groups of different severity of steatosis, fibrosis, hepatocellular ballooning, lobular and portal inflammation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower SEPP levels were observed in patients with definite NASH compared with controls, a finding warranting larger studies.
Assuntos
Fígado/metabolismo , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/sangue , Selenoproteína P/sangue , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Fígado/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hepatopatia Gordurosa não Alcoólica/patologiaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Invasive aspergillosis (IA) remains a critical issue in immunosuppressed patients. Detection of galactomannan antigen (GM) in serum samples is included as a criterion of IA by the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer/Mycoses Study Group. Nevertheless, Aspergillus DNA detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) has not yet been included because clinical data validation is lacking. The present study describes the simultaneous performance of GM and PCR tests as routine methods for IA diagnosis. METHODS: During the period January 2012 to December 2017, a total of 156 white children hospitalized in a tertiary children's hospital of Athens (97 boys and 59 girls; age range, 5 months-14 years) were examined as possible cases of IA. Patients were classified into 4 groups based on their underlying diseases: hematologic malignancies (107 of 156 [68.6%]), solid tumors (16 of 156 [10.2%]), primary immunodeficiency (12 of 156 [7.7%]), and hereditary immunodeficiency (21 of 156 [13.5%]). GM detection was made with the Platelia Aspergillus Ag kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, California). Sera with a cut-off index ≥0.5 on at least 2 separate blood collections were considered positive. Serum detection of Aspergillus DNA was conducted with real-time PCR MycAssay Aspergillus assay (Myconostica Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom). PCR positivity was determined by using a threshold of 38 cycles in at least 1 serum sample. Four or more successive samples per patient were tested. FINDINGS: Overall, 28 of 156 patients (53 of 744 serum samples) were found positive. Eleven patients were positive using both methods (24 samples). Four children were positive only by PCR (6 samples), whereas 13 (23 samples) were positive only with GM in consecutive samples. Agreement of both methods, GM(+)/PCR(+) or GM(-)/PCR(-), was found in 139 patients (90% of total patients) and 715 samples (96.1% of total samples). The agreement of both methods was found: (1) 85% in patients with hematologic malignancies; (2) 100% in patients with solid tumors; (3) 97.5% in patients with primary immunodeficiency; and (4) 98.8% in patients with hereditary immunodeficiency. Overall disagreement was observed in 17 patients, in which the positive result in any of the 2 methods was estimated as true positive in conjunction with radiologic and other clinical findings. IMPLICATIONS: The combination of GM and PCR, provided high diagnostic accuracy in consecutive samples (twice a week). Clinical, radiologic, and other laboratory findings should be taken into consideration in the evaluation of GM and PCR.
Assuntos
Antígenos/sangue , Aspergilose/diagnóstico , Aspergillus/genética , DNA Fúngico/sangue , Mananas/sangue , Adolescente , Aspergilose/sangue , Aspergilose/microbiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Galactose/análogos & derivados , Grécia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/sangue , Síndromes de Imunodeficiência/microbiologia , Lactente , Masculino , Neoplasias/sangue , Neoplasias/microbiologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase em Tempo RealRESUMO
Greece has been officially malaria free since 1974. However, from 2009 to 2012, several locally acquired, cases of Plasmodium vivax malaria were detected, in immigrants and in Greek citizens. In this study, the antibody (Ab) response of Greeks and immigrants with documented malaria was initially assessed, followed by an Ab screening of Greeks and immigrant residents of local transmission areas. Of the 38 patients tested, 10.5% of Greeks and 15.7% of immigrants were positive 5-7 months after infection. Of the 1,019 individuals from various areas of Greece, including those of autochthonous transmission, 85 of the 721 (11.8%) immigrants were positive, whereas all 298 Greeks were negative. The rapid Ab titer decline observed is reasonable, given the non-endemic epidemiological setting. The seroepidemiological findings indicate that the local Greek population remains malaria naive and that at this point Greeks are unlikely to serve as reservoir for the infection of local mosquitoes.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Malária/imunologia , Proteína 1 de Superfície de Merozoito/imunologia , Plasmodium/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Grécia , Humanos , Lactente , Malária/transmissão , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Enteroviruses are important human pathogens, causing a broad spectrum of diseases from minor common colds to fatal myocarditis. However, certain disease syndromes are caused by one or few serotypes. Serotype identification is difficult due to the laborious neutralization tests that lack of sensitivity, while in commercial ELISAs homotypic antibodies' activities are largely masked by the recognition of genera-specific epitopes by heterotypic antibodies. In the present study homotypic assays were developed with the ability to discriminate different enterovirus serotypes. Seventy-three children sera, positive for IgM antibodies against enterovirus genus and 49 healthy children were examined for the presence of antibodies against 14 synthetic peptides derived from a non-conserved region of the VP1 protein of coxsackieviruses B2, B3, B4, B5, A9, A16, A24, echoviruses 6, 7, 9, 11, 30, enterovirus 71 and parechovirus 1. 50% of the anti-enterovirus IgM positive sera (>150 BU) reacted with the peptides with the majority of them to preferentially recognize one of them, supporting the homotypic nature of our assay. Inhibition studies yielded homologous inhibition rates 67-95% suggesting that specific peptide recognition actually occurred. The diagnostic value of our assay was tested in blood samples drawn over a 1.5-year period from a 5-year old patient. The anti-enterovirus reactivity was clearly attributed to echovirus serotype 11. The IgM/IgG antibody ratio was reversed 4 months later and subsequently IgM antibodies dropped below the cutoff point. In this paper we demonstrate that our assay can be used to discriminate between antibodies targeting different enterovirus serotypes.