Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol ; 32(4): 233-6, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16440821

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of our study was to verify, by applying clinical performance indicators, the quality of healthcare given to hysterectomy patients and the benefits on their adoption in healthcare facilities. METHODS: The different surgical approaches and indications for surgery were evaluated in 534 patients analysing postoperative short-term complications and triggered clinical performance indicators (CPIs). RESULTS: Surgery was performed by the abdominal (80.9%) and vaginal route (19.1%). Postoperative complication rate was 13.5% and CPIs were triggered 108 times overall: 42 in benign conditions (10.3%) and 30 in malignancy (23.4%) (p = 0.001). In patients operated on for benign conditions the different approaches, abdominal or vaginal, showed differences in postoperative period (p = 0.4). In 10.9% of malignant and in 2.9% of benign conditions hospital stay was triggered (p = 0.001). Vaginal surgery showed a shorter average stay than laparotomy (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of CPIs may determine a refinement of clinical performance with positive effects on health, patient satisfaction, postoperative morbidity hospitalisation and healthcare cost savings.


Assuntos
Histerectomia/normas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Doenças Uterinas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Histerectomia/economia , Histerectomia/métodos , Tempo de Internação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA