Exercise-based training programs for patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: We assessed the effects of exercise-based training programs (EBTP) in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a search in Pubmed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library, and SciELO until January 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized intervention studies (NRIS) investigating the effects of EBTP in CCC patients were included. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and the secondary outcomes were exercise capacity by peak VO2, heart failure-related hospital admissions (HFRHA), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: The search strategy yielded 3617 studies. After removing duplicates and screening, eight studies (3 RCTs and 5 NRIS) involving 222 patients were included. Seven studies were conducted in Brazil. The age range was from 30 to 71 years, and 47.1% were male. Data on mortality, HRQoL, LVEF, and HFRHA were scarcely reported. The meta-analysis pooling four studies showed that the peak VO2 was significantly higher (mean difference 4.45, 95% confidence interval 3.50 to 5.39 mL/kg/min, I2 = 0%) in the EBTP group compared to the control group. Conclusion: The evidence available was limited and heterogeneous. While EBTP has shown to improve HRQoL and exercise capacity, there is no conclusive information about the other proposed outcomes. These positive effects present an opportunity to provide treatment to CCC patients in low- and middle-income countries. Further studies are needed to ascertain the effects of EBTP on hard outcomes in this population.Registration number: CRD42022334060.

Concordancia entre ecoscopia realizada por médicos no cardiólogos y ecocardiografía convencional / Agreement between "echoscopy" performed by non-cardiologist physicians and conventional cardiac ultrasound

Resumen Introducción: el ultrasonido cardiaco enfocado ha sido propuesto como una aproximación útil para mejorar la toma de decisiones clínicas, permitiendo identificar rápidamente signos ultrasonográficos de una lista específica de diagnósticos potenciales. Objetivo: evaluar un programa de entrenamiento para médicos sin experiencia en ecocardiografía a fin de realizar ultrasonido cardiaco enfocado por medio de un dispositivo portátil (ecoscopio). Materiales y métodos: se compararon los resultados obtenidos mediante ecoscopia realizada por los médicos que recibieron el entrenamiento, con los obtenidos mediante ecocardiografía convencional realizada por cardiólogos expertos. Métodos: un total de 5 médicos no cardiólogos incluyendo un estudiante de Medicina de último año, 2 residentes de Medicina Interna y 2 Intensivistas participaron en un curso de entrenamiento de cuatro semanas, dirigido por un Cardiólogo experto de nivel III así: Primera semana: teoría y bases de ecocardiografía (3 horas diarias) Segunda semana: teoría de la adquisición de imágenes. Hallazgos normales y anormales (50 estudios). Tercera semana: manejo del ecoscopio (50 estudios). Cuarta semana: recolección de datos. Se incluyeron pacientes programados para ecocardiografía convencional en el Laboratorio de métodos no invasivos. A cada paciente se le realizaron dos exámenes. El primero consistió en una ecoscopia hecha por médico que recibió el entrenamiento y el segundo consistió en un ecocardiograma realizado por un cardiólogo experto. Los parámetros ecocardiográficos evaluados fueron: fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo, disfunción ventricular derecha, crecimiento auricular izquierdo, hipertensión pulmonar, enfermedad valvular cardiaca y derrame pericárdico. Por medio de análisis de concordancia (índice Kappa) se compararon los resultados encontrados en ecoscopia versus ecocardiografía. Resultados: de 221 estudios se obtuvo concordancia moderada en fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo (к =0,541, p<0,000), función ventricular derecha (к =0,403, p<0,001), dilatación de la aurícula izquierda (к =0,413, p<0,001), valvulopatía mitral (к =0,466, p<0,001) y tricuspídea (к =0,437, p<0,001). La valvulopatía aórtica mostró un acuerdo débil. El derrame pericárdico y la hipertensión pulmonar tuvieron concordancia pobre y débil, respectivamente. Conclusiones: con un tiempo limitado de formación, los participantes sin experiencia previa en técnicas de ultrasonido y utilizando ecoscopia, alcanzaron un acuerdo moderado en la mayoría de las mediciones cuando se comparó con ecocardiografía convencional practicada por ecocardiografistas expertos. Es necesario un estudio con mayor número de participantes que determine el tiempo de formación ideal para obtener resultados comparables con ecocardiografía.

