Interindividual variation of progesterone elevation post LH rise: implications for natural cycle frozen embryo transfers in the individualized medicine era.

BACKGROUND: The key to optimal timing of frozen embryo transfer (FET ) is to synchronize the embryo with the receptive phase of the endometrium. Secretory transformation of the endometrium is induced by progesterone. In contrast, detection of the luteinizing hormone (LH) surge is the most common surrogate used to determine the start of secretory transformation and to schedule FET in a natural cycle. The accuracy of LH monitoring to schedule FET in a natural cycle relies heavily on the assumption that the period between the LH surge and ovulation is acceptably constant. This study will determine the period between LH rise and progesterone rise in ovulatory natural menstrual cycles. METHODS: Retrospective observational study including 102 women who underwent ultrasound and endocrine monitoring for a frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle. All women had serum LH, estradiol and progesterone levels measured on three consecutive days until (including) the day of ovulation defined with serum progesterone level exceeding 1ng/ml. RESULTS: Twenty-one (20.6%) women had the LH rise 2 days prior to progesterone rise, 71 (69.6%) had on the day immediately preceding progesterone rise and 10 (9.8%) on the same day of progesterone rise. Women who had LH rise 2 days prior to progesterone rise had significantly higher body mass index and significantly lower serum AMH levels than women who had LH rise on the same day with progesterone rise. CONCLUSION: This study provides an unbiased account of the temporal relationship between LH and progesterone increase in a natural menstrual cycle. Variation in the period between LH rise and progesterone rise in ovulatory cycles likely has implications for the choice of marker for the start of secretory transformation in frozen embryo transfer cycles. The study participants are representative of the relevant population of women undergoing frozen embryo transfer in a natural cycle.

Embryo Culture Medium Has No Impact on Mosaicism Rates: a Sibling Oocyte Study.

Human embryos cultured in vitro can contain two or more cytogenetically distinct cell lineages known as "chromosomal mosaicism". Since mosaicism is produced by mitotic errors after fertilization occurs, culture conditions might contribute to mosaicism origins. Many studies demonstrated that euploidy rates are not affected by culture media; however, whether oocytes cultured under continuous culture media (CCM) or sequential culture media (SCM) has a higher risk of mosaicism occurring remains unsolved. Therefore, this study aims to determine whether mosaicism rates differ when sibling oocytes are cultured in CCM or SCM. A single center observational study was performed including 6072 sibling oocytes. Mature oocytes (MII) were inseminated and cultured in CCM (n = 3,194) or SCM (n = 2,359) until blastocyst stage for trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on day (D) 5, D6, or D7 for preimplantation genetic testing analysis with a semi-automated next-generation sequencing. Mosaicism was classified as low (30-50%) or high (50-80%) based on the percentage of abnormal cells constitution detected in TE samples. As a result, 426 women with a mean age of 34.7 ± 6.4 years were included in the study. Fertilization rates were comparable between CCM and SCM (74.0% vs 72.0%, p = 0.091). Although total blastulation rate and usable blastocyst rate (biopsied blastocysts) were significantly higher in CCM than SCM (75.3 % vs. 70.3%, p < 0.001 and 58.0% vs. 54.5%, p = 0.026), euploidy rates did not differ significantly (45.2% vs. 45.7%, p = 0.810, respectively). Mosaicism rate was not significantly different for blastocysts cultured in CCM or SCM (4.7% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.650), neither the proportion of low or high mosaic rates (3.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.353 and 1.0% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.355, respectively). Hence, it was concluded that CCM or SCM does not have an impact on mosaicism rate of embryos cultured until the blastocyst stage.

Effect of the endometrial thickness on the live birth rate: insights from 959 single euploid frozen embryo transfers without a cutoff for thickness.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether endometrial thickness (ET) independently affects the live birth rate (LBR) after embryo transfer. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Private assisted reproductive technology center. PATIENT(S): A total of 959 single euploid frozen embryo transfers. INTERVENTION(S): Vitrified euploid blastocyst transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate per embryo transfer. RESULT(S): The conditional density plots did not demonstrate either a linear relationship between the ET and LBR or a threshold below which the LBR decreased perceivably. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses did not suggest a predictive value of the ET for the LBR. The area under the curve values were 0.55, 0.54, and 0.54 in the overall, programmed, and natural cycle transfers, respectively. Logistic regression analyses with age, embryo quality, day of trophectoderm biopsy, body mass index, and ET did not suggest an independent effect of the ET on the LBR. CONCLUSION(S): We did not identify a threshold of the ET that either precluded live birth or under which the LBR decreases perceivably. Common practice of cancelling embryo transfers when the ET is <7 mm may not be justified. Prospective studies, in which the management of the transfer cycle would not be altered by ET, would provide higher-quality evidence on the subject.

