Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.

BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action. METHODS: National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country. RESULTS: Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.

An artificial intelligence-assisted clinical framework to facilitate diagnostics and translational discovery in hematologic neoplasia.

BACKGROUND: The increasing volume and intricacy of sequencing data, along with other clinical and diagnostic data, like drug responses and measurable residual disease, creates challenges for efficient clinical comprehension and interpretation. Using paediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL) as a use case, we present an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted clinical framework clinALL that integrates genomic and clinical data into a user-friendly interface to support routine diagnostics and reveal translational insights for hematologic neoplasia. METHODS: We performed targeted RNA sequencing in 1365 cases with haematological neoplasms, primarily paediatric B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (BCP-ALL) from the AIEOP-BFM ALL study. We carried out fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), karyotyping and arrayCGH as part of the routine diagnostics. The analysis results of these assays as well as additional clinical information were integrated into an interactive web interface using Bokeh, where the main graph is based on Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP) analysis of the gene expression data. At the backend of the clinALL, we built both shallow machine learning models and a deep neural network using Scikit-learn and PyTorch respectively. FINDINGS: By applying clinALL, 78% of undetermined patients under the current diagnostic protocol were stratified, and ambiguous cases were investigated. Translational insights were discovered, including IKZF1plus status dependent subpopulations of BCR::ABL1 positive patients, and a subpopulation within ETV6::RUNX1 positive patients that has a high relapse frequency. Our best machine learning models, LDA and PASNET-like neural network models, achieve F1 scores above 97% in predicting patients' subgroups. INTERPRETATION: An AI-assisted clinical framework that integrates both genomic and clinical data can take full advantage of the available data, improve point-of-care decision-making and reveal clinically relevant insights promptly. Such a lightweight and easily transferable framework works for both whole transcriptome data as well as the cost-effective targeted RNA-seq, enabling efficient and equitable delivery of personalized medicine in small clinics in developing countries. FUNDING: German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), German Research Foundation (DFG) and Foundation for Polish Science.

Mechanisms of Music Impact: Autonomic Tone and the Physical Activity Roadmap to Advancing Understanding and Evidence-Based Policy.

Research demonstrates that both music-making and music listening have an ability to modulate autonomic nervous system activity. The majority of studies have highlighted acute autonomic changes occurring during or immediately following a single session of music engagement. Several studies also suggest that repeated music-making and listening may have longer-term effects on autonomic tone-the prevailing balance of sympathetic vs. parasympathetic activity. Autonomic imbalance is associated with a range of neurodegenerative and neurodevelopmental disorders, mental health conditions and non-communicable diseases. Established behavioral interventions capable of restoring healthy autonomic tone (e.g., physical activity; smoking cessation) have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in broadly promoting health and preventing disease and up to 7.2 million annual deaths. Accordingly, this article proposes that music's suggested ability to modulate autonomic tone may be a key central mechanism underpinning the broad health benefits of music-making and listening reported in several recent reviews. Further, this article highlights how physical activity research provides a relevant roadmap to efficiently advancing understanding of music's effects on both autonomic tone and health more broadly, as well as translating this understanding into evidence-based policy and prescriptions. In particular, adapting FITT-Frequency, Intensity, Timing, Type-criteria to evaluate and prescribe music-making and listening in observational and intervention studies has excellent prospective utility.

Optimizing Clinical Screening for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

CONTEXT: Efficient and accurate clinical screening for treatment-related toxicities is a critical component of optimal patient management. A number of alternate screening tools for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) have been proposed in response to demonstrated limitations with standard clinical screening, although their relative diagnostic value is unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relative construct validity and discriminant properties of available CIPN screening tools. METHODS: Patients treated with known potentially neurotoxic therapies underwent CIPN evaluation at one or multiple timepoints (N = 316 patients; age = 56 ± 13 years). At each testing session (N = 644 testing sessions), patients were evaluated using screening tools and comprehensive CIPN assessments. Comprehensive assessments were clinician-rated (Total Neuropathy Score, reduced) or patient-reported outcome (PRO; Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gynecologic Oncology Group/Neurotoxicity questionnaire). Similarly, screening tools were clinician-rated (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [NCI-CTCAE]) or PRO (Patient Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, PRO-CTCAE). RESULTS: Analyses revealed moderate-to-high correlations between screening tools and comprehensive assessments (0.55 ≤ rho ≤ 0.75; P < 0.001) and similar discriminant properties across screening tools (P > 0.01). Screening tool grading corresponding to clinically significant (grade 2/3) vs. low-grade (grade 0/1) CIPN would correspond to greater ratings of CIPN severity by more comprehensive assessments in a predicted 77%-91% of cases (c-statistic = 0.77-0.91; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PRO screening tools provide adequate CIPN screening while avoiding potential biases demonstrated to limit currently used clinician-rated screening tools. Addition of a brief objective test did not add value to PRO screening. Up to 23% of patients would be misidentified through screening, providing quantitative evidence of the limitations of available screening tools. More extensive CIPN evaluations are critical in patients at risk of serious neurotoxicity.

