RESUMO
Pediatric tumors of the central nervous system are the most common cause of cancer-related death in children. The five-year survival rate for high-grade gliomas in children is less than 20%. Due to their rarity, the diagnosis of these entities is often delayed, their treatment is mainly based on historic treatment concepts, and clinical trials require multi-institutional collaborations. The MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) Challenge is a landmark community benchmark event with a successful history of 12 years of resource creation for the segmentation and analysis of adult glioma. Here we present the CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge, which represents the first BraTS challenge focused on pediatric brain tumors with data acquired across multiple international consortia dedicated to pediatric neuro-oncology and clinical trials. The BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge focuses on benchmarking the development of volumentric segmentation algorithms for pediatric brain glioma through standardized quantitative performance evaluation metrics utilized across the BraTS 2023 cluster of challenges. Models gaining knowledge from the BraTS-PEDs multi-parametric structural MRI (mpMRI) training data will be evaluated on separate validation and unseen test mpMRI dataof high-grade pediatric glioma. The CBTN-CONNECT-DIPGR-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS-PEDs 2023 challenge brings together clinicians and AI/imaging scientists to lead to faster development of automated segmentation techniques that could benefit clinical trials, and ultimately the care of children with brain tumors.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: MRI methods that have reduced sensitivity to motion are attractive in pediatric applications. In spine imaging, physiologic motion such as respiration and cerebrospinal fluid pulsation can hamper diagnostic image quality. We compare a 3D T1-weighted non-Cartesian radial acquisition with a conventional Cartesian 2D turbo-spin-echo (TSE) acquisition in axial post-contrast spine imaging at 3T. METHODS: Thirty-two patients (mean age 12.2 ± 5.3 years) scheduled for routine clinical spine exams with contrast were enrolled. Three pediatric neuroradiologists compared the two sequences and assessed the presence of motion, the conspicuity of nerve roots, and whether one of the sequences was preferred in visualizing pathology using Likert scales. RESULTS: The Fleiss' kappa statistic for inter-rater agreement was 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.43) for the presence of motion, 0.30 (0.21-0.38) for conspicuity, and 0.37 (0.19-0.55) for sequence preference. Radial images were less sensitive to motion than TSE (p < 0.01). Motion and consequent artifacts were present in all TSE cases, while it was absent in 51% of the radial cases. In depicting nerve roots, radial images were superior in the cervical (p < 0.05), thoracic (p < 0.01), and lumbar spines (p < 0.01). Lastly, in 28 of the 32 patients who demonstrated contrast-enhancing pathology, radial images were preferred in 51% of the cases, while both sequences were equally preferred in 41% of the cases. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the potential utility of radial MRI in post-contrast spine imaging. The free-breathing method is robust in generating diagnostic image quality and is superior in visualizing nerve roots and extramedullary metastases than traditional Cartesian TSE acquisitions.