Frozen embryo transfers in a natural cycle: how to do it right.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Assisted reproductive technology treatment has seen a significant shift from fresh to frozen embryo transfers (FET). Endometrial receptivity in the FET cycle can be achieved through a hormonal replacement cycle or a natural cycle, and the preparation approach has important implications on the pregnancy itself. In the natural cycle approach, planning of the embryo transfer timing might be challenging due to the need to identify ovulation correctly. RECENT FINDINGS: Ovulation in a natural cycle is characterized by a luteinizing hormone surge, followed by the rise in progesterone (P4) levels, inducing secretory transformation. However, the luteinizing hormone surge can vary widely in its pattern, amplitude and duration and might not even result in the formation of a corpus luteum and P4 production. Monitoring of the luteinizing hormone surge using urinary luteinizing hormone kits might be a convenient approach, however, it is deemed unreliable and should be considered inadequate for securing the best outcome of a FET cycle. SUMMARY: Endometrial receptivity depends on the duration of progesterone exposure to the adequately estrogenized endometrium. In a natural cycle endometrial preparation approach, correct planning for the embryo transfer timing should include the measurement of luteinizing hormone, estradiol and P4.

Ovulation induction in anovulatory infertility is obsolete.

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome make up the vast majority of patients with anovulatory infertility. The commonly accepted treatment guidelines recommend ovulation induction for timed intercourse as the first-line treatment. After a 2-year treatment period, the cumulative pregnancy rates with a singleton live-born baby reached 71% and 78% in two prospective studies. Despite aiming for monofollicular growth, multifollicular responses with subsequent multiple/higher order multiple pregnancies are a dreaded risk associated with ovarian induction. However, the lengthy treatment, the increase of maternal age and the psychological effects of 'obligatory intercourse' are also factors challenging the concept of ovarian induction as the first treatment approach in anovulatory infertility. Nowadays, individualized IVF treatment with cycle segmentation, freeze-all strategies and single-embryo transfers in frozen embryo transfer cycles dramatically reduces the risk of multiple pregnancies, and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 83% can be achieved over three complete cycles, thereby reducing exposure to fertility medication and time to pregnancy. Although on first sight ovarian induction might present the easier and less costly approach, efficient and individualized IVF treatments with low complication rates and the chance of preventing multiple pregnancies challenge this concept, and it seems that the time has come to abandon ovarian induction in anovulatory infertility.

Marginal differences in preimplantation morphokinetics between conventional IVF and ICSI in patients with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): A sibling oocyte study.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the morphokinetic behaviour between conventional IVF and ICSI, in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). MATERIALS: A randomized controlled trial (NCT03708991) was conducted in a private fertility center. Thirty couples with non-male factor infertility were recruited between November 2018 and April 2019. A total of 568 sibling cumulus oocyte complexes were randomly inseminated with conventional IVF and ICSI and cultured in an Embryoscope time-lapse system. The morphokinetic behaviour of IVF/ICSI sibling oocytes was analysed as primary endpoint. As secondary endpoints, morphokinetic parameters that predict blastocysts that will be biopsied, the day of biopsy, gender and euploid outcome was assessed. RESULTS: When comparing IVF to ICSI, only the time to reach the 2-cell stage (t2) was significantly delayed for IVF embryos: OR: 1.282 [1.020-1.612], p = 0.033. After standardizing for tPNf (ct parameters), only Blast(tStartBlastulation-t2) remained significant: OR: 0.803 [0.648-0.994], p = 0.044. For the analysis of zygotes that will be biopsied on day 5/6 versus zygotes without biopsy, only early morphokinetic parameters were considered. All parameters were different in the multivariate model: ct2: OR: 0.840 [0.709-0.996], p = 0.045; ct6: OR: 0.943 [0.890-0.998], p = 0.043; cc2(t3-t2): OR: 1.148 [1.044-1.263], p = 0.004; cc3(t5-t3): OR: 1.177 [1.107-1.251], p<0.0001. When comparing the development between blastocysts biopsied on day 5 versus day 6, only three morphokinetic parameters were significant: cc2(t3-t2): OR: 1.394 [1.010-1.926], p = 0.044; ctBlastocyst: OR: 0.613 [0.489-0.768], p<0.0001 and ctExpandedBlastocyst: OR: 0.913 [0.868-0.960], p = 0.0004. Multivariate analysis of gender and ploidy did not reveal differences in morphokinetic behaviour. CONCLUSION: Minor morphokinetic differences are observed between IVF and ICSI. Early in the development, distinct cleavage patterns are observed between embryos that will be biopsied or not.

