Anthropometric Renal Anatomic Alterations Between Supine and Prone Positions in Percutaneous Renal Ablation for Renal Cortical Neoplasms.

OBJECTIVES: To establish patterns of anatomic changes relevant to the kidney and colon during positional change between the supine and prone positions as noted on CT scans performed during percutaneous cryoablation for renal cortical neoplasms (RCN). METHODS: Nineteen patients undergoing percutaneous cryoablation for RCN with abdominal CT scan in both the supine and prone positions were included in the study. We documented the anterior/posterior, medial/lateral, and cranial/caudal anatomic changes of the kidney, kidney rotation, and the proportion of the kidney whose access was limited by the liver, spleen, and lung. We also calculated the length of the percutaneous access tract and the distance between the colon and kidney in hilar position as well as the anterior/posterior location of the colon relative to the kidney. RESULTS: In the prone position, the kidney lies significantly more anteriorly on both sides: 4.7 cm vs 4.3 cm (L) and 4.4 cm vs 4.1 cm (R) (p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). On prone CT images, both kidneys are more cranial when compared with the supine position: 80.4 mm vs 60.8 mm (L) and 87.2 mm vs 57.4 mm (R) (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). The skin to tumor distance is significantly shorter in the prone position (p < 0.0001 [L], p = 0.005 [R]). The colon lies closer to the hilum of the kidney and is more posteriorly located in the prone position: 1.21 cm vs 1.04 cm (L) and 0.80 cm vs 0.70 cm (R) (p = 0.005 and p = 0.005, respectively). In the prone position, the lung covers a significantly larger proportion of the right kidney (27.3 mm vs 6.05 mm, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: We documented clinically significant anatomic alterations between supine and prone CT imaging. The changes associated with the prone position modify percutaneous access, particularly for right upper pole tumors. Prone imaging before surgery may be helpful in selected cases.

Development of a novel iPad-based laparoscopic trainer and comparison with a standard laparoscopic trainer for basic laparoscopic skills testing.

INTRODUCTION: We developed the iTrainer (iT) as a portable laparoscopic trainer, which incorporates the iPad tablet. We then compared the iT with a standard pelvic trainer (SPT) to assess surgical skills as well as its image quality, resolution, brightness, comfort, and overall performance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We designed and constructed the iT to be compatible with the Apple iPad 3 and standard laparoscopic instruments. Participants were assigned to perform the thread-the-loops task on both trainers and were prospectively randomized to start on either the iT or the SPT. Each participant was allowed a 2-minute warm-up before the 2-minute testing period. We scored participants using the product of skill quality (0-4 scale) and quantity of loops threaded (0-10 scale). Participants then rated each trainer on image quality, resolution, brightness, comfort, and overall performance on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: A total of 45 subjects including 10 undergraduates, 10 medical students, 10 general surgery and urology residents, and 15 experts (fellows and attending surgeons) participated in this study. There was no significant difference between thread-the-loops task scores completed on the iT when compared with the SPT for all groups tested (p > 0.05) with the exception of the medical student group, who performed better on the SPT (p < 0.05). On evaluation of each trainer, participants rated the iT as having superior image quality and resolution when compared with the SPT (p < 0.05) but rated the SPT higher in overall performance (p < 0.05). Brightness and comfort were rated similarly for both trainers. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated face validity and criterion validity for the thread-the-loops task on the iT. The iT rated superior in image quality and resolution but inferior in overall performance compared with the SPT. The iT provides trainees a unique advantage over SPT as an additional resource to laparoscopic training as it is inexpensive, portable, and can be readily available for training.

Evaluation of the impact of three-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance.