Abstract Introduction: Focused cardiac ultrasound has been proposed as a useful approach for improving clinical decision making, as well as to be able to rapidly identify the ultrasound signs of a specific list of potential diagnoses. Objective: To evaluate a training program for physicians with no experience in cardiac ultrasound with the aim performing focused cardiac ultrasound using a portable device (echoscopy). Materials and methods: The results obtained from echoscopy performed by the physicians that received training were compared with those obtained with conventional cardiac ultrasound carried out by expert cardiologists. A total of 5 non-cardiologist doctors, including 1 medical student, 2 Internal Medicine residents, and 2 from Intensive Medicine, took part in a four-week training course given by a Level III Cardiology specialist. The course included: First week: Theory and basis of cardiac ultrasound (3 hours daily) Second week: Theory of acquiring images. Normal and abnormal findings (50 studies). Third week: handling of the echoscope (50 studies). Fourth week: Data collection. The study included patients scheduled for conventional cardiac ultrasound in the Non-Invasive Methods Laboratory. Two examinations were carried out on each patient. The first consisted of an echoscopy performed by a doctor that had received the training, and the second consisted of a cardiac ultrasound carried out by an expert cardiologist. The ultrasound parameters evaluated were: left ventricular ejection fraction, right ventricular dysfunction, left atrial enlargement, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac valve disease, and pericardial effusion. The results found in echoscopy versus cardiac ultrasound were compared using concordance analysis (Kappa Index). Results: The following results were obtained on the 221 studies performed: moderate agreement in left ventricular ejection fraction (к =0.541, P<.000), right ventricular function (к =0.403, P<.001), left atrial enlargement (к =0.413, P<.001), mitral valve and tricuspid valve disease (к =0.437, P<.001 and (к =0.466, P<.001, respectively). There was weak agreement with aortic valve disease. Pericardiac effusion and the presence of pulmonary hypertension had a poor and week agreement, respectively. Conclusions: With a limited training period, the participants with no previous experience in ultrasound techniques and using echoscopy achieved a moderate agreement in the majority of measurements when compared with conventional cardiac ultrasound performed by experts in the technique. A study with a larger number of participants is required in order to determine the ideal training period to obtain results comparable with cardiac ultrasound.

A comparison of reconstruction and viewing parameters on image quality and accuracy of stress myocardial CT perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Myocardial stress computed tomography perfusion (CTP) has similar diagnostic accuracy for detecting perfusion defects (PDs) versus single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). However, the optimal diagnostic viewing and image processing parameters for CTP are unknown. OBJECTIVE: We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of different image processing techniques, cardiac phases, slice thicknesses, and viewing parameters for detection of PDs. METHODS: A stress and rest dual-source CTP protocol was performed with adenosine. Twelve subjects with severe stenosis proven by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), with corresponding territorial defects at SPECT, were selected as well as 7 controls (subjects with similar clinical suspicion but negative QCA and SPECT). Short-axis stress images were processed with 3 techniques: minimum intensity projection (MinIP), maximum intensity projection, and average intensity multiplanar reconstruction (MPR), 3 thicknesses (1, 3, 8 mm), and 2 phases (systolic, mid-diastolic). The resulting images (n = 1026) were randomized and interpreted by independent readers. RESULTS: Diastolic reconstructions (8-mm MPR) showed the highest sensitivity (81%) to detect true PDs. The highest accuracy was achieved with the 8-mm (61%) and 1-mm (61%) MPR diastolic images. The most sensitive and accurate systolic reconstructions were 3-mm MinIP images. These findings related to viewing in relatively narrow window width and window level settings. CONCLUSION: Viewing parameters for optimal accuracy in detection of perfusion defects on CTP differ for systolic and diastolic images.

Safety of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention.

We sought to determine the safety and efficacy of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Four hundred ninety-three consecutive patients undergoing elective or emergency PCI received unfractionated heparin (70 U/kg, intravenously) or enoxaparin (1 mg/kg, intravenously). Patients who had received subcutaneous enoxaparin in the emergency department were given a supplementary 0.3-mg/kg intravenous dose. There was no crossover of therapies. All patients received oral antiplatelet therapy and eptifibatide. Primary safety outcomes were bleeding and a postprocedural hemoglobin decrease of >or=3 g/dL. Troponin I levels were considered a marker for myocardial injury.Two hundred twenty-two patients received enoxaparin, and 271 received unfractionated heparin. There were no thrombotic events or in-hospital deaths. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin yielded a lower risk of bleeding (odds ratio [OR]=0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-1.05) and significantly fewer >3-g/dL decreases in hemoglobin (OR=0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.94). Enoxaparin also produced less of a decrease in mean platelet count (41 +/- 34 vs 55 +/- 63 x10(9)/L; P = 0.02) and in platelets >30% from baseline (OR=0.56; 95% CI, 0.31-0.99). After elective PCI, fewer enoxaparin patients had troponin I levels >or=3 times the upper limit of normal (OR=0.40; 95% CI, 0.028-0.66).Compared with unfractionated heparin, enoxaparin entailed less bleeding during both elective and emergent PCI and less cardiac enzyme elevation in patients undergoing elective PCI. Therefore, we believe that intravenous enoxaparin is a safe alternative to unfractionated heparin in both settings.

Comprehensive imaging including three-dimensional echocardiography of an infected, ruptured sinus of valsalva aneurysm.

A 30-year-old man presented with fevers and fatigue. Blood cultures grew Streptococcus mitis in 4/4 bottles. Transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography revealed an anterior coronary sinus of Valsalva (SOV) aneurysm with fistula formation into the right ventricle with vegetation on the fistulous tract, and a bicuspid aortic valve without vegetation. Transesophageal echocardiography confirmed these findings. After parenteral antibiotic treatment, the patient went for successful repair of the fistula, with the imaging findings confirmed at surgery. This case represents a rare complication of a ruptured SOV aneurysm, with excellent delineation of cardiac anatomy using transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography.