End-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated perfusion for extended criteria donors in liver transplantation: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial-HOPExt.

BACKGROUND: Given the scarce donor supply, an increasing number of so-called marginal or extended criteria donor (ECD) organs are used for liver transplantation. These ECD liver grafts are however known to be associated with a higher rate of early allograft dysfunction and primary non-function because of a greater vulnerability to ischemia-reperfusion injury. The end-ischemic hypothermic oxygenated machine perfusion (HOPE) technique may improve outcomes of liver transplantation with ECD grafts by decreasing reperfusion injury. METHODS: HOPExt trial is a comparative open-label, multicenter, national, prospective, randomized, controlled study, in two parallel groups, using static cold storage, the gold standard procedure, as control. The trial will enroll adult patients on the transplant waiting list for liver failure or liver cirrhosis and/or liver malignancy requiring liver transplantation and receiving an ECD liver graft from a brain-dead donor. In the experimental group, ECD liver grafts will first undergo a classical static cold (4 °C) storage followed by a hypothermic oxygenated perfusion (HOPE) for a period of 1 to 4 h. The control group will consist of the classic static cold storage which is the gold standard procedure in liver transplantation. The primary objective of this trial is to study the efficacy of HOPE used before transplantation of ECD liver grafts from brain-dead donors in reducing postoperative early allograft dysfunction within the first 7 postoperative days compared to simple cold static storage. DISCUSSION: We present in this protocol all study procedures in regard to the achievement of the HOPExt trial, to prevent biased analysis of trial outcomes and improve the transparency of the trial results. Enrollment of patients in the HOPExt trial has started on September 10, 2019, and is ongoing. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03929523. Registered on April 29, 2019, before the start of inclusion.

Screening and care for alcohol use disorder in France: expectations, barriers and levers using a mixed-methods approach.

BACKGROUND: The widespread under-screening and under-treatment of alcohol use disorder (AUD) contributes to its health and socioeconomic burden. We conducted a mixed-methods (qualitative and qualitative) study in people with alcohol use disorder (PWAUD) to explore their expectations, as well as barriers and levers to AUD care. METHODS: Individuals with AUDIT > 15 (N = 179) were interviewed using computer-assisted interviews in several medical and non-medical sites (e.g., bars) (quantitative substudy). We also conducted semi-structured face-to-face interviews with 36 PWAUD (qualitative substudy). Using logistic regression, we explored factors associated with having previously received/sought care for AUD. Three major themes were identified in the qualitative textual analysis using a descending hierarchical classification. RESULTS: Not socializing with heavy drinkers (AOR [95%CI]:3.84[1.66-8.85]), regular smoking (9.72[3.91-24.15]) and feeling discriminated against (2.35[1.10-5.05]) were independent levers to having sought/received care for AUD, while being aged < 50 and employment were independent barriers. The five predominant themes in PWAUD discourses emerging from the textual analysis were: drinking context, medical care, alcohol treatment, tobacco/addiction and family. When triangulating results from the logistic regression and the textual analysis, two barriers (social drinking and difficulties with the medical care system), and two levers (family influence and tobacco addiction), emerged. CONCLUSION: These results underline the need for interventions targeting families and the social network to increase awareness about AUD and related care. Simplified and novel comprehensive care trajectories are urgently needed to reduce the clinical and public health burden of AUD.

The use of a thromboelastometry-based algorithm reduces the need for blood product transfusion during orthotopic liver transplantation: A randomised controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic liver transplantation is associated with a risk of bleeding. Coagulation in cirrhotic patients is difficult to assess with standard coagulation tests because of rebalanced coagulation. This can be better assessed by thromboelastometry which can detect coagulation impairments more specifically in such patients. OBJECTIVES: Our first objective was to compare the number of units of blood products transfused during liver transplantation when using an algorithm based on standard coagulation tests or a thromboelastometry-guided transfusion algorithm. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Single-centre tertiary care hospital in France, from December 2014 to August 2016. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 81 adult patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation were studied. Patients were excluded if they had congenital coagulopathies. INTERVENTION: Transfusion management during liver transplantation was guided either by a standard coagulation test algorithm or by a thromboelastometry-guided algorithm. Transfusion, treatments and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total number of transfused blood product units during the operative period (1 U is one pack of red blood cells (RBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or platelets). RESULTS: Median [interquartile range] intra-operative transfusion requirement was reduced in the thromboelastometry group (3 [2 to 4] vs. 7 [4 to 10] U, P = 0.005). FFP and tranexamic acid were administered less frequently in the thromboelastometry group (respectively 15 vs. 46.3%, P = 0.002 and 27.5 vs. 58.5%, P = 0.005), whereas fibrinogen was more often infused in the thromboelastometry group (72.5 vs. 29.3%, P < 0.001). Median transfusions of FFP (3 [2 to 6] vs. 4 [2 to 7] U, P = 0.448), RBCs (3 [2 to 5] vs. 4 [2 to 6] U, P = 0.330) and platelets (1 [1 to 2] vs. 1 [1 to 2] U, P = 0.910) were not different between groups. In the postoperative period, RBC or platelet transfusion, the need for revision surgery or occurrence of haemorrhage were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: A transfusion algorithm based on thromboelastometry assessment of coagulation reduced the total number of blood product units transfused during liver transplantation, particularly FFP administration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02352181.