Female parental consanguinity is associated with a reduced ovarian reserve.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is parental consanguinity associated with a reduced ovarian reserve in women from the Arabian Peninsula, comparing anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC)? DESIGN: Retrospective large-scale observational study including 2482 women from the Arabian Peninsula, aged 19-49 years, who had their serum AMH and AFC measured as part of their fertility assessment, from May 2015 to November 2019. Consanguinity was defined as women whose parents were first-degree or second-degree cousins. Serum AMH was measured for all participants. RESULTS: A total of 2198 women were included: 605 in the consanguine group (27.53%), 1593 (72.47%) in the non-consanguine group. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of body mass index, years of infertility or smoking status. Women from the consanguine group were significantly younger (mean age 33.74 ± 6.64 years) compared with the non-consanguine group (mean age 34.78 ± 6.64 years, P < 0.0001). Median AMH and AFC for the consanguine group were 1.90 ng/ml (min-max: 0.01-23.8) and 11 (0-80), respectively, and for the non-consanguine group 1.84 ng/ml (min-max: 0.01-23.0) and 11 (0-60), respectively. AMH and AFC exhibit an age-dependent decline. As both parameters are age-dependent, the multivariate analysis showed that women from the consanguine group presented significantly lower AMH (coefficient of variation [CV] -0.07 ± 0.03, P = 0.036) and AFC (CV -0.16 ± 0.06, P = 0.003) compared with non-consanguine women, and the highest differences were found for women below 35 years of age (AMH median [min-max]: 2.82 ng/ml (0.01-23.80) versus 2.92 ng/ml (0.01-23.00); P = 0.035; AFC median [min-max]: 15 (0-80) versus 14 (0-80); P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The adjusted analysis by age indicates that female parental consanguinity is associated with reduced ovarian reserve in the studied population. Clinical evaluation should include extensive family history and subsequent counselling of the affected couples.

Reintroducing serum FSH measurement during ovarian stimulation for ART.

RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the impact of systemic FSH concentrations during ovarian stimulation for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection on systemic progesterone concentrations in the late follicular phase? DESIGN: Post-hoc analysis of a previously performed randomized controlled trial (RCT) performed between November 2017 and February 2020 in a tertiary IVF centre. The RCT included patients with infertility undergoing ovarian stimulation in a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. The GnRH antagonist was administered at 08:00 h and recombinant FSH at 20:00 h. Ultrasound and blood tests were performed 3-5 h after the GnRH antagonist. RESULTS: The subgroup analysis comprised 105 patients. Systemic FSH concentrations increased from Day 2/3 until initiation of GnRH antagonist and remained constant until the day of trigger (DoT). The total group was split according to the median FSH DoT concentration (12.95 IU/l; Group A <12.95 IU/l; Group B ≥12.95 IU/l). Significant differences, with the higher concentrations in Group B, were found for: systemic FSH concentration on Day 2/3 (P = 0.04), total gonadotrophin dosage (P = 0.03), progesterone on DoT (P = 0.001) and progesterone per follicle (P = 0.004). In the total group, systemic DoT FSH concentration was statistically significantly positively correlated with the DoT progesterone concentration and the ratio of progesterone per follicle (ρ = 0.37 and 0.38, respectively, both P < 0.001). No significant correlations were seen between the systemic DoT FSH concentration and the number of retrieved oocytes. CONCLUSION: While ovarian response seems to be independent from the systemic FSH concentrations on the DoT, high concentrations of circulatory FSH augment the production of progesterone.

