Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
iScience ; 26(4): 106506, 2023 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37073374

RESUMO

We report a decentralized prospective cohort study of self-reported adverse events and antibody responses to COVID vaccines derived from dried blood spots. Data are presented for 911 older (aged >70 years) and 375 younger (30-50 years) recruits to 48 weeks after the primary vaccine series. After a single vaccine, 83% younger and 45% older participants had overall seropositivity (p < 0.0001) increasing to 100/98% with the second dose, respectively (p = 0.084). A cancer diagnosis (p = 0.009), no mRNA-1273 vaccine doses (p <0 .0001), and older age (p <0 .0001) predicted lower responses. Antibody levels declined in both cohorts at 12 and 24 weeks increasing with booster doses. At 48 weeks, for participants with 3 vaccine doses, the median antibody levels were higher in the older cohort (p = 0.04) with any dose of mRNA-1273 (p <0 .0001) and with COVID infection (p <0 .001). The vaccines were well tolerated. Breakthrough COVID infections were uncommon (16% older cohort, 29% younger cohort; p < 0.0001) and mild.

2.
Lancet Healthy Longev ; 4(3): e107-e114, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36870336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic have shown that crowding in nursing homes is associated with high incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infections, but this effect has not been shown for other respiratory pathogens. We aimed to measure the association between crowding in nursing homes and outbreak-associated respiratory infection incidence and related mortality before the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing homes in Ontario, Canada. We identified, characterised, and selected nursing homes through the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care datasets. Nursing homes that were not funded by the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care and homes that closed before January, 2020 were excluded. Outcomes consisting of respiratory infection outbreaks were obtained from the Integrated Public Health Information System of Ontario. The crowding index equalled the mean number of residents per bedroom and bathroom. The primary outcomes were the incidence of outbreak-associated infections and mortality per 100 nursing home residents per year. We examined the incidence of infections and deaths as a function of the crowding index by use of negative binomial regression with adjustment for three home characteristics (ie, ownership, number of beds, and region) and nine mean resident characteristics (ie, age, female sex, dementia, diabetes, chronic heart failure, renal failure, cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and activities of daily living score). FINDINGS: Between Sept 1, 2014, and Aug 31, 2019, 5107 respiratory infection outbreaks in 588 nursing homes were recorded, of which 4921 (96·4%), involving 64 829 cases of respiratory infection and 1969 deaths, were included in this analysis. Nursing homes with a high crowding index had higher incidences of respiratory infection (26·4% vs 13·8%; adjusted rate ratio per one resident per room increase in crowding 1·89 [95% CI 1·64-2·17]) and mortality (0·8% vs 0·4%; 2·34 [1·88-2·92]) than did homes with a low crowding index. INTERPRETATION: Respiratory infection and mortality rates were higher in nursing homes with high crowding index than in homes with low crowding index, and the association was consistent across various respiratory pathogens. Decreasing crowding is an important safety target beyond the COVID-19 pandemic to help to promote resident wellbeing and decrease the transmission of prevalent respiratory pathogens. FUNDING: None.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Ontário , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Casas de Saúde , Surtos de Doenças
3.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 42(1): 74-81, 2023 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36450100

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the availability of conjugate pneumococcal vaccines, children with high-risk conditions remain vulnerable to invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD). This study sought to describe IPD prevalence, vaccination and outcomes among high-risk children. METHODS: We used International Classification of Disease10 discharge and microbiology codes to identify patients hospitalized for IPD at a large pediatric hospital from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2018. Patients were considered high-risk if they had: primary immunodeficiency, asplenia, transplant, active malignancy, sickle cell disease, cochlear implant, nephrotic syndrome, chronic lung disease, cerebrospinal fluid leak, HIV or used immunosuppressive therapy. RESULTS: In total 94 high-risk patients were hospitalized for IPD. The most common high-risk conditions included malignancy (n = 33, 35%), solid-organ or bone marrow transplant (n = 17, 18%) and sickle cell disease (n = 14, 15%). Bacteremia was the most common presentation (n = 81, 86%) followed by pneumonia (n = 23, 25%) and meningitis (n = 9, 10%). No deaths occurred. Of 66 patients with known pneumococcal vaccination status, 15 (23%) were unvaccinated, and 51 (77%) received at least one dose of a pneumococcal vaccine; 20 received all four recommended pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) doses. Only three children received PPSV23. Of 20 children with no or partial (<3 doses) immunization, 70% (14) of IPD episodes were due to vaccine-preventable serotypes. Of 66 known IPD serotypes, 17% (n = 11) were covered by PCV13, 39% (n = 26) were covered by PPSV23 and 39% (n = 26) were nonvaccine serotype. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the availability of effective pneumococcal vaccines, IPD persists among children with high-risk conditions. Improving PCV13 and PPSV23 vaccination could significantly reduce IPD; most episodes were due to vaccine-preventable serotypes in incompletely immunized patients.


