Haploidentical vs HLA-matched sibling donor HCT with PTCy prophylaxis: HLA factors and donor age considerations.

ABSTRACT: HLA-matched sibling donors (MSDs) are preferred for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, the use of alternative donors, especially haploidentical, is increasing, as is our understanding of the impact of HLA factors such as B-leader and DRB1-matching on its outcomes. Yet, data comparing these donor types, particularly considering these HLA factors, is lacking. Herein, we compared haploidentical-HCT (n = 1052) with MSD-HCT (n = 400), both with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, haploidentical group had similar overall survival (OS; hazard ratio (HR), 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.14; P = .54), nonrelapse mortality (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.72-1.32; P = .87), and relapse (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.70-1.08; P = .20) as the MSD group. Younger donor age was a significant predictor of improved OS. Next, we directly compared the outcomes of "younger" haploidentical (donor age <35 years, n = 347) vs an "older" MSD (donor age ≥50 years, n = 143) in older recipients (patient age ≥50 years). Patients with younger haploidentical B-leader-matched donors had significantly superior OS (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P = .009) than the older MSD group. Additionally, patients with younger DRB1-mismatched haploidentical donors (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P = .004) had significantly lower risk of relapse than older MSDs. Our study suggests that haploidentical-HCT may offer comparable outcomes to MSD-PTCy HCT. Moreover, among older patients, a younger haploidentical B-leader-matched donor might be preferable to an older MSD. These findings need validation in larger data sets.

Decreasing Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease rates in all populations.

Since 2005 there has been steady decline in chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center (FHCC). To better understand this phenomenon, we studied the risk of cGVHD requiring systemic immunosuppression (cGVHD-IS) as a function of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-date in 3066 survivors from 2005 through 2019. Cox regression models were fit to assess associations of HCT-date (as a continuous linear variable) with cause-specific hazards of cGVHD, using unadjusted and adjusted models. Median follow-up for study subjects was 7.0 years (range, 1.0-17.2). Two-year probabilities of cGVHD-IS declined among all survivors from 45-52% (2005-2007) to approximately 40% (2008-2012) and then further to ~26% by 2017. A decline was also observed when the analysis was restricted to 502 pediatric survivors, with cGVHD-IS probabilities being <10% since 2013. Among 305 adult and pediatric survivors who were transplanted for nonmalignant diseases, cGVHD rates showed greater fluctuation but remained <20% after 2016. Each 5-year increase in HCT-date was associated with a 27% decrease in the cause-specific hazard of cGVHD (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.78, p<.0001); the HR was 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.87, p<.0001) even after adjusting for various factors (age, donor/stem-cell source, race, sex, conditioning intensity, GVHD prophylaxis, among others) that could lead to cGVHD reduction. The decline in cGVHD was not fully explained by demographic shifts and greater use of HCT approaches generally associated with lower cGVHD rates. This observation underscores that single-cohort cGVHD-prevention studies should use contemporaneous and not historical controls for comparisons.

Interplay between donor age and HLA-DP matching in 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor HCT.

ABSTRACT: In 10/10 HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with calcineurin-inhibitor (CNI)-based prophylaxis, T-cell epitope DP-matched and permissive mismatched donors are associated with similar overall survival (OS) whereas donors with nonpermissive mismatches should be avoided. Younger unrelated donors are also favored over older donors. We explored outcomes associated with different combinations of DP-matching and donor age (dichotomized at 35 years) to further guide donor selection. Using a Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data set, we categorized 10 783 patients into 6 groups: DP-matched/younger donor (n = 1591), DP-matched/older donor (n = 526), permissive-mismatched/younger donor (n = 3845), permissive-mismatched/older donor (n = 1184), nonpermissive mismatched/younger donor (n = 2659), and nonpermissive mismatched/older donor (n = 978). We noted that younger donor age, rather than DP matching, was associated with better OS. Younger donors with permissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older matched donors. Furthermore, younger donors with nonpermissive mismatches were associated with improved OS compared with older donors with permissive mismatches. Our study adds further information about the association of DP matching and donor age with HCT outcomes. Donor age should be prioritized over DP matching in patients undergoing 10/10 HLA-MUD with CNI prophylaxis. Among those with younger donors, permissive-mismatched or DP-matched donors are preferred over nonpermissive mismatched donors.

Haploidentical Versus Mismatched Unrelated Donor Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: HLA Factors and Donor Age Considerations.

