Petit-Morel method for hip development dysplasia in toddlers: A retrospective observational study in 34 patients.

BACKGROUND: The Petit-Morel method allows the treatment of developmental hip dysplasia in toddlers by combining gradual traction to achieve reduction followed by immobilisation during which pelvic osteotomy is performed. The objective of this study was to assess the radiographic and clinical outcomes in a retrospective cohort of patients. HYPOTHESIS: The Petit-Morel method is associated with low rates of avascular necrosis and residual acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity, as well as with satisfactory medium-term clinical outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a single-centre retrospective study of 34 patients (35 hips) treated between 1997 and 2014. The radiological assessment criteria included an evaluation for avascular necrosis classified according to Kalamchi and MacEwan, the vertical centre edge (VCE) angle, femoral head sphericity according to Mose, and acetabular dysplasia at skeletal maturity according to Severin. Hip function was assessed by determining the Postel-Merle d'Aubigné (PMA) score. RESULTS: Mean age at treatment was 19±4 months (range, 14-29). Mean follow-up was 11 years (range, 5-20). There were two failures including one case of recurrent dislocation requiring surgical reduction. Group II avascular necrosis occurred in 1 (3%) patient. Tönnis Grade IV dysplasia was significantly associated with resolving irregularity of the ossification centre, seen in 19 (54%) cases (p=0.002). In the 18 patients followed-up to skeletal maturity, with a mean follow-up of 15 years (range, 12-20 years), 17 hips were Severin Class I. The mean VCE angle was 29° (range, 15°-38°), and the head was spherical for 34 (98%) hips. The PMA score at last follow-up was excellent (17-18). The mean VCE angle was greater in all 5 patients who experienced pain during long walks (35° [range, 32°-37°]) than in the asymptomatic patients (28° [range, 15°-38°]) (p=0.009). DISCUSSION: The Petit-Morel method is a reliable treatment that provides good clinical and radiological outcomes. Overcorrection of the VCE angle was noted in the patients who experienced walking-related pain in adulthood. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective observational cohort study.

Comparison of subjective outcomes of Darrach and Sauvé-Kapandji procedures at a minimum 2 years' follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: In distal radioulnar joint pathology, the literature regularly recommends reserving the Sauvé-Kapandji (SK) procedure to young patients and heavy manual workers, and the Darrach (D) procedure to older patients and rheumatic wrists. However, the SK procedure is more technically demanding and requires more proximal resection of the ulna, with greater risk of instability in the ulnar stump. The aim of the present study was to determine whether the SK procedure really does show superiority. HYPOTHESIS: Subjective results are no better after the SK than the D procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventy of the 101 operated cases (70 patients: 40 female, 30 male; mean age at surgery, 50.2 years [range, 16.4-87.2 years]) were assessed, at a minimum 24 months. Group D comprised 44 wrists, and group SK 26. Assessment was conducted by telephone interview for pain, ranges of flexion-extension and pronation-supination, strength, stump stability and satisfaction, and by mail for the QuickDASH questionnaire. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years (range, 25 months to 17 years). RESULTS: The surgical revision rate was significantly higher in SK (p=0.003). Results were comparable between groups for pain, strength, range of motion and satisfaction. Mean QuickDASH score was 45.5 in group D and 26.5 in group SK. Age-matched comparison found no significant differences on endpoints. DISCUSSION: Subjective results after the SK procedure showed no superiority over the D procedure, despite group D patients having twice the rate of heavy manual work and sport activities. This non-difference casts doubt on the need to reserve the D procedure to elderly patients and the SK procedure to young patients and heavy manual workers, especially as the latter is more technically demanding and is associated with a higher rate of surgical revision. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; retrospective study.

