Methacrylated Gelatin as a Scaffold for Mechanically Isolated Stromal Vascular Fraction for Cutaneous Wound Repair.

Mechanically processed stromal vascular fraction (mSVF) is a highly interesting cell source for regenerative purposes, including wound healing, and a practical alternative to enzymatically isolated SVF. In the clinical context, SVF benefits from scaffolds that facilitate viability and other cellular properties. In the present work, the feasibility of methacrylated gelatin (GelMA), a stiffness-tunable, light-inducible hydrogel with high biocompatibility is investigated as a scaffold for SVF in an in vitro setting. Lipoaspirates from elective surgical procedures were collected and processed to mSVF and mixed with GelMA precursor solutions. Non-encapsulated mSVF served as a control. Viability was measured over 21 days. Secreted basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) levels were measured on days 1, 7 and 21 by ELISA. IHC was performed to detect VEGF-A, perilipin-2, and CD73 expression on days 7 and 21. The impact of GelMA-mSVF on human dermal fibroblasts was measured in a co-culture assay by the same viability assay. The viability of cultured GelMA-mSVF was significantly higher after 21 days (p < 0.01) when compared to mSVF alone. Also, GelMA-mSVF secreted stable levels of bFGF over 21 days. While VEGF-A was primarily expressed on day 21, perilipin-2 and CD73-positive cells were observed on days 7 and 21. Finally, GelMA-mSVF significantly improved fibroblast viability as compared with GelMA alone (p < 0.01). GelMA may be a promising scaffold for mSVF as it maintains cell viability and proliferation with the release of growth factors while facilitating adipogenic differentiation, stromal cell marker expression and fibroblast proliferation.

A systematic comparison of pan-Trk immunohistochemistry assays among multiple cancer types.

AIMS: NTRK rearranged tumours are rare but can be successfully treated using anti-TRK-targeted therapies, making NTRK testing important for treatment choices in patients with advanced cancers. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry (IHC) has become a valuable and affordable screening tool in many laboratories. Unfortunately, the choice of antibodies and IHC protocols to investigate biomarkers is not standardised. In this study, we compared the performance of four pan-Trk IHC methods, using three different clones, primarily in NTRK fusion-positive tumours. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied the performance of four pan-Trk IHC methods using three different clones: EPR17341 (Abcam and Ventana), EP1058Y (Abcam) and A7H6R (Cell Signaling) in 22 molecularly confirmed NTRK rearranged tumours. Additionally, selected NTRK fusion-negative tumours were further included: NTRK mutated (n = 8) and amplified (n = 15) tumours as well as NTRK fusion-negative tumours driven by other gene fusions, such as ALK, ROS1 and BCOR (n = 20), as well as salivary gland tumours (n = 16). Inter-rater agreement of three pathologists was additionally calculated, including H-score. With clone EPR17341 (Abcam in-house and ready-to-use Ventana protocol), all molecularly confirmed NTRK1-3 rearranged tumours were positively detected by immunohistochemistry, while the other clones missed NTRK2-3 rearranged tumours. For the fusion-negative cohort we found the best performance (least false-positive cases) using the clone A7H6R (Cell Signalling). CONCLUSION: Given the therapeutic importance, testing for NTRK rearrangements in daily practice has become necessary and, despite IHC being a fast and affordable tool, using it in routine diagnostics is complicated and requires a high level of expertise.