INTRODUCTION: Recent technological advancements have led to the introduction of new three-dimensional (3D) cameras in laparoscopic surgery. The 3D view has been touted as useful during robotic surgery, however, there has been limited investigation into the utility of 3D in laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized crossover trial comparing a 0° 3D camera with a conventional 0° two-dimensional (2D) camera using a high definition monitor (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany). All participants completed six standardized basic skills tasks. Quality testing scores were measured by the number of drops, grasping attempts, and precision of needle entry and exiting. Additionally, resolution, color distribution, depth of field and distortion were measured using optical test targets. RESULTS: In this pilot study, we evaluated 10 medical students, 7 residents, and 7 expert surgeons. There was a significant difference in the performance in all the six skill tasks, for the three levels of surgical expertise and training levels in 2D vs 3D except for the cut the line quality score and the peg transfer quality score. Adjusting for the training level, 3D camera image results were superior for the number of rings left (p=0.041), ring transfer quality score (p=0.046), thread the rings (no. of rings) (p=0.0004), and thread the rings quality score (p=0.0002). The 3D camera image was also superior for knot tying (quality score) (p=0.004), peg transfer (time in seconds) (p=0.047), peg transfer pegs left (p=0.012), and for peg transfer quality score (p=0.001). The 3D camera system showed significantly less distortion (p=0.0008), a higher depth of field (p=0.0004) compared with the 2D camera system. CONCLUSION: 3D laparoscopic camera equipment results in a significant improvement in depth perception, spatial location, and precision of surgical performance compared with the conventional 2D camera equipment. With this improved quality of vision, even expert laparoscopic surgeons may benefit from 3D imaging.

High-fidelity simulation-based team training in urology: evaluation of technical and nontechnical skills of urology residents during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The use of low-risk simulation training for resident education is rapidly expanding as teaching centers integrate simulation-based team training (SBTT) sessions into their education curriculum. SBTT is a valuable tool in technical and communication skills training and assessment for residents. We created a unique SBTT scenario for urology residents involving a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents were randomly paired with a certified registered nurse anesthetists or an anesthesia resident. The scenario incorporated a laparoscopic right partial nephrectomy utilizing a unique polyvinyl alcohol kidney model with an embedded 3cm lower pole exophytic tumor and the high-fidelity SimMan3G mannequin. The Urology residents were instructed to pay particular attention to the patient's identifying information provided at the beginning of the case. Two scripted events occurred, the patient had an anaphylactic reaction to a drug and, after tumor specimen was sent for a frozen section, the confederate pathologist called into the operating room (OR) twice, first with the wrong patient name and subsequently with the wrong specimen. After the scenario was complete, technical performance and nontechnical performance were evaluated and assessed. A debriefing session followed the scenario to discuss and assess technical performance and interdisciplinary nontechnical communication between the team. RESULTS: All Urology residents (n = 9) rated the SBTT scenario as a useful tool in developing communication skills among the OR team and 88% rated the model as useful for technical skills training. Despite cuing to note patient identification, only 3 of 9 (33%) participants identified that the wrong patient information was presented when the confederate "pathologist" called in to report pathology results. CONCLUSION: All urology residents rated SBTT sessions as useful for the development of communication skills between different team members and making residents aware of unlikely but potential critical errors in the OR. We will continue to use SBTT as a useful method to develop resident technical and nontechnical skills outside of the high-risk operating environment.

