Dose Optimization in Oncology Drug Development: An International Consortium for Innovation and Quality in Pharmaceutical Development White Paper.

The landscape of oncology drug development has witnessed remarkable advancements over the last few decades, significantly improving clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with cancer. Project Optimus, introduced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, stands as a groundbreaking endeavor to reform dose selection of oncology drugs, presenting both opportunities and challenges for the field. To address complex dose optimization challenges, an Oncology Dose Optimization IQ Working Group was created to characterize current practices, provide recommendations for improvement, develop a clinical toolkit, and engage Health Authorities. Historically, dose selection for cytotoxic chemotherapeutics has focused on the maximum tolerated dose, a paradigm that is less relevant for targeted therapies and new treatment modalities. A survey conducted by this group gathered insights from member companies regarding industry practices in oncology dose optimization. Given oncology drug development is a complex effort with multidimensional optimization and high failure rates due to lack of clinically relevant efficacy, this Working Group advocates for a case-by-case approach to inform the timing, specific quantitative targets, and strategies for dose optimization, depending on factors such as disease characteristics, patient population, mechanism of action, including associated resistance mechanisms, and therapeutic index. This white paper highlights the evolving nature of oncology dose optimization, the impact of Project Optimus, and the need for a tailored and evidence-based approach to optimize oncology drug dosing regimens effectively.

Dostarlimab, an anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody, does not cause QT prolongation in patients with solid tumours: A concentration-QT analysis.

AIMS: Patients with solid tumours were treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody dostarlimab in the Phase I GARNET trial. This study aimed to examine dostarlimab's effect on corrected QT (QTc) interval and the systemic concentration-QTc interval relationship. METHODS: In GARNET Part 2B, patients received 500 mg dostarlimab every 3 weeks (Q3W) for four cycles, then 1000 mg Q6W. Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were recorded and time-matched pharmacokinetic (PK) samples collected at screening, on Day 1 of Cycles 1, 4, 5, 8, 12 (pre-dose and 0.5 h after infusion end), and at treatment end. Concentration-change from baseline QTcF (ΔQTcF) analysis using a linear mixed effects model, summary statistics, incidence of clinically noteworthy ECG values and rhythm abnormalities were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 377 patients were considered for evaluation (n = 15 excluded from concentration-ΔQTcF). There was a non-significant concentration-ΔQTcF relationship (0.001589 ms/µg/mL; P = .5906). Mean ΔQTcF increase was <6 ms (upper-bound two-sided 90% confidence interval [CI], <10 ms at all post-dose timepoints). Highest geometric mean concentration was 414.1 µg/mL (Cycle 5 Day 1, 0.5 h) with predicted mean ∆QTcF of 3.064 ms (upper-bound two-sided 90% CI: 5.071). Mean QTcF prolongation (all concentrations) was 2.4 ms. QTcF prolongation ≥500 ms occurred in five patients (1.3%); 51 (13.6%) and nine patients (2.4%) had ΔQTcF ≥30 ms and ≥60 ms, respectively. Ten patients (2.7%) reported rhythm abnormalities. No U-wave abnormalities, torsades de pointes, ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation/flutter were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Dostarlimab does not cause clinically significant QTcF prolongation exceeding the regulatory concern threshold.

Comparative analysis of PD-1 target engagement of dostarlimab and pembrolizumab in advanced solid tumors using ex vivo IL-2 stimulation data.

