Cost-of-Illness of Skin Cancer: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer's rising incidence demands understanding of its economic impact. The current understanding is fragmented because of the various methodological approaches applied in skin cancer cost-of-illness studies. OBJECTIVE: This study systematically reviews melanoma and keratinocyte carcinoma cost-of-illness studies to provide an overview of the applied methodological approaches and to identify the main cost drivers. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted adhering to the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from December 2022 until December 2023 using a search strategy with entry terms related to the concepts of skin cancer and cost of illness. The records were screened on the basis of the title and abstract and subsequently on full text against predetermined eligibility criteria. Articles published before 2012 were excluded. A nine-item checklist adapted for cost-of-illness studies was used to assess the methodological quality of the articles. RESULTS: This review included a total of 45 studies, together evaluating more than half a million patients. The majority of the studies (n = 36) focused on melanoma skin cancer, a few (n = 3) focused on keratinocyte carcinomas, and 6 studies examined both. Direct costs were estimated in all studies, while indirect costs were only estimated in nine studies. Considerable heterogeneity was observed across studies, mainly owing to disparities in study population, methodological approaches, included cost categories, and differences in healthcare systems. In melanoma skin cancer, both direct and indirect costs increased with progressing tumor stage. In advanced stage melanoma, systemic therapy emerged as the main cost driver. In contrast, for keratinocyte carcinoma no obvious cost drivers were identified. CONCLUSIONS: A homogeneous skin cancer cost-of-illness study design would be beneficial to enhance between-studies comparability, identification of cost drivers, and support evidence-based decision-making for skin cancer.

A critical re-evaluation of Mohs micrographic surgery for a facial basal cell carcinoma in older adults: Should we waive this treatment in certain patients?

BACKGROUND: Skin cancer incidences are increasing. Treatment for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs) can be questioned in certain patients. Treatment options are various, but Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) has the highest cure rate. It is, however, time-consuming and results in high logistical burden and treatment costs for both patients and society. OBJECTIVES: This study critically re-evaluates MMS for facial BCCs in older adults. The main objective is to examine all clinical, tumour and patient characteristics in relation to safety and survival to detect a subgroup in which MMS was not the best choice. The overall aim is to identify characteristics that support clinical decision-making in daily practice. METHODS: Patients that received MMS between November 1998 and December 2012 were included. Only patients >75 years with a facial BCC were withheld for analysis. This is a retrospective cohort study, since evaluating the outcome of MMS in accordance with life expectancy is the main objective. Patient charts were evaluated towards comorbidities, complications and survival. RESULTS: This cohort comprises 207 patients. Median survival was 7.85 years. The age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (aCCI) was divided into low/medium scores (aCCI < 6) and high scores (aCCI ≥ 6). Median survival was 11.58 years in the low aCCI group and 3.60 years in the high aCCI group (p < 0.001). There was a very strong association between high aCCI and survival (HR, 6.25; 95% CI, 3.83-10.21). Other characteristics were not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should assess the aCCI in older patients presenting with a facial BCC before deciding if MMS is an eligible treatment option. High aCCI has shown to be an indicator for low median survival, even in MMS patients with usually high functional status. MMS should be waived as treatment in older patients with high aCCI scores in favour of other, less intensive and less expensive treatment options.

A Detailed Evaluation of the Effect of Prostate-specific Antigen-based Screening on Morbidity and Mortality of Prostate Cancer: 21-year Follow-up Results of the Rotterdam Section of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Considering the long natural history of prostate cancer (PCa), long-term results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for PCa (ERSPC) are crucial. OBJECTIVE: To provide an update on the effect of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening on PCa-specific mortality (PCSM), metastatic disease, and overdiagnosis in the Dutch arm of the ERSPC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Between 1993 and 2000, a total of 42376 men, aged 55-74 yr, were randomised to a screening or a control arm. The main analysis was performed with men aged 55-69 yr (n = 34831). Men in the screening arm were offered PSA-based screening with an interval of 4 yr. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Intention-to-screen analyses with Poisson regression were used to calculate rate ratios (RRs) of PCSM and metastatic PCa. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: After a median follow-up of 21 yr, the RR of PCSM was 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-0.88) favouring screening. The numbers of men needed to invite (NNI) and needed to diagnose (NND) to prevent one PCa death were 246 and 14, respectively. For metastatic PCa, the RR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58-0.78) favouring screening. The NNI and NND to prevent one metastasis were 121 and 7, respectively. No statistical difference in PCSM (RR of 1.18 [95% CI: 0.87-1.62]) was observed in men aged ≥70 yr at the time of randomisation. In the screening arm, higher rates of PCSM and metastatic disease were observed in men who were screened only once and in a selected group of men above the screening age cut-off of 74 yr. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis illustrates that with a follow-up of 21 yr, both absolute metastasis and mortality reduction continue to increase, resulting in a more favourable harm-benefit ratio than demonstrated previously. These data do not support starting screening at the age of 70-74 yr and show that repeated screening is essential. PATIENT SUMMARY: Prostate-specific antigen-based prostate cancer screening reduces metastasis and mortality. Longer follow-up shows fewer invitations and diagnoses needed to prevent one death, a positive note towards the issue of overdiagnosis.