Evaluation of potential distractors in the urology operating room.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgical outcomes depend on patient and disease-related factors, as well as the technical skill of the surgeon. Various distractions in the operating room (OR) environment have been shown to negatively impact a surgeon's performance. A survey was conducted with the objective to evaluate and characterize distractions during urologic surgery. METHODS: An Internet-based survey was distributed to 2057 international urologists via email between April and October 2011; questions focused on a variety of disruptive factors postulated to have a negative impact on surgical performance. RESULTS: Of the 523 (25%) respondents, 58% practiced in North America, 42% were from an academic institution, and 68% had completed a clinical fellowship. In an average year, 83% reported having operated at least once while sleep deprived, 84% when significantly ill, 55% with a musculoskeletal injury, and 65% under significant social stress. Up to 38% reported that on at least one occasion, such "internal distractions" had significantly affected surgical performance and 14% perceived that at least one surgical complication was caused mainly by an internal distraction. Less than 50% had ever cancelled surgery because of an internal distraction. Music was routinely played in the OR by 57% of respondents, >67% reported answering pages and discussing consults while operating, and 25% reported "commonly" working with scrub nurses/techs that were unfamiliar with the procedure and/or instruments. Only 44% had consistent individual(s) assisting, and 27% reported that the scrub nurse/tech would "commonly" scrub out during a critical portion of the procedure. Overall, 14.5% reported that at least one complication had occurred mainly because of such "external" or "interactive" distractions. CONCLUSIONS: Urologists face various distractions in the OR that can negatively impact surgical performance, potentially compromising patient outcomes and safety. Further studies are needed to elucidate the true impact of such distractions and to develop strategies to mitigate their effects.

Robotic surgical simulation.

Robotic surgery has undergone exponential growth and has ever developing utilization. The explosion of new technologies and regulation have led to challenges in training surgeons who desire this skill set. We review the current state of robotic simulation and incorporation of simulation into surgical training curricula. In addition to the literature review, results of a questionnaire survey study of 21 expert and novice surgeons attending a Urologic Robotic Oncology conference using 3 different robotic skill simulation devices are discussed. An increasing number of robotic surgery simulators have had some degree of validation study of their use in surgical education curricula and proficiency testing. Although simulators are advantageous, confirmation of construct and predictive validity of robotic simulators and their reliability as a training tool will be necessary before they are integrated into the surgical credentialing process.

Validation, correlation, and comparison of the da Vinci trainer(™) and the daVinci surgical skills simulator(™) using the Mimic(™) software for urologic robotic surgical education.

PURPOSE: Virtual reality simulators with self-assessment software may assist novice robotic surgeons to augment direct proctoring in robotic surgical skill acquisition. We compare and correlate the da Vinci Trainer™ (dVT) and da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulators (dVSSS) in subjects with varying robotic experience. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Students, urology residents, fellows, and practicing urologists with varying robotic experience were enrolled after local institutional review board approval. Three virtual reality tasks were preformed in sequential order (pegboard 1, pegboard 2, and tubes)-initially on the dVSSS and then on the dVT. The Mimic™ software used on both systems provides raw values and percent scores that were used in statistical evaluation. Statistical analysis was performed with the two-tailed independent t-test, analysis of variance, Tukey, and the Pearson rank correlation coefficient where appropriate. RESULTS: Thirty-two participants were recruited for this study and separated into five groups based on robotic surgery experience. In regards to construct validity, both simulators were able to differentiate differences among the five robotic surgery experience groups in the tubes suturing task (p≤0.00). Sixty-seven percent (4/6) robotic experts thought that surgical simulation should be implemented in residency training. The overall cohort considered both platforms easy to learn and use. CONCLUSIONS: Although performance scores were less in the dVT compared with the dVSSS, both simulators demonstrate good content and construct validity. The simulators appear to be equivalent for assessing surgeon proficiency and either can be used for robotic skills training with self-assessment feedback.

Positive correlation between motion analysis data on the LapMentor virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator and the results from videotape assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries.

