Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment.

The risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with cancer receiving cancer therapies is not well defined. In this study we aimed to (1) evaluate the risk of SCD during the first 6 months of cancer treatment and (2) identify risk factors (RFs) for SCD in patients who underwent active cancer treatment. The study population comprised 8,356 patients who received any cancer treatment at the University of Rochester Medical Center from 2011 to 2020. The primary end point was the occurrence of SCD within 6 months of cancer treatment. SCD was defined by using the modified Hinkle-Thaler classification. The mean age at the time of cancer treatment was 64 ± 14 years and 49% were women. All-cause mortality occurred in 834 patients (10%), of whom 51 (6%) were identified as SCD. The cumulative probability of SCD at 6 months was 0.6%. Age <74 years (0.042), history of congestive heart failure (0.058) and lung cancer (0.004) were identified as independent RFs for SCD in the multivariate Cox regression models. The cumulative probability of SCD at 6 months from cancer treatment initiation was significantly higher in patients with ≥2 RFs (1.6%) than in patients with 0 or 1 RF (0.5%) (log-rank p <0.001). In conclusion, our findings suggest that active cancer treatment is associated with SCD risk that is more pronounced in younger patients (< 74 years), patients with cancer and a history of heart failure, and those who underwent treatment for lung cancer. Future studies should address appropriate modalities for prevention and protection in this high-risk population.

Genetic variant annotation scores in congenital long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Congenital Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) is a hereditary arrhythmic disorder. We aimed to assess the performance of current genetic variant annotation scores among LQTS patients and their predictive impact. METHODS: We evaluated 2025 patients with unique mutations for LQT1-LQT3. A patient-specific score was calculated for each of four established genetic variant annotation algorithms: CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2. The scores were tested for the identification of LQTS and their predictive performance for cardiac events (CE) and life-threatening events (LTE) and then compared with the predictive performance of LQTS categorization based on mutation location/function. Score performance was tested using Harrell's C-index. RESULTS: A total of 917 subjects were classified as LQT1, 838 as LQT2, and 270 as LQT3. The identification of a pathogenic variant occurred in 99% with CADD, 92% with SIFT, 100% with REVEL, and 86% with PolyPhen-2. However, none of the genetic scores correlated with the risk of CE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.51, REVEL = 0.50, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52) or LTE (Harrell's C-index: CADD = 0.50, SIFT = 0.53, REVEL = 0.54, and PolyPhen-2 = 0.52). In contrast, high-risk mutation categorization based on location/function was a powerful independent predictor of CE (HR = 1.88; p < .001) and LTE (HR = 1.89, p < .001). CONCLUSION: In congenital LQTS patients, well-established algorithms (CADD, SIFT, REVEL, and PolyPhen-2) were able to identify the majority of the causal variants as pathogenic. However, the scores did not predict clinical outcomes. These results indicate that mutation location/functional assays are essential for accurate interpretation of the risk associated with LQTS mutations.

Design and characteristics of the prophylactic intra-operative ventricular arrhythmia ablation in high-risk LVAD candidates (PIVATAL) trial.

BACKGROUND: The use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) in patients with advanced heart failure refractory to optimal medical management has progressed steadily over the past two decades. Data have demonstrated reduced LVAD efficacy, worse clinical outcome, and higher mortality for patients who experience significant ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA). We hypothesize that a novel prophylactic intra-operative VTA ablation protocol at the time of LVAD implantation may reduce the recurrent VTA and adverse events postimplant. METHODS: We designed a prospective, multicenter, open-label, randomized-controlled clinical trial enrolling 100 patients who are LVAD candidates with a history of VTA in the previous 5 years. Enrolled patients will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to intra-operative VTA ablation (n = 50) versus conventional medical management (n = 50) with LVAD implant. Arrhythmia outcomes data will be captured by an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) to monitor VTA events, with a uniform ICD programming protocol. Patients will be followed prospectively over a mean of 18 months (with a minimum of 9 months) after LVAD implantation to evaluate recurrent VTA, adverse events, and procedural outcomes. Secondary endpoints include right heart function/hemodynamics, healthcare utilization, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: The primary aim of this first-ever randomized trial is to assess the efficacy of intra-operative ablation during LVAD surgery in reducing VTA recurrence and improving clinical outcomes for patients with a history of VTA.

Arrhythmogenic Cardiotoxicity Associated With Contemporary Treatments of Lymphoproliferative Disorders.

