Alcohol Consumption Post-Liver Transplantation: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Listing patients with alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) for liver transplant (LT) remains challenging especially due to the risk of alcohol resumption post-LT. We aimed to evaluate post-LT alcohol consumption at a Portuguese transplant center. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including LT recipients from 2019 at Curry Cabral Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal. A pretested survey and a validated Portuguese translation of the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) were applied via a telephone call. Alcohol consumption was defined by patients' self-reports or a positive AUDIT. Results: In 2019, 122 patients underwent LT, and 99 patients answered the survey (June 2021). The mean (SD) age was 57 (10) years, 70 patients (70.7%) were males, and 49 (49.5%) underwent ALD-related LT. During a median (IQR) follow-up of 24 (20-26) months post-index LT, 22 (22.2%) recipients consumed any amount of alcohol: 14 had a drink monthly or less and 8 drank 2-4 times/month. On drinking days, 18 patients usually consumed 1-2 drinks and the remainder no more than 3-4 drinks. One patient reported having drunk ≥6 drinks on one occasion. All post-LT drinking recipients were considered low risk (score <8) as per the AUDIT score (median [IQR] of 1 [1-2]). No patient reported alcohol-related problems, whether self-inflicted or toward others. Drinking recipients were younger (53 vs. 59 years, p = 0.020), had more non-ALD-related LT (72.7 vs. 44.2%, p = 0.018) and active smoking (31.8 vs. 10.4%, p = 0.037) than abstinent ones. Conclusion: In our cohort, about a quarter of LT recipients consumed alcohol early posttransplant, all with a low-risk pattern according to the AUDIT score.

Introdução: Incluir doentes com doença hepática associada ao álcool (DHA) em lista ativa de transplante hepático (TH) é desafiante, especialmente pelo risco de recidiva de consumo de álcool pós-TH. O objetivo foi avaliar o consumo de álcool pós-TH num centro de transplantação português. Métodos: Realizamos um estudo transversal incluindo doentes submetidos a TH em 2019 no Hospital Curry Cabral, Lisboa, Portugal. Foi realizado um questionário previamente testado e uma tradução validada para o português do Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), através de uma chamada telefónica. O consumo de álcool foi definido pelo autorrelato do doente ou por um AUDIT positivo. Resultados: Durante 2019, 122 doentes foram submetidos a TH e 99 responderam ao questionário (junho de 2021). A idade média (SD) foi de 57 (10) anos, 70 doentes (70,7%) eram do sexo masculino e 49 (49,5%) foram submetidos a TH relacionado com DHA. Com uma mediana (IQR) de follow-up de 24 (20­26) meses após o TH-índex, 22 (22,2%) doentes admitiram algum consumo de álcool: 14 beberam mensalmente ou menos e oito beberam 2­4 vezes/mês. Nos dias em que bebiam, 18 consumiam normalmente 1­2 bebidas e os restantes não mais do que 3­4 bebidas. Um doente reportou o consumo de ≥6 bebidas em uma ocasião. Todos os doentes transplantados com consumo alcoólico pós-TH foram considerados de baixo risco (pontuação >8) de acordo com o AUDIT (mediana [IQR] de 1 [1­2]). Nenhum doente reportou problemas relacionados com o álcool, tanto autoinfligido como a terceiros. Os indivíduos transplantados com consumo alcoólico eram mais jovens (53 vs. 59 anos, p = 0,020), o motivo de TH era mais frequentemente não relacionado com DHA (72,7 vs. 44,2%, p = 0,018) e apresentavam mais tabagismo ativo (31,8 vs. 10,4%, p = 0,037) quando comparado com os abstinentes. Conclusão: Na nossa coorte, cerca de um quarto dos doentes transplantados hepáticos consumiram álcool no período pós-transplante precoce, todos com um padrão de baixo risco, de acordo com o AUDIT.

Quality of life following liver transplantation: a comparative study between Familial Amyloid Neuropathy and liver disease patients.

BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated in many studies that quality of life can be improved after liver transplantation in patients with liver disease. Nevertheless, quality of life improvement in specific groups of transplanted patients such as those with Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy has not yet been explored. The present study aimed to compare the change in quality of life following liver transplantation between patients with Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy (FAP) and patients with liver disease. RESULTS: Patient's mental quality of life showed an improvement in all liver disease patients, and a worsening in FAP patients, resulting in a significant difference between the two groups. Regarding physical quality of life, although a similar improvement was seen in both groups, FAP patients had significantly less improvement than the sub-group of decompensated liver disease (Child-Pugh B and C). CONCLUSION: It is concluded that liver transplantation has a less beneficial impact in FAP patient's physical quality of life, probably because they are not so much disabled by their disease at the moment of liver transplantation. The lesser improvement in mental quality of life of FAP patients may be due to their particular psychological profile and greater expectations towards transplantation.

Psychiatric differences between liver transplant candidates with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and those with alcoholic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric diagnoses are very common in liver transplant candidates, and such diagnoses are predictive of a poor clinical evolution and quality of life after transplantation. Also, nonadherence before the transplant is predictive of nonadherence after the transplant. METHODS: We studied the psychiatric and psychosocial profiles of 85 liver transplant candidates, comprising consecutive patients attending outpatient clinics of a liver transplantation unit at a public hospital. Interviews and questionnaires were used to measure personality traits, symptoms of anxiety and depression, social support, and adherence. These patients were broken into 3 groups: patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy (n = 20), patients with alcoholic liver disease (n = 33), and patients with other liver diseases (n = 32). RESULTS: About 58% of patients had a current psychiatric diagnosis (24.8%, major depressive disorder, 22.3% generalized anxiety disorder, 8.3% adaptive disorder, 2.3% abuse of or dependence on substances other than alcohol). Current psychiatric diagnosis did not differ between patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy and patients with alcoholic liver disease. Patients with alcoholic liver disease showed lower scores for 2 protective personality traits, social support and adherence to medication, than other patients. Patients with familial amyloid polyneuropathy showed higher scores for those traits. CONCLUSIONS: All patients waiting for a liver transplant should undergo psychiatric and psychological assessment. Some psychological characteristics such as personality traits and social support differ between clinical groups, so it may be useful to design different approaches for each group. Patients with alcoholic liver disease may require a special approach to improve adherence to medication.