Anti-E1E2 antibodies status prior therapy favors direct-acting antiviral treatment efficacy.

INTRODUCTION: Presence of anti-E1E2 antibodies was previously associated with spontaneous cure of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and predictive before treatment of a sustained virological response (SVR) to bi- or tri-therapy in naïve or experienced patients, regardless of HCV genotype. We investigated the impact of anti-E1E2 seroprevalence at baseline on treatment response in patients receiving direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We screened anti-E1E2 antibodies by ELISA in serum samples collected at treatment initiation for two groups of patients: 59 with SVR at the end of DAA treatment and 44 relapsers after DAA treatment. Nineteen patients received a combination of ribavirin (RBV) or PEG-interferon/ribavirin with sofosbuvir or daclatasvir and others received interferon-free treatment with DAA±RBV. HCV viral load was measured at different time points during treatment in a subgroup of patients. RESULTS: A significant association was observed between presence of anti-E1E2 and HCV viral load<6log10 prior treatment. Among patients with anti-E1E2 at baseline, 70% achieved SVR whereas among patients without anti-E1E2, only 45% achieved SVR. Conversely, 66% of patients experiencing DAA-failure were anti-E1E2 negative at baseline. In the multivariate analysis, presence of anti-E1E2 was significantly associated with SVR after adjustment on potential cofounders such as age, sex, fibrosis stage, prior HCV treatment and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of anti-E1E2 at treatment initiation is a predictive factor of SVR among patients treated with DAA and more likely among patients with low initial HCV viral load (<6log10). Absence of anti-E1E2 at baseline could predict DAA-treatment failure.

Direct-acting antiviral therapy decreases hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate in cirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Arrival of direct-acting antiviral agents against hepatitis C virus with high-sustained virological response rates and very few side effects has drastically changed the management of hepatitis C virus infection. The impact of direct-acting antiviral exposure on hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after a first remission in patients with advanced fibrosis remains to be clarified. METHODS: 68 consecutive hepatitis C virus patients with a first hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis and under remission, subsequently treated or not with a direct-acting antiviral combination, were included. Clinical, biological and virological data were collected at first hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis, at remission and during the surveillance period. RESULTS: All patients were cirrhotic. Median age was 62 years and 76% of patients were male. Twenty-three patients (34%) were treated with direct-acting antivirals and 96% of them achieved sustained virological response. Median time between hepatocellular carcinoma remission and direct-acting antivirals initiation was 7.2 months (IQR: 3.6-13.5; range: 0.3-71.4) and median time between direct-acting antivirals start and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence was 13.0 months (IQR: 9.2-19.6; range: 3.0-24.7). Recurrence rate was 1.7/100 person-months among treated patients vs 4.2/100 person-months among untreated patients (P=.008). In multivariate survival analysis, the hazard ratio for hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after direct-acting antivirals exposure was 0.24 (95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.55; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence rate was significantly lower among patients treated with direct-acting antivirals compared with untreated patients. Given the potential impact of our observation, large-scale prospective cohort studies are needed to confirm these results.

Efficacy and safety of boceprevir-based triple therapy in HCV cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (ANRS HC29 BOCEPRETRANSPLANT).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In this French multicentre, open-label study, we analyzed the efficacy, safety and patient-reported outcomes of a boceprevir-based triple therapy in HCV genotype 1 cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Patients received PEG-IFN/ribavirin (RBV) for 48 weeks (W) and boceprevir from W4 to W48 or until LT. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (80% males, median age: 56 years) were included. Fifty-seven percent had hepatocellular carcinoma and 43% end-stage liver disease. At enrolment, the median MELD score was 9 (range: 6-18); the Child-Pugh score was A in 65%, B in 35% and C in 2%. Therapy was discontinued because of severe adverse events (SAEs) in 39% of cases and virological inefficacy in 24%. 16% of patients had undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR24). LT was performed in 18 patients (35%). HCV RNA was undetectable in 16.6% at LT. Seven patients (14%) died and three deaths were attributed to treatment. SAEs (n=129) were observed in 84% of patients. Twenty-four percent of patients developed severe infections. Albumin<35g/L was independently associated with severe infection. Compared with baseline values, a significant decrease (P=0.02) of the physical dimension of health-related quality of life was observed between W4 and W24. The mean (95% CI) number of self-reported symptoms doubled during treatment (from 6.3 [4.8-7.7] to 11.8 [9.3-14.3]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The safety of the PEG-IFN/RBV/boceprevir combination is poor in patients awaiting LT, with a high risk of severe infection. Moreover, the limited efficacy confirms the indication for IFN-free combinations in these patients.