Background There are limited data on risk of arrhythmias among patients with lymphoproliferative disorders. We designed this study to determine the risk of atrial and ventricular arrhythmia during treatment of lymphoma in a real-world setting. Methods and Results The study population comprised 2064 patients included in the University of Rochester Medical Center Lymphoma Database from January 2013 to August 2019. Cardiac arrhythmias-atrial fibrillation/flutter, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular arrhythmia, and bradyarrhythmia-were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the risk of arrhythmic events with treatments categorized as Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi), mainly ibrutinib/non-BTKi treatment versus no treatment. Median age was 64 (54-72) years, and 42% were women. The overall rate of any arrhythmia at 5 years following the initiation of BTKi was (61%) compared with (18%) without treatment. Atrial fibrillation/flutter was the most common type of arrhythmia accounting for 41%. Multivariate analysis showed that BTKi treatment was associated with a 4.3-fold (P<0.001) increased risk for arrhythmic event (P<0.001) compared with no treatment, whereas non-BTKi treatment was associated with a 2-fold (P<0.001) risk increase. Among subgroups, patients without a history of prior arrhythmia exhibited a pronounced increase in the risk for the development of arrhythmogenic cardiotoxicity (3.2-fold; P<0.001). Conclusions Our study identifies a high burden of arrhythmic events after initiation of treatment, which is most pronounced among patients treated with the BTKi ibrutinib. Patients undergoing treatments for lymphoma may benefit from prospective focused cardiovascular monitoring prior, during, and after treatment regardless of arrhythmia history.

Left atrial appendage exclusion with less invasive left ventricular assist device implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this single-center, pilot, prospective, and historical control study is to evaluate safety and feasibility outcomes associated with left atrial appendage exclusion (LAAE) concomitant with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation via less invasive surgery (LIS) as a stroke prevention strategy. METHODS: A predefined number of 30 eligible subjects scheduled for LIS LVAD with LAAE were enrolled in the prospective arm between January 2020 and February 2021. Eligible retrospective LIS LVAD patients without LAAE were propensity-matched in a 1:1 ratio with the prospective arm subjects. The primary study objectives were to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of the LAAE concomitant with LIS LVAD. RESULTS: Preoperative characteristics of patients in the Non-LAAE and LAAE groups were similar. LAAE was successfully excluded in all prospective patients (100%). Primary safety endpoints of chest tube output within the first 24 postoperative hours, Reoperation for bleeding within 48 h, and index hospitalization mortality demonstrated comparable safety of LAAE versus Non-LAAE with LIS LVAD. Cox proportional hazard regression demonstrated that LAAE with LIS LVAD was associated with 37% and 49% reduction in the risk of stroke and disabling stroke, respectively (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Results from our pilot study demonstrated the safety and feasibility of LAAE concomitant with LIS LVAD as a stroke prevention strategy. This is the first prospective study describing LAAE performed concomitantly to less invasive LVAD implantation. The efficacy of LAAE in long-term stroke prevention needs to be confirmed in future prospective randomized clinical trials.

Impact of surgical approach for left ventricular assist device implantation on postoperative invasive hemodynamics and right ventricular failure.

BACKGROUND: Right ventricular failure (RVF) remains one of the major causes of morbidity and mortality after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We sought to compare immediate postoperative invasive hemodynamics and the risk of RVF following two different surgical approaches: less invasive surgery (LIS) versus full sternotomy (FS). METHODS: The study population comprised all 231 patients who underwent implantation of a HeartMate 3 (Abbott) LVAD at our institution from 2015 to 2020, utilizing an LIS (n = 161; 70%) versus FS (n = 70; 30%) surgical approach. Outcomes included postoperative invasive hemodynamic parameters, vasoactive-inotropic score (VIS), RVF during index hospitalization, and 6-month mortality. RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Multivariate analysis showed that LIS, compared with FS, was associated with the improved cardiac index (CI) at the sixth postoperative hour (p = .036) and similar CI at 24 h, maintained by lower VIS at both timepoints (p = .002). The LIS versus FS approach was also associated with a three-fold lower incidence of in-hospital severe RVF (8.7% vs. 28.6%, p < .001) and need for RVAD support (5.0% vs. 17.1%, p = .003), and with 68% reduction in the risk of 6-month mortality after LVAD implantation (Hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.13-0.78; p = .012). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that LIS, compared with FS, is associated with a more favorable hemodynamic profile, as indicated by similar hemodynamic parameters maintained by lower vasoactive-inotropic support during the acute postoperative period. These findings were followed by a reduction in the risk of severe RVF and 6-month mortality in the LIS group.