Day 5 vs day 6 single euploid blastocyst frozen embryo transfers: which variables do have an impact on the clinical pregnancy rates?

OBJECTIVE: To determine which variables affect most the clinical pregnancy rate with positive fetal heartbeat (CPR FHB+) when frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles are performed with day 5 (D5) or day 6 (D6) euploid blastocysts. Design and method A single center retrospective study was performed from March 2017 till February 2021 including all single FET cycles with euploid D5 or D6 blastocysts and transferred in natural cycles (NC) or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) cycles. Trophectoderm (TE) and inner cell mass (ICM) qualities were recorded before biopsy. RESULTS: A total of 1102 FET cycles were included, 678 with D5 and 424 with D6 blastocysts. Pregnancy rate (PR), clinical PR (CPR), and CPR FHB+ were significantly higher with D5 blastocysts (PR: 70.7% vs 62.0%, OR = 0.68 [0.53-0.89], p = 0.004; CPR: 63.7% vs 54.2%, OR = 0.68 [0.52-0.96], p = 0.002 and CPR FHB+: 57.8% vs 49.8%, OR = 0.72 [0.53-0.96], p = 0.011). However, miscarriage rate (12.5% vs 11.4%, OR = 0.78 [0.48-1.26], p = 0.311) did not differ. From a multivariate logistic regression model, endometrial thickness (OR = 1.11 [1.01-1.22], p = 0.028), patient's age (OR = 1.03 [1.00-1.05], p = 0.021), BMI (OR = 0.97 [0.94-0.99], p = 0.023), and ICM grade C (OR = 0.23 [0.13-0.43], p < 0.001) were significant in predicting CPR FHB+. CONCLUSION: Although clinical outcomes are higher with D5 blastocysts, CPR FHB+ is more affected by endometrial thickness, patient age, BMI, and ICM grade C rather than biopsy day or endometrial preparation protocol.

Different CO2 settings (6.0% vs 7.0%) do have an impact on extracellular pH of culture medium (pHe) and euploidy rates rather than on blastocyst development: a sibling oocyte study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether euploidy rates and blastocyst development differ in a continuous culture medium under different CO2 concentrations. DESIGN AND METHOD: A single-center retrospective study was performed from July 2018 to October 2019 including 44 fresh cycles with at least four fresh mature oocytes (MII) without severe male factor infertility. Sibling MII were injected and cultured in Global®Total®LP under 6.0% (pHe = 7.374 ± 0.014) or 7.0% (pHe = 7.300 ± 0.013) CO2, 5.0% O2, and 89.0% or 88.0% N2. Analyzed variables were normally fertilized oocytes (2PN), cleavage rate, blastulation rate on day 5/2PN, usable blastocyst (blastocysts biopsied/2PN), and euploidy rates. Blastocyst's trophectoderm biopsy was performed on day 5, 6, or 7 for genetic testing and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) quantification by next-generation sequencing. RESULTS: Women's mean age was 33.0 ± 6.6 years old. From a total of 604 MII, no differences were found in normal fertilization and cleavage rates on day 3 between 6.0 and 7.0% CO2 (72.3% vs 67.1%, p = 0.169 and 96.6% vs 96.3%, p = 0.897, respectively). Blastulation rate on day 5/2PN was comparable between 6.0 and 7.0% CO2 (68.1% vs 64.2%, p = 0.409). Although usable blastocyst rate was not different (54.3% vs 55.3%, p = 0.922), total euploidy rates differed significantly (58.7% vs 42.8%, p = 0.016) between 6.0% and 7.0% CO2, respectively. The mean blastocyst mtDNA content was significantly lower in 6.0% CO2 (30.4 ± 9.1 vs 32.9 ± 10.3, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Blastocyst development is not affected when embryos are cultured in vitro at 6.0% or 7.0% CO2, while euploidy rates are significantly decreased at a higher CO2 concentration, therefore at a lower pHe.

Step-Down of FSH- Dosage During Ovarian Stimulation - Basic Lessons to Be Learnt From a Randomized Controlled Trial.

