LncRNA TUG1 inhibits the proliferation and fibrosis of mesangial cells in diabetic nephropathy via inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the potential function of long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) TUG1 in the progression of diabetic nephropathy (DN) and the underlying mechanism. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rat diabetes mellitus (DM) model was established by streptozocin (STZ) administration. In vivo levels of TUG1 and relative genes in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT) pathway in DM rats and control rats were determined by the quantitative Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR). Moreover, levels of kidney weight, 24 h-urine protein, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine in DM rats and controls were detected. Mesangial cells were subjected to induction of high-level glucose. Relative levels of TUG1 and relative genes in the PI3K/AKT pathway in mesangial cells were determined as well. Through Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay, the regulatory effect of TUG1 on the proliferative ability of mesangial cells induced with high-level glucose was evaluated. Finally, expression changes in the PI3K/AKT pathway and extracellular matrix (ECM)-related genes in mesangial cells were determined. RESULTS: TUG1 was downregulated in DM rats and mesangial cells induced with high-level glucose. Compared with controls, DM rats presented higher levels of kidney weight, 24 h-urine protein, blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine, which were markedly reduced after TUG1 overexpression in vivo. Moreover, overexpression of TUG1 downregulated TGF-ß1, FN, and COL-IV, and inhibited the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway. CONCLUSIONS: TUG1 is downregulated in DN. The overexpression of TUG1 could suppress the proliferation and ECM accumulation of mesangial cells via inhibiting the PI3K/AKT pathway.

Induction treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis with leflunomide combined with prednisone: a prospective multi-centre observational study.

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of leflunomide in the treatment of proliferative lupus nephritis, a prospective multi-centre observational study was conducted. Patients with biopsy proven proliferative lupus nephritis were assigned to receive either leflunomide or cyclophosphamide with concomitant prednisone. Leflunomide was given orally with a loading dose of 1 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by 30 mg/day. Intravenous cyclophosphamide was administered monthly at a dose of 0.5 g/m2 of body-surface area. A total of 110 patients were enrolled, 70 in the leflunomide group and 40 in the cyclophosphamide group. The complete remission rate in the leflunomide group was 21% and partial remission rate 52%, as compared with 18% and 55%, respectively, in the cyclophosphamide group. Renal parameters and systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index improved significantly and similarly in both groups. Serum creatinine decreased or stabilized in both treatment groups. No significant difference was noted with respect to clinical outcome between groups. Repeat biopsy also showed a significant reduction of active lesions in kidney pathology after 6 months of leflunomide treatment. Major adverse events, similar in both treatment groups, included infection, alopecia and hypertension. Leflunomide, compared with cyclophosphamide, in combination with prednisone was effective in the induction therapy of proliferative lupus nephritis and was generally well-tolerated.