Sex hormones and repolarization dynamics during the menstrual cycle in women with congenital long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Women with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS) experience increased cardiac event risk after the onset of adolescence, perhaps stemming from the known modulating effects of sex hormones on the cardiac potassium channels. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the effect of sex hormones on cardiac ion channel function may modify electrocardiographic (ECG) parameters associated with the propensity for ventricular tachyarrhythmias during the menstrual cycle in women with LQTS. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 65 women with congenital LQTS (type 1 LQTS [LQT1], n = 24 [36.9%]; type 2 LQTS [LQT2], n = 20 [30.8%]) and unaffected female relatives (n = 21 [32.3%]). Patients underwent three 7-day ECG recordings during their menstrual cycles. Simultaneous saliva testing of sex hormone levels was conducted on the first day of each 7-day ECG recording cycle. RESULTS: The mean age was 35 ± 8 years, without a significant difference among the groups. In women with LQT2, linear mixed effects models showed significant inverse correlations of the corrected QT interval with progesterone levels (P < .001) and with the progesterone to estradiol ratio (P < .001). Inverse relationships of the R-R interval with estradiol levels (P = .003) and of the T-wave duration with testosterone levels (P = .014) were also observed in women with LQT2. In contrast, no significant associations were observed between ECG parameters and sex hormone levels in women with LQT1 or unaffected relatives. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to prospectively assess correlations between repolarization dynamics and sex hormone levels during the menstrual cycle in women with congenital LQTS. Our findings show genotype-specific unique corrected QT dynamics during the menstrual cycle that may affect the propensity for ventricular tachyarrhythmia in women with LQTS, particularly women with LQT2.

Use of oral contraceptives in women with congenital long QT syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Use of oral contraceptives (OCs) may modulate the clinical course of women with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). The safety of OC use by sex hormone content has not been assessed in women with LQTS. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the association of OCs with the risk of cardiac events (CEs) in women with LQTS. METHODS: Beginning in 2010, information on menarche onset, OC use, pregnancy, and menopause were obtained from women enrolled in the Rochester LQTS Registry. Type of OC was categorized as progestin-only, estrogen-only, or combined (estrogen/progestin). Andersen-Gill multivariate modeling was used to evaluate the association of time-dependent OC use with the burden of CE (total number of syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and LQTS-related sudden cardiac death) from menarche onset through 40 years. Findings were adjusted for genotype, corrected QT duration, and time-dependent ß-blocker therapy. RESULTS: A total of 1659 women with LQTS followed through March 2021, of whom 370 (22%) were treated with an OC. During a cumulative follow-up of 35,797 years, there were a total of 2027 CE. Multivariate analysis showed that progestin-only OC was associated with a pronounced 2.8-fold (P = .01) increased risk of CEs in women who did not receive ß-blocker therapy, while ß-blockers were highly protective during progestin-only OC treatment (hazard ratio 0.22; P = .01; P = .006 for ß-blocker-by-OC interaction). The risk associated with OC use without concomitant ß-blocker treatment was pronounced in women with LQTS type 2. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that progestin-only OC should not be administered in women with LQTS without concomitant ß-blocker therapy. OCs should be used with caution in women with LQTS type 2.

Smoking and the Risk of Stroke in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist device.

There are limited data on the association of smoking with the risk of stroke following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We designed this study to analyze the impact of smoking status at the time of LVAD implantation on stroke. We hypothesized that current smokers are at increased risk of stroke when compared with patients who were former or never smokers. The study population comprised of 369 patients in the University of Rochester Medical Center LVAD database, implanted with an LVAD between 2008 and 2018. Patients were stratified as current smoker (smoking within 30 days before LVAD implantation), former smoker, and never smoker. Stroke was defined as a transient ischemic attack or cerebrovascular accident (hemorrhagic or ischemic). There were 45 current smokers, 198 former smokers, and 125 never smokers. Current smokers were younger (mean age 50 ± 11 years), as compared with former (58 ± 12 years) and never smokers (56 ± 13 years) p < 0.001. At 2 years following LVAD implantation, the cumulative incidence of stroke was significantly higher among current smokers (39%) as compared with former and never smokers (16% and 15%, respectively; p = 0.022 for the overall difference during follow-up). In a multivariate model adjusted for significant clinical variables, current smoking was associated with a significant 88% (p = 0.018) higher risk of stroke when compared with all noncurrent smokers. In conclusion, our data suggest that LVAD candidates who are current smokers experience a significantly higher risk of stroke following device implantation.

