Enhancing patient outcomes: Integrating electronic cardiology consultation in primary care for cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of cancer patients with concomitant cardiovascular (CV) disease is on the rise due to improved cancer prognoses. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term outcomes of cancer patients referred to a cardiology department (CD) via primary care using e-consultation. METHODS: We analysed data from cancer patients with prior referrals to a CD between 2010 and 2021 (n = 6889) and compared two care models: traditional in-person consultations and e-consultations. In e-consultation model, cardiologists reviewed electronic health records (e-consultation) to determine whether the demand could be addressed remotely or necessitated an in-person consultation. We used an interrupted time series regression model to assess outcomes during the two periods: (1) time to cardiology consultation, (2) rates of all-cause and CV related hospital admissions and (3) rates of all-cause and CV-related mortality within the first year after the initial consultation or e-consultation at the CD. RESULTS: Introduction of e-consultation for cancer patients referred to cardiology care led to a 51.8% reduction (95%CI: 51.7%-51.9%) in waiting times. Furthermore, we observed decreased 1-year incidence rates, with incidence rate ratios (iRRs) [IC95%] of .75 [.73-.77] for CV-related hospitalizations, .43 [.42-.44] for all-cause hospitalizations, and .87 [.86-.88] for all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to traditional in-person consultations, an outpatient care program incorporating e-consultation for cancer patients significantly reduced waiting times for cardiology care and demonstrated safety, associated with lower rates of hospital admissions.

Stratification and management of cardiovascular risk in cancer patients. A consensus document of the SEC, FEC, SEOM, SEOR, SEHH, SEMG, AEEMT, AEEC, and AECC.

Both cancer treatment and survival have significantly improved, but these advances have highlighted the deleterious effects of vascular complications associated with anticancer therapy. This consensus document aims to provide a coordinated, multidisciplinary and practical approach to the stratification, monitoring and treatment of cardiovascular risk in cancer patients. The document is promoted by the Working Group on Cardio Oncology of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (SEC) and was drafted in collaboration with experts from distinct areas of expertise of the SEC and the Spanish Society of Hematology and Hemotherapy (SEHH), the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), the Spanish Society of General and Family Physicians (SEMG), the Spanish Association of Specialists in Occupational Medicine (AEEMT), the Spanish Association of Cardiovascular Nursing (AEEC), the Spanish Heart Foundation (FEC), and the Spanish Cancer Association (AECC).

Atrial Fibrillation in Active Cancer Patients: Expert Position Paper and Recommendations.

Improvements in survival among cancer patients have revealed the clinical impact of cardiotoxicity on both cardiovascular and hematological and oncological outcomes, especially when it leads to the interruption of highly effective antitumor therapies. Atrial fibrillation is a common complication in patients with active cancer and its treatment poses a major challenge. These patients have an increased thromboembolic and hemorrhagic risk but standard stroke prediction scores have not been validated in this population. The aim of this expert consensus-based document is to provide a multidisciplinary and practical approach to the prevention and treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with active cancer. This is a position paper of the Spanish Cardio-Oncology working group and the Spanish Thrombosis working group, drafted in collaboration with experts from the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology, and the Spanish Society of Hematology.

Cardio-Onco-Hematology in Clinical Practice. Position Paper and Recommendations.

Improvements in early detection and treatment have markedly reduced cancer-related mortality. However survival not only depends on effectively cure cancer, but prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related complications is also needed. Cardiovascular toxicity is a widespread problem across many classes of therapeutic schemes, however scientific evidence in the management of cardiovascular complications of onco-hematological patients is scarce, as these patients have been systematically excluded from clinical trials and current recommendations are based on expert consensus. Multidisciplinary teams are mandatory to decrease morbidity and mortality from both cardiotoxicity and cancer itself. An excessive concern for the occurrence of cardiovascular toxicity, can avoid potentially curative therapies, while underestimating this risk, increases long-term mortality of cancer survivors. The objective of this consensus document, developed in collaboration of the Spanish Society of Cardiology, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology, the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology and the Spanish Society of Hematology, is to update the necessary concepts and expertise on cardio-onco-hematology that enable its application in daily clinical practice and to promote the development of local multidisciplinary teams, to improve the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer.