Assuntos
Anemia Falciforme , Infecções Pneumocócicas , Criança , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Pneumocócicas , Anemia Falciforme/complicações , Anemia Falciforme/epidemiologia
4.
Med ; 3(6): 422-432.e3, 2022 06 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35437520

RESUMO

Background: SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern (VOC) has evolved multiple mutations within the spike protein, raising concerns of increased antibody evasion. In this study, we assessed the neutralization potential of COVID-19 convalescent sera and sera from vaccinated individuals against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and VOCs. Methods: The neutralizing activity of sera from 65 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine recipients and convalescent individuals against clinical isolates of ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and Beta, Delta, and Omicron VOCs was assessed using a micro-neutralization assay. Findings: Convalescent sera from unvaccinated individuals infected by the ancestral virus demonstrated reduced neutralization against Beta and Omicron VOCs. Sera from individuals that received three doses of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines demonstrated reduced neutralization of the Omicron variant relative to ancestral SARS-CoV-2. Sera from individuals that were naturally infected with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 and subsequently received two doses of the Pfizer vaccine induced significantly higher neutralizing antibody levels against ancestral virus and all VOCs. Infection alone, either with ancestral SARS-CoV-2 or the Delta variant, was not sufficient to induce high neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron. Conclusions: In summary, we demonstrate that convalescent and vaccinated sera display varying levels of SARS-CoV-2 VOC neutralization. Data from this study will inform booster vaccination strategies against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs. Funding: This research was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). VIDO receives operational funding from the Government of Saskatchewan through Innovation Saskatchewan and the Ministry of Agriculture and from the Canada Foundation for Innovation through the Major Science Initiatives for its CL3 facility.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus , Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Imunização Passiva , Glicoproteínas de Membrana/genética , Testes de Neutralização , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Saskatchewan , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/genética , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/genética , Soroterapia para COVID-19
5.
Clin Microbiol Infect ; 27(9): 1336-1344, 2021 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34020033

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Protecting healthcare workers (HCWs) from coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is critical to preserve the functioning of healthcare systems. We therefore assessed seroprevalence and identified risk factors for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) seropositivity in this population. METHODS: Between 22 June 22 and 15 August 2020, HCWs from institutions in northern/eastern Switzerland were screened for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. We recorded baseline characteristics, non-occupational and occupational risk factors. We used pairwise tests of associations and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with seropositivity. RESULTS: Among 4664 HCWs from 23 healthcare facilities, 139 (3%) were seropositive. Non-occupational exposures independently associated with seropositivity were contact with a COVID-19-positive household (adjusted OR 59, 95% CI 33-106), stay in a COVID-19 hotspot (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.2) and male sex (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.1). Blood group 0 vs. non-0 (aOR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.8), active smoking (aOR 0.4, 95% CI 0.2-0.7), living with children <12 years (aOR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.6) and being a physician (aOR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1-0.5) were associated with decreased risk. Other occupational risk factors were close contact to COVID-19 patients (aOR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.4), exposure to COVID-19-positive co-workers (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-2.9), poor knowledge of standard hygiene precautions (aOR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2-2.9) and frequent visits to the hospital canteen (aOR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.8). DISCUSSION: Living with COVID-19-positive households showed the strongest association with SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity. We identified several potentially modifiable work-related risk factors, which might allow mitigation of the COVID-19 risk among HCWs. The lower risk among those living with children, even after correction for multiple confounders, is remarkable and merits further study.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/metabolismo , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/virologia , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , COVID-19/imunologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/imunologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos , Caracteres Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Suíça/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
7.
Crit Care Med ; 49(3): e219-e234, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555780

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic continues to affect millions worldwide. Given the rapidly growing evidence base, we implemented a living guideline model to provide guidance on the management of patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. METHODS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Disease 2019 panel has expanded to include 43 experts from 14 countries; all panel members completed an electronic conflict-of-interest disclosure form. In this update, the panel addressed nine questions relevant to managing severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. We used the World Health Organization's definition of severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019. The systematic reviews team searched the literature for relevant evidence, aiming to identify systematic reviews and clinical trials. When appropriate, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis to summarize treatment effects. We assessed the quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach, then used the evidence-to-decision framework to generate recommendations based on the balance between benefit and harm, resource and cost implications, equity, and feasibility. RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued nine statements (three new and six updated) related to ICU patients with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019. For severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019, the panel strongly recommends using systemic corticosteroids and venous thromboprophylaxis but strongly recommends against using hydroxychloroquine. In addition, the panel suggests using dexamethasone (compared with other corticosteroids) and suggests against using convalescent plasma and therapeutic anticoagulation outside clinical trials. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel suggests using remdesivir in nonventilated patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 and suggests against starting remdesivir in patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 outside clinical trials. Because of insufficient evidence, the panel did not issue a recommendation on the use of awake prone positioning. CONCLUSION: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Coronavirus Diease 2019 panel issued several recommendations to guide healthcare professionals caring for adults with critical or severe coronavirus disease 2019 in the ICU. Based on a living guideline model the recommendations will be updated as new evidence becomes available.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/terapia , Cuidados Críticos , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Monofosfato de Adenosina/análogos & derivados , Monofosfato de Adenosina/uso terapêutico , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Alanina/uso terapêutico , Anticoagulantes , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina , Imunização Passiva , Posicionamento do Paciente , Ventilação , Soroterapia para COVID-19
8.
JCI Insight ; 5(19)2020 10 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32870820

RESUMO

Most of the patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mount a humoral immune response to the virus within a few weeks of infection, but the duration of this response and how it correlates with clinical outcomes has not been completely characterized. Of particular importance is the identification of immune correlates of infection that would support public health decision-making on treatment approaches, vaccination strategies, and convalescent plasma therapy. While ELISA-based assays to detect and quantitate antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 in patient samples have been developed, the detection of neutralizing antibodies typically requires more demanding cell-based viral assays. Here, we present a safe and efficient protein-based assay for the detection of serum and plasma antibodies that block the interaction of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor binding domain (RBD) with its receptor, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). The assay serves as a surrogate neutralization assay and is performed on the same platform and in parallel with an ELISA for the detection of antibodies against the RBD, enabling a direct comparison. The results obtained with our assay correlate with those of 2 viral-based assays, a plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) that uses live SARS-CoV-2 virus and a spike pseudotyped viral vector-based assay.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/imunologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/terapia , Pneumonia Viral/imunologia , Pneumonia Viral/terapia , Glicoproteína da Espícula de Coronavírus/imunologia , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Área Sob a Curva , COVID-19 , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Humanos , Imunização Passiva/métodos , Testes de Neutralização , Pandemias , Análise de Regressão , Estudos de Amostragem , Resultado do Tratamento , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/imunologia , Soroterapia para COVID-19
10.
Am J Infect Control ; 48(5): 490-495, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32057509

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Some electronic hand hygiene (HH) monitoring systems require a benchmark of HH opportunities. To establish a benchmark, we measured rates of HH opportunities among general surgery patients at a tertiary care hospital. METHODS: Trained observers recorded HH opportunities for newly admitted patients daily for up to 5 days. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the relationship between patient variables and the HH opportunity rate. A subset of observed HH events was compared to event data from an electronic HH monitoring system. RESULTS: We observed 2,404 HH opportunities over 677.4 care-hours for 23 patients (median 3.25 per hour; IQR 2.2-4.7, range 0-13). Rates of HH opportunities were significantly higher on admission day 1, for sessions starting before 9 AM, and for patients without roommates. HH was performed using alcohol-based hand rub from dispensers at the door to a patient's room more often than bedside or pocket dispensers (72.7% vs 20.8% or 5.1%). Electronic dispenser event counts did not match observed event counts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide a benchmark HH opportunity rate for general surgery patients, and highlight the importance of validating electronic HH event counts. Further research is needed to determine which patient factors affect HH opportunity rates.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Geral/estatística & dados numéricos , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Higiene das Mãos/estatística & dados numéricos , Controle de Infecções/estatística & dados numéricos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Cirurgia Geral/normas , Higiene das Mãos/normas , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Quartos de Pacientes , Centros de Atenção Terciária
11.
Transfusion ; 60(2): 430-435, 2020 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31859413