HLA-mismatched unrelated donors and haploidentical related donors are suitable stem cell sources for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) when patients lack HLA-matched donors. Clinical outcome after mismatched HCT is influenced by HLA factors including the similarity of peptide-binding motifs (PBMs) between the patient and unrelated donor, and of the HLA-B leader in unrelated and haploidentical donors. Whether these factors can aid in the selection between mismatched unrelated and haploidentical donors is not known. To address this question, we investigated outcomes between the two donor types defined by matching for the PBM and leader peptide. We compared PBM-matched (n = 614) and mismatched (n = 958) MMUDs with calcineurin-inhibitor-based prophylaxis to four haploidentical groups that received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)-based prophylaxis. The haploidentical groups were B-leader matched/DRB1-mismatched (n = 722), B-leader matched/DRB1-matched (n = 154), B-leader mismatched/DRB1-mismatched (n = 493), and B-leader mismatched/DRB1-matched (n = 63). Multivariate analysis showed that the B-leader matched/DRB1-mismatched haploidentical group had the best overall survival (OS) compared to the PBM-matched MMUD, while other haploidentical groups had comparable OS. The PBM-mismatched MMUD showed the poorest outcomes, similar to the B-leader mismatched/DRB1-matched haploidentical group. Among non-HLA factors, donor age was the most significant predictor of OS. These results suggest that a B-leader matched/DRB1 mismatched haploidentical donor might be the preferred choice among donors of similar age. If such a donor is not available, the youngest donor from either PBM-matched unrelated or other haploidentical groups could be a beneficial choice. These findings need validation with both donor groups receiving PTCy-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Current Status and Future Directions of Donor Selection.

The landscape of HLA matching in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is continuously advancing, introducing more nuanced criteria beyond traditional 10/10 HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 allele matching. For 10/10 matched donors, prioritizing a donor with a "core" permissive HLA-DPB1 mismatch is recommended over "noncore" permissive mismatches, with nonpermissive mismatches being the least prefered. In the one-antigen mismatched setting (7/8 HLA-matched), HLA-C matching, particularly avoiding high-expression mismatches at residues 116 or 77/80, is preferred over HLA-A or HLA-B mismatches. HLA B-leader matching is beneficial in both one-antigen mismatched and haploidentical HCT. Additionally, specific HLA mismatches in haploidentical HCT, such as DRB1 mismatches with DQB1 matches and DPB1 nonpermissive mismatches are linked to better outcomes. Among non-HLA factors, evidence consistently underscores the pivotal impact of donor age on overall survival. For HLA-mismatched transplants, including haploidentical HCT, avoidance of donors against whom the recipient has preformed donor-specific antibodies is paramount. Selecting a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seronegative donor is important particularly for CMV-negative recipients; however, more research is needed in the letermovir prophylaxis era. The impact of ABO-matching on transplant outcomes is debatable. Other unanswered questions include defining "younger" donors and establishing hierarchy in donor selection based on factors like CMV status, ABO compatibility, or sex-mismatch, to name a few. Future research addressing these issues will refine donor selection algorithms and improve transplant success. In conclusion, selecting a donor for HCT requires multifaceted considerations, integrating evolving HLA-matching criteria and non-HLA factors, to optimize HCT outcomes in this rapidly advancing field.

Combined effect of unrelated donor age and HLA peptide-binding motif match status on HCT outcomes.

ABSTRACT: An HLA-mismatched unrelated donor who is class I peptide-binding motif (PBM)-matched is preferred over a PBM-mismatched donor. We hypothesized that using a younger donor (aged ≤35 years vs >35 years) could compensate for the inferior overall survival (OS) associated with PBM mismatches. We compared 6 groups: HLA-matched/younger donor (n = 10 531), HLA-matched/older donor (n = 3572), PBM-matched/younger donor (n = 357), PBM-matched/older donor (n = 257), PBM-mismatched/younger donor (n = 616), and PBM-mismatched/older donor (n = 339) in patients undergoing transplantation with conventional graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, HLA-matched/younger donors were associated with superior OS relative to any other group. Pairwise comparisons showed that donor age significantly impacted OS in both HLA-matched and HLA-mismatched groups. Moreover, younger donors appeared to negate the detrimental effect of PBM mismatching: the PBM-matched/younger donor group had similar OS as the HLA-matched/older donor group and the PBM-mismatched/younger donor group had similar OS as the PBM-matched/older donor group. Our study suggests that older unrelated donor age and PBM mismatching confer similarly adverse effects on OS and the impacts are additive, a finding which may widen the "acceptable" donor pool. The best OS is observed with HLA-matched/younger donors and the worst with PBM-mismatched/older donors. These findings should be validated with other data sets and with posttransplantation cyclophosphamide-based prophylaxis.