Control of cardiovascular risk factors in revascularized patients with diabetes: a subanalysis of the ICP-Bypass study.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with type 2 diabetes and revascularized coronary disease are a group with very high cardiovascular risk that has been rarely studied. This ICP-Bypass substudy analyzes the clinical characteristics and risk factor control of these patients. METHODS: The analysis selected patients with type 2 diabetes who had participated in an earlier multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study (ICP-Bypass) conducted in 2293 patients > 18 years of age who had undergone coronary surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention. Demographic and therapeutic variables, as well as clinical and analytical parameters, were collected and comparatively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age (standard deviation) of the 771 diabetic patients included in the analysis was 67.7 (9.6) years (71.4% men; mean time since revascularization, 3.5 years). Most (57.8%) were receiving treatment with oral hypoglycemics alone, whereas 30.4% were receiving insulin alone or in combination. The mean glycohemoglobin figure was 7.1% (in 70%,<7.5%); 74.8% had been diagnosed with dyslipidemia. Mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 93.5 mg/dL (in 73%, > 70 mg/dL). Among these patients, 93.6% were receiving statins and 18.7% a statin combined with ezetimib. A total of 78.1% had been diagnosed with hypertension; systolic/diastolic blood pressure was < 130/80 mmHg in 52% and < 140/90 mmHg in 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular risk and prevention may be improved in revascularized diabetic patients in Spain through further control of risk factors, particularly dyslipidemia. Patients with glycohemoglobin > 7.5% should be individually assessed in terms of glycemic targets.

[Cardiovascular risk in the 21st century: identifying risk in primary prevention. Controlling risk in secondary prevention]. / Riesgo cardiovascular en el siglo XXI. Cómo detectarlo en prevención primaria. Cómo controlarlo en prevención secundaria.

If a primary prevention strategy for cardiovascular disease is to be implemented successfully, it is essential to have some knowledge of the level of risk in the general population, long before clinical disease appears. Traditionally, risk stratification has been based on risk factors that were first described some 50 years ago. However, we know that we are not able to identify all individuals who could present with a cardiovascular condition. in recent years, various techniques, principally imaging techniques, have been developed for detecting subclinical vascular disease, but they have not yet been approved for general use. While we will clearly witness changes in cardiovascular risk assessment in the future, until then we must make use of every available tool to ensure that any patient who needs our expertise does not escape our attention. Once a patient presents with clinical symptoms of cardiovascular disease or is known to have silent disease, we must implement secondary prevention measures to avoid the appearance of additional clinical conditions. in addition to strictly controlling risk factors, we must also make use of both drug treatment and surgical revascularization, strategies that have been demonstrated to be effective but which are underutilized. Above all, there is the unfinished business of modifying lifestyles to encourage healthier habits. Considerable medical progress will be lost if we do not improve our diet, exercise regularly and completely ban smoking.

Cardiovascular prevention (VI). Use of drugs in the primary prevention of arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia.

Arterial hypertension and dyslipidemia are two of the main risk factors for cardiovascular and renal disease in Spain. Lifestyle modification and drug therapy are the mainstays of risk reduction. Both the goals of therapy and the choice of drug treatment, in particular of antihypertensive treatment, are determined by the patient's demographic characteristics, the presence of other cardiovascular risk factors and the coexistence of asymptomatic vascular and kidney disease; that is, by the determinants of overall cardiovascular risk. Although some clinical guidelines exclude beta-blockers from first-line treatment of hypertension because they may have little effect, we believe that the five main classes of antihypertensive drugs currently available could provide first-line therapy since the majority of the hypertensive patients require combination therapy to achieve their blood pressure targets. Statins are fundamental to the pharmacologic treatment of dyslipidemia. Their primary effect is to reduce the plasma low-density lipoprotein level, which has been shown to be closely related to the reduction in cardiovascular risk. Other therapeutic agents include selective cholesterol absorption inhibitors (e.g., ezetimibe), which must be used in combination with statins, and fibrates, whose use is more restricted but which are helpful in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.