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are antibiotic-resistant organisms associated with both colonization and serious life-threatening infection in health care settings. Contamination of platelet concentrates (PCs) with Enterococcus can result in transfusion-transmitted infection. CASE PRESENTATION: This report describes the investigation of a septic transfusion case involving a 27-year-old male patient with relapsed acute leukemia who was transfused with a 5-day-old buffy coat PC pool and developed fever and rigors. DISCUSSION: Microbiology testing and pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was done on patient blood cultures obtained from peripheral and central lines. Microbiology and molecular testing were also performed on the remaining posttransfusion PC pool, which was refrigerated for 24 hours before microbiology testing. Red blood cell (RBC) and plasma units associated with the implicated PCs were screened for microbial contamination. Patient blood cultures obtained from peripheral and central lines yielded vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. Gram stain of a sample from the platelet pool was negative but coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CNST) and VRE were isolated on culture. Antibiotic sensitivity and PFGE profiles of several VRE isolates from the patient before and after transfusion, and the PC pool, revealed that all were closely related. Associated RBC and plasma components tested negative for microbial contamination. CONCLUSIONS: Microbiological and molecular investigations showed a relationship between VRE isolated from the patient before and after transfusion, and therefore it is postulated that a patient-to-PC retrograde contamination (from either blood or skin) occurred. As the CNST isolated from the PC pool was not isolated from patient samples, its implication in the transfusion event is unknown.


Assuntos
Enterococcus faecium/patogenicidade , Reação Transfusional/diagnóstico , Reação Transfusional/microbiologia , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/patogenicidade , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Enterococcus faecium/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Reação Transfusional/tratamento farmacológico , Enterococos Resistentes à Vancomicina/efeitos dos fármacos
13.
J Clin Oncol ; 37(30): 2795-2804, 2019 10 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31465264

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Seasonal influenza vaccination is recommended for patients with cancer despite concerns of disease or treatment-associated immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against laboratory-confirmed influenza for patients with cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted an observational test-negative design study of previously diagnosed patients with cancer 18 years of age and older who underwent influenza testing during the 2010-2011 to 2015-2016 influenza seasons in Ontario, Canada. We linked individual-level cancer registry, respiratory virus testing, and health administrative data to identify the study population and outcomes. Vaccination status was determined from physician and pharmacist billing claims. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate VE, adjusting for age, sex, rurality, income quintile, cancer characteristics, chemotherapy exposure, comorbidities, previous health care use, influenza season, and calendar time. RESULTS: We identified 26,463 patients with cancer who underwent influenza testing, with 4,320 test-positive cases (16%) and 11,783 (45%) vaccinated. Mean age was 70 years, 52% were male, mean time since diagnosis was 6 years, 69% had solid tumor malignancies, and 23% received active chemotherapy. VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza was 21% (95% CI, 15% to 26%), and VE against laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization was 20% (95% CI, 13% to 26%). For patients with solid tumor malignancies, VE was 25% (95% CI, 18% to 31%), compared with 8% (95% CI, -5% to 19%) for patients with hematologic malignancies (P = .015). Active chemotherapy usage did not significantly affect VE, especially among patients with solid tumor cancer. CONCLUSION: Our results support recommendations for influenza vaccination for patients with cancer. VE was decreased for patients with hematologic malignancies, and there was no significant difference in VE among patients with solid tumor cancer receiving active chemotherapy. Strategies to optimize influenza prevention among patients with cancer are warranted.


