INSPIRED Symposium Part 5: Expanding the Use of CAR T Cells in Children and Young Adults.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory (r/r) B cell malignancies, including in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Expanding this success to other hematologic and solid malignancies is an area of active research and, although challenges remain, novel solutions have led to significant progress over the past decade. Ongoing clinical trials for CAR T cell therapy for T cell malignancies and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have highlighted challenges, including antigen specificity with off-tumor toxicity and persistence concerns. In T cell malignancies, notable challenges include CAR T cell fratricide and prolonged T cell aplasia, which are being addressed with strategies such as gene editing and suicide switch technologies. In AML, antigen identification remains a significant barrier, due to shared antigens across healthy hematopoietic progenitor cells and myeloid blasts. Strategies to limit persistence and circumvent the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME) created by AML are also being explored. CAR T cell therapies for central nervous system and solid tumors have several challenges, including tumor antigen heterogeneity, immunosuppressive and hypoxic TME, and potential for off-target toxicity. Numerous CAR T cell products have been designed to overcome these challenges, including "armored" CARs and CAR/T cell receptor (TCR) hybrids. Strategies to enhance CAR T cell delivery, augment CAR T cell performance in the TME, and ensure the safety of these products have shown promising results. In this manuscript, we will review the available evidence for CAR T cell use in T cell malignancies, AML, central nervous system (CNS), and non-CNS solid tumor malignancies, and recommend areas for future research.

Practice Preferences for Consolidative Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Following Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Treatment with tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) achieves excellent complete remission rates in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), but approximately 50% maintain long-term remission. Consolidative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (cHSCT) is a potential strategy to reduce relapse risk, but it carries substantial short- and long-term toxicities. Additionally, several strategies for management of B cell recovery (BCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) positivity post-tisa-cel exist, without an accepted standard. We hypothesized that practice preferences surrounding cHSCT, as well as management of BCR and NGS positivity, varies across tisa-cel-prescribing physicians and sought to characterize current practice preferences. A survey focusing on preferences regarding the use of cHSCT, management of BCR, and NGS positivity was distributed to physicians who prescribe tisa-cel for children and young adults with B-ALL. Responses were collected from August 2022 to April 2023. Fifty-nine unique responses were collected across 43 institutions. All respondents prescribed tisa-cel for children and young adults. The clinical focus of respondents was HSCT in 71%, followed by leukemia/lymphoma in 24%. For HSCT-naive patients receiving tisa-cel, 57% of respondents indicated they made individualized decisions for cHSCT based on patient factors, whereas 22% indicated they would avoid cHSCT and 21% indicated they would pursue cHSCT when feasible. Certain factors influenced >50% of respondents towards recommending cHSCT (either an increased likelihood of recommending or always recommending), including preinfusion disease burden >25%, primary refractory B-ALL, M3 bone marrow following reinduction for relapse, KMT2A-rearranged B-ALL, history of blinatumomab nonresponse, and HSCT-naive status. Most respondents indicated they would pursue HSCT for HSCT-naive, total body irradiation (TBI) recipients with BCR before 6 months post-tisa-cel or with NGS positivity at 1 or 3 months post-tisa-cel, although there was variability in responses regarding whether to proceed to HSCT directly or provide intervening therapy prior to HSCT. Fewer respondents recommended HSCT for BCR or NGS positivity in patients with a history of HSCT, in noncandidates for TBI, and in patients with trisomy 21. The results of this survey indicate there exists significant practice variability regarding the use of cHSCT, as well as interventions for post-tisa-cel BCR or NGS positivity. These results highlight areas in which ongoing clinical trials could inform more standardized practice.

INSPIRED Symposium Part 3: Prevention and Management of Pediatric Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell-Associated Emergent Toxicities.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a revolutionary cancer treatment modality, particularly in children and young adults with B cell malignancies. Through clinical trials and real-world experience, much has been learned about the unique toxicity profile of CAR-T therapy. The past decade brought advances in identifying risk factors for severe inflammatory toxicities, investigating preventive measures to mitigate these toxicities, and exploring novel strategies to manage refractory and newly described toxicities, infectious risks, and delayed effects, such as cytopenias. Although much progress has been made, areas needing further improvements remain. Limited guidance exists regarding initial administration of tocilizumab with or without steroids and the management of inflammatory toxicities refractory to these treatments. There has not been widespread adoption of preventive strategies to mitigate inflammation in patients at high risk of severe toxicities, particularly children. Additionally, the majority of research related to CAR-T toxicity prevention and management has focused on adult populations, with only a few pediatric-specific studies published to date. Given that children and young adults undergoing CAR-T therapy represent a unique population with different underlying disease processes, physiology, and tolerance of toxicities than adults, it is important that studies be conducted to evaluate acute, delayed, and long-term toxicities following CAR-T therapy in this younger age group. In this pediatric-focused review, we summarize key findings on CAR-T therapy-related toxicities over the past decade, highlight emergent CAR-T toxicities, and identify areas of greatest need for ongoing research.