Anti-E1E2 antibodies do predict response to triple therapy in treatment-experienced Hepatitis C Virus-cirrhosis cases.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We previously showed that pre-treatment serum anti-E1E2 predicted hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral kinetics (VKs) and treatment outcome in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon/ribavirin (Peg-IFN/RBV) double therapy. Here, we determined whether baseline anti-E1E2 was correlated with the on-treatment VK and could predict virological outcome in treatment-experienced HCV-infected cirrhotic patients receiving protease inhibitor-based triple therapy. METHODS: Sera from 19 patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and compensated cirrhosis who failed to respond to a prior course of Peg-IFN/RBV were selected at time 0 before starting triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir. We assessed patients with sustained viral response 12 weeks after the end of triple therapy (SVR12) by analyzing VKs at weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 (end of treatment) and 60. RESULTS: Patients baseline characteristics were similar to the well-defined CUPIC cohort (age, HCV subtype, baseline viremia, and treatment history). Among the 19 patients, 11 achieved an SVR12. Fifteen patients were positive for pre-treatment anti-E1E2 and all of them achieved SVR12. Moreover, anti-E1E2 and SVR12 correlated with prior response to IFN/RBV therapy (relapse, partial or null response). CONCLUSIONS: Baseline anti-E1E2 could be considered as a new biomarker to predict SVR12 after triple therapy in this most difficult-to-treat population. These results warrant further validation on larger cohorts including patients receiving highly effective direct-acting antivirals to explore whether this test could help in better defining treatment duration for these very costly molecules.

Pretreatment predictive factors for hepatitis C therapy outcome: relevance of anti-E1E2 antibodies compared to IP-10 and IL28B genotypes.

BACKGROUND: Unique serum anti-E1E2 antibodies were shown to be associated with spontaneous recovery or predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving pegylated interferon/ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy. The objectives were to establish the relationship between pretreatment anti-E1E2 titres and HCV RNA kinetics during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy, and to examine whether the combined determination of interleukin (IL)28B rs12979860 and rs8099917, pretreatment inducible protein (IP)-10 levels and/or anti-E1E2 improved the prediction of SVR. METHODS: Sera from 26 treatment-naive consecutive HCV patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV for 48 weeks were analysed. Serum anti-E1E2 titres and pretreatment IP-10 levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. The IL28B variants were determined using genotyping real-time polymerase chain reaction method. Viral decline was measured at weeks (W) 4 and 12 and SVR assessed 6 months after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Baseline anti-E1E2 titres were correlated with HCV RNA decline at W4 and W12 and were highly predictive of SVR with 100% of patients negative for anti-E1E2 failing to achieve SVR. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses indicate that the best prediction of SVR (AUC 0.990) was obtained with the combination of anti-E1E2 and IP-10 levels. Predictive values were better than those obtained with IP-10 alone or in combination with IL28B variants. CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment serum anti-E1E2 response predicts HCV RNA clearance kinetics and treatment outcome. The combination of anti-E1E2 and IP-10 significantly improved the prediction of treatment response. This warrants further investigation and validation on larger cohorts of patients in the context of new therapeutic strategies.

A randomized controlled trial of high-dose ursodesoxycholic acid for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is a prevalent liver disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may have antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antifibrotic properties and may reduce liver injury in NASH. To date, no studies have assessed the efficacy and safety of high-dose UDCA (HD-UDCA) in patients with NASH. METHODS: We conducted a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HD-UDCA (28-35 mg/kg per day) in 126 patients with biopsy-proven NASH and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels. The primary study end point was reduction in ALT levels from baseline in patients treated with HD-UDCA compared with placebo. Secondary study end points were the proportion of patients with ALT normalization, relative reduction in the scores of serum markers of fibrosis and hepatic inflammation, and safety and tolerability. RESULTS: HD-UDCA significantly reduced mean ALT levels -28.3% from baseline after 12 months compared with -1.6% with placebo (p<0.001). At the end of the trial, ALT levels normalized (≤35 IU/L) in 24.5% of patients treated with HD-UDCA and in 4.8% of patients who received placebo (p=0.003). Both results were not accounted for by changes in weight during the trial. HD-UDCA significantly reduced the FibroTest® serum fibrosis marker (p<0.001) compared with placebo. HD-UDCA also significantly improved markers of glycemic control and insulin resistance. There were no safety issues in this population. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with HD-UDCA was safe, improved aminotransferase levels, serum fibrosis markers, and selected metabolic parameters. Studies with histologic end points are warranted.