Surgical treatment of chronic instability of the metacarpophalangeal finger joint based on the intraoperative condition of the collateral ligament: Results of a single-center study with 7years' follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Severe traumatic injuries to the collateral ligaments of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the fingers are rare and often missed. There is no consensus on how to treat neglected, chronic, and symptomatic ligament tears. The two main options are ligament reinsertion and ligament reconstruction, but no criteria exist to help surgeons choose between them. HYPOTHESIS: The structure and intraoperative appearance of the collateral ligament can be used to select between reattachment and ligament reconstruction; when the ligament is repairable, effective reattachment with a suture anchor is possible in chronic forms more than 3months after the injury event. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (14 consecutive cases) who underwent surgical treatment for a traumatic complete symptomatic tear of an MCP joint collateral ligament that was at least 3months old were included retrospectively. Six patients (7 fingers) had been treated by anchor reinsertion (group A) and seven patients (7 fingers) by ligament reconstruction as described by Hsieh (group B). Clinical and radiographic assessment consisted of the QuickDASH questionnaire, measurements of strength and active range of motion of the MCP compared to the other hand, and AP and lateral radiographs over the MCP joint. RESULTS: Twelve patients (13 fingers) were reviewed after a mean follow-up of 84±49months. The mean QuickDASH was 4.7±5.4 for group A and 23.8±16.0 for group B (p=0.008). There was a significant decrease in the flexion/extension motion (64°/-6°) in group B relative to the healthy contralateral hand and group A fingers (p=0.012 and p=0.014). There were no visible degenerative joint lesions at the final assessment; however, three patients in group B had undergone revision surgery to address chronic pain. Two of them had a preoperative volar subluxation that was not corrected by the ligament reconstruction. DISCUSSION: When a ligament is determined to be repairable based on intraoperative findings, reinsertion on bone provides satisfactory and long-lasting stabilization of the MCP joint even if the procedure is not done immediately after the injury occurs. If it is not repairable and no preoperative volar subluxation is found, the ligament reconstruction technique described by Hsieh restores stability to the MCP joint in the medium term with no signs of degeneration. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; case series.

Humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using cemented or cementless stems comparative retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 9 years.

INTRODUCTION: The cause of proximal humeral osteolysis after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) remains controversial. The primary objective of our study was to compare the radiographic outcomes of Grammont-type RSA when a cemented stem is used versus when a cementless stem is used. The secondary objective was to identify the cause of these radiographic changes, especially for the cementless stems. HYPOTHESIS: More proximal humerus bone loss occurs when a cementless humeral stem is used. METHODS: With a minimum follow-up of 5 years, two paired cohorts were compared retrospectively: 70 RSA with cemented stem and 70 RSA with cementless stem. Using the radiographs made at the final follow-up visit, we looked for tuberosity resorption, signs of stress shielding, the presence of periprosthetic radiolucent lines and scapular notching. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 9 years (5.0-20.6), the RSA revision rate was 1.8% in the cemented group and 3.6% in the cementless group (p=1). Tuberosity resorption was twice as common in the cementless group: 59% versus 30% (p<0.001). Signs of stress shielding such as osteopenia were only present in the cementless group. In both groups, tuberosity resorption was often associated with scapular notching. In the shoulders with tuberosity resorption, stage≥3 scapular notching was more common in the cementless group (p=0.001). DISCUSSION: For the cementless stems, proximal humeral osteolysis can in part be attributed to stress shielding. The relationship between notching and tuberosity resorption in the two groups also suggests a secondary biological cause. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III; Comparative retrospective study.

Press-fit vs. cemented humeral stem fixation for reverse shoulder arthroplasty: functional outcomes at a mean follow-up of 9.5 years.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a reliable, long-term treatment option for degenerative shoulder pathology. However, the functional outcomes degrade around the fifth year postoperation, particularly for internal and external rotation. Long-term radiographic changes have been reported around the humeral stem, depending on the fixation method. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to compare the clinical outcomes of RSAs by fixation method-cemented vs. press-fit-after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. We hypothesized that proximal humeral osteolysis impacts the functional outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Our study compared 2 matched cohorts: 56 RSAs with cemented stems and 56 RSAs with press-fit stems. We evaluated all the patients using the Constant-Murley score (CMS) and range of motion (ROM), which we measured preoperatively and at the final follow-up visit. We evaluated radiographs from the final follow-up visit to look for proximal humeral osteolysis with tuberosity resorption, signs of stress shielding, periprosthetic radiolucent lines, and scapular notching. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 9.5 years (5-21), regardless of the fixation method, the RSA procedure helped to improve the CMS and active joint ROM postoperatively, except for internal and external rotation with elbow at side in the press-fit group. Shoulder ROM was significantly better in the group with cemented stems for anterior elevation (P < .001), abduction (P = .006), and external (P = .02) and internal rotation with elbow at side (P = .02). The CMS did not differ between groups. The presence of tuberosity resorption or scapular notching had no effect on the CMS and active ROM in either group. Osteopenia, which was more prevalent in the press-fit group, had no impact on the functional outcome. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference between groups in the CMS, although the active shoulder ROM was significantly worse in the press-fit group. This difference could be attributed to more frequent tuberosity resorption in this group.

Modified Lateral Approach of the Elbow for Surgical Release and Synovectomy.