A rise in serum progesterone in the late follicular phase is a well described adverse effect of ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. Previous data suggest, that enhanced gonadotropin stimulation causes progesterone elevation and the incidence of premature progesterone elevation can be reduced by declining gonadotropin dosages. This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to achieve a significant reduction of the progesterone level on the day of final oocyte maturation by a daily reduction of 12.5 IU rec-FSH from a follicle size of 14 mm in a GnRH-antagonist protocol. A total of 127 patients had been recruited (Control group (CG): 62 patients; Study group (SG): 65 patients). Due to drop out, data from 108 patients (CG: 55 patients; SG: 53 patients) were included into the analysis. Patients' basic parameters, gonadotropin (Gn)-starting dose, total Gn-stimulation dosage, the number of retrieved and mature oocytes as well as in the hormonal parameters on the day of trigger (DoT) were not statistically significantly different. However, through stepwise Gn-reduction of 12.5 IU/day in the SG, there was a statistically highly significant difference in the Gn-stimulation dosage on the day of trigger (p < 0.0001) and statistically significant associations for the DoT-P4-levels with the DoT-FSH-levels for both groups (CG: p = 0.001; SG: p = 0.0045). The herein described significant associations between DoT-P4-levels and DoT-FSH-levels confirm the theory that enhanced FSH stimulation is the primary source of progesterone elevation on the day of final oocyte maturation in stimulated IVF/ICSI cycles. Given the pathophysiologic mechanism of progesterone elevation during ovarian stimulation, the use of an increased FSH step-down dosage should be studied in future RCTs, despite the fact that a step-down approach of daily 12.5 IU rec-FSH did not achieve a significantly reduced progesterone level on the DoT. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT03356964.

Euploidy rates are not affected when embryos are cultured in a continuous (CCM) or sequential culture medium (SCM): a sibling oocyte study.

PURPOSE: To determine if euploidy rates and embryo development differ when blastocysts are cultured in CCM or SCM. METHOD: A single-center retrospective observational study was performed from September 2018 to March 2019. Patients [23-46 years] with at least four fresh mature oocytes (MII) without severe male factor infertility were included. Sibling MII were injected and cultured in Global®Total®LP (CCM) or Sage Quinn's Advantage® Cleavage and Blastocyst media (SCM) under 6% CO2, 5% O2, and 89% N2. Fertilization, cleavage, day (D) 5 blastulation, usable blastocyst (blastocysts biopsied/normally fertilized oocytes), and euploidy rates were recorded. Blastocysts were graded prior to trophectoderm (TE) biopsy on D5, 6, or 7 for genetic testing and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) quantification. RESULTS: According to clinical practice, 1452 MII were randomly distributed: 751 in CCM and 701 in SCM. No differences were observed in fertilization and cleavages rates for CCM and SCM (77.4% vs 75.5%, p = 0.429 and 97.6% vs 99.1%, p = 0.094, respectively). Blastulation rate on D5 was higher in CCM (70.6% vs 62.2, p = 0.009); however, usable blastocyst rates were comparable (CCM: 58.3% vs SCM: 56.7%, p = 0.625). From a Poisson regression model adjusted for confounding factors, euploidy rates were not different between media (aOR = 1.18, [0.94-1.48], p = 0.157). Euploid blastocyst's mtDNA values were similar (CCM: 32.2, [30.5, 34.1] and SCM: 33.5, [31.8, 35.2], p = 0.345) and top-quality blastocysts (AA/BA) were increased in SCM (OR=1.04, [1.00-1.09], p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: Under controlled in vitro conditions, euploidy rates and embryo development are comparable when embryos are cultured in CCM or SCM.