Dostarlimab (JEMPERLI) is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody (mAb) which is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with recurrent/advanced mismatch repair-deficient solid tumors, including endometrial cancer, following progression on prior treatment, with approval based on data from the phase I GARNET trial. To support dostarlimab dose regimen recommendations, we estimated and compared the potency of dostarlimab relative to anti-PD-1 mAb pembrolizumab using both data published from the KEYNOTE-001 trial of pembrolizumab and data from the GARNET trial. PD-1 target engagement was assessed ex vivo in blood samples via a super antigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B stimulation assay and interleukin-2 (IL-2) stimulation ratios calculated for dostarlimab. A non-linear mixed-effect sigmoid maximum effect inhibitory model was fitted to dostarlimab IL-2 stimulation ratios using extracted pembrolizumab data as informative priors. The estimated half-maximal effective concentration was 1.95 µg ml-1 (95% credibility interval: 0.21-5.87) for dostarlimab and 1.59 µg ml-1 (95% confidence interval: 0.42-6.12) for pembrolizumab. These findings suggest dostarlimab and pembrolizumab to be equipotent for peripheral PD-1 suppression based on analysis of ex vivo IL-2 stimulation ratios. Accounting for a three-fold dilution between serum and tumor, a target dostarlimab trough concentration of ~54 µg ml-1 would be needed for 90% suppression in the tumor. These data support the use of dostarlimab as a potent PD-1 suppressor and the recommended dostarlimab monotherapy dose regimen of 500 mg Q3W ×4 cycles followed by 1000 mg Q6W thereafter in recurrent/advanced solid tumors.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 monoclonal antibody dostarlimab in advanced solid tumours.

AIM: Develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model to characterise the pharmacokinetics (PK) of anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody dostarlimab, identify covariates of clinical relevance, and investigate efficacy/safety exposure-response (ER) relationships. METHODS: A PopPK model was developed using Phase 1 GARNET (NCT02715284) trial data for dostarlimab (1, 3 or 10 mg kg-1 every 2 wk; 500 mg every 3 wk or 1000 mg every 6 wk; 500 mg every 3 wk × 4 then 1000 mg every 6 wk [recommended regimen]) serum concentrations over time. Concentration-time data were analysed using nonlinear mixed effects modelling with standard stepwise covariate modelling. ER was explored for treatment-related adverse events and overall response rate (ORR) using logistic regression. RESULTS: PopPK model/adverse event ER analyses included 546 patients (ORR ER analysis n = 362). Dostarlimab PK was well described by a 2-compartment model with time-dependent linear elimination. Time-dependent clearance decreased over time to a maximum of 14.9%. At steady state, estimated dostarlimab geometric mean coefficient of variation % clearance was 0.179 (30.2%) L d-1 ; volume of distribution was 5.3 (14.2%) L; terminal elimination half-life was 23.5 (22.4%) days. Statistically significant covariates were age, body weight, sex, time-varying albumin and alanine aminotransferase for clearance; body weight, albumin and sex for volume of distribution of the central compartment. Hepatic or renal impairment did not affect PK. There were no clinically significant ER relationships. CONCLUSION: Dostarlimab PK parameters are similar to other anti-programmed cell death protein-1 antibodies. The clinical impact of covariates on exposure was limited-to-moderate, supporting recommended dostarlimab monotherapy therapeutic dosing.

Quantification of Radiation Injury on Neutropenia and the Link between Absolute Neutrophil Count Time Course and Overall Survival in Nonhuman Primates Treated with G-CSF.

PURPOSE: To model absolute neutrophil count (ANC) suppression in response to acute radiation (AR) exposure and evaluate ANC time course as a predictor of overall survival (OS) in response to AR exposure with or without treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in nonhuman primates. METHODS: Source data were obtained from two pivotal studies conducted in rhesus macaques exposed to 750 cGy of whole body irradiation on day 0 that received either placebo, daily filgrastim, or pegfilgrastim (days 1 and 8 after irradiation). Animals were observed for 60 days with ANC measured every 1 to 2 days. The population model of ANC response to AR and the link between observed ANC time course and OS consisted of three submodels characterizing injury due to radiation, granulopoiesis, and a time-to-event model of OS. RESULTS: The ANC response model accurately described the effects of AR exposure on the duration of neutropenia. ANC was a valid surrogate for survival because it explained 76% (95% CI, 41%-97%) and 73.2% (95% CI, 38.7%-99.9%) of the treatment effect for filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, respectively. CONCLUSION: The current model linking radiation injury to neutropenia and ANC time course to OS can be used as a basis for translating these effects to humans.