Association of previous cardiac surgery with outcomes in left ventricular assist device patients.

OBJECTIVES: History of prior cardiac surgery has traditionally been considered a risk factor for subsequent cardiac procedures. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device via redo sternotomy. METHODS: Prospectively collected data were reviewed for all patients implanted with a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device at a single institution from December 2006 through June 2018. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: those with a history of prior cardiac surgery (redo sternotomy) and those undergoing primary sternotomy at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation. The primary outcome was overall survival. RESULTS: Of the 321 patients included in the study, 77 (24%) were implanted via redo sternotomy and 244 (76%) via primary sternotomy. The redo sternotomy cohort was generally older (59 ± 10 vs 57 ± 12 years, P = 0.050) and had a higher incidence of ischaemic disease (70% vs 49%, P = 0.002). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that overall survival was not significantly different between the redo sternotomy and primary sternotomy groups (6-month survival: 86% vs 92%; 5-year survival: 53% vs 51%; log-rank P = 0.590 for overall difference during follow-up). The propensity score analysis consistently showed that redo sternotomy was not significantly associated with mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 0.73-1.93; P = 0.488). Redo sternotomy patients were more likely to require rehospitalization during their first year postoperatively (P = 0.020) and spent less time out of the hospital during the first year (P = 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: The redo sternotomy cohort represents a more technically challenging patient population, but overall survival similar to that of primary sternotomy patients can be achieved.

Clinical Significance of Early Hospital Readmission in Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients.

Data on the clinical significance of early hospital readmission within 90 days following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with continuous-flow LVAD are limited. We aimed to assess the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of 90-day readmission in LVAD patients. Hospital readmission or death was assessed within 90 days after hospital discharge in 177 patients with HeartMate II LVADs implanted between May 2008 and June 2014. Predictors of early readmission and risk of death were evaluated using multivariable Cox models following adjustment for clinical covariates. Hospital readmission or death rate was 37% within 90 days. Age at implantation (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.03 per 1 year increase, p = 0.016), diabetes (HR = 2.19, p = 0.031) and smoking at baseline (HR = 2.06, p = 0.034) predicted early hospital readmission, while a higher baseline body mass index was found to be protective (HR = 0.92 per each unit increase in body mass index, p = 0.003). One-year all-cause mortality was 19% in patients with early hospital readmission as compared to 1% with no early hospital readmission (HR 15.50, p = 0.01). One-year mortality was 35% in patients with 2 or more readmissions compared to 10% mortality in patients with one readmission and 1% mortality in patients with no readmissions (p < 0.001). In LVAD patients, there is a high incidence of hospital readmission within 90 days, which is associated with an increased mortality. Targeted interventions, such as closer follow-up to prevent early and recurrent hospital readmissions in LVAD recipients, are warranted to improve outcomes.

Implantation of a fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device using a sternal-sparing surgical technique.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have improved outcomes for selected patients with advanced heart failure, but alternative optimal surgical techniques remain to be defined. We aim to describe our initial experience in using a sternal-sparing (SS) technique for implantation of a magnetically levitated LVAD, the HeartMate 3 (HM3) pump. METHODS: This retrospective, single-center study included consecutive patients implanted with the HM3 LVAD between September 2015 and September 2018. Patients were compared based on surgical approach: SS or traditional sternotomy (TS). The primary outcome was overall survival at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included peri-operative complications, blood product utilization, and hospital readmissions. RESULTS: Of 105 patients implanted with the HM3 LVAD, 41 (39%) were implanted via SS and 64 (61%) via TS approach. There were no intraoperative conversions. The SS patients were younger; otherwise, all other characteristics were similar between cohorts. The SS cohort demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of severe right ventricular failure (7% vs 28%, p = 0.012), fewer blood-product transfusions (41% vs 86%, p < 0.001), and shorter index hospital length of stay (15.5 vs 21 days, p = 0.018). Six-month survival was 93% for the SS cohort. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center observational study, we have demonstrated that the SS approach may be a safe and effective surgical technique for implantation of the HM3 LVAD in well-selected patients. The potential benefits compared with TS require further inquiry.

Association of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy With Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in Patients With Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiomyopathy.