PURPOSE: We studied the construct validity of the LapMentor, a virtual reality laparoscopic surgical simulator, and the correlation between the data collected on the LapMentor and the results of video assessment of real laparoscopic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-two urologists were tested on basic skill tasks No. 3 (SK3) to No. 8 (SK8) on the LapMentor. They were divided into three groups: Group A (n=25) had no experience with laparoscopic surgeries as a chief surgeon; group B (n=33) had <35 experiences; and group C (n=34) had ≥35 experiences. Group scores on the accuracy, efficacy, and time of the tasks were compared. Forty physicians with ≥20 experiences supplied unedited videotapes showing a laparoscopic nephrectomy or an adrenalectomy in its entirety, and the videos were assessed in a blinded fashion by expert referees. Correlations between the videotape score (VS) and the performances on the LapMentor were analyzed. RESULTS: Group C showed significantly better outcomes than group A in the accuracy (SK5) (P=0.013), efficacy (SK8) (P=0.014), or speed (SKs 3 and 8) (P=0.009 and P=0.002, respectively) of the performances of LapMentor. Group B showed significantly better outcomes than group A in the speed and efficacy of the performances in SK8 (P=0.011 and P=0.029, respectively). Analyses of motion analysis data of LapMentor demonstrated that smooth and ideal movement of instruments is more important than speed of the movement of instruments to achieve accurate performances in each task. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the average score of the accuracy in SK4, 5, and 8 had significant positive correlation with VS (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the construct and predictive validity of the LapMentor basic skill tasks, supporting their possible usefulness for the preclinical evaluation of laparoscopic skills.

Medical students pursuing surgical fields have no greater innate motor dexterity than those pursuing nonsurgical fields.

INTRODUCTION: Medical students pursue different career paths based on a variety of factors. We sought to examine the impact of innate manual dexterity, both perceived and objective, on the career interests of medical students. METHODS: Third-year medical students from the University of California, Irvine were recruited for this study. Subjects completed a pretest questionnaire followed by assessment of gross and fine motor dexterity using the Purdue Pegboard test. A total of 6 independent trials were performed, 3 for each hand. The scores were recorded as an integer value between 0 and 25. A statistical analysis was performed using student t tests, the Fischer exact test, or the χ(2) test, where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 100 students completed the questionnaire while 58 completed the dexterity testing. Students interested in a surgical field (SF) were similar in handedness, gender, video game exposure, and learning style as those interested in a nonsurgical field (NSF). In the SF group, "personal skill set" was reported as the most common factor influencing career selection, and "interest in disease process/patient population" was reported most commonly by NSF students (p = 0.015). Although a perceived innate manual dexterity was higher among SF students compared with NSF students (p = 0.032), no significant objective differences were found in right hand, left hand, or combined dexterity scores. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived "personal skill set" may influence strongly a medical student's career choice. Despite greater perceived manual dexterity, students interested in an SF do not have greater objective innate manual dexterity than those interested in an NSF.

High fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management.

PURPOSE: Simulation based team training provides an opportunity to develop interdisciplinary communication skills and address potential medical errors in a high fidelity, low stakes environment. We evaluated the implementation of a novel simulation based team training scenario and assessed the technical and nontechnical performance of urology and anesthesiology residents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Urology residents were randomly paired with anesthesiology residents to participate in a simulation based team training scenario involving the management of 2 scripted critical events during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, including the vasovagal response to pneumoperitoneum and renal vein injury during hilar dissection. A novel kidney surgical model and a high fidelity mannequin simulator were used for the simulation. A debriefing session followed each simulation based team training scenario. Assessments of technical and nontechnical performance were made using task specific checklists and global rating scales. RESULTS: A total of 16 residents participated, of whom 94% rated the simulation based team training scenario as useful for communication skill training. Also, 88% of urology residents believed that the kidney surgical model was useful for technical skill training. Urology resident training level correlated with technical performance (p=0.004) and blood loss during renal vein injury management (p=0.022) but not with nontechnical performance. Anesthesia resident training level correlated with nontechnical performance (p=0.036). Urology residents consistently rated themselves higher on nontechnical performance than did faculty (p=0.033). Anesthesia residents did not differ in the self-assessment of nontechnical performance compared to faculty assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Residents rated the simulation based team training scenario as useful for interdisciplinary communication skill training. Urology resident training level correlated with technical performance but not with nontechnical performance. Urology residents consistently overestimated their nontechnical performance.

