Cost of disease progression among US patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Aim: The objectives were to investigate the differences in per patient per month (PPPM) healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) who experience disease progression in 12 months compared with those who don't investigate the impact of progression timing on cumulative healthcare costs. Patients & methods: This claims-based study included patients diagnosed with mBC between 1 January 2013 and 30 April 2020 and received HER2-targeted therapy. Patients were categorized as progressed or nonprogressed. For objective one, monthly HCRU and costs were assessed for up to two lines of therapy (LOTs). Data were summarized descriptively and compared using a generalized linear model (GLM). For objective two, patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were assessed and cumulative healthcare costs were estimated in the 3 years following the start of LOT1 or LOT2 using a GLM and Kaplan-Meier weighting. Results: Among the 4113 patients in the study sample, 3406 had at least 12 months of follow-up (or less if due to death). Compared with nonprogressed patients, progressed patients had higher mean PPPM healthcare costs (LOT1: $22,014 vs $18,372, p < 0.001; LOT2: $19,643 vs $16,863, p = 0.001), and HCRU, including number of emergency room visits and inpatient stays (both p < 0.001) in the 12 months following LOT start. Progressed patients had higher 3-year mean cumulative healthcare costs than nonprogressed patients following LOT1 and LOT2 and this difference was greater for patients who progressed earlier. Conclusion: Disease progression was associated with significant increases in HCRU and costs. Delays in progression were associated with lower cumulative healthcare costs. Earlier use of more clinically effective treatments to delay progression may reduce the economic burden among these patients.

Characteristics, healthcare utilization, and outcomes of patients with HER2-low breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment for HER2-low [defined as ImmunoHistoChemistry (IHC) 1 + or 2 + and negative/normal in Situ Hybridization (ISH)] breast cancer patients is rapidly evolving, yet we lack critical information about the HER2-low population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women aged 18 years or older diagnosed with breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 in North Carolina. Analyses were conducted for the overall cohort and a stage IV sub-cohort. We examined demographic and clinical characteristics, and characterized prevalence of HER2-low disease and healthcare utilization. We estimated adjusted rate ratios for the association between HER2 classifications and utilization outcomes, and hazard ratios for 3-year all cause mortality (stage IV only). RESULTS: The overall and stage IV cohorts included 12,965 and 635 patients, respectively. HER2-low patients represented more than half of both cohorts (59% overall, 53% stage IV). HER2-low patients were more likely than IHC 0 patients to have hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. In the stage IV cohort, HER2-low patients were more likely to be Black (26% vs. 16% IHC 0, p = 0.0159). In both cohorts, rates of hospitalizations were slightly higher among HER2-low patients. There were no survival differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 among stage IV patients. CONCLUSION: New treatment options for HER2-low breast cancer may have potential for significant impact at the population level particularly for patients with stage IV disease. In light of racial differences between HER2-low and IHC 0 patients observed in our cohort, research- and practice-based efforts to ensure equitable adoption of new treatment guidelines for patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer will be essential.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Following First-Line Pertuzumab and Trastuzumab Among Patients with HER2+ Metastatic Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Many patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive metastatic breast cancer (HER2+ mBC) require subsequent lines of therapy (LOTs) after being treated with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the first line (1L). Although the efficacy of the second-line (2L) therapies has been demonstrated in clinical trials, the real-world effectiveness of these treatments is understudied. This retrospective cohort study assessed the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes for patients with HER2+ mBC following 1L therapy with pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in the United States (US) during 2015-2019. METHODS: Adults with HER2+ mBC in the US who initiated 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens between 01/01/2015 and 09/30/2019 and had ≥ 60 days of follow-up after 1L initiation were identified from the IQVIA Oncology Electronic Medical Records database. The regimens utilized in 2L following 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens were described. Median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were reported for 2L based on Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Of the 710 eligible patients who received pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens in 1L (median age: 57.0 years [interquartile range: 48.0-65.0]; median follow-up: 20.3 months; median 1L duration: 15.3 months), 222 (31.3%) initiated 2L. The most common regimens in 2L were ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-based regimens (n = 159 [71.6%]), followed by lapatinib-based (n = 21 [9.5%]) and neratinib-based (n = 18 [8.1%]) regimens. The median treatment duration and time to treatment failure were 5.9 (95% CI: 5.0, 8.7) and 8.6 (7.3, 11.5) months, respectively, among patients initiating 2L, and 5.7 (4.7, 7.8) and 7.9 (6.5, 10.0) months among those receiving 2L T-DM1. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HER2+ mBC requiring additional treatments after 1L pertuzumab and trastuzumab-based regimens utilized T-DM1 in 2L during 2015-2019. The short median treatment duration and time to treatment failure highlight an unmet need that can potentially be fulfilled by recently approved treatment options.

Prevalence and predictors of human papillomavirus vaccination in adolescent girls.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and predictors of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in adolescent girls who were recommended to receive the vaccine by their health care providers. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: United States in 2007-08. PARTICIPANTS: Parents or guardians most knowledgeable about health and health care of adolescent girls aged 12 to 17 years participating in the 2007 National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH). INTERVENTION: NCSH was a population-based telephone survey using a complex probability sampling design. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of HPV vaccination in adolescent girls who were recommended to receive the HPV vaccine and predisposing, enabling, and need factors associated with HPV vaccination. RESULTS: Of 12.38 million adolescent girls aged 12 to 17 years, 3.69 million (29.76%) were recommended to receive the HPV vaccine by their health care provider. The majority who received the HPV vaccine recommendation were 13 to 17 years of age (83%), were white (71%), and had one or more preventive visits (94%). Among those for whom the HPV vaccine was recommended, 48.75% (95% CI 45.37-52.13) received the vaccine. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of those who were recommended revealed that enabling and predisposing factors were significantly associated with the HPV vaccination. Children living at 101% to 200% of the Federal Poverty Level (odds ratio 0.54 [95% CI 0.30-0.98]) and children in households with two or more adults (0.51 [0.33-0.80]) were negatively associated with HPV vaccination, whereas children with any preventive medical care visit(s) (2.28 [1.36-3.84]) in the previous year were positively associated with HPV vaccination. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-half of adolescent girls received the HPV vaccine among those who were recommended by their health care provider. The study finding emphasizes the importance of predisposing and enabling factors for HPV vaccination. Policy and education efforts can focus on these factors to improve HPV vaccination rates.