Prediction of Survival Benefit of Filgrastim in Adult and Pediatric Patients With Acute Radiation Syndrome.

Acute exposure to high doses of radiation leads to severe myelosuppression, but few treatments are currently available to treat hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome. Granulocyte colony stimulating factors (e.g., filgrastim) stimulate proliferation of neutrophil precursors and enhance mature neutrophil function. Owing to ethical constraints on conducting clinical research in lethally irradiated humans, we developed a model-based strategy to integrate preclinical experience in irradiated nonhuman primates (NHPs) and other clinical myelosuppressive conditions to inform filgrastim dosing to treat hematopoietic syndrome of acute radiation syndrome. Models predicting neutrophil counts and overall survival based on drug exposures were calibrated and scaled from NHPs to adult and pediatric human subjects. Several scenarios were examined investigating variations in filgrastim doses, dose frequency, treatment initiation, and duration, as well as the effect of age and radiation dose rate. Model-based simulations and established safety profiles supported that a subcutaneous filgrastim dose of 10 µg/kg once daily provides a significant survival benefit (50%) over placebo in both adults and children, provided that the treatment is initiated within 1-14 days after radiation exposure and lasts 2-3 weeks. For treatment durations of longer than 3 weeks, filgrastim treatment is not expected to provide significantly greater benefit. This survival benefit is expected to hold for the wide range of radiation doses and dose rates (0.01-1,000 Gy/hours) examined.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Etelcalcetide, a Novel Calcimimetic for Treatment of Secondary Hyperparathyroidism in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease on Hemodialysis.

Etelcalcetide, a d-amino acid peptide, is an intravenous calcimimetic approved for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism. Etelcalcetide binds the calcium-sensing receptor and increases its sensitivity to extracellular calcium, thereby decreasing secretion of parathyroid hormone (PTH) by chief cells. Etelcalcetide and its low-molecular-weight transformation products are rapidly cleared by renal excretion in healthy subjects, but clearance is substantially reduced and dependent on hemodialysis in end-stage renal disease. The effective half-life is 3-5 days in patients undergoing hemodialysis 3 times a week. A clinical study using a single microtracer intravenous dose of [14 C]etelcalcetide indicated that 60% of the administered dose was eliminated in dialysate. Etelcalcetide undergoes reversible disulfide exchange with serum albumin to form a serum albumin peptide conjugate that is too large (67 kDa) to be dialyzed, until a subsequent exchange forms etelcalcetide or a low-molecular-weight transformation product. This exchange from albumin is apparent after hemodialysis, when it partially restores etelcalcetide concentrations in plasma. Etelcalcetide has no known risks for drug-drug interactions. In phase 3 studies, 74%-75% of hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism who received etelcalcetide achieved a >30% PTH reduction from baseline versus 8%-10% of patients who received placebo. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of etelcalcetide in hemodialysis patients supports a 5-mg starting dose administered after hemodialysis and uptitration in 2.5- or 5-mg increments every 4 weeks to a maximum dose of 15 mg 3 times a week.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of neutrophil response to G-CSF in healthy subjects and patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