Clinical Trials on Cellular Therapy for Children and Adolescents With Cancer: A 15-Year Trend in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Cellular therapies are frequently studied in clinical trials for pediatric patients with malignant disease. Characteristics of ongoing and completed cellular therapy clinical trials in the U.S. involving children and adolescents have not previously been reported. METHODS: We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for clinical trials involving cellular therapies enrolling patients under 18 years of age in the U.S. Trials were initially stratified into child-only (maximum age of eligibility <18 years), child/adolescent and young adult (AYA) (maximum age of eligibility ≤21 years), and child/adult (maximum age of eligibility >21 years). Descriptive characteristics and trends over time were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 202 trials posted 2007-2022. Of the 202 trials, only three trials were child-only; thus, our subsequent analysis focused on comparing child/AYA (≤21 years) and child/adult trials (>21 years). One hundred sixty-nine (84%) enrolled both child and adult populations. The vast majority of trials were early phase (phase 1, 1/2, and 2, 198/202, 98%). Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies were most commonly studied (88/202, 44%), while natural-killer cell therapies were most common in child/AYA trials (42% vs. 16%). Most trials were single institution-only (130/202, 64%) and did not receive industry funding (163/202, 81%). Studies with industry funding were more likely to be multicenter (64% vs. 29%) and international (31% vs. 0.6%). Notably, no central nervous system tumor-specific trials had industry funding. There was no difference in therapy type based on funding source. Yearly new trial activations increased over the time period studied (p=0.01). CONCLUSION: The frequency of cellular therapy trial activations enrolling child/AYA patients with cancer in the U.S. has increased over time. Most studies were phase 1 or 2, single institution-only, and not industry-supported. Future opportunities for cell therapy for pediatric cancer should include multi-institutional approaches.

Mediport use as an acceptable standard for CAR T cell infusion.

Introduction: Mediport use as a clinical option for the administration of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T cell) therapy in patients with B-cell malignancies has yet to be standardized. Concern for mediport dislodgement, cell infiltration, and ineffective therapy delivery to systemic circulation has resulted in variable practice with intravenous administration of CAR T cell therapy. With CAR T cell commercialization, it is important to establish practice standards for CAR T cell delivery. We conducted a study to establish usage patterns of mediports in the clinical setting and provide a standard of care recommendation for mediport use as an acceptable form of access for CAR T cell infusions. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, data on mediport use and infiltration rate was collected from a survey across 34 medical centers in the Pediatric Real-World CAR Consortium, capturing 504 CAR T cell infusion routes across 489 patients. Data represents the largest, and to our knowledge sole, report on clinical CAR T cell infusion practice patterns since FDA approval and CAR T cell commercialization in 2017. Results: Across 34 sites, all reported tunneled central venous catheters, including Broviac® and Hickman® catheters, as accepted standard venous options for CAR T cell infusion. Use of mediports as a standard clinical practice was reported in 29 of 34 sites (85%). Of 489 evaluable patients with reported route of CAR T cell infusion, 184 patients were infused using mediports, with no reported incidences of CAR T cell infiltration. Discussion/Conclusion: Based on current clinical practice, mediports are a commonly utilized form of access for CAR T cell therapy administration. These findings support the safe practice of mediport usage as an accepted standard line option for CAR T cell infusion.

HLH-like toxicities predict poor survival after the use of tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-ALL.

