The "Latines Lideres En Salud (LaLiSa)" study: Rationale and design.

BACKGROUND: Latines suffer from breast cancer (BC), due to elevated biological and social determinants of health (SDOH) risks. This study compares the effects of different strategies on uptake of cancer genetic services, specifically hereditary cancer risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing, and risk-based BC care. DESIGN/METHODS: In Chicago, Illinois, Aim 1 participants are recruited from a federally qualified health center (FQHC) and community venues. For Aim 1, eligible participants: (1) are female; (2) are Latine; (3) are 30+ years old; (4) have personal or family history of BC or cancers with shared hereditary mutations; (5) have at least one SDOH risk; and (6) have not received any cancer genetic services. Participants are randomly assigned to different study arms. Both arms include phone-based sessions, FQHC-based navigation for SDOH, and low- or no-cost cancer genetic services. The educate sessions focus on risk assessment and prevention. The empower sessions focus on risk assessment and equip participants with the skills to share information about FQHC-based cancer genetic services. For Aim 2, eligible participants are: (1) female; (2) network members of Aim 1 participants; and (3) eligible for BC screening based on guidelines recommended by the American Cancer Society (ACS). Primary outcomes include uptake of any cancer genetic services. Analyses will also explore intervention differences by neighborhood context. DISCUSSION: This is one of the first trials focused on Latines' participation in cancer genetic services and risk-based BC care within the context of SDOH - which has major implications for equity in precision cancer prevention.

HPV Self-Sampling in the Workplace: A Qualitative Study of Benefits, Barriers, and Opportunities for Improvement Perceived by Health Professionals and Managers.

AIM: To inform the implementation of Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling (HPV-SS) in the workplace, we assessed the perspectives of healthcare professionals and managers on the benefits, barriers, and opportunities for improvement of a pilot program. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study based on in-depth telephone interviews was conducted between June and August 2023. Data were analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. Fifteen health professionals from different companies and fifteen managers from the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) were interviewed. RESULTS: Participants identified several benefits of the HPV-SS, including ease of use, privacy, convenience, affordability, reduced workplace absences, and promotion of a prevention culture. However, there were also individual and organizational barriers to program implementation. The former consisted of women's concerns about collecting a reliable sample or injuring themselves, lack of confidence in the HPV test, fear of positive results, and discomfort caused by the brush used to collect the sample. Organizational barriers included failure to follow up on positive test results, lack of knowledge of program indicators, perceived negative impact on the established Pap smear cervical cancer screening indicator, and the lack of government regulations supporting HPV testing. To improve the program, participants suggested disseminating information through mass media campaigns and social networks, providing companies with additional support from IMSS preventive staff, extending the work hours of IMSS Family Medicine clinics, and training IMSS health staff on the follow-up of women with HPV test results. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings suggest potential areas for improvement in HPV-SS programs.

The effect of mailed outreach on FIT completion among patients aged 45-50 in a safety net healthcare system.

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer screening is recommended starting at age 45, but there has been little research on strategies to promote screening in patients younger than 50. METHODS: An outreach program quasi-randomly assigned patients aged 45-50 without recent fecal immunochemical test (FIT), colonoscopy or contraindications to screening to two intervention arms: electronic outreach with email and text (electronic outreach only) versus electronic outreach plus mailed outreach with FIT, an instructional letter and a prepaid return envelope (mailed + electronic outreach). In response to known disparities in screening uptake, all Black patients were assigned to receive mailed + electronic outreach. RESULTS: Among patients quasi-randomly assigned to an intervention (non-Black patients), the 180-day FIT completion rate was 18.8% in the electronic outreach only group (n = 1,318) and 25.0% in the mailed + electronic outreach group (n = 1,364) (difference 6.2% [95% CI 3.0, 9.4]). FIT completion was 16.6% among Black patients (n = 469), 8.4% (95% CI 4.1, 12.6) lower than among non-Black patients also assigned to mailed + electronic outreach. CONCLUSION: Among patients aged 45-50, mailed + electronic outreach had a greater effect on FIT completion than electronic outreach alone. Crossover between intervention groups likely lead to an underestimation of the effect of mailed outreach.

The Cervical Cancer Treatment Gap in Mexico Under Seguro Popular, 2006-2016.

From 2005 to 2019, the Mexican government financed cervical cancer treatment for individuals without social security insurance through Seguro Popular's Fund for Protection against Catastrophic Health Expenses. To better understand the impact of this program on access to treatment, we estimated the cervical cancer treatment gap (the proportion of patients with cervical cancer in this population who did not receive treatment). To calculate the expected number of incident cervical cancer cases we used national surveys with information on insurance affiliation and incidence estimates from the Global Burden of Disease study. We used a national claims database to determine the number of cases whose treatment was financed by Seguro Popular. From 2006 to 2016, the national cervical cancer treatment gap changed from 0.61 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.62) to 0.45 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.48), with an average yearly reduction of -0.012 (95% CI -0.024 to -0.001). The gap was greater in states with higher levels of marginalization and in the youngest and oldest age groups. Although the cervical cancer treatment gap among individuals eligible for Seguro Popular decreased after the introduction of public financing for treatment, it remained high. Seguro Popular was eliminated in 2019; however, individuals without social security have continued to receive cancer care financed by the government in the same healthcare facilities. These results suggest that barriers to care persisted after the introduction of public financing for treatment. These barriers must be reduced to improve cervical cancer care in Mexico, particularly in states with high levels of marginalization.