Blastocyst mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is not affected by oocyte vitrification: a sibling oocyte study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether mtDNA content at the blastocyst stage differs between embryos derived from fresh or vitrified sibling oocytes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed between March 2017 and September 2018, including 504 blastocysts from 94 couples undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), using fresh oocytes together with previously vitrified oocytes. Trophectoderm biopsies were performed and subjected to next generation sequencing. RESULTS: On average, 1.8 ± 1.0 oocyte vitrification cycles were performed per patient. Between fresh and vitrified cycles, no difference was observed between the number of fertilized oocytes (5.3 ± 4.2 versus 5.5 ± 3.0). Blastulation rate on day 5 per fertilized oocyte was significantly higher in the fresh group (62% ± 29% versus 44% ± 31%; p < 0.001). For the 504 biopsied blastocysts, 294 fresh versus 210 vitrified, no significant differences were found in the euploid rate, 40.5% versus 38.6% (p = 0.667), and mtDNA content, 30.1 (± 10.6) versus 30.0 (± 12.5) (p = 0.871), respectively. Regardless of the origin of the oocytes, aneuploid blastocysts contained significantly higher mtDNA values compared with the euploid ones (31.4 versus 28.0; p = 0.001). Furthermore, top-quality blastocysts had a significantly lower mtDNA content compared with moderate and poor-quality blastocysts (p < 0.001) and blastocysts biopsied on day 5 showed significantly lower mtDNA content compared with day 6 or day 7 blastocysts (p < 0.001). However, when analyzing the blastocyst mtDNA content according to the ploidy state, no differences were found for blastocyst quality or day of biopsy between blastocysts originating from fresh or vitrified oocytes. CONCLUSION: Oocyte vitrification does not affect the mtDNA content of trophectoderm biopsies.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not superior to conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A).

STUDY QUESTION: Does the insemination method impact the euploidy outcome in couples with non-male factor infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Conventional IVF can be applied in cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), as both IVF and ICSI generate equal numbers of euploid blastocysts. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Ever since its introduction, the popularity of ICSI has increased tremendously, even in couples with non-male factor infertility. The use of conventional IVF is a contraindication for couples undergoing PGT to ensure monospermic fertilisation and to eliminate potential paternal contamination from extraneous sperm attached to the zona pellucida. Despite this, it has recently been shown that sperm DNA fails to amplify under the conditions used for trophectoderm biopsy samples. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This single-centre prospective pilot study included 30 couples between November 2018 and April 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD: Arab couples, with a female age between 18-40 years, body mass index ≤30 kg/m2, at least 10 cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) following oocyte retrieval (OR) and normal semen concentration and motility (WHO) in the fresh ejaculate on the day of OR, were eligible for the study. Half of the sibling oocytes were assigned to conventional IVF, and the other half were assigned to ICSI. All embryos were cultured in a time-lapse imaging system in Global Total LP media. Blastocysts were subjected to trophectoderm biopsy on Day 5, 6 or 7 and next-generation sequencing (NGS) to determine blastocyst ploidy status. The primary objective was to determine the euploid rate in blastocysts from sibling oocytes. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 568 COCs were randomly allocated between IVF (n = 283; 9.4 ± 4.0) and ICSI (n = 285; 9.5 ± 4.1). While the incidence of normal fertilisation per cycle (6.1 ± 3.8 (64.0%) vs 6.3 ± 3.5 (65.4%); P = 0.609) was distributed equally between IVF and ICSI, the degeneration rate (0.1 ± 0.3 vs 0.7 ± 0.8; P = 0.0003) was significantly higher after ICSI and the incidence of abnormal fertilisation (≥3 pronuclei) was significantly higher after IVF (0.9 ± 1.2 vs 0.2 ± 0.4; P = 0.005). For all fertilised oocytes, there were no differences in the number of good-quality embryos on Day 3 (74% vs 78%; P = 0.467), nor in the blastulation rate on Day 5 (80.4% vs 70.8%; P = 0.076). The total number of blastocysts biopsied per cycle on Days 5, 6 and 7 was not significantly different between IVF or ICSI (4.0 ± 2.8 vs 3.9 ± 2.5; P = 0.774). With euploid rates of 49.8 and 44.1% (P = 0.755; OR: 1.05664 [0.75188-1.48494), respectively, there was no significant difference identified between IVF and ICSI (2.0 ± 1.8 vs 1.9 ± 1.7; P = 0.808) and all couples had at least one euploid blastocyst available for transfer. When considering only euploid blastocysts, the male/female ratio was 61/39 in IVF and 43/57 in ICSI (P = 0.063). LIMITATIONS, REASON FOR CAUTION: This is a pilot study with a limited patient population of 30 couples (and 568 COCs) with a normal ovarian response. The results of our study should not be extrapolated to other patient populations. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: It is safe to apply conventional IVF in couples with non-male factor infertility undergoing PGT-A. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No funding was obtained. There are no competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03708991.