A phantom model as a teaching modality for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a materials model for laparoscopic ultrasound identification and partial nephrectomy of kidney tumors. METHODS: Five urology fellows performed laparoscopic ultrasonography (LUS) examination of the tumor model, and the time for identification was recorded. After identifying the tumor, they performed a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using the target tumor with measurement of operative parameters. They completed a questionnaire and rated the quality of the renal tumor model on a 5-point Likert scale. RESULTS: The participants were able to identify 49 tumors by LUS (98%). The mean time to identify the renal tumors by LUS was 1.12 minutes ± 0.93 standard deviation (SD). A partial nephrectomy was successfully completed on 49 tumor models (98%). The mean resection time was 7.69 minutes ± 3.8 SD. All of the participants considered that this model was helpful in the practice of LPN. The fellows would recommend this model as a teaching tool for residents/fellows to perform tumor imaging by LUS and for practicing LPN in a simulated environment. CONCLUSION: We have developed a unique model that simulates small kidney tumors that can be used for training surgeons in the clinical skills of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Laparoscopic warm-up exercises improve performance of senior-level trainees during laparoscopic renal surgery.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgery is a high-stakes "performance." Yet, unlike athletes or musicians, surgeons do not engage in routine "warm-up" exercises before "performing" in the operating room. We study the impact of a preoperative warm-up exercise routine (POWER) on surgeon performance during laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serving as their own controls, each subject performed two pairs of laparoscopic cases, each pair consisting of one case with POWER (+POWER) and one without (-POWER). Subjects were randomly assigned to +POWER or -POWER for the initial case of each pairing, and all cases were performed ≥ 1 week apart. POWER consisted of completing an electrocautery skill task on a virtual reality simulator and 15 minutes of laparoscopic suturing and knot tying in a pelvic box trainer. For each case, cognitive, psychomotor, and technical performance data were collected during two different tasks: mobilization of the colon (MC) and intracorporeal suturing and knot tying (iSKT). Statistical analysis was performed using SYSTAT v11.0. RESULTS: A total of 28 study cases (14+POWER, 14-POWER) were performed by seven different subjects. Cognitive and psychomotor performance (attention, distraction, workload, spatial reasoning, movement smoothness, posture stability) were found to be significantly better in the +POWER group (P ≤ 0.05) and technical performance, as scored by two blinded laparoscopic experts, was found to be better in the +POWER group for MC (P=0.04) but not iSKT (P=0.92). Technical scores demonstrated excellent reliability using our assessment tool (Cronbach ∝=0.88). Subject performance during POWER was also found to correlate with intraoperative performance scores. CONCLUSIONS: Urologic trainees who perform a POWER approximately 1 hour before laparoscopic renal surgery demonstrate improved cognitive, psychomotor, and technical performance.

Simulating laparoscopic renal hilar vessel injuries: preliminary evaluation of a novel surgical training model for residents.

INTRODUCTION: Many surgical training programs utilize simulation-based strategies for instruction and assessment of laparoscopic skills. While the use of inanimate, animate, and virtual-reality simulation for basic or procedural skills training has been well described, the use of simulation for the purpose of training surgeons in managing intraoperative laparoscopic complications has been given less attention. We describe a novel, affordable inanimate surgical model for use in simulation-based training of laparoscopic renal hilar vessel injury management. METHODS: Using a laparoscopic box trainer, a half-inch Penrose drain, standard silicone intravenous tubing, and a commercially available kidney part-task trainer, an inanimate surgical training model was developed to simulate various clinical scenarios involving renal hilar vessel injuries. To evaluate the construct validity of this training model, urology residents from the University of California, Irvine, completed a simulated scenario involving a renal vein injury (RVI) during laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). RESULTS: This surgical model is able to simulate both renal arterial and venous injuries during laparoscopic radical and partial nephrectomy scenarios. Initial cost to construct the model was ~800 U.S. dollars (USD) and each subsequent use was an additional 7 USD. Resident training level correlated strongly with technical performance (p<0.01) and "blood loss" (p=0.02) during the "RVI during LRN" scenario. The checklist and global rating scale used to assess performance demonstrated adequate reliability (Cronbach's α=0.82). CONCLUSIONS: While further validation, technical refinement, and improved fidelity are being considered, we present a novel, affordable surgical model for simulating laparoscopic renal hilar vessel injuries that is suitable for urology trainees.

