Epidemiology of cranial infections in battlefield-related penetrating and open cranial injuries.

BACKGROUND: Penetrating brain injuries are a potentially lethal injury associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. We examined characteristics and outcomes among military personnel who sustained battlefield-related open and penetrating cranial injuries during military conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan. METHODS: Military personnel wounded during deployment (2009-2014) were included if they sustained an open or penetrating cranial injury and were admitted to participating hospitals in the United States. Injury characteristics, treatment course, neurosurgical interventions, antibiotic use, and infection profiles were examined. RESULTS: The study population included 106 wounded personnel, of whom 12 (11.3%) had an intracranial infection. Posttrauma prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed in more than 98% of patients. Patients who developed central nervous system (CNS) infections were more likely to have undergone a ventriculostomy ( p = 0.003), had a ventriculostomy in place for a longer period (17 vs. 11 days; p = 0.007), had more neurosurgical procedures ( p < 0.001), and have lower presenting Glasgow Coma Scale ( p = 0.01) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores ( p = 0.018). Time to diagnosis of CNS infection was a median of 12 days postinjury (interquartile range, 7-22 days) with differences in timing by injury severity (critical head injury had median of 6 days, while maximal [currently untreatable] head injury had a median of 13.5 days), presence of other injury profiles in addition to head/face/neck (median, 22 days), and the presence of other infections in addition to CNS infections (median, 13.5 days). The overall length of hospitalization was a median of 50 days, and two patients died. CONCLUSION: Approximately 11% of wounded military personnel with open and penetrating cranial injuries developed CNS infections. These patients were more critically injured (e.g., lower Glasgow Coma Scale and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores) and required more invasive neurosurgical procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Proposal of a Management Algorithm to Predict the Need for Expansion Duraplasty in American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A-C Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Patients.

Expansion duraplasty to reopen effaced subarachnoid space and improve spinal cord perfusion, autoregulation, and spinal pressure reactivity index (sPRX) has been advocated in patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (tCSCI). We designed this study to identify candidates for expansion duraplasty, based on the absence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) interface around the spinal cord on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in the setting of otherwise adequate bony decompression. Over a 61-month period, 104 consecutive American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) grades A-C patients with tCSCI had post-operative MRI to assess the adequacy of surgical decompression. Their mean age was 53.4 years, and 89% were male. Sixty-one patients had falls, 31 motor vehicle collisions, 11 sport injuries, and one an assault. The AIS grade was A in 56, B in 18, and C in 30 patients. Fifty-four patients had fracture dislocations; there was no evidence of skeletal injury in 50 patients. Mean intramedullary lesion length (IMLL) was 46.9 (standard deviation = 19.4) mm. Median time from injury to decompression was 17 h (interquartile range 15.2 h). After surgery, 94 patients had adequate decompression as judged by the presence of CSF anterior and posterior to the spinal cord, whereas 10 patients had effacement of the subarachnoid space at the injury epicenter. In two patients whose decompression was not definitive and post-operative MRI indicated inadequate decompression, expansion duraplasty was performed. Candidates for expansion duraplasty (i.e., those with inadequate decompression) were significantly younger (p < 0.0001), were AIS grade A (p < 0.0016), had either sport injuries (six patients) or motor vehicle collisions (three patients) (p < 0.0001), had fracture dislocation (p = 0.00016), and had longer IMLL (p = 0.0097). In regression models, patients with sport injuries and inadequate decompression were suitable candidates for expansion duraplasty (p = 0.03). Further, 9.6% of patients failed bony decompression alone and either did (2) or would have (8) benefited from expansion duraplasty.