Assuntos
Vacinas contra Influenza/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/complicações , Idoso , Canadá , Técnicas de Laboratório Clínico , Feminino , Humanos , Vacinas contra Influenza/farmacologia , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Ontário , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 111(8): 1141-6, 2016 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI) contributes to a significant burden of disease in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). In this study, we seek to identify risk factors for rCDI in a population of IBD patients at the Mount Sinai Hospital IBD Centre. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, IBD patients with rCDI diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 were identified and compared with IBD patients with single-episode CDI. Multivariate regression was used to identify predictors of rCDI in IBD. Outcome analysis was performed for hospitalizations due to CDI, colectomy, and CDI-attributable mortality. RESULTS: A total of 503 patients were included, 110 (22%) of whom had IBD (49% CD, 51% ulcerative colitis). Recurrent CDI occurred in 32% of IBD patients compared with 24% of non-IBD patients (P<0.01). IBD patients with rCDI were more likely than those without rCDI to report recent antibiotic therapy (42.9 vs. 30.7%, P<0.01), 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) use (51.5 vs. 30.7%, P<0.001), steroid use (51.4 vs. 33.3%, P<0.001), and biologic therapy (48.6 vs. 40.0%, P<0.01). Infliximab (34.3 vs. 17.3%, P<0.01) but not adalimumab was associated with more rCDI events. Using a Cox model of predictors of rCDI in IBD, significant predictors included non-ileal Crohn's disease (hazard ratio (HR) 2.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-6.30) and the use of 5-ASA (HR 2.15, 95% CI 1.11-4.18). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the general population, IBD patients are 33% more likely to experience rCDI. Within the IBD cohort, exposure to certain drug classes (antibiotics, 5-ASA, steroids, certain biologics) and non-ileal Crohn's disease were found to be the predictors of rCDI.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Colite Ulcerativa/epidemiologia , Doença de Crohn/epidemiologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Glucocorticoides/uso terapêutico , Mesalamina/uso terapêutico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/mortalidade , Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/mortalidade , Feminino , Fármacos Gastrointestinais/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/epidemiologia , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem
17.
Clin Infect Dis ; 58(7): 980-3, 2014 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24577290

RESUMO

This proof-of-concept study demonstrates that no longer routinely reporting urine culture results from noncatheterized medical and surgical inpatients can greatly reduce unnecessary antimicrobial therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria without significant additional laboratory workload. Larger studies are needed to confirm the generalizability, safety, and sustainability of this model of care.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Assintomáticas , Bacteriúria/tratamento farmacológico , Procedimentos Desnecessários , Infecções Urinárias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Bacteriúria/diagnóstico , Tratamento Farmacológico/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados , Masculino , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico
18.
Vaccine ; 31(49): 5863-71, 2013 Dec 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24099873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In 1995, a publicly funded pneumococcal vaccination program for 23-valent polysaccharide vaccine (PPV23) was introduced in Ontario. Conjugate vaccines were authorized in 2001 (PCV7), 2009 (PCV10) and 2010 (PCV13). METHODS: From 1995-2011, active, population-based surveillance for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) was conducted in Metropolitan Toronto and Peel Region, Canada. RESULTS: 6404 IPD cases were included. After PPV23 program implementation in 1995, IPD due to PPV23 strains decreased 49% in older adults prior to PCV7 introduction. Estimated PPV23 efficacy in vaccine eligible adults was 42.2% (95% CI; 28.6-53.2%). IPD incidence due to PCV7 serotypes in children <5 years decreased significantly after PCV7 authorization and before introduction of a publicly funded PCV7 program. Seven years after PCV7 program implementation, the incidence of IPD due to PCV7 serotypes decreased to zero in children and by 88% in adults, however, overall IPD incidence remained unchanged in adults. In 2011, the incidence of IPD was 4.5 per 100,000 in adults aged 15-64 and 19.9 per 100,000 in adults aged over 65 years, with 45 serotypes causing disease. Between 1995 and 2011, the case fatality rate of IPD in adults decreased 2% per year (95% CI, -0.9% to -3.2%). In multivariable analysis, predictors of mortality included older age, chronic conditions, nursing home residence, current smoking, bacteraemia, and illness due to serotypes 3,11A, 19A, and 19F. CONCLUSIONS: While vaccination programs resulted in substantial public health benefits, herd immunity benefits of PCV7 were seen at low pediatric vaccination rates, and the case fatality rate of IPD has decreased, IPD will continue to be a cause of considerable morbidity and mortality in adults.


