RESUMO
One of the important tasks of the German Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (known as the MAK Commission) is in the evaluation of a potential for carcinogenicity of hazardous substances at the workplace. Often, this evaluation is critically based on data on carcinogenic responses seen in animal studies and, if positive tumor responses have been observed, this will mostly lead to a classification of the substance under investigation into one of the classes for carcinogens. However, there are cases where it can be demonstrated with a very high degree of confidence that the tumor findings in the experimental animals are not relevant for humans at the workplace and, therefore, the MAK Commission will not classify the respective substance into one of the classes for carcinogens. This paper will summarize the general criteria used by the MAK Commission for the categorization into "carcinogen" and "non-carcinogen" and compare this procedure with those used by other national and international organizations.
Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/classificação , Carcinógenos/classificação , Guias como Assunto , Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Animais , Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Alemanha , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Agências Internacionais , Neoplasias/induzido quimicamente , Doenças Profissionais/induzido quimicamente , Exposição Ocupacional , Medição de Risco , Especificidade da EspécieRESUMO
The Permanent Senate Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area (MAK Commission of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) evaluates chemical substances using scientific criteria to prevent adverse effects on health at the work place. As part of this task there is a need to evaluate tumor promoting activity of chemicals (enhancement of formation of squamous cell carcinomas via premalignant papillomas) obtained from two-stage initiation/promotion experiments using the mouse skin model. In the present communication we address this issue by comparing responses seen in mouse skin with those in humans. We conclude that tumor promotional effects seen in such animal models be carefully analyzed on a case by case basis. Substances that elicit a rather non-specific effect that is restricted to the high dose range are considered to be irrelevant to humans and thus do not require classification as carcinogens. In contrast, substances that might have both a mode of action and a potency similar to the specific effects seen with TPA (12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate), the prototype tumor promoter in mouse skin, which triggers receptor-mediated signal cascades in the very low dose range, have to be classified in a category for carcinogens.
Assuntos
Carcinógenos/toxicidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/induzido quimicamente , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/patologia , Animais , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Camundongos , Acetato de Tetradecanoilforbol/administração & dosagem , Local de TrabalhoRESUMO
1,3-Butadiene (BD) was carcinogenic in rodents. This effect is related to reactive metabolites such as 1,2-epoxy-3-butene (EB) and especially 1,2:3,4-diepoxybutane (DEB). A third mutagenic epoxide, 3,4-epoxy-1,2-butanediol (EBD), can be formed from DEB and from 3-butene-1,2-diol (B-diol), the hydrolysis product of EB. In BD exposed rodents, only blood concentrations of EB and DEB have been published. Direct determinations of EBD and B-diol in blood are missing. In order to investigate the BD-dependent blood burden by all of these metabolites, we exposed male B6C3F1 mice and male Sprague-Dawley rats in closed chambers over 6-8h to constant atmospheric BD concentrations. BD and exhaled EB were measured in chamber atmospheres during the BD exposures. EB blood concentrations were obtained as the product of the atmospheric EB concentration at steady state with the EB blood-to-air partition coefficient. B-diol, EBD, and DEB were determined in blood collected immediately at the end of BD exposures up to 1200 ppm (B-diol, EBD) and 1280 ppm (DEB). Analysis of BD was done by GC/FID, of EB, DEB, and B-diol by GC/MS, and of EBD by LC/MS/MS. EB blood concentrations increased with BD concentrations amounting to 2.6 micromol/l (rat) and 23.5 micromol/l (mouse) at 2000 ppm BD and to 4.6 micromol/l in rats exposed to 10000 ppm BD. DEB (detection limit 0.01 micromol/l) was found only in blood of mice rising to 3.2 micromol/l at 1280 ppm BD. B-diol and EBD were quantitatively predominant in both species. B-diol increased in both species with the BD exposure concentration reaching 60 micromol/l at 1200 ppm BD. EBD reached maximum concentrations of 9.5 micromol/l at 150 ppm BD (rat) and of 42 micromol/l at 300 ppm BD (mouse). At higher BD concentrations EBD blood concentrations decreased again. This picture probably results from a competitive inhibition of the EBD producing CYP450 by BD, which occurs in both species.