Importance: The incidence of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy is increasing and is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Objective: To assess the association of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with improvement in cardiac function, as well as clinical improvement in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Chemotherapy-Induced Cardiomyopathy was an uncontrolled, prospective, cohort study conducted between November 21, 2014, and June 21, 2018, at 12 tertiary centers with cardio-oncology programs in the United States. Thirty patients were implanted with CRT owing to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF≤35%), New York Heart Association class II-IV heart failure symptoms, and wide QRS complex, with established chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy and were followed up for 6 months after CRT implantation. The date of final follow-up was February 6, 2019. Exposures: CRT implantation according to standard of care. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in LVEF from baseline to 6 months after initiating CRT. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality and change in left ventricular end-systolic volume and end-diastolic volume. Results: Among 30 patients who were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 64 [11] years; 26 women [87%]; 73% had a history of breast cancer; 20% had a history of lymphoma or leukemia), primary end point data were available for 26 patients and secondary end point data were available for 23 patients. Patients had nonischemic cardiomyopathy with left bundle branch block, median LVEF of 29%, and a mean QRS duration of 152 ms. Patients with CRT experienced a statistically significant improvement in mean LVEF at 6 months from 28% to 39% (difference, 10.6% [95% CI, 8.0%-13.3%]; P < .001). This was accompanied by a reduction in LV end-systolic volume from 122.7 to 89.0 mL (difference, 37.0 mL [95% CI, 28.2-45.8]) and reduction in LV end-diastolic volume from 171.0 to 143.2 mL (difference, 31.9 mL [95% CI, 22.1-41.6]) (both P < .001). Adverse events included a procedure-related pneumothorax (1 patient), a device pocket infection (1 patient), and heart failure requiring hospitalization during follow-up (1 patient). Conclusions and Relevance: In this preliminary study of patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy, CRT was associated with improvement in LVEF after 6 months. The findings are limited by the small sample size, short follow-up, and absence of a control group. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02164721.

Effectiveness of high rate and delayed detection ICD programming by race: A MADIT-RIT substudy.

INTRODUCTION: Data on inappropriate and appropriate ICD therapy, and efficacy of ICD programing strategies by race are limited. METHODS: In MADIT-RIT, we evaluated the risk of ICD therapy by race, and the efficacy of high rate cut-off ventricular tachycardia (VT) zone ≥200 beats per minute (bpm) (Arm B), or 60 seconds delay in VT zone 170-199 bpm (Arm C), compared to 2.5 seconds delay at 170 bpm (Arm A) among black and white patients. RESULTS: MADIT-RIT enrolled 272 (20%) black and 1119 (80%) white patients. The risk of inappropriate therapy was similar among blacks and whites, HR 1.25, 95% CI (0.82-1.93), P  =  0.30. High rate cut-off or delayed VT therapy was associated with significant reductions in inappropriate therapy among whites, Arm B versus Arm A, HR 0.15, 95% CI (0.08-0.29), P < 0.0001, Arm C versus Arm A, HR 0.19, 95% CI (0.11-0.33), P < 0.001, and black individuals Arm B versus Arm A, HR 0.24, 95% CI (0.01-0.56), P  =  0.0001, Arm C versus Arm A, HR 0.30, 95% CI (0.13-0.68), P  =  0.004, P interaction > 0.10). However, delayed VT therapy was associated with a trend toward greater reduction in appropriate therapy in black individuals, HR 0.08, 95% CI (0.03-0.27), P < 0.0001 relative to white individuals, HR 0.27, 95% CI (0.16-0.43), P < 0.0001, P interaction  =  0.077. CONCLUSION: In MADIT-RIT, high rate and delayed detection ICD programming provided similar benefit with reductions in both inappropriate therapy and unnecessary appropriate therapy among black and white individuals. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00947310.

