Message in a bottle: the discovery of a young medical officer's map from the 1917 Battle of Hill 70

Summary: We report the serendipitous discovery of a map drawn by an army surgeon during the First World War. The map, entitled "Loos 36° NW3,'"was drawn by 24-year-old Captain Alexander Edward MacDonald in fall 1917 and was found in his old surgery textbook. MacDonald's map depicts the positions of Canadian frontlines and medical units after the Battle of Hill 70. During the battle, Dr. MacDonald tended to the wounded in an aid post that he constructed in a ruined coal mine near the Front. MacDonald would go on to serve with distinction in the Battle of Passchendaele and Canada's Hundred Days, and he received the Military Cross for gallantry. He maintained a passionate interest in cartography throughout his life and eventually became an authority among map collectors. Artifacts such as MacDonald's map remind us of the realities of war and the sacrifices of our surgeon predecessors.

The 1917 Halifax Explosion: the first coordinated local civilian medical response to disaster in Canada.

SUMMARY: The 1917 Halifax Explosion was an unfortunate but predictable tragedy, given the sea traffic and munitions cargo, resulting in sudden large-scale damage and catastrophic injuries, with 1950 dead and 8000 injured. Although generous support was received from the United States, the bulk of the medical work was undertaken using local resources through an immediate, massive, centrally coordinated medical response. The incredible care provided 100 years ago by these Canadian physicians, nurses and students is often forgotten, but deserves attention. The local medical response to the 1917 disaster is an early example of coordinated mass casualty relief, the first in Canada, and remains relevant to modern disaster preparedness planning. This commentary has an appendix, available at canjsurg.ca/016317-a1.

Delivery recommendations for pregnant females with risk factors for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

OBJECTIVE: High-risk pathologies for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in otherwise healthy pregnant females are not contraindications for spontaneous vaginal delivery. However, 74% of European obstetrician-gynecologist (OBGYN) respondents in 2008 recommended operative delivery for females at risk for RRD. This discrepancy is likely due to an older study suggesting a causal relation between Valsalva-like manoeuvres and RRD. The purpose of this study is to determine current delivery recommendations for healthy pregnant females with high-risk pathologies for RRD among Canadian ophthalmologists and OBGYNs. METHODS: Anonymous prospective cross-sectional survey sent via electronic link in 2013. χ(2) test of proportions was used to compare delivery recommendations between the 2 specialties. Multinomial logistic regression was used to identify predictors for recommendations. RESULTS: A total of 356 participants responded including 92 ophthalmologists and 27 trainees, and 185 OBGYNs and 52 trainees. For healthy pregnant females with previously treated retinal hole/tear or treated RRD, significantly more OBGYNs recommended cesarean section and significantly more ophthalmologists recommended spontaneous vaginal delivery. Length of practice and type of practice setting were significant predictors among obstetricians in their delivery recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to include obstetricians, ophthalmologists, and their trainees in a survey of the recommended mode of delivery for pregnant females with risk factors of RRD. Our results suggest that obstetricians concerned about potential RRD in pregnant patients may be unnecessarily recommending operative management. Educational sessions on the risk for RRD with spontaneous vaginal delivery may reconcile the current differences in recommendations between ophthalmologists and obstetricians.

Anterior capsular snap: new sign of zonular dehiscence and instability.

UNLABELLED: We describe the case of a 95-year-old woman with dense nuclear sclerotic cataracts and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma. Preoperative phacodonesis was noted on slitlamp biomicroscopy. During surgery, a localized anterior capsule dehiscence occurred with visible snapping of the anterior capsule over the capsulorhexis edge. This preferential anterior zonular dehiscence occurred during the lateral separation of 2 hemisegments of nucleus; the nuclear fragments protected the equatorial and posterior zonular fibers, avoiding zonular dialysis. The case was completed without incident after recognition and management of the zonular instability. The anterior capsular snap is a new sign of intraoperative anterior zonular dehiscence. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: Neither author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Comparison of lifestyle and practice patterns between male and female Canadian ophthalmologists.

OBJECTIVE: To identify sex differences in lifestyle and practice patterns of Canadian ophthalmologists. DESIGN: Web-based national survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the Canadian Ophthalmological Society. METHODS: A 48-item questionnaire was sent electronically. Analysis of results was completed using χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests where appropriate. RESULTS: Of 385 respondents (30%), 102 were female and 283 male. Several statistically significant differences exist in lifestyle and practice patterns. Fifty-one percent of females operate less than 2 days per month as compared with 36% of males (p = 0.01) despite similar clinical hours. No statistically significant differences were found in other practice pattern parameters including laser refractive surgery, hospital affiliation, university appointment/rank, and number of peer-review publications. Ninety percent of males and 81% of females report having ≥1 children, but males report greater number of children (p < 0.001). Females are commonly the primary caregiver, whereas males report their partner as primary caregiver (p < 0.001). Fifty-two percent of females are unhappy with the amount of parental leave (p < 0.001). Fifty-one percent of females believe that childbearing slowed or markedly slowed career progress, as compared with 15% of males (p < 0.001). Both female (83%) and male (87%) ophthalmologists report high career satisfaction (p = 0.43). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in practice patterns between males and females in our analysis surround surgical time, with no difference seen in other practice patterns or academic achievements. Differences in family patterns surround household and childrearing duties. Despite differences, both males and females report high satisfaction across several professional and personal parameters. Compared with previous studies, this suggests a change in practice patterns over time.

The Halifax Explosion of 1917: the oculist experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite its prominence in Canadian history, there are few publications about the Halifax Explosion of 1917 that deal with the care of victims with eye injuries. METHODS: Archived documents relating to the nature and treatment of eye injuries sustained during the Halifax Explosion were reviewed at the Public Archives of Nova Scotia and the Maritime Museum of the Atlantic. A review of current literature was performed. RESULTS: Detailed accounts regarding the personal and surgical experience of 2 ophthalmologists, G.H. Cox and F.T. Tooke, were found. Several unpublished government and personal documents on eye injuries sustained during the Halifax Explosion are filed at the Public Archives of Nova Scotia. Twelve ophthalmologists treated 592 people with eye injuries and performed 249 enucleations. Sixteen people had double enucleations. Most of the eye injuries were caused by shards of shattered glass. Sympathetic ophthalmia was the feared complication for penetrating eye injuries and a common indication for enucleation in 1917. A Blind Relief Fund was established to help treat, rehabilitate, and compensate the visually impaired. INTERPRETATION: Many of the eye injuries sustained during the Halifax Explosion were due to flying shards of glass. Details of their treatment provide insight into a unique and devastating event in Canadian medical history and demonstrate how eye injuries were managed in 1917.