Financial Toxicity, Time Toxicity, and Quality of Life in Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) may be on therapy for years, which can lead to financial toxicity (FinTox) or time toxicity (TimeTox). The prevalence, predictors, and quality of life (QOL) impacts of FinTox and TimeTox during different phases of MM treatment have not been characterized. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center cross-sectional survey of patients with MM who had undergone transplantation. FinTox+ was defined as a COST-FACIT score <23, TimeTox+ as MM-related interactions (including phone calls) ≥1x weekly or ≥1x monthly in-person among far-residing patients, QOL using PROMIS Global Health, and functional status using patient-reported Karnofsky performance status (KPS). RESULTS: Of 252 patients, 22% and 40% met FinTox+ and TimeTox+ criteria respectively. Respective FinTox+ and TimeTox+ proportions were 22%/37% for patients on maintenance, 22%/82% with active therapy, and 20%/14% with observation. FinTox+ predictors included annual income (P < .01) and out-of-pocket costs (P < .01). TimeTox+ predictors included disease status (P < .001), caregiver status (P = .01), far-residing status (P < .001), and out-of-pocket costs (P = .03). FinTox+ was associated with a clinically meaningful decrease in mental QOL, while TimeTox+ patients were more likely to have KPS ≤ 80. CONCLUSIONS: In our large study, monetary status but not disease status predicted FinTox. Over a third of patients on maintenance reported TimeTox. FinTox+ was associated with decreased mental health, while TimeTox+ was associated with worse performance status. These two toxicities may negatively impact patient wellbeing, and studies of strategies to mitigate their impact are in development.

Effect of donor age in patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation vary by conditioning intensity and recipient age.

We investigated the impact of donor age (younger [≤35 years] vs. older [>35 years]) after accounting for other non-HLA and HLA factors on outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia undergoing HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (n = 790). The effect differed by conditioning-partly related to the differences in the recipient age in myeloablative (MAC; median 46 years) versus reduced-intensity/non-myeloablative conditioning (RIC/NMA; median 61 years) groups. With MAC (n = 320), donor age had no impact on acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-2.30, p = .02) independent of recipient age and other factors. Donor age had no impact on either relapse or non-relapse mortality (NRM). The impact of donor/recipient age on overall survival changed over time. Older donors were associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>6 months) in younger recipients (≤ 50 years; HR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.03-4.6, p = .04) but not older recipients. With RIC/NMA (n = 470), neither recipient's nor donor's age influenced the risk of GVHD. Donor age had no significant impact on the risk of relapse, but older donors were associated with a significantly higher risk of NRM (HR: 1.6, 95% CI: 1.02-2.6, p = .04) independent of recipient age. Older donor age was associated with significantly higher late overall mortality (>9 months) in older recipients (>50 years; HR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.0-2.67; p = .049) but not in younger recipients. Donor selection based on donor age may require a tailored approach for a particular recipient.

Myeloablative fractionated busulfan for allogeneic stem cell transplant in older patients or patients with comorbidities.

Traditional conditioning regimens for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) provide suboptimal outcomes, especially for older patients and those with comorbidities. We hypothesized that a fractionated myeloablative busulfan dose delivered over an extended period would reduce nonrelapse mortality (NRM) while retaining antileukemic effects. Here, we performed a phase 2 trial for adults with hematological malignancies receiving matched related or unrelated allo-HCT. Participants received busulfan 80 mg/m2 as outpatients on days -20 and -13 before transplant. Fludarabine 40 mg/m2 was administered on days -6 to -3, followed by busulfan dosed to achieve a target area under the curve of 20 000 mol/min for the whole course. The primary end point was day-100 NRM. Seventy-eight patients were included, with a median age of 61 years (range, 39-70 years), who received transplantation for acute leukemia (24%), myelodysplastic syndrome (27%), or myeloproliferative disease/chronic myeloid leukemia (44%). HCT-specific comorbidity index (HCT-CI) was ≥3 in 34 (44%). With a median follow-up of 36.4 months (range, 2.9-51.5), the 100-day, 1-year, and 3-year NRM rates were 3.8%, 8%, and 9.3%, respectively, without a significant difference in age or HCT-CI score. The 1-year and 3-year relapse incidence was 10% and 18%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival was 80%, without a significant difference in age or HCT-CI score and was similar for patients aged >60 years and those aged <60 years as well as for those with HCT-CI ≥3 and HCT-CI <3. Overall, a myeloablative fractionated busulfan regimen has low NRM without an increase in relapse rate, resulting in promising survival, even in older patients or in patients with comorbidities. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02861417.