Are multiple cryoprobes additive or synergistic in renal cryotherapy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between multiple cryoprobes was investigated to determine whether they work in an additive or synergistic fashion in an in vivo animal model because 1.47 mm (17-gauge) cryoprobes have been introduced to the armamentarium for renal cryotherapy. METHODS: Laparoscopic-guided percutaneous cryoablation was performed in both renal poles of 3 pigs using 3 IceRod cryoprobes. These 12 cryolesions were compared with 12 cryolesions using a single IceRod cryoprobe. Each cycle consisted of two 10-minute freeze cycles separated by a 5-minute thaw. The iceball volume was measured using intraoperative ultrasonography. The kidneys were harvested, and cryolesion surface area was calculated. The lesions were fixed and excised to obtain a volume measurement. Statistical analysis was used to compare the single probe results multiplied by 3 to the multiple probe group for iceball volume, cryolesion surface area, and cryolesion volume. RESULTS: The iceball volume for the first freeze cycle for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 8.55 cm3 compared with 9.79 cm3 for the multiple cryoprobe group (P=.44) and 10.01 cm3 versus 16.58 cm3 for the second freeze (P=.03). The cryolesion volume for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 11.29 cm3 versus 14.75 cm3 for the multiple cyroprobe group (P=.06). The gross cryolesion surface area for the single cryoprobe multiplied by 3 was 13.14 cm2 versus 13.89 cm2 for the multiple probe group (P=.52). CONCLUSION: The cryolesion created by 3 simultaneously activated 1.47-mm probes appears to be larger than that of an additive effect. The lesions were significantly larger as measured by ultrasonography and nearly so (P=.06) as measured by the gross cryolesion volume.

Introduction and validation of the American Urological Association Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery skills curriculum.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS(™)) skills curriculum has validity evidence supporting use for assessing laparoscopic skills for general surgeons. As charged by the American Urological Association (AUA) Laparoscopy, Robotic, and New Surgical Technology Committee, we sought to develop and validate a urology-specific FLS, referred to as the Basic Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery (BLUS(©)) skills curriculum. The psychomotor component consists of three existing FLS tasks and one new clip-applying task. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An animate renal artery model was designed for a clip-applying skills task. We assessed the acceptability and construct validity of using BLUS for basic laparoscopic skills assessment for urologists. A cohort of practicing urologists, fellows, residents, and medical students completed the tasks at the AUA Annual Meetings in 2010 and 2011. RESULTS: All exercises were acceptable and demonstrated excellent face and content validity (>4.5/5 on a five-point Likert scale). Practicing clinical urologists (N=81) outperformed residents and medical students (N=35) in time to completion of circle cut (P<0.01) and in keeping scissor tips toward the center of the circle (P<0.01). Practicing urologists who reported >3 laparoscopic procedures per week were faster at the peg-transfer exercise (P<0.05) and the cutting exercise (P<0.01) than those reporting one to two procedures. More errors were committed for clip-applying among practicing urologists who perform one to two laparoscopic procedures (1.24) vs. those who perform >3 procedures (0.57) per week (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: All exercises including the novel clip-applying model demonstrated good acceptability and evidence of construct validity (face, content, concurrent and convergent validity) for assessment of basic laparoscopic skill for urologic surgeons.