Balance Deficits and Functional Disability in Cancer Survivors Exposed to Neurotoxic Cancer Treatments.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) persists after treatment in up to 40% of cancer survivors and has been linked with increased balance deficits, disabilities, and fall occurrences. This study aimed to comprehensively assess the links between CIPN, balance deficits, and functional disability and to inform the development of clinical screening tools for patients at risk of these events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 190 cancer survivors exposed to neurotoxic chemotherapies (age, 57 ± 13 years; average time from completion of neurotoxic therapy, 12 ± 11 months) attended a neurology research clinic for a single cross-sectional assessment of patient-reported and objective CIPN, standing balance in 4 conditions of increasing difficulty, and functional disability. RESULTS: Most patients (68%) reported CIPN symptoms at assessment. Symptomatic patients displayed increased functional disability (F=39.4; P<.001) and balance deficits (F=34.5; P<.001), with degree of balance impairments consistent with a healthy elderly population (age ≥65 years) reporting multiple falls over the subsequent year. Increasing CIPN severity correlated with increasing functional disability (clinically assessed R2=0.46; patient-reported R2=0.49; P<.001) and balance deficits (clinically assessed R2=0.41; patient-reported R2=0.30; P<.001). A 5-factor model of key independent correlates-patient-reported numbness/tingling, weakness, and balance deficit; age; and vibration perception-was strongly linked to balance deficits (R2=0.46; P<.001) and functional disability (R2=0.56; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms links between increasing CIPN severity and increasing balance deficits and functional disability using comprehensive CIPN assessment methodology. The extent of balance deficits in patients with CIPN underscores the functional consequences of neurotoxicity. A 5-factor model provides a foundation for clinical screening tools to assess balance deficits and functional disability in patients exposed to neurotoxic chemotherapies.

Mobility in survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy and utility of the 6-min walk test.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a significant and often lasting side effect of cancer treatment, with increasing CIPN severity associated with increasing deficits in balance, gait, and mobility. The 6-min walk test (6MWT) is a widely validated and utilized measure of general physical functioning and mobility, although its utility in a CIPN context is unclear. This study aimed to determine the utility of the 6MWT as an assessment of mobility deficits in a CIPN cohort and utilize the 6MWT to compare mobility data from CIPN patients to those of healthy and clinical populations. METHODS: Cancer survivors exposed to neurotoxic chemotherapies (N = 100; mean 17 ± 13 months post-treatment; mean age 59 ± 13 years) completed a single cross-sectional assessment of patient-reported and objective CIPN, mobility (6MWT), and disability. RESULTS: CIPN symptoms were reported in the majority of the cohort (87%). Increasing age, patient-reported and objective CIPN symptoms, and disability were associated with decreasing 6MWT distance (.48 ≤ R ≤ .63; p < .001) in bivariate models. Multiple regression models of 6MWT distance included age, sex, and patient-reported or objective CIPN severity as significant independent correlates (.62 ≤ R ≤ .64; p < .03). 6MWT distances in patients with CIPN symptom severity above the cohort mean were consistent with mean values reported in diabetic neuropathy and clinical populations. CONCLUSIONS: Increased CIPN symptoms are associated with increased mobility deficits. The 6MWT demonstrates promising utility as a mobility assessment in a CIPN cohort. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: The impact of the progression of CIPN on mobility deficits in survivors emphasizes the need for effective interventions to treat and prevent CIPN.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy-patient-reported outcomes compared with NCI-CTCAE grade.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) are becoming increasingly recognised as essential to comprehensively collect chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptom information. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study aimed to evaluate the utility and feasibility of CIPN PRO assessment tools in a real-world clinical setting through investigation of the correlation of PRO with NCI-CTCAE assessments particularly in relation to cumulative dose of chemotherapy. Patients receiving oxaliplatin or paclitaxel chemotherapy in Sydney, Australia, completed a questionnaire containing standardised CIPN PRO assessments (EORTC CIPN-20, PRO-CTCAE) via tablet device. PRO assessment scores were correlated with NCI-CTCAE grade determined by nursing assessment and analysed with respect to cumulative dose of chemotherapy. RESULTS: There were 87 patients who completed a total of 145 questionnaires, 68 in patients receiving oxaliplatin and 77 in patients receiving paclitaxel. CIPN PRO scores were associated with NCI-CTCAE grade, for EORTC CIPN-20 (r2 = 0.19, p < 0.01) and PRO-CTCAE (r2 = 0.41, p < 0.01), although individual patient correlation was poor. PRO assessments, however, identified higher grade symptoms, in particular symptoms causing functional impairment, at lower doses of cumulative chemotherapy compared to NCI-CTCAE. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that CIPN PRO may provide complementary information to nursing assessed NCI-CTCAE grade, particularly in earlier stages of chemotherapy and can be considered an important component in the comprehensive assessment of neuropathy.