A prospective phase 2 clinical trial of a C5a complement inhibitor for acute GVHD with lower GI tract involvement.

Involvement of lower gastrointestinal tract (LGI) occurs in 60% of patients with graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD). Complement components C3 and C5 are involved in GVHD pathogenesis. In this phase 2a study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of ALXN1007, a monoclonal antibody against C5a, in patients with newly diagnosed LGI acute GVHD receiving concomitant corticosteroid. Twenty-five patients were enrolled; one was excluded from the efficacy analysis based upon negative biopsy. Most patients (16/25, 64%) had acute leukemia; 52% (13/25) had an HLA-matched unrelated donor; and 68% (17/25) received myeloablative conditioning. Half the patients (12/24) had a high biomarker profile, Ann Arbor score 3; 42% (10/24) had high-risk GVHD per Minnesota classification. Day-28 overall response was 58% (13/24 complete response, 1/24 partial response), and 63% by Day-56 (all complete responses). Day-28 overall response was 50% (5/10) in Minnesota high-risk and 42% (5/12) in high-risk Ann Arbor patients, increasing to 58% (7/12) by Day-56. Non-relapse mortality at 6-months was 24% (95% CI 11-53). The most common treatment-related adverse event was infection (6/25, 24%). Neither baseline complement levels (except for C5), activity, nor inhibition of C5a with ALXN1007 correlated with GVHD severity or responses. Further studies are needed to evaluate the role of complement inhibition in GVHD treatment.

Impact of Donor Age in Haploidentical-Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide versus Matched Unrelated Donor Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with inferior overall survival (OS) compared to HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with PTCy prophylaxis in patients receiving reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC). Given prognostic implications of donor age, we investigated the differences in outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n = 775) undergoing RIC-HCT with a younger MUD (age <35 years; n = 84) versus a younger haploidentical donor (age <35 years; n = 302) versus an older haploidentical donor (age ≥35 years; n = 389). The older MUD group was excluded from the analysis because of small numbers. The younger haploidentical donor group (median age, 59.5 years) was somewhat younger than the younger MUD group (median age, 66.8 years) and the older haploidentical donor group (median age, 64.7 years). More patients in the MUD group received peripheral blood grafts (82%) compared to the haploidentical donor groups (55% to 56%). In multivariate analysis, compared to the younger MUD group, the younger haploidentical donor group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22 to 3.12; P = .005) and the older haploidentical donor group (HR, 2.36; 95% CI, 1.50 to 3.71; P < .001) had a significantly inferior OS, and the younger haploidentical donor group (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.39 to 9.93; P = .009) and older haploidentical donor group (HR, 6.91; 95% CI, 2.75 to 17.39; P < .001) had a significantly higher risk of nonrelapse mortality. The older haploidentical group had a significantly higher risk of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.80; P = .001) and grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.09 to 6.71; P = .03). There were no significant differences across the groups in the incidence of chronic GVHD or relapse. Among adult AML patients in CR undergoing RIC-HCT with PTCy prophylaxis, a young MUD may be preferred over a young haploidentical donor.

Younger haploidentical donor versus older matched unrelated donor for patients with AML/MDS.

Optimal donor selection is fundamental to successful allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), and donor age influences survival after both matched unrelated donor (MUD) and haploidentical donor HCT. Though recent studies have shown similar outcomes between MUD and haploidentical HCT, it is unknown if outcomes differ following HCT with younger haploidentical donors compared to HCT with older MUDs. Therefore, we performed a retrospective analysis comparing outcomes of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who underwent HCT with younger (≤35 years) haploidentical donors (n = 494) or older (>35 years) MUDs (n = 1005). Patients in the haploidentical and MUD groups received post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and conventional graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, respectively. In multivariate analysis, use of younger haploidentical donors was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.95, p = .01) and lower rates of grade II-IV acute GVHD (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.53-0.77, p < .001), grade III-IV acute GVHD (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.25-0.53, p < .001), and chronic GVHD (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.40-0.60, p < .001). Relapse rates were similar among those who received myeloablative conditioning but were higher in patients of the younger haploidentical group who received reduced intensity conditioning (HR 1.49, 95%CI 1.18-1.88, p = .001). The younger haploidentical group had significantly lower non-relapse mortality ≥3 months post-HCT (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.38-0.90, p = .02). Our data support the use of younger haploidentical donors with PTCy over older MUDs with conventional prophylaxis in patients with MDS or AML. Further studies on the importance of donor age in haploidentical and MUD HCT with PTCy prophylaxis are warranted.