Association of anti-E1E2 antibodies with spontaneous recovery or sustained viral response to therapy in patients infected with hepatitis C virus.

UNLABELLED: The monoclonal antibody (mAb) D32.10 recognizes a discontinuous epitope encompassing three regions E1 (amino acids 297-306), E2A (amino acids 480-494), and E2B (amino acids 613-621) juxtaposed on the surface of serum-derived hepatitis C virus (HCV) particles (HCVsp). The mAb D32.10 inhibits efficiently and specifically the binding of HCVsp to human hepatocytes. Therefore, we investigated the clinical relevance of anti-E1E2A,B response in the serum of patients infected with HCV. To this end, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using synthetic E1-, E2A-, and E2B-derived peptides was used. The ELISA was validated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and test efficiency. The detection of the anti-E1E2 D32.10 epitope-binding antibodies during natural HCV infection in more than 300 HCV-positive sera demonstrated significantly (P < 0.001) higher prevalence of these antibodies: (1) in patients who spontaneously cured HCV infection (46 of 52, 88.5%) showing high titers (70% ≥ 1/1000) compared to never-treated patients with chronic hepatitis C (7 of 50, 14%) who actively replicated the virus, and (2) in complete responders (20 of 52, 38.5%) who cleared virus following treatment and achieved a sustained viral response compared to nonresponders (4 of 40, 10%). Serum anti-E1E2 antibodies were monitored before, during, and after the current standard-of-care therapy (pegylated interferon plus ribavirin) in responder and nonresponder patients. Optimal cutoff values were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. One month prior to therapy initiation, the threshold of 1131 (optical density × 1000) gave 100% and 86% positive and negative predictive values, respectively, for achieving or not achieving a sustained viral response. CONCLUSION: The anti-E1E2 D32.10 epitope-binding antibodies are associated with control of HCV infection and may represent a new relevant prognostic marker in serum. This unique D32.10 mAb may also have immunotherapeutic potential.

Amantadine triple therapy for non-responder hepatitis C patients. Clues for controversies (ANRS HC 03 BITRI).

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether addition of amantadine to pegylated interferon/ribavirin improved response rates among chronic hepatitis C patients, non-responders to interferon/ribavirin and study the dynamic of response. METHODS: In a double blind, multicenter, randomized trial, 200 non-responder patients received pegylated interferon 1.5 microg/kg per week and ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day, plus either amantadine 200 mg/day or placebo for 48 weeks. Endpoints were virological responses, ALT normalization, and histological benefit overtime. RESULTS: Twenty percent of all patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). This rate was 8% higher in the triple therapy group (24%) compared with the double therapy group (16%) (P = 0.22). A better virological response rate at week 24 was observed in the triple regimen group (43 vs 29%; P = 0.06), which was lost at week 48 suggesting viral escape. The biochemical response rate was also significantly higher with triple therapy at week 12 (63 vs 49%; P = 0.05) and week 24 (64 vs 49%; P = 0.03). Fibrosis stabilized or improved in 77% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Re-treatment of interferon/ribavirin non-responder patients should be encouraged since a substantial proportion benefits from re-treatment with pegylated interferon/ribavirin +/- amantadine. In triple therapy involving amantadine, a time wise response and an increased SVR rate in subgroups less prone to viral breakthrough suggest clues for existing controversies.

The predictive value of core antigen testing for the management of hepatitis C patients receiving pegylated interferon/ribavirin treatment.

A new quantitative marker of HCV viremia based on the detection of the core antigen of the virus has recently become commercially available in Europe. The usefulness of this test was examined for the management of patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin. One hundred twenty-eight pegylated interferon/ribavirin treated patients were studied. Serum samples were available at baseline, week 4 and week 12 time-points, respectively. Core antigen was quantified using the trak-C assay (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ). For all genotypes at week 4, the positive and negative predictive values of HCV core antigen were 81.4 and 92.9%, respectively, while at week 12 they were 67.9 and 100%, respectively. These predictive values varied substantially according to viral genotype. Among patients with a negative core antigen level (<1.5 pg/ml) at week 12, only 33% of those who were positive at week 4 achieved a sustained virological response whereas 85% of those who were already negative did (P < 0.001). The core antigen assay may be used at week 4 and week 12 to distinguish patients who will achieve a sustained virological response from those who will relapse/breakthrough. This assay is a new reliable alternative for early prediction of virological non-response in patients treated with pegylated interferon/ribavirin.