Chimeric antigen receptor-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities (LTs) involving hyperferritinemia, multiorgan dysfunction, coagulopathy, and/or hemophagocytosis are described as occurring in a subset of patients with cytokine release syndrome (CRS). Case series report poor outcomes for those with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) who develop HLH-LTs, although larger outcomes analyses of children and young adults (CAYAs) with B-ALL who develop these toxicities after the administration of commercially available tisagenlecleucel are not described. Using a multi-institutional database of 185 CAYAs with B-ALL, we conducted a retrospective cohort study including groups that developed HLH-LTs, high-grade (HG) CRS without HLH-LTs, or no to low-grade (NLG) CRS without HLH-LTs. Primary objectives included characterizing the incidence, outcomes, and preinfusion factors associated with HLH-LTs. Among 185 CAYAs infused with tisagenlecleucel, 26 (14.1%) met the criteria for HLH-LTs. One-year overall survival and relapse-free survival were 25.7% and 4.7%, respectively, in those with HLH-LTs compared with 80.1% and 57.6%, respectively, in those without. In multivariable analysis for death, meeting criteria for HLH-LTs carried a hazard ratio of 4.61 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-8.83), controlling for disease burden, age, and sex. Patients who developed HLH-LTs had higher pretisagenlecleucel disease burden, ferritin, and C-reactive protein levels and lower platelet and absolute neutrophil counts than patients with HG- or NLG-CRS without HLH-LTs. Overall, CAYAs with B-ALL who developed HLH-LTs after tisagenlecleucel experienced high rates of relapse and nonrelapse mortality, indicating the urgent need for further investigations into prevention and optimal management of patients who develop HLH-LTs after tisagenlecleucel.

Immune Effector Cell-Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis-Like Syndrome.

T cell-mediated hyperinflammatory responses, such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), are now well-established toxicities of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. As the field of CAR T cells advances, however, there is increasing recognition that hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-like toxicities following CAR T cell infusion are occurring broadly across patient populations and CAR T cell constructs. Importantly, these HLH-like toxicities are often not as directly associated with CRS and/or its severity as initially described. This emergent toxicity, however ill-defined, is associated with life-threatening complications, creating an urgent need for improved identification and optimal management. With the goal of improving patient outcomes and formulating a framework to characterize and study this HLH-like syndrome, we established an American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy panel composed of experts in primary and secondary HLH, pediatric and adult HLH, infectious disease, rheumatology and hematology, oncology, and cellular therapy. Through this effort, we provide an overview of the underlying biology of classical primary and secondary HLH, explore its relationship with similar manifestations following CAR T cell infusions, and propose the term "immune effector cell-associated HLH-like syndrome (IEC-HS)" to describe this emergent toxicity. We also delineate a framework for identifying IEC-HS and put forward a grading schema that can be used to assess severity and facilitate cross-trial comparisons. Additionally, given the critical need to optimize outcomes for patients experiencing IEC-HS, we provide insight into potential treatment approaches and strategies to optimize supportive care and delineate alternate etiologies that should be considered in a patient presenting with IEC-HS. By collectively defining IEC-HS as a hyperinflammatory toxicity, we can now embark on further study of the pathophysiology underlying this toxicity profile and make strides toward a more comprehensive assessment and treatment approach.

Acute Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Two Pediatric AML Patients.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is an anti-CD33 antibody-tumor antibiotic conjugate with proven efficacy in pediatric and adult patients with CD33+ acute myeloid leukemia. Adverse effects commonly associated with GO include hyperbilirubinemia, elevated transaminases, and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome. Cardiotoxicity has not been a commonly described adverse event. We describe 2 pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia who received fractionated GO monotherapy and subsequently developed severe acute left ventricular dysfunction. Both patients achieved remission, recovered cardiac function with medical therapy, and tolerated subsequent stem cell transplantation.

Potential Role of IFNγ Inhibition in Refractory Cytokine Release Syndrome Associated with CAR T-cell Therapy.

SUMMARY: Here we review the pathophysiology and management of cytokine release syndrome (CRS) secondary to immunotherapy, and potential options for CRS refractory to IL6 inhibition and glucocorticoids, for which there are no proven treatments. To illustrate, we describe a patient with B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia who developed refractory grade 4 CRS following CD19-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, treated with tocilizumab, methylprednisolone, siltuximab, and the IFNγ inhibitor emapalumab, with complete remission from leukemia for 12 months. See related article by Bailey et al., p. 136 (15).

Xenograft models for pediatric cancer therapies.