Bacteroides ovatus alleviates dysbiotic microbiota-induced intestinal graft-versus-host disease.

Acute gastrointestinal intestinal GVHD (aGI-GVHD) is a serious complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and the intestinal microbiota is known to impact on its severity. However, an association between treatment response of aGI-GVHD and the intestinal microbiota has not been well-studied. In a cohort of patients with aGI-GVHD (n=37), we found that non-response to standard therapy with corticosteroids was associated with prior treatment with carbapenem antibiotics and loss of Bacteroides ovatus from the microbiome. In a mouse model of carbapenem-aggravated GVHD, introducing Bacteroides ovatus reduced severity of GVHD and improved survival. Bacteroides ovatus reduced degradation of colonic mucus by another intestinal commensal, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, via its ability to metabolize dietary polysaccharides into monosaccharides, which then inhibit mucus degradation by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron and reduce GVHD-related mortality.

Enhanced Recovery Stem-Cell Transplantation: Multidisciplinary Efforts to Improve Outcomes in Older Adults Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant.

PURPOSE: Older adults have unique risk factors for poor outcomes after hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT). We sought to determine the impact of our multidisciplinary supportive care program, Enhanced Recovery after stem-cell transplant (ER-SCT), on survival outcomes in patients age 65 years and older who underwent HSCT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinicodemographic data, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), and relapse were compared between 64 patients age 65 years and older who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplant during ER-SCT program's first year, October 2017 through September 2018, and 140 historical controls age 65 years and older who underwent allogeneic HSCT, January 2015 through September 2017. RESULTS: In the ER-SCT cohort, 41% (26 of 64) of patients were women, and the median (range) age was 68 (65-74) years; in the control cohort, 38% (53 of 140) of patients were women, and the median (range) age was 67 (65-79) years. Hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index and donor type/cell source were similar between cohorts. The ER-SCT cohort had a lower 1-year NRM rate (13% v 26%, P = .03) and higher 1-year OS rate (74% v 53%, P = .007). Relapse rate did not differ significantly between cohorts. In multivariate analyses, ER-SCT was associated with improved 1-year NRM (hazard ratio, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.9; P = .02) and improved 1-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.9; P = .03). CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary supportive care program may improve NRM and OS in older patients undergoing allogeneic HSCT. Randomized studies are warranted to confirm this benefit and explore which program components most contribute to the improved outcomes.

Haploidentical vs matched unrelated donors for patients with ALL: donor age matters more than donor type.

Haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD) prophylaxis yields a similar overall survival (OS) to HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD) HCT with conventional prophylaxis. Given the prognostic implications of donor age, we investigated the impact of donor age (younger [<35 years, n = 868] vs older [≥35 years, n = 418]) and donor type (haploidentical [n = 373] vs MUD [n = 913]) on OS in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Older donor age was independently associated with significantly poor OS, whereas donor type was not. Next, we directly compared the outcomes of a younger haploidentical donor (n = 187) vs an older MUD (n = 232). In this cohort, more patients in the haploidentical group had B-cell immunophenotype (89% vs 77%, respectively, P < .001), poor cytogenetics (61% vs 51%, respectively, P = .44), Philadelphia chromosome-negative (53% vs 48%, respectively, P = .38), received bone marrow graft (42% vs 16%, respectively, P < .001), and reduced-intensity conditioning (45% vs 23%, respectively, P < .001). In the multivariate analysis, the older MUD group was associated with a significantly higher risk of chronic GVHD, higher nonrelapse mortality (NRM), lower relapse, and poorer OS. Despite a higher risk of relapse, younger donor haploidentical HCT with PTCy prophylaxis may be preferred over older MUD HCT with conventional prophylaxis in patients with ALL due to lower NRM and better OS. Further analysis comparing the effect of donor age in haploidentical PTCy vs MUD PTCy is warranted.