Surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients.

BACKGROUND: Due to his multifactorial aetiology, treating patellofemoral instability can be a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. The incidence of patellofemoral instability shows a peak during adolescence, especially from 11 to 14 years old. AIM: Several clinical studies focusing on recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients have been published, reporting inconsistent or controversial results. Currently, there is a lack of consensus regarding the surgical management of these patients. The purpose of this study is to update current evidence and systematically review indications, treatments, and outcomes of surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients. METHODS: A comprehensive review of the literature was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, the PRISMA Statement. The following electronic databases were accessed in February 2019: PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, CINAHL, EMBASE. All the articles treating surgical management for recurrent patellar dislocations in skeletally immature patients were considered for inclusion. For the methodological quality assessment, we referred to the Coleman Methodology Score (CMS). For the statistical analysis, we referred to the unpaired t-test to establish whether the results are statistically significant. RESULT: The overall CMS resulted in 52.78 points, attesting a satisfactory methodological quality assessment to this systematic review. A total of 21 articles including 623 patients (577 knees) were evaluated. The overall mean age was 13.02 years. The mean follow-up was 46.61 months. The mean Kujala score improved from 58.94 ± 10.38 to 87.07 ± 7.68 points. The Lysholm score reported a pre- and post-operative mean values of 49.54 ± 14.20 and 88.32 ± 8.80, respectively. The mean Tegner Activity Scale scored 4.28 ± 1.22 at baseline, improving to 5.26 ± 0.83 post-operatively. A total of 4.19% of patients incurred into a major complication, while 9.6% sustained a minor one. We observed a total of 89 re-dislocations above 692 treated knees (12%). CONCLUSION: The main findings of this study are that surgical procedures for skeletally immature patients affected by recurrent patellar dislocations are feasible and effective. Complications and re-dislocations occurred infrequently. It is of fundamental importance to treat precociously these patients in order to reduce the risk of further recurrences, to increase the level of sporting activity and improving the quality of life.

Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: There exist a relevant number of clinical trials comparing the minimally invasive surgery to the standard-invasive approach in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Up to date, there are still debates concerning the most effective approach in THA. AIM: The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes concerning patients undergoing primary THA performed via the minimally invasive versus standard-invasive surgery incision. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The search was performed in the main databases, evaluating both quantitative and qualitative results. All the randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised controlled trials (nRCTs) comparing the minimally invasive versus the standard-invasive approach were enrolled in this study. We focused on the clinical and radiological outcomes and on the complication rate. Study methodological quality was assessed performing the PEDro critical appraisal scale. All meta-analyses were performed using the Review Manager software. To analyse the publication's bias, we performed the Funnel plot. RESULT: We enrolled in our study 4761 patients, undergoing to 4842 total hip arthroplasties. The mean follow-up was 22.26 months. In favour of the minimally invasive group, we reported less total estimated blood loss, shorter surgical duration, and a shorter length of stay. In favour of the standard-invasive group, we reported a higher value of the Harris hip score. Concerning the radiological outcomes, we did not report substantial differences across the two exposures. No difference was observed regarding the risk of femoral fractures, dislocation, and revision rates. We evidenced an increasing risk occurred in an iatrogenic nerve palsy during the minimally invasive approach. CONCLUSION: Based on currently available evidences concerning the outcomes following THA and the analysis of our results, we stated no remarkable benefits of the minimally invasive compared to the standard-invasive surgery.