Assuntos
Programas de Imunização , Infecções Pneumocócicas/epidemiologia , Vacinas Pneumocócicas/administração & dosagem , Vigilância da População , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Feminino , Vacina Pneumocócica Conjugada Heptavalente , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ontário/epidemiologia , Infecções Pneumocócicas/mortalidade , Infecções Pneumocócicas/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Conjugadas/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
19.
PLoS One ; 8(4): e62678, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23638132

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that admission screening for extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired ESBL-E clinical isolates. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 12 hospitals (6 screening and 6 non-screening) in Toronto, Canada. PATIENTS: All adult inpatients with an ESBL-E positive culture collected from 2005-2009. METHODS: Cases were defined as hospital-onset (HO) or community-onset (CO) if cultures were positive after or before 72 hours. Efficacy of screening in reducing HO-ESBL-E incidence was assessed with a negative binomial model adjusting for study year and CO-ESBL-E incidence. The accuracy of the HO-ESBL-E definition was assessed by re-classifying HO-ESBL-E cases as confirmed nosocomial (negative admission screen), probable nosocomial (no admission screen) or not nosocomial (positive admission screen) using data from the screening hospitals. RESULTS: There were 2,088 ESBL-E positive patients and incidence of ESBL-E rose from 0.11 to 0.42 per 1,000 inpatient days between 2005 and 2009. CO-ESBL-E incidence was similar at screening and non-screening hospitals but screening hospitals had a lower incidence of HO-ESBL-E in all years. In the negative binomial model, screening was associated with a 49.1% reduction in HO-ESBL-E (p<0.001). A similar reduction was seen in the incidence of HO-ESBL-E bacteremia. When HO-ESBL-E cases were re-classified based on their admission screen result, 46.5% were positive on admission, 32.5% were confirmed as nosocomial and 21.0% were probable nosocomial cases. CONCLUSIONS: Admission screening for ESBL-E is associated with a reduced incidence of HO-ESBL-E. Controlled, prospective studies of admission screening for ESBL-E should be a priority.


Assuntos
Enterobacteriaceae/isolamento & purificação , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Programas de Rastreamento , Admissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , beta-Lactamases/biossíntese , Canadá/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiologia , Infecções por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiologia , Humanos , Incidência , Reto/microbiologia
20.
Leuk Lymphoma ; 54(7): 1387-95, 2013 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23240909

RESUMO

This is a randomized trial evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of one or two doses of 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination in adults with lymphoid malignancies. Adults with a lymphoid malignancy receiving active systemic therapy, or within a year after autologous stem cell transplant, received one dose of AS03-adjuvanted A/California/7/2009 (H1N1) vaccine, and were randomized 21 days later to a second dose or no further vaccination. The primary outcomes were seroprotection and seroconversion rates by hemagglutination inhibition 21 and 42 days after initial vaccination. Twenty-two patients received one dose, and 20 patients received a second dose. Seroconversion rates at day 21 were 30% (one dose) and 5% (two doses), and subsequently 30% for both groups at day 42. Seroprotection rates at day 21 were 40% (one dose) and 15% (two doses), and subsequently 35% (one dose) and 40% (two doses) at day 42. Differences in serologic endpoints were not statistically significant between both study arms at day 42. Patients with low levels of B-cells (CD19-positive) had low seroconversion rates on days 21 (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.93, p = 0.043) and 42 (OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01-1.07, p = 0.058). Only three of the 14 patients who received rituximab achieved seroprotective titers by day 42. Patients with lymphoid malignancies did not achieve rates of seroconversion or seroprotection seen in healthy subjects despite a second dose and the use of an adjuvant. Notwithstanding suboptimal immunogenicity, seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccination should continue to be recommended.


Assuntos
Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/complicações , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Leucemia Linfoide/complicações , Linfoma/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/imunologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Feminino , Transplante de Células-Tronco Hematopoéticas , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/sangue , Fatores Imunológicos/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Vacinas contra Influenza/efeitos adversos , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Leucemia Linfoide/imunologia , Leucemia Linfoide/terapia , Linfoma/imunologia , Linfoma/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Transplante Autólogo , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA