Local control of 1-5 fraction radiotherapy regimens for spinal metastases: an analysis of the impacts of biologically effective dose and primary histology.

BACKGROUND: This analysis evaluates the impacts of biologically effective dose (BED) and histology on local control (LC) of spinal metastases treated with highly conformal radiotherapy to moderately-escalated doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were treated at two institutions from 2010-2020. Treatments with less than 5 Gy per fraction or 8 Gy in 1 fraction were excluded. The dataset was divided into three RPA classes predictive of survival (1). The primary endpoint was LC. RESULTS: 223 patients with 248 treatments met inclusion criteria. Patients had a median Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS ) of 80, and common histologies included breast (29.4%), non-small cell lung cancer (15.7%), and prostate (13.3%). A median 24 Gy was delivered in 3 fractions (BED: 38.4 Gy) to a median planning target volume (PTV) of 37.3 cc. 2-year LC was 75.7%, and 2-year OS was 42.1%. Increased BED was predictive of improved LC for primary prostate cancer (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74-0.99). Patients with favorable survival (RPA class 1) had improved LC with BED ≥ 40 Gy (p = 0.05), unlike the intermediate and poor survival groups. No grade 3-5 toxicities were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Moderately-escalated treatments were efficacious and well-tolerated. BED ≥ 40 Gy may improve LC, particularly for prostate cancer and patients with favorable survival.

A comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to the sacral spine and treatment of the thoracolumbar spine.

Background: This study compares the outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for sacral and thoracolumbar spine metastases. Methods: This analysis considered each sacral spine SBRT treatment at a single institution and a cohort of consecutive thoracolumbar treatments. Results: 28 patients with 35 sacral treatments and 41 patients with 49 thoracolumbar treatments were included. Local control was 63% and 90%, respectively. The sacral cohort contained more lesions with ≥2 vertebrae and epidural and paraspinal involvement. Sacral patients had larger treatment volumes, increased rates of subsequent SBRT, decreased propensity for pain improvement, and decreased local control (p=0.02 on Kaplan-Meier analysis). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that PTV > 50 cc and epidural involvement were correlated with decreased local control. No cases had grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusion: SBRT for sacral spine metastases is a distinct disease process than metastases to the thoracolumbar spine, resulting in lower rates of local control and pain improvement.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases: a novel local control stratification by spinal region.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a large cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy for spinal metastases and investigated predictive factors for local control, local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival, and pain response between the different spinal regions. METHODS: The study was undertaken via retrospective review at a single institution. Patients with a tumor metastatic to the spine were included, while patients with benign tumors or primary spinal cord cancers were excluded. Statistical analysis involved univariate analysis, Cox proportional hazards analysis, the Kaplan-Meier method, and machine learning techniques (decision-tree analysis). RESULTS: A total of 165 patients with 190 distinct lesions met all inclusion criteria for the study. Lesions were distributed throughout the cervical (19%), thoracic (43%), lumbar (19%), and sacral (18%) spines. The most common treatment regimen was 24 Gy in 3 fractions (44%). Via the Kaplan-Meier method, the 24-month local control was 80%. Sacral spine lesions demonstrated decreased local control (p = 0.01) and LPFS (p < 0.005) compared with those of the thoracolumbar spine. The cervical spine cases had improved local control (p < 0.005) and LPFS (p < 0.005) compared with the sacral spine and trended toward improvement relative to the thoracolumbar spine. The 36-month local control rates for cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral tumors were 86%, 73%, and 44%, respectively. Comparably, the 36-month LPFS rates for cervical, thoracolumbar, and sacral tumors were 85%, 67%, and 35%, respectively. A planning target volume (PTV) > 50 cm3 was also predictive of local failure (p = 0.04). Fewer cervical spine cases had disease with PTV > 50 cm3 than the thoracolumbar (p = 5.87 × 10-8) and sacral (p = 3.9 × 10-3) cases. Using decision-tree analysis, the highest-fidelity models for predicting pain-free status and local failure demonstrated the first splits as being cervical and sacral location, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a novel risk stratification for local failure and LPFS by spinal region. Patients with metastases to the sacral spine may have decreased local control due to increased PTV, especially with a PTV of > 50 cm3. Multidisciplinary care should be emphasized in these patients, and both surgical intervention and radiotherapy should be strongly considered.

Stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of bulky spine metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has shown durable local control for the treatment of metastatic diseasespinal metastases. Multilevel disease or epidural or paraspinal involvement present challenges to achieving local control, and this study aims to analyze treatment outcomes for such lesions. METHODS: Patients treated at a single institution with SRS to the spine from 2010-2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria required clinical follow-up with either a pain assessment or imaging study. Bulky spine metastasis was defined as consisting of multilevel disease or epidural or paraspinal tumor involvement. RESULTS: 54 patients treated for 62 lesions met inclusion criteria. 42 treatments included at least two vertebrae, and 21 and 31 had paraspinal and epidural involvement, respectively. Treatment regimens had a median 24 Gy in 3 fractions to a volume of 37.75 cm3. Median follow-up was 14.36 months, with 5 instances (8%) of local failure. Median overall survival was 13.32 months. Pain improvement was achieved in 47 treatments (76%), and pain improved with treatment (p < 0.0001). Severe pain (HR = 3.08, p = 0.05), additional bone metastases (HR = 4.82, p = 0.05), and paraspinal involvement (HR = 3.93, p < 0.005) were predictive for worse overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that prior chemotherapy (p = 0.03) and additional bone metastases (p = 0.02) were predictive of worse overall survival. Grade < 3 toxicity was observed in 19 cases; no grade ≥ 3 side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: SRS can effectively treat bulky metastases to the spine, resulting in improvement of pain with minimal toxicity. Severe pain independently predicts for worse overall survival, indicating that treatment prior to worsening of pain is strongly recommended.