Inter-assay variation and reproducibility of progesterone measurements during ovarian stimulation for IVF.

In recent years there is increasing evidence that elevated progesterone levels during ovarian stimulation for IVF / ICSI have a negative impact on the ART-outcome. However, different progesterone assays were used in the previous studies and different assays might produce varying results. This retrospective study evaluated the reproducibility and reliability of different progesterone assays with a special focus on progesterone levels below 1.5 ng/ml, as this range is crucial for early detection of progesterone rise during ovarian stimulation for IVF. A total of 413 blood samples were categorized in different progesterone ranges and whether they were retrieved on the day of final oocyte maturation and the results were compared regarding their reproducibility and reliability. To compare the reproducibility between the different progesterone assays, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was calculated and interpretation of the ICC results was done according to Cicchetti, ranging from poor to excellent. The correlation of the assays was excellent when all samples were compared including samples retrieved on day of final oocyte maturation, however in the ranges of progesterone levels 1.0 ng/ml to < 1.5 ng/ml, 0.8 ng/ml to < 1.0 ng/ml and < 0.8 ng/ml, the ICC varied between poor and excellent. The assays "gen III" and "Architect" showed an excellent reproducibility of progesterone results throughout all ranges of progesterone levels. This analysis demonstrates, that different progesterone assays have a limited reproducibility and that the results depend on the assay used and the range of progesterone level. This fact leads to two important conclusions. Firstly the limited reproducibility might lead to substantially different treatment decisions in ovarian stimulation treatment for IVF and secondly critical interpretation of thresholds, provided by meta-analysis, is crucial despite the risk that the so far gained clinical experience might become irrelevant and has to be adjusted to the results, obtained by each assay.

Premature progesterone rise in ART-cycles.

Premature rise of progesterone during the late follicular phase in stimulated IVF cycles is a frequent event and its effect on the endometrial receptivity and on the ART (Assisted Reproductive Technique) - outcome has become a matter of intense debate and research. An emerging body of evidence demonstrates that premature progesterone rise does have a negative impact on the outcome of the ART-success. Until now, the exact cause of progesterone elevation is not fully clear, however lately published studies points to the fact, that premature progesterone elevation might be caused by enhanced FSH stimulation. The impact of elevated peripheral progesterone levels seems to be mainly on the endometrium and the window of implantation, leading to an asynchrony between the endometrium and the developing embryo. Hence, new data show additional an influence on the embryo quality. This review aims to summarize the up-to-date knowledge on the causes of premature progesterone rise during hormonal stimulation, on its influence on endometrial receptivity and embryo quality, on the impact on pregnancy and live birth rates as well as on the possible strategies to prevent this event or to deal with premature progesterone elevation in case it could not be avoided.

Individual luteolysis pattern after GnRH-agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation.

Final oocyte maturation using GnRH-agonist trigger in a GnRH-antagonist protocol is increasingly common, as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is almost completely avoided. However, this approach might lead to reduced pregnancy rates due to severe luteolysis. This proof of concept study evaluated the extend of luteolysis by measuring progesterone levels 48 hours after oocyte retrieval in 51 patients, who received GnRH-agonist trigger for final oocyte maturation in a GnRH-antagonist protocol due to the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. It was shown, that luteolysis after GnRHa-trigger differs greatly among patients, with progesterone levels ranging from 13.0 ng/ml to ≥ 60.0 ng/ml, 48 hours after oocyte retrieval. Significant positive correlations could be demonstrated between progesterone levels and the number of ovarian stimulation and suppression days (p = 0.006 and p = 0.002 respectively), the total amount of medication used for ovarian suppression (p = 0.015), the level of progesterone on the day of final oocyte maturation (p = 0.008) and the number of retrieved oocytes (p = 0.019). Therefore it was concluded, that luteolysis after GnRH-agonist trigger is patient-specific and also luteal phase support requires individualization. Longer stimulation duration as well as a higher level of progesterone on the day of final oocyte maturation and more retrieved oocytes will result in higher levels of progesterone 48 hours after oocyte retrieval.