A randomized trial of oral prednisone for cystic fibrosis pulmonary exacerbation treatment.

BACKGROUND: Elevated markers of systemic and pulmonary inflammation are associated with failure to recover lung function following pulmonary exacerbations (PExs) in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). Our aim was to determine whether adjuvant oral prednisone treatment would improve recovery of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) in CF PExs not responding to antibiotic therapy. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in pwCF treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics for a PEx. At Day 7, those who had not returned to >90% baseline ppFEV1 were randomized to adjuvant prednisone 1 mg·kg-1 twice daily (max 60 mg/day) or placebo for 7 days. The primary outcome was the difference in proportion of subjects who recovered >90% baseline ppFEV1 at Day 14 of IV antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: 173 subjects were enrolled, with 76 randomized. 50% of subjects in the prednisone group recovered baseline FEV1 on Day 14 compared to 39% of subjects in the placebo group for a difference of 11% (95% CI -11, 34%, p=0.34). The mean (sd) change in ppFEV1 from Day 7 to Day 14 was 6.8% predicted (8.8) in the prednisone group and 4.6% (6.9) in the placebo group (mean difference 2.2% predicted 95% CI -1.5, 5.9%, p=0.24). Time to subsequent exacerbation was not prolonged in prednisone treated subjects (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45, 1.53; p=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: This study failed to detect a difference in ppFEV1 recovery between adjuvant oral prednisone and placebo treatment in pwCF not responding at day 7 of IV antibiotic therapy for PExs.

Canadian Cystic Fibrosis-related Diabetes Clinical Practice Survey: Analysis of Current Practices and Gaps in Clinical Care.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim in this study was to identify challenges and gaps in Canadian practices in screening, diagnosis, and treatment of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD), with the goal of informing a Canadian-specific guideline for CFRD. METHODS: We conducted an online survey of health-care professionals (97 physicians and 44 allied health professionals) who care for people living with CF (pwCF) and/or CFRD (pwCFRD). RESULTS: Most pediatric centres followed <10 pwCFRD and adult centres followed >10 pwCFRD. Children with CFRD are usually followed at a separate diabetes clinic, whereas adults with CFRD may be followed by respirologists, nurse practitioners, or endocrinologists in a CF clinic or in a separate diabetes clinic. Less than 25% of pwCF had access to an endocrinologist with a special interest or expertise in CFRD. Many centres perform screening oral glucose tolerance testing with fasting and 2-hour time points. Respondents, especially those working with adults, also indicate use of additional tests for screening not currently recommended in CFRD guidelines. Pediatric practitioners tend to only use insulin to manage CFRD, whereas adult practitioners are more likely to use repaglinide as an alternative to insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Access to specialized CFRD care may be a challenge for pwCFRD in Canada. There appears to be wide heterogeneity of CFRD care organization, screening, and treatment among health-care providers caring for pwCF and/or pwCFRD across Canada. Practitioners working with adult pwCF are less likely to adhere to current clinical practice guidelines than practitioners working with children.

Physician's perspective regarding asthma guided self-management: directives or guidance?

INTRODUCTION: Asthma guided self-management enhances patients' control of their condition under the guidance of the treating physician. The aim of the present study was to understand how physicians perceive, endorse, uptake, and support asthma guided self-management. METHODS: We conducted a secondary supplementary analysis of data originally collected as part of a multicenter collective case study in which physicians treating patients with asthma were interviewed. Using reflective thematic analysis, we aimed to explore physicians' understanding of guided asthma self-management as related to four ideas, namely: (a) understanding of the disease management and treatment goals; (b) defining medical frame and guidance; (c) describing the importance of patient-physician relationship; and (d) implementing asthma guided self-management. RESULTS: Evidence indicates that physicians perceived optimal guided self-management as related to patients' adherence to physician's instructions and recommendations, supported by the adjustment of prescribed pharmaceutical therapy contingent upon patient's symptoms. Some physicians also perceived behavior change and environmental control along with the medical recommendations. While physicians' perception of asthma and its treatment were aligned with the recommended guidelines-i.e., patient-centered care approach based on guided self-management, the actual guidance offered to patients remained primarily directive and paternalistic. Non-pharmacological approaches, such as exercise, smoking cessation, patient self-monitoring, and self-management supported by education and written self-management plans, were given little consideration in the context of the recommended treatment plan.

Eradication of early P. aeruginosa infection in children <7 years of age with cystic fibrosis: The early study.

OBJECTIVE: Antibiotic eradication treatment is the standard-of-care for cystic fibrosis (CF) patients with early Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pa)-infection; however, evidence from placebo-controlled trials is limited. METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomised CF patients <7 years (N = 51) with early Pa-infection to tobramycin inhalation solution (TOBI 300 mg) or placebo (twice daily) for 28 days with an optional cross-over on Day 35. Primary endpoint was proportion of patients having throat swabs/sputum free of Pa on Day 29. RESULTS: On Day 29, 84.6% patients in the TOBI versus 24.0% in the placebo group were Pa-free (p < 0.001). At the end of the cross-over period, 76.0% patients receiving TOBI in the initial 28 days were Pa-free compared to 47.8% receiving placebo initially. Adverse events were consistent with the TOBI safety profile with no differences between TOBI and placebo. CONCLUSION: TOBI was effective in eradicating early Pa-infection with a favourable safety profile in young CF patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01082367.