Mammography prevalence in Mexico from 2001-2018: Results from the Mexican Health and Aging study.

After introducing guidelines for breast cancer screening in 2003, Mexico began to prioritize the implementation of mammography screening nationally. Since then, there have been no studies assessing changes in mammography in Mexico using the two-year prevalence interval that corresponds to national guidelines for screening frequency. The present study analyzes the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS), a national population-based panel study of adults aged 50 and older, to evaluate changes in 2-year mammography prevalence among women aged 50 to 69 across five survey waves from 2001 to 2018 (n = 11,773). We calculated unadjusted and adjusted mammography prevalence by survey year and health insurance type. Overall prevalence increased substantially from 2003 to 2012 and leveled off in the period from 2012 to 2018 (2001: 20.2 % [95 % CI 18.3, 22.1]; 2003: 22.7 % [20.4, 25.0]; 2012: 56.5 % [53.2, 59.7]; 2015: 62.0 % [58.8, 65.2]; 2018: 59.4 % [56.7,62.1]; unadjusted prevalence). Prevalence was higher among respondents with social security insurance, who are more likely to work in the formal economy, than among respondents without social security, who are more likely to work in the informal economy or be unemployed. The overall prevalence estimates observed were higher than previously published estimates of mammography prevalence in Mexico. More research is needed to confirm findings regarding two-year mammography prevalence in Mexico and to better understand the causes of observed disparities.

Neighborhood socioeconomic status and the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening outreach with mailed fecal immunochemical tests within a safety net healthcare system in San Francisco, CA: A subgroup analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Neighborhood context shapes opportunities and barriers for residents to access healthcare and cancer screening. Neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) is associated with disparities in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but the extent to which the effectiveness of specific screening interventions vary by nSES has not been studied. The original trial conducted in San Francisco, CA from 2016 to 2017 randomly assigned patients eligible for CRC screening either to a multicomponent intervention including advanced notification, mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits and reminders or to a control group receiving usual care. For the nSES analysis addresses for 9699 patients were geocoded and stratified by city-wide nSES quintile (Q1 lowest, Q5 highest) using an established index at the census tract level. Compared to usual care, the outreach intervention improved FIT test completion at one year (58.7% vs 38.4%; OR 2.32 [2.14, 2.52]) but its effectiveness did not vary substantially by nSES quintile (adjusted OR Q1 2.64 [2.30, 3.04]; Q2 2.43 [2.04, 2.90]; Q3 2.31 [1.84, 2.89]; Q4 2.47 [1.86, 3.28]; Q5 2.64 [1.83, 3.81]; Wald test for interaction p = 0.87). The implementation of mailed FIT outreach has the potential to increase CRC screening completion without leading to disparities in screening related to nSES (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02613260).

Estimating the Human Resource Costs of Developing and Implementing Shared Medical Appointments in Primary Care.

We used activity-based costing to estimate the human resource costs for developing and implementing a program to support shared medical appointments (SMAs) and an additional SMA on cancer survivorship. In-depth, key informant interviews were conducted to determine completed tasks, personnel involved, and time to complete tasks. Introducing new providers or a new type of SMA may require relatively modest incremental organizational resources and provider time (<8% of time and about 15% of the finances required to start the initial SMA). Time and cost could possibly be further decreased by leveraging relevant materials from existing SMAs.

Patient and provider characteristics associated with colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening among Asian Americans.

BACKGROUND: Routinely recommended screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers can significantly reduce mortality from these types of cancer, yet screening is underutilized among Asians. Surveys rely on self-report and often are underpowered for analysis by Asian ethnicities. Electronic health records (EHR) include validated (as opposed to recall-based) rates of cancer screening. In this article, we seek to better understand cancer screening patterns in a population of insured Asian Americans. METHODS: We calculated rates of compliance with cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among Asians from an EHR population and compared them with non-Hispanic whites. We performed multivariable modeling to evaluate potential predictors (at the provider- and patient-level) of screening completion among Asian patients. RESULTS: Aggregation of Asian subgroups masked heterogeneity in screening rates. Asian Indians and native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders had the lowest rates of screening in our sample, well below that of non-Hispanic whites. In multivariable analyses, screening completion was negatively associated with patient-physician language discordance for mammography [OR, 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.92] and colorectal cancer screening (OR, 0.79; CI, 0.72-0.87) and positively associated with patient-provider gender concordance for mammography (OR, 1.16; CI, 1.00-1.34) and cervical cancer screening (OR, 1.66; CI, 1.51-1.82). In addition, patient enrollment in online health services increased mammography (OR, 1.32; CI, 1.20-1.46) and cervical cancer screening (OR, 1.31; CI, 1.24-1.37). CONCLUSIONS: Language- and gender-concordant primary care providers and culturally tailored online health resources may help improve preventive cancer screening in Asian patient populations. IMPACT: This study demonstrates how the use of EHR data can inform investigations of primary prevention practices within the healthcare delivery setting.