Elbow stiffness is a common reason for consultation. In recent years, arthroscopic techniques in elbow surgery have progressed, but there are still some contraindications to performance of arthroscopic synovectomy and release in this joint (elbows with anatomic deformity after multiple procedures, malunion, presence of osteosynthesis material, severe stiffness of >80 degrees, instability, or previous transposition of the ulnar nerve). Therefore, knowledge of a safe and reliable open approach to achieve elbow release and/or synovectomy is essential. We report the technical details of the modified lateral approach between extensor carpi radialis brevis and longus muscles, as well as the clinical results of 43 elbow release and/or synovectomy procedures, illustrating its feasibility. The modified lateral approach, providing visual control of the radial nerve and good anterior exposure of the elbow joint, is detailed. From 1994 to 2016, this approach was used in 43 release and/or synovectomy procedures of the elbow in 41 patients, 30 men and 11 women, with a mean age of 40.56 years (range, 17 to 84 y). Using this procedure, 38 elbows (93%) recovered full extension and 5 subtotal extension with an average deficit of 11 degrees (range, 5 to 20 degrees). All elbows were stable. No neurological complications were reported. The modified lateral approach preserves the insertion of the lateral epicondyle muscles that are major dynamic stabilizers and reduces the risk of instability. Initially described for the treatment of radial tunnel syndrome, it should also be recommended for elbow release and synovectomy.

Survival and complications in hinged knee reconstruction prostheses after distal femoral or proximal tibial tumor resection: A retrospective study of 161 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Hinged knee megaprostheses are mainly used for reconstruction after tumor resection. They may incur complications, but this has not been assessed in the French literature, except in small series at short follow-up. We therefore conducted a large-scale nationwide multicenter retrospective study with a minimum 5 years' follow-up. The objectives were (1) to compare survival between distal femoral and proximal tibial reconstruction prostheses, and (2) to analyze complications and failure. HYPOTHESIS: Distal femoral hinged reconstruction prostheses show longer survival with fewer complications than proximal tibial prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred sixty-one patients were included: 118 in the distal femoral group, and 43 in the proximal tibial group. Tumors were mostly osteosarcomas (90 cases) or chondrosarcomas (31 cases). Mean age was 37 years (range, 12-86 years). Complications were assessed on the Henderson classification. Failure was defined by prosthesis anchor exchange or amputation. RESULTS: At a mean 9 years' follow-up (range, 5-23 years), implant survival was longer in the distal femoral group: 5- and 10-year survival, 84% [95% CI, 75-89] and 70% [95% CI, 59-79] versus 74% [95% CI, 69-85] and 43% [95% CI, 23-61] (p=0.02). Revision surgery for complications mainly concerned aseptic loosening (19%, 30 cases) or deep infection (16%, 25 cases) and more often involved the proximal tibia (65% vs. 43%, 28 vs. 51 cases; OR 2.4 [95% CI, 1.2-5.1]; p=0.02). DISCUSSION: Hinged knee reconstruction prosthesis is a solution in tumoral pathology, but with a high risk of complications (loosening and infection) and a higher failure rate in the proximal tibial reconstruction prosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of ultrasound analysis of the long head of the biceps.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound assessment of the long head of the biceps (LHB) is difficult. The aim of the present study was to analyze the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of 2 ultrasound cross-sections not previously assessed: humeral head apex (image 1) and bicipital groove entrance (image 2). HYPOTHESIS: These ultrasound cross-sectional images allow reliable and reproducible analysis of the intra-articular LHB. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center prospective study was conducted. Inter-observer reproducibility was assessed between 2 radiologists in 20 healthy shoulders (asymptomatic group) and 35 painful shoulders (symptomatic group); intra-observer reproducibility was assessed for 1 observer in 10 healthy shoulders. Quantitative parameters comprised short and long axes and transverse area, and qualitative parameters comprise echogenicity and LHB position. RESULTS: On images 1 and 2, inter-observer agreement on the 3 quantitative parameters was good to excellent in both subject groups (p<0.05), and more precise and highly reproducible for image 1. Agreement on the 2 qualitative parameters was excellent (p<0.001). Intra-observer reproducibility results were non-significant on all parameters. DISCUSSION: The 2 intra-articular LHB cross-sections proved reliable and reproducible in painful and in healthy shoulders. A standardized ultrasound protocol could thus enhance the precision of LHB assessment and treatment. The difficulties of LHB measurement, often related to shoulder pathology, may, however, hinder interpretation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective intra- and inter-observer study.