Anatomical determinants of occipitocervical fusion in skull base chordoma resection: a systematic review of the literature with illustrative cases.

OBJECTIVE: Skull base chordomas are rare, locally osseo-destructive lesions that present unique surgical challenges due to their involvement of critical neurovascular and bony structures at the craniovertebral junction (CVJ). Radical cytoreductive surgery improves survival but also carries significant morbidity, including the potential for occipitocervical (OC) destabilization requiring instrumented fusion. The published experience on OC fusion after CVJ chordoma resection is limited, and the anatomical predictors of OC instability in this context remain unclear. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were systematically searched according to the PRISMA guidelines for studies describing skull base chordoma resection and OC fusion. The search strategy was predefined in the authors' PROSPERO protocol (CRD42024496158). RESULTS: The systematic review identified 11 surgical case series describing 209 skull base chordoma patients and 116 (55.5%) who underwent OC instrumented fusion. Most patients underwent lateral approaches (n = 82) for chordoma resection, followed by midline (n = 48) and combined (n = 6) approaches. OC fusion was most often performed as a second-stage procedure (n = 53), followed by single-stage resection and fusion (n = 38). The degree of occipital condyle resection associated with OC fusion was described in 9 studies: total unilateral condylectomy reliably predicted OC fusion regardless of surgical approach. After lateral transcranial approaches, 4 studies cited at least 50%-70% unilateral condylectomy as necessitating OC fusion. After midline approaches-most frequently the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA)-at least 75% unilateral condylectomy (or 50% bilateral condylectomy) led to OC fusion. Additionally, resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements (the C1 anterior arch and tip of the dens), usually via EEA, reliably necessitated OC fusion. Two illustrative cases are subsequently presented, further exemplifying how the extent of CVJ bony elements removed via EEA to achieve complete chordoma resection predicts the need for OC fusion. CONCLUSIONS: Unilateral total condylectomy, 50% bilateral condylectomy, and resection of the medial atlantoaxial joint elements were the most frequently described independent predictors of OC fusion in skull base chordoma resection. Additionally, consistent with the occipital condyle harboring a significantly thicker joint capsule at its posterolateral aspect, an anterior midline approach seems to tolerate a greater degree of condylar resection (75%) than a lateral transcranial approach (50%-70%) prior to generating OC instability.

Intraoperative MRI: A Review of Applications Across Neurosurgical Specialties.

Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) made its debut to great fanfare in the mid-1990s. However, the enthusiasm for this technology with seemingly obvious benefits for neurosurgeons has waned. We review the benefits and utility of iMRI across the field of neurosurgery and present an overview of the evidence for iMRI for multiple neurosurgical disciplines: tumor, skull base, vascular, pediatric, functional, and spine. Publications on iMRI have steadily increased since 1996, plateauing with approximately 52 publications per year since 2011. Tumor surgery, especially glioma surgery, has the most evidence for the use of iMRI contributing more than 50% of all iMRI publications, with increased rates of gross total resection in both adults and children, providing a potential survival benefit. Across multiple neurosurgical disciplines, the ability to use a multitude of unique sequences (diffusion tract imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, magnetic resonance angiography, blood oxygenation level-dependent) allows for specialization of imaging for various types of surgery. Generally, iMRI allows for consideration of anatomic changes and real-time feedback on surgical outcomes such as extent of resection and instrument (screw, lead, electrode) placement. However, implementation of iMRI is limited by cost and feasibility, including the need for installation, shielding, and compatible tools. Evidence for iMRI use varies greatly by specialty, with the most evidence for tumor, vascular, and pediatric neurosurgery. The benefits of real-time anatomic imaging, a lack of radiation, and evaluation of surgical outcomes are limited by the cost and difficulty of iMRI integration. Nonetheless, the ability to ensure patients are provided by a maximal yet safe treatment that specifically accounts for their own anatomy and highlights why iMRI is a valuable and underutilized tool across multiple neurosurgical subspecialties.

Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial solitary fibrous tumors: systematic review and pooled quantitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial solitary fibrous tumors (SFTs), formerly hemangiopericytomas (HPCs), are rare, aggressive dural-based mesenchymal tumors. While adjuvant radiation therapy has been suggested to improve local tumor control (LTC), especially after subtotal resection, the role of postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and the optimal SRS dosing strategy remain poorly defined. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were systematically searched according to PRISMA guidelines for studies describing postoperative SRS for intracranial SFTs. The search strategy was defined in the authors' PROSPERO protocol (CRD42023454258). RESULTS: 15 studies were included describing 293 patients harboring 476 intracranial residual or recurrent SFTs treated with postoperative SRS. At a mean follow-up of 21-77 months, LTC rate after SRS was 46.4-93% with a mean margin SRS dose of 13.5-21.7 Gy, mean maximum dose of 27-39.6 Gy, and mean isodose at the 42.5-77% line. In pooled analysis of individual tumor outcomes, 18.7% of SFTs demonstrated a complete SRS response, 31.7% had a partial response, 18.9% remained stable (overall LTC rate of 69.3%), and 30.7% progressed. When studies were stratified by margin dose, a mean margin dose > 15 Gy showed an improvement in LTC rate (74.7% versus 65.7%). CONCLUSIONS: SRS is a safe and effective treatment for intracranial SFTs. In the setting of measurable disease, our pooled data suggests a potential dose response of improving LTC with increasing SRS margin dose. Our improved understanding of the aggressive biology of SFTs and the tolerated adjuvant SRS parameters supports potentially earlier use of SRS in the postoperative treatment paradigm for intracranial SFTs.

First use of radiation for the treatment of arteriovenous malformation.

In 1921, Norwegian neurosurgeon Vilhelm Magnus (1871-1929) described the first use of radiation for the treatment of an arteriovenous malformation (AVM) in his monograph, Bidrag til hjernechirurgiens klinik og resultater. Seeing as this monograph has never been widely translated nor digitized, the authors discuss the impact of Magnus' original work and the ethics surrounding its citation. The senior author of this paper gained access to and directly translated key sections of Magnus' publication. Without Norwegian language skills, reading and understanding Magnus' text would have been impossible. Magnus described the use of radiation therapy in a single patient found to have an AVM (or "angioma"). He states that she was "well" 8 years later. No other information on that treatment is given, but for good reason Magnus has been given credit in the literature for the first use of radiation of any kind to treat a person with AVM. Most papers that have referenced Magnus' monograph cite it even though it is probable that the authors did not see it, let alone read its contents. While it is appropriate that his innovation has been properly credited, the authors discuss the limits of citing publications sight unseen.