Influence of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes in Patients After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite previous studies, the mortality risk of patients with diabetes mellitus after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant remains unclear. In addition, the relationship between the degree of glycemic control and long-term mortality risk in LVAD patients with diabetes has not been established. METHODS: Ninety-five nondiabetic patients and 96 diabetic patients from the University of Rochester Medical Center who received a HeartMate II (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA) continuous-flow LVAD between May 2008 and June 2014 were included in this study. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included rates of infection, neurologic dysfunction, renal dysfunction, and rehospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and Cox models were utilized. RESULTS: During follow-up, 32 diabetic patients (33%) and 15 nondiabetic patients (16%) died after LVAD implantation. Cumulative probability of death was higher for diabetic patients when compared with nondiabetic patients (42% versus 21% at 3 years, p = 0.013). There were no significant differences in overall rates of infection, neurologic dysfunction, and rehospitalization between the two groups. However, after an initial secondary outcome event, diabetic patients continued to have a higher mortality rate when compared with nondiabetic patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the risk of death between diabetic patients with pre-LVAD hemoglobin A1c less than 7.0% and diabetic patients with pre-LVAD hemoglobin A1c 7.0% or greater (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.72 to 4.08, p = 0.223). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients who underwent LVAD implantation had a higher risk of death compared with nondiabetic patients. Adverse event rates did not differ between the two groups. Finally, the degree of glycemic control in diabetic patients before LVAD was not found to influence mortality.

Clinical presentation at first heart failure hospitalization does not predict recurrent heart failure admission.

AIMS: There are limited data on whether clinical presentation at first heart failure (HF) hospitalization predicts recurrent HF events. We aimed to assess predictors of recurrent HF hospitalizations in mild HF patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data on HF hospitalizations were prospectively collected for patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT. Predictors of recurrent HF hospitalization (HF2) after the first HF hospitalization were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression models including baseline covariates and clinical presentation or management at first HF hospitalization. There were 193 patients with first HF hospitalization, and 156 patients with recurrent HF events. Recurrent HF rate after the first HF hospitalization was 43% at 1 year, 52% at 2 years, and 55% at 2.5 years. Clinical signs and symptoms, medical treatment, or clinical management of HF at first HF admission was not predictive for HF2. Baseline covariates predicting recurrent HF hospitalization included prior HF hospitalization (HR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.15-2.20, P = 0.005), digitalis therapy (HR = 1.58, 95% CI: 1.13-2.20, P = 0.008), and left ventricular end-diastolic volume >240 mL (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.17-2.25, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrent HF events are frequent following the first HF hospitalization in patients with implanted implantable cardioverter defibrillator or cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator. Neither clinical presentation nor clinical management during first HF admission was predictive of recurrent HF. Prior HF hospitalization, digitalis therapy, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume at enrolment predicted recurrent HF hospitalization, and these covariates could be used as surrogate markers for identifying a high-risk cohort.

Multiple Comorbidities and Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: MADIT-CRT Long-Term Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with multiple comorbidities are limited. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the association of multiple comorbidities with the benefits of CRT over implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) alone. METHODS: We examined 1,214 MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy) study patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and 0, 1, 2, or ≥3 comorbidities, including renal dysfunction, hypertension (HTN), diabetes, coronary artery disease, history of atrial arrhythmias, history of ventricular arrhythmias, current smoking, and cerebrovascular accident. In an adjusted analysis, we analyzed risk of heart failure (HF) events or death by comorbidity group in all patients and in patients with CRT with defibrillator (CRT-D) versus ICD. Then we examined percent change in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volume, LV end-systolic volume, LV ejection fraction, left atrial volume, and LV dyssynchrony at 1-year in CRT-D patients by comorbidity group. RESULTS: There was an inverse relationship between comorbidity burden and improvements in LV end-systolic volume, LV end-diastolic volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume, and LV dyssynchrony. In an adjusted model, there was an increasing risk of death or nonfatal HF events with increasing comorbidity burden regardless of treatment group (p < 0.001). During a mean follow-up of 4.65 years, there was no interaction with respect to comorbidity burden and the benefit of CRT-D versus ICD only for death or nonfatal HF events (interaction p = 0.943). In the groups with greatest comorbidity burden (2 and ≥3), the absolute risk reduction associated with CRT-D over ICD alone appeared greater than that seen for groups with less comorbidity burden (0 and 1). CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up of MADIT-CRT study patients with LBBB randomized to CRT-D, there were differences in HF or death risk and in the degree of reverse remodeling among comorbidity groups. However, the burden of comorbidity does not appear to compromise the clinical benefits of CRT-D compared with ICD alone.

Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the risk of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with chronic kidney disease.

