Factors associated with persistent opioid use 6-12 months after primary total knee arthroplasty.

Persistent pain following knee arthroplasty occurs in up to 20% of patients and may require ongoing analgesia, including extended opioid administration. A comprehensive secondary analysis was performed from results of a study that considered persistent postoperative pain in 242 patients who underwent unilateral knee arthroplasty using a standardised enhanced recovery programme. Opioid prescribing for 12 months before and 12 months after surgery was evaluated and converted to oral morphine equivalents. Demographic, functional, psychological and pain questionnaires were completed along with quantitative sensory testing and genetic analysis. Forty-nine percent of patients had at least one opioid prescription in the 12 months before surgery. Opioid prescriptions were filled in 93% of patients from discharge to 3 months and in 27% of patients ≥6 months after surgery. Persistent opioid use ≥6 months after surgery was strongly associated with pre-operative opioid use (RR 3.2, p < 0.001 (95%CI 1.9-5.4)). The median (IQR [range]) oral morphine equivalent daily dose was 3.6 (0.9-10.5 [0-100.0]) mg pre-operatively, 35.0 (22.5-52.5 [4.6-180.0]) mg in hospital, 12.8 (5.1-24.8 [0-57.9]) mg from discharge to 3 months and 5.9 (4.5-12.0 [0-44.5]) mg at ≥6 months following surgery. Predictors of increased daily oral morphine equivalent ≥6 months after surgery included increased average daily oral morphine equivalent dose compared with previous values (lag), increased body mass index and three or more comorbid pain sites. Persistent opioid use was not associated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain (RR 1.003, p = 0.655, 95%CI 0.65-1.002) or WOMAC function (RR 1.001, p = 0.99, 95%CI 0.99-1.03) outcomes 6 months after surgery. There was no association between persistent opioid use and pre-operative quantitative sensory testing results or psychological distress. Pre-operatively, patients with a higher body mass index, more comorbid pain sites and those who had filled an opioid prescription in the last 12 months, were at increased risk of persistent opioid use and a higher oral morphine equivalent daily dose ≥ 6 months after surgery. Strategies need to be developed to limit dose and duration of persistent opioid use in patients following knee arthroplasty surgery.

Steroids to reduce the impact on delirium (STRIDE): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled feasibility trial of pre-operative dexamethasone in people with hip fracture.

Neuro-inflammation may be important in the pathogenesis of postoperative delirium following hip fracture surgery. Studies have suggested a potential role for steroids in reducing postoperative delirium; however, the potential efficacy and safety of pre-operative high-dose dexamethasone in this specific population is largely unknown. Conducting such a study could be challenging, considering the multidisciplinary team involvement and the emergency nature of the surgery. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and effectiveness of dexamethasone given as early as possible following hospital admission for hip fracture, to inform whether a full-scale trial is warranted. This single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomly allocated 79 participants undergoing hip fracture surgery to dexamethasone 20 mg or placebo pre-operatively. Eligibility and recruitment rates, timing of the intervention and adverse events were recorded. Incidence and severity of postoperative delirium were assessed using the 4AT delirium screening tool and the Memorial Delirium Assessment Scale. Postoperative pain, length of stay and mortality were also assessed. The eligibility rate for inclusion was 178/527 (34%), and 57/178 (32%) of eligible patients presented to hospital when no researcher was available (e.g. after-hours, weekends, public holidays). Recruitment was limited mainly by ethical limitations (not including patients with impaired cognition) and lack of weekend staffing. Median (IQR [range]) time from emergency department admission to drug administration was 13.3 (5.9-17.6 [1.8-139.6]) hours. There was a significant difference in delirium severity scores, favouring the dexamethasone group: median (IQR [range]) 5 (3-6 [3-7]) vs. 9 (6-13 [5-14]) in the placebo group, with the probability of superiority effect size being 0.89, p = 0.010. Delirium incidence did not differ between groups: 6/40 (15%) in the dexamethasone group vs. 9/39 (23%) in the placebo group, relative risk (95%CI) 0.65 (0.22-1.65), p = 0.360). A larger randomised controlled trial is feasible and ideally this should include people with existing cognitive impairment, seven days-a-week cover and a multicentre design.

Persistent postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study of potential risk factors.

BACKGROUND: Persistent postoperative pain (PPP) is common after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The primary aim of this prospective cohort study was to identify important predictors of moderate to severe PPP 6 and 12 months after TKA. METHODS: Consenting patients (n=300) undergoing primary unilateral TKA attended a preoperative session to collect clinical information (age, gender, BMI, preoperative knee pain, comorbid pain, likely neuropathic pain) and psychological variables (depression, anxiety, catastrophising, expected pain). Quantitative sensory testing (pressure pain thresholds, temporal summation, conditioned pain modulation) was performed, and blood samples were obtained for subsequent genotyping of OPRM1 and COMT. Acute postoperative pain was measured at rest and during movement. Surgical factors (surgery time, patella resurfacing, anaesthetic type) were collected after operation. Follow-up questionnaires were sent 6 and 12 months after surgery. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of PPP. RESULTS: The prevalence of moderate to severe PPP was 21% (n=60) and 16% (n=45) 6 and 12 months after surgery, with 55% (n=33) and 60% (n=31) of PPP likely neuropathic in nature. At 6 months, a combination of preoperative pain intensity, expected pain, trait anxiety, and temporal summation (Akaike information criterion, 309.9; area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, 0.70) was able to correctly classify 66% of patients into moderate to severe PPP and no to mild PPP groups. At 12 months, preoperative pain intensity, expected pain, and trait anxiety (Akaike information criterion, 286.8; area under ROC curve, 0.66) correctly classified 66% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study highlight several factors that may be targeted in future intervention studies to reduce the development of PPP. TRIAL REGISTRY NUMBER: ACTRN12612001089820.

Predictors of persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have identified clinical, psychosocial, patient characteristic, and perioperative variables that are associated with persistent postsurgical pain; however, the relative effect of these variables has yet to be quantified. The aim of the study was to provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictor variables associated with persistent pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Included studies were required to measure predictor variables prior to or at the time of surgery, include a pain outcome measure at least 3 months post-TKA, and include a statistical analysis of the effect of the predictor variable(s) on the outcome measure. Counts were undertaken of the number of times each predictor was analysed and the number of times it was found to have a significant relationship with persistent pain. Separate meta-analyses were performed to determine the effect size of each predictor on persistent pain. Outcomes from studies implementing uni- and multivariable statistical models were analysed separately. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies involving almost 30 000 patients were included in the review. Preoperative pain was the predictor that most commonly demonstrated a significant relationship with persistent pain across uni- and multivariable analyses. In the meta-analyses of data from univariate models, the largest effect sizes were found for: other pain sites, catastrophizing, and depression. For data from multivariate models, significant effects were evident for: catastrophizing, preoperative pain, mental health, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Catastrophizing, mental health, preoperative knee pain, and pain at other sites are the strongest independent predictors of persistent pain after TKA.

Interventions for the prevention and management of neck/upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review.

Considered from medical, social or economic perspectives, the cost of musculoskeletal injuries experienced in the workplace is substantial, and there is a need to identify the most efficacious interventions for their effective prevention, management and rehabilitation. Previous reviews have highlighted the limited number of studies that focus on upper extremity intervention programmes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the findings of primary, secondary and/or tertiary intervention studies for neck/upper extremity conditions undertaken between 1999 and 2004 and to compare these results with those of previous reviews. Relevant studies were retrieved through the use of a systematic approach to literature searching and evaluated using a standardised tool. Evidence was then classified according to a "pattern of evidence" approach. Studies were categorised into subgroups depending on the type of intervention: mechanical exposure interventions; production systems/organisational culture interventions and modifier interventions. 31 intervention studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings provided evidence to support the use of some mechanical and modifier interventions as approaches for preventing and managing neck/upper extremity musculoskeletal conditions and fibromyalgia. Evidence to support the benefits of production systems/organisational culture interventions was found to be lacking. This review identified no single-dimensional or multi-dimensional strategy for intervention that was considered effective across occupational settings. There is limited information to support the establishment of evidence-based guidelines applicable to a number of industrial sectors.