Elevated tumour marker: an indication for imaging?

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of imaging examinations in patients with elevated tumour markers when (a) the tumour marker is not validated for as a primary diagnostic test; (b) the patient had no personal history of cancer and (c) the patient had no other imaging indication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients without known cancer who had abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen, CA19-9, CA125 and/or CA15-3 serology over a one-year period were included. A retrospective medical record review was performed to assess the number of these cases who underwent imaging because of 'elevated tumour marker' in the absence of a clinical indication for imaging. The number and result of these imaging studies were evaluated. RESULTS: Eight hundred and nineteen patients were included. Of those, 25 patients (mean age: 67.8 [range 41-91] y), were imaged to evaluate: 'elevated tumour marker'. They underwent 29 imaging studies (mean [+/-standard deviation (SD)] per patient = 1.2 [+/-0.4]), and had 42 elevated tumour marker serology tests (mean [+/-SD] per patient = 1.7 [+/-0.7]). Four patients had >1 imaging test. No patient had an imaging study which diagnosed a malignancy or explained the elevated tumour marker. CONCLUSION: The non-judicious use of tumour markers can prompt further unnecessary investigations including imaging. In this study, there was no positive diagnostic yield for imaging performed for investigation of 'elevated tumour marker'. 'Elevated tumour marker', in the absence of a known underlying malignancy, should not be considered an independent indication for imaging.

Vitamin E modulation of C-reactive protein in smokers with acute coronary syndromes.

Acute coronary syndromes are characterized by the expression of proinflammatory cytokines such as C-reactive protein (CRP). Sustained upregulation of inflammatory markers is associated with an adverse prognosis. Vitamin E is known to have significant anti-inflammatory properties and has been associated with a reduction in cardiovascular events in some studies of high-risk patients. The mechanism of benefit remains controversial. We conducted a randomized, double-blind placebo controlled trial of vitamin E 400 IU daily for 6 months in 110 patients with acute coronary syndromes. Serum samples were collected at enrollment and at 2, 4, and 6 months. CRP, interleukin-6 and the soluble cell adhesion molecules were measured. Vitamin E levels increased significantly in the treatment group (from 31 micromol/l at baseline to 51 micromol/l, p <.0001) and were unchanged in the placebo group (32 micromol/l at baseline to 34 micromol/l, p = NS). CRP levels fell in both the vitamin E group and the placebo group over the treatment period (from 17.2 +/- 2.9 to 6.1 +/- 0.8 mg/l and from 21.5 +/- 4.9 to 5.9 +/- 0.9 mg/l, p = NS for the difference between active and placebo groups). However, vitamin E treatment was associated with significantly lower 6 month CRP levels in smokers versus smokers on placebo (4.7 +/- 0.71 mg/l vs. 8.26 +/- 1.5 mg/l, p =.02). Vitamin E reduces CRP levels in smokers with acute coronary syndromes for up to 6 months after hospitalization.