The prognosis for childhood cancer has improved considerably over the past 50 years. This improvement is attributed to well-designed clinical trials which have incorporated chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation. With an increased understanding of cancer biology and genetics, we have entered an era of precision medicine and immunotherapy that provides potential for improved cure rates. However, preclinical evaluation of these therapies is more nuanced, requiring more robust animal models. Evaluation of targeted treatments requires molecularly defined xenograft models that can capture the diversity within pediatric cancer. The development of novel immunotherapies ideally involves the use of animal models that can accurately recapitulate the human immune response. In this review, we provide an overview of xenograft models for childhood cancers, review successful examples of novel therapies translated from xenograft models to the clinic, and describe the modern tools of xenograft biobanks and humanized xenograft models for the study of immunotherapies.

Convalescent plasma for pediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.

There are no proven safe and effective therapies for children who develop life-threatening complications of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Convalescent plasma (CP) has demonstrated potential benefit in adults with SARS-CoV-2, but has theoretical risks.We present the first report of CP in children with life-threatening coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), providing data on four pediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. We measured donor antibody levels and recipient antibody response prior to and following CP infusion. Infusion of CP was not associated with antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and did not suppress endogenous antibody response. We found CP was safe and possibly efficacious. Randomized pediatric trials are needed.

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children and COVID-19 are distinct presentations of SARS-CoV-2.

BACKGROUNDInitial reports from the severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic described children as being less susceptible to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) than adults. Subsequently, a severe and novel pediatric disorder termed multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) emerged. We report on unique hematologic and immunologic parameters that distinguish between COVID-19 and MIS-C and provide insight into pathophysiology.METHODSWe prospectively enrolled hospitalized patients with evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and classified them as having MIS-C or COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 were classified as having either minimal or severe disease. Cytokine profiles, viral cycle thresholds (Cts), blood smears, and soluble C5b-9 values were analyzed with clinical data.RESULTSTwenty patients were enrolled (9 severe COVID-19, 5 minimal COVID-19, and 6 MIS-C). Five cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-10, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α) contributed to the analysis. TNF-α and IL-10 discriminated between patients with MIS-C and severe COVID-19. The presence of burr cells on blood smears, as well as Cts, differentiated between patients with severe COVID-19 and those with MIS-C.CONCLUSIONPediatric patients with SARS-CoV-2 are at risk for critical illness with severe COVID-19 and MIS-C. Cytokine profiling and examination of peripheral blood smears may distinguish between patients with MIS-C and those with severe COVID-19.FUNDINGFinancial support for this project was provided by CHOP Frontiers Program Immune Dysregulation Team; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; National Cancer Institute; the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society; Cookies for Kids Cancer; Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation for Childhood Cancer; Children's Oncology Group; Stand UP 2 Cancer; Team Connor; the Kate Amato Foundations; Burroughs Wellcome Fund CAMS; the Clinical Immunology Society; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology; and the Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics.

Enhancing Neuroblastoma Immunotherapies by Engaging iNKT and NK Cells.

Neuroblastoma (NB) is the most common extracranial solid tumor in children and, in the high-risk group, has a 5-year mortality rate of ~50%. The high mortality rate and significant treatment-related morbidities associated with current standard of care therapies belie the critical need for more tolerable and effective treatments for this disease. While the monoclonal antibody dinutuximab has demonstrated the potential for immunotherapy to improve overall NB outcomes, the 5-year overall survival of high-risk patients has not yet substantially changed. The frequency and type of invariant natural killer T cells (iNKTs) and natural killer cells (NKs) has been associated with improved outcomes in several solid and liquid malignancies, including NB. Indeed, iNKTs and NKs inhibit tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), kill cancer stem cells (CSCs) and neuroblasts, and robustly secrete cytokines to recruit additional immune effectors. These capabilities, and promising pre-clinical and early clinical data suggest that iNKT- and NK-based therapies may hold promise as both stand-alone and combination treatments for NB. In this review we will summarize the biologic features of iNKTs and NKs that confer advantages for NB immunotherapy, discuss the barriers imposed by the NB tumor microenvironment, and examine the current state of such therapies in pre-clinical models and clinical trials.

Sinusoidal Obstruction Syndrome During Maintenance Therapy for Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia With 6-Mercaptopurine and Methotrexate: A Pediatric Case Report.

We report a case of a child with pre-B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing maintenance chemotherapy with 6-mercaptopurine and methotrexate (MTX) who developed sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after being treated with ciprofloxacin for BK viremia. This case represents a rare complication of maintenance therapy with MTX and 6-mercaptopurine, and suggests a drug interaction between ciprofloxacin and MTX.