Preoperative warming up exercises improve laparoscopic operative times in an experienced laparoscopic surgeon.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Performing warm-up exercises before athletic competition or stage performance is very common; however, most surgeons do not "warm up" before performing complex surgery. We analyzed the intraoperative effects of warming up before surgery in an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. METHODS: A retrospective review of all laparoscopic partial (LPN) and radical nephrectomies (LRN) completed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon (RVC) were analyzed according to whether warm-up exercises were performed before surgery. Routine warm-up consisted of 15 to 20 minutes of pelvic trainer suturing exercises (forehand and backhand sutures and knot tying), using both hands. Intraoperative and postoperative parameters were examined. RESULTS: LRN and LPN subjects were well matched among the warm-up group and nonwarm-up group. Patients in the LPN warm-up group did have significantly larger tumors (3.7 cm vs 2.4 cm, P=0.02). Despite larger tumors, surgical time was significantly less in the warm-up group (227 min vs 281 min, P=0 .04), and total operating room time trended toward significance (320 min vs 371 min, P=0.0501). Similarly, in the LRN group, operative times and total operating room time was significantly less in the preoperative warm-up group (P=0.0068 and P=0.014, respectively). Intraoperative and postoperative complications, estimated blood loss, positive margin rate, warm ischemia time, length of stay, changes in hemoglobin and creatinine levels from baseline were not significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Performing warm-up exercises before complex laparoscopic surgery may improve operative times and performance in the operating room, especially for complex laparoscopic surgeries.

Current minimally invasive practice patterns among postgraduate urologists.

PURPOSE: To determine laparoscopic and robotic surgical practice patterns among current postgraduate urologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 9,095 electronic surveys sent to practicing urologists with e-mail addresses registered with the American Urological Association. RESULTS: Responses were received from 864 (9.5%) urologists; 84% report that laparoscopic or robotic procedures are performed in their practice. The highest training obtained by the primary laparoscopist was fellowship (31%), residency (23%), or 2- to 3-day courses (22%). Eighty-six percent report performance of laparoscopic nephrectomy in their practice, and 71% consider it the standard of care. Sixty-six percent of practices have access to at least one robotic unit, and 9% plan on purchasing one within a year. Attitudes toward robotics are favorable, with 80% indicating that it will increase in volume and potential procedures. Thirty-one percent state that robot-assisted prostatectomy is standard of care, while 50% believe this procedure looks promising. Respondents think that optimal training in minimally invasive techniques is fellowships (23%), minifellowships (23%), or hands-on courses (23%). Twenty-nine percent think that they were trained adequately in laparoscopy and robotics from residency, and 62% believe residents should be able to perform most laparoscopic procedures on completion of residency. CONCLUSIONS: The practice and availability of laparoscopic and robotic procedures have increased since previous evaluations. Opinions regarding these techniques are favorable and optimistic. As the field of urology continues to see a growing demand for minimally invasive procedures, training of postgraduate urologists and residents remains essential.

Preliminary assessment of a renal tumor materials model.

PURPOSE: To evaluate a materials model for laparoscopic guided cryotherapy or radiofrequency tissue ablation (RFA) of kidney tumors through expert surgeon assessment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the inaugural American Urological Association 2010 Tissue Ablative course content, validity testing of a renal tumor model was undertaken. Five expert faculty in cryotherapy and RFA techniques for renal tumors performed laparoscopic ultrasonography (US) examination of the tumor model. They performed US guided placement and activation of the treatment probe into the tumor of the model. They completed a questionnaire and rated the quality of the renal tumor model on a 5 point Likert scale. RESULTS: All of the subjects assigned a score of 5 of 5 on the Likert scale regarding the ability to identify the tumor with US, were able to deploy the ablative probe into the model under US guidance, and would recommend the use of this teaching model to residents or fellows. They thought that this tumor model was appropriate for teaching laparoscopic US imaging of a renal tumor during ablative treatment procedures, teaching and practicing laparoscopic US-guided cryotherapy, and teaching and practicing laparoscopic US-guided RFA. CONCLUSION: We have developed a unique model that simulates small kidney tumors that can be used for training surgeons in ablative techniques.