AIM: The objective of the present study was to use pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling to characterize the effects of chemotherapy on the granulopoietic system and to predict the absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) for patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia treated with filgrastim and pegfilgrastim. METHODS: Data were extracted from 10 phase I-III studies conducted in 110 healthy adults, and 618 adult and 52 paediatric patients on chemotherapy following administration of filgrastim or pegfilgrastim. The structural model accounted for ANC dynamics and the effects of filgrastim and pegfilgrastim, chemotherapy and corticosteroids. The impact of neutrophils on drug disposition was based on a drug receptor-binding model that assumed quasi-equilibrium and stimulation of the production and maturation of neutrophils upon treatment. The chemotherapy and corticosteroid effects were represented by kinetic-pharmacodynamic-type models, where chemotherapy stimulated elimination of neutrophil precursors at the mitotic stage, and corticosteroids stimulated neutrophil production. RESULTS: The systemic half-lives of filgrastim (2.6 h) and pegfilgrastim (10.1 h) were as expected. The effective half-life of chemotherapy was 9.6 h, with a 2-day killing effect. The rate of receptor elimination from mitotic compartments exhibited extreme interindividual variability (% coefficient of variation >200), suggesting marked differences in sensitivity to chemotherapy effects on ANCs. The stimulatory effects of pegfilgrastim were significantly greater than those of filgrastim. Model qualification confirmed the predictive capability of this model. CONCLUSION: This qualified model simulates the time course of ANC in the absence or presence of chemotherapy and predicts nadir, time to nadir and time of recovery from different grades of neutropenia upon treatment with filgrastim and pegfilgrastim.

Population Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Etelcalcetide in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Receiving Hemodialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Etelcalcetide is a novel calcimimetic that binds and activates calcium-sensing receptors (CaSRs) for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). METHODS: To assess titrated dosing regimens, population pharmacokinetic (PK) and PK/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modeling of etelcalcetide was performed using NONMEM 7.2. In this analysis, plasma etelcalcetide, serum parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium (Ca) concentration-time data were collected from five phase I, II, and III clinical trials following single or multiple intravenous doses of etelcalcetide ranging from 2.5 to 60 mg. A semi-mechanistic model was used to describe the relationship between etelcalcetide, PTH, and Ca. This model included the role of PTH in Ca regulation, the feedback of Ca onto PTH production via the CaSR, and the activity of etelcalcetide plasma levels in increasing the sensitivity of the CaSR to Ca via the cooperative binding model. The impact of relevant covariates was evaluated by stepwise forward/backward selection. Model evaluation was based on standard goodness-of-fit plots and prediction-corrected visual predictive checks (pcVPCs). Simulation was conducted to evaluate titrated dosing regimens. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The time courses of etelcalcetide, PTH, and Ca were well-described by the model. The clearance and central volume of distribution (Vc) of etelcalcetide were 0.472 L/h and 49.9 L, respectively, while estimates of the turnover half-lives of PTH and Ca were 0.36 and 23 h, respectively. The extent of interindividual variability in model parameters was low to moderate (6-67%), and no covariates were identified as significant predictors of PK and PD variability. pcVPCs confirmed the predictive ability of the model. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis confirms the putative mechanism of action of etelcalcetide as an allosteric activator of CaSR. Simulations showed that dose titration of etelcalcetide, rather than fixed dose, is needed to effectively decrease the PTH level in patient populations.

Drug disposition model of radiolabeled etelcalcetide in patients with chronic kidney disease and secondary hyperparathyroidism on hemodialysis.

Etelcalcetide (AMG 416) is an allosteric activator of the calcium-sensing receptor for treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on hemodialysis. To characterize the time course of etelcalcetide in different matrices (plasma, dialysate, urine, and feces), a drug disposition model was developed. Nonlinear mixed-effect modeling was used to describe data from six adults with CKD on hemodialysis who received a single intravenous dose of [14C]etelcalcetide (10 mg; 710 nCi) after hemodialysis (study NCT02054572). A three-compartment model with the following attributes adequately described the observed concentration-time profiles of etelcalcetide in the different matrices: biotransformation in the central compartment; elimination in dialysate, urine, and feces; and a nonspecific elimination process. The terminal half-life of total C-14 in plasma was approximately 56 days. The ratio of conjugation-deconjugation rate constants between etelcalcetide and biotransformed products was 11.3. Simulations showed that three hemodialysis sessions per week for 52 weeks would contribute to 60.1% of the total clearance of etelcalcetide following single-dose intravenous etelcalcetide administration. Minimal amounts were eliminated in urine (2.5%) and feces (5.7%), whereas nonspecific elimination accounted for 31.2% of total elimination