Gene-modified PA1-STK cells home to tumor sites in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant mesothelioma is an uncommon but lethal cancer of increasing incidence, particularly among patients with a history of exposure to asbestos. Although numerous treatments have been employed, including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, surgical resection, and combinations of the above, no satisfactory treatment yet exists, and affected patients will die of this disease, usually within 12 months. Gene-based therapies constitute a new approach that offers hope of improved control of these tumors while being associated with less morbidity than conventional chemotherapeutic or surgical regimens. We demonstrated that PA1-STK cells home in vivo to mesothelioma deposits, a phenomenon that is required for optimal exertion of this therapeutic concept. METHODS: Gene-modified ovarian cancer cells expressing the thymidine-kinase gene (PA1-STK) were radiolabeled with 99Tc and infused into the pleural space of 4 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, then scanned to determine distribution of the cells. RESULTS: PA1-STK cells recognized and adhered preferentially to mesothelioma lining the chest wall. CONCLUSIONS: Cell-based "suicide gene" therapy utilizing the "bystander effect" with the gene-modified ovarian cancer cell line PA1-STK is feasible in human pleural mesothelioma. We have shown that this trafficking and homing of the therapeutic cells to the intrapleural tumor sites, a requirement for success with this novel therapeutic concept, is also valid in humans.

High-dose indium 111In pentetreotide radiotherapy for metastatic atypical carcinoid tumor.

Indium In 111 pentetreotide imaging of neuroendocrine tumors that overexpress somatostatin receptors has become standard for localization of these tumors. This radioligand is internalized into the cell and can induce receptor-specific cytotoxicity by emission of Auger electrons. We hypothesized that high-dose 111In-pentetreotide could be therapeutic in patients with somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors. Our 35-year-old patient had atypical carcinoid tumor metastatic to cervical, supraclavicular, mediastinal, and mesenteric lymph nodes and to the liver and bone. Chemotherapy had stabilized the disease but with severe gastrointestinal side effects. After a diagnostic 111In-pentetreotide scan, the patient was given eight courses (180 mCi each) of 111In-pentetreotide therapy to selectively target somatostatin receptor-expressing tumor cells. The disease was stable for approximately 14 months. The patient had two additional courses of 111In-pentetreotide therapy (360 mCi each). She died of the disease approximately 18 months after initiation of 111In-pentetreotide therapy.

In situ radiotherapy with 111In-pentetreotide. State of the art and perspectives.

111In-pentetreotide (Octreoscan) and other radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are useful in the management of well differentiated neuroendocrine malignancies such as carcinoid or islet cell neoplasms. These radiopeptides bind to membrane bound somatostatin receptors (sst 1-5) which are over-expressed in a wide variety of neoplasms, especially those arising from the neuroectoderm. Imaging advances allow for the noninvasive determination of the presence of sst receptors by combining radioactivity [111Indium with a somatostatin analog, DTPA-D-phe1-octreotide (pentetreotide)]. Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs bind to membrane receptors and internalization of the complex occurs. Auger emitting somatostatin analogs offer a novel and significantly less toxic approach to controlling neoplastic diseases by delivering targeted radiation specifically to receptor bearing cells while sparing receptor negative cells. Responses of 62-69% in 85 patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors treated with high dose (6-19.6 GBq) 111In-pentetreotide, specifically targeting tumor somatostatin receptors, have been reported. Objective responses observed included biochemical and radiographic responses with prolonged survival. This article will discuss and review the multi-center data available to date, the mechanisms of action of radiolabeled somatostatin analogs, dosimetry, clinical response parameters, and toxicity.

Experiences with high dose radiopeptide therapy: the health physics perspective.

One of the new, promising areas of nuclear medicine involves radiolabeled low-molecular-weight peptides for the diagnosis and management of cancer. Somatostatin analogous peptides bind to membrane receptors on tumors with high specificity. These analogues, when radiolabeled with 123I, 131I, 99mTc, or (111)In, allow for external scintigraphic imaging or radioguided surgical resection of tumors. Somatostatin analogues with high tumor binding affinity have also been used for high-dose radiotherapy at the Medical Center of Louisiana since 1994. Although we had extensive prior experience with relatively high-dose 131I administration for thyroid ablation, our personnel protection, contamination control, and other safety techniques required significant modification to ensure effective contamination and radiation exposure control. As therapy with radiolabeled peptides becomes more widely utilized, the controls developed at our institution may be implemented by others to maintain exposures ALARA.

In situ radiotherapy with 111In-pentetreotide: initial observations and future directions.

PURPOSE: Somatostatin and its analogues, such as octreotide and lanreotide, are used to treat neuroendocrine malignancies. Somatostatin analogues bind to somatostatin receptors (sst 1-5), which are differentially expressed in a wide variety of neoplasms. Following ligand receptor binding, a fraction of these complexes internalize. Internalization of radiolabeled somatostatin analogues, especially those that emit Auger electrons, may allow treatment of somatostatin-receptor-positive tumors by delivering a radioactive isotope to the cancer cell in a targeted fashion. 111In-pentetreotide, an sst-2-preferring somatostatin analogue, has been used for scintigraphic evaluation and management of neuroendocrine cancer patients. We hypothesized that binding and internalization of 111In-pentetreotide, an Auger electron emitter, may induce receptor-specific cytotoxicity and could be a useful therapeutic agent in somatostatin-receptor-expressing malignancies. METHODS: To test this hypothesis, subjects who had failed conventional therapy and had somatostatin-receptor-positive malignancies, as determined by positive uptake on a 6.0 mCi 111In-pentetreotide scan, were treated with two monthly 180 mCi intravenous injections of 111In-pentetreotide. CT scans were obtained before therapy and within 30 days following the completion of the second 111In-pentetreotide dose. Toxicity was evaluated using standard criteria. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were studied from February 1997 to August 1997. Clinical benefit occurred in six of 10 gastroenteropancreatic tumor patients. Objective partial radiographic responses occurred in two of 14 patients, and significant tumor necrosis (defined by changes in Hounsfield units) developed in six of the 10 gastroenteropancreatic tumor patients. Possible treatment-related toxicity included two patients experiencing grade 3/4 myelosuppression, and two patients had no measurable toxicity. The most common toxicity was grade 1/2 hemoglobin (N = 6). CONCLUSION: One hundred eighty millicurie (180-mCi) doses of 111In-pentetreotide are well tolerated and are an effective therapy in some subjects with somatostatin receptor-expressing tumors. The maximal tolerated dose of 111In-pentetreotide and the optimal dosing schedules remain to be determined.

Diphosphonate intestinal activity seen on two bone images in neuroblastoma.

Neuroblastoma is well recognized as a cause of soft tissue uptake of Tc-99m MDP. Two cases of neuroblastoma arising in the midline from the celiac axis are reported. Bone imaging performed on two separate days showed not only typical soft tissue uptake, but also the appearance of the radiopharmaceutical in the bowel. At surgery, a midline upper abdominal neuroblastoma was found in both patients without evidence of involvement of the liver, kidneys, bowel, gallbladder or mesentery. It became apparent with delayed images in the second patient that this activity was in the bowel and moving around the abdomen in a typical large bowel pattern. Bowel activity was not seen in other patients having bone scans at this time. Follow-up bone imaging on the first patient after resection of the tumor did not demonstrate diphosphonate activity in the bowel. These authors have never seen or read of this finding previously in this condition, and report it in these two patients.