Exercise-based rehabilitation for cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) affects up to 40% of cancer survivors and is associated with functional deficits and an increased falls incidence. There are presently no strongly recommended treatment strategies for CIPN. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multimodal exercise intervention on CIPN symptoms and related functional deficits, as well as neurophysiologic parameters. METHODS: All outcomes were assessed before and after an 8-week exercise intervention (3-weekly sessions) and preceding 8-week control period at baseline, pre-exercise and post-exercise. Outcome measures were objective and patient-reported CIPN, standing and dynamic balance, mobility, quality of life, and sensory and motor nerve excitability and conduction studies. RESULTS: Twenty-nine cancer survivors (8 male, 21 female; mean age 61.6 ± 11.8 years) with CIPN symptoms affecting function completed all assessments. Objective and patient-reported CIPN, dynamic balance, standing balance in eyes open conditions, mobility and quality of life were improved from pre- to post-exercise (4.0 < F < 10.2; p < .05), with no changes over the control period (p > .21). No changes were observed in sensory or motor neurophysiologic parameters (p > .23). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides encouraging evidence of the rehabilitative potential of multimodal exercise for persisting CIPN in a post-treatment cohort. Large randomised controlled trials are justified to confirm observed benefits and determine the mechanisms and clinical significance.

Optimal clinical assessment strategies for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): a systematic review and Delphi survey.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a prominent side effect of the treatment of cancer. Despite this frequent complication, there has been no comprehensive review and quality appraisal of CIPN assessments. The purpose of this study is to provide a definitive quality appraisal of CIPN assessment strategies for clinical use. METHODS: Relevant studies were identified through database searches of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane. CIPN assessment strategies from included articles were extracted and initially rated by an oncologist and neurophysiologist according to criteria related to assessment depth, comprehensiveness, appropriateness, and reliability. The six highest scoring assessment strategies were the focus of a two-round Delphi survey of a working party of 32 physicians, nurses, and consumers to achieve consensus on the highest rated assessments for each criterion. RESULTS: The database search yielded 117 distinct CIPN assessments that were extracted from 2373 articles. Three patient-reported outcome surveys and three clinician-based assessments were included in the Delphi survey. No consensus was generated regarding the best overall CIPN assessment, although good (≥70%) consensus was achieved regarding the best assessment within each criterion. The Participant Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (PNQ) was rated the highest overall and patient-reported outcome (PRO) assessment, while the Total Neuropathy Score clinical version (TNSc) was the highest rated clinician-based assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A diverse range of CIPN assessments currently exists. While several assessments assess CIPN symptoms with adequate comprehensiveness, depth, language, and feasibility, the consensus 'gold standard' clinical assessment remains to be established.