BACKGROUND: The effect of chronic kidney disease (CKD) on benefit from cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator (CRT-D) in reducing ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) risk among mild heart failure (HF) patients is not well understood. METHODS: We evaluated the impact of baseline renal function on VTAs in 1274 left bundle branch block (LBBB) patients enrolled in MADIT-CRT. Two prespecified subgroups were created based on estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR): GFR <60 (n = 413) and GFR ≥60 ml/min/1.73 m2 (n = 861). Primary end point was ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation/death (VT/VF/death). Secondary end points were any VT/VF and ventricular tachycardia ≥ 200 bpm or VF (fast VT/VF). RESULTS: There were 413 (32%) LBBB patients presenting with CKD, primarily of moderate severity (GFR mean 48.1 ± 8.3). For patients with and without CKD, CRT-D was associated with lower risk of the primary end point (GFR<60: HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .010; GFR≥60: HR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.52-0.89, p = .005), relative to ICD-only treatment. For patients in both renal function categories, CRT-D in comparison to ICD alone was associated with lower risk of VT/VF (GFR<60: HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.42-1.10, p = .113; GFR≥60: HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.88, p = .005) and fast VT/VF (GFR<60: HR = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.25-0.96, p = .038; GFR≥60: HR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.39-0.80, p = .001), when accounting for competing mortality risk. This effect was independent of CRT-induced reverse remodeling. CONCLUSION: Among mild HF patients with LBBB, those with and without CKD both derived benefit from CRT-D in risk reduction in VTAs, independent of cardiac reverse remodeling.

Clinical Presentation and Outcomes by Sex in Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy: Findings from the North American ARVC Registry.

BACKGROUND: Sex differences in clinical presentation and outcomes of hereditary arrhythmias are commonly reported. We aimed to compare clinical presentation and outcomes in men and women with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) enrolled in the North American ARVC Registry. METHODS: A total of 125 ARVC probands (55 females, mean age 38 ± 12; 70 males, mean age 41 ± 15) diagnosed, as either "affected" or "borderline" were included. Baseline clinical characteristics and time-dependent outcomes including syncope, ventricular tachycardia (VT), fast VT (>240 bpm), ventricular fibrillation (VF), and death were compared between males and females. RESULTS: The percentage of ARVC subjects diagnosed as "affected" (84% vs. 89%; P = 0.424) or "borderline" (16% vs. 11%; P = 0.424) was similar between females and males. Among the baseline characteristics, inverted T-waves in V2 trended to be more common in women (P = 0.09), whereas abnormal signal-averaged ECGs (SAECGs; P < 0.001) and inducible VT/VF (P = 0.026) were more frequent in men. During a mean follow-up of 37 ± 20 months, the probability of ICD-recorded VT/VF or death was not significantly different between men and women (P = 0.456). However, there was a trend toward lower risk of fast VT/VF or death in women compared to men (hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.151-1.113, P = 0.066). Abnormal SAECG and evidence of intramyocardial fat by cardiac MRI was associated with adverse outcomes in men (P = 0.006 and 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSION: In the North American ARVC Registry, we found similar frequency of "affected" and "borderline" subjects between men and women. Sex-related differences were observed in baseline ECG, SAECG, Holter-recorded ventricular arrhythmias, and VT inducibility. Men showed a trend toward greater risk of fast VT than women.

Relationship between age and inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy in MADIT-RIT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy).

BACKGROUND: There is limited data regarding the relationship between age and inappropriate therapy among patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) and resynchronization therapy. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate this relationship and the effect of ICD programming on inappropriate therapy by age. METHODS: In the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial-Reduce Inappropriate Therapy (MADIT-RIT) 1500 patients were randomized to 3 ICD programming arms: (A) conventional with ventricular tachycardia (VT) therapy ≥170; (B) high-rate cutoff with VT therapy ≥200, and (C) prolonged 60-second delay for VT therapy ≥170. We investigated the relationship between age, the risk of inappropriate ICD therapy (including antitachycardia pacing [ATP] or shock), and ICD programming. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence function Kaplan-Meier graphs showed an inverse relationship between increasing quartiles of age (Q1: ≤55, Q2: 56-64, Q3: 65-71, and Q4: ≥72 years) and the risk for inappropriate therapy. Multivariate analyses showed that each increasing decade of life was associated with 34% (P < .001), 27% (P < .001), and 26% (P < .001) reduction in the risk of inappropriate shock, inappropriate ATP, and any inappropriate therapy, respectively. Treatment arms B and C as compared with arm A were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of inappropriate therapies across all age quartiles (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with a primary prevention indication for an ICD, there is an inverse relationship between age and inappropriate ICD therapy. Innovative ICD programming of high-rate cutoff or prolonged delay for VT therapy is associated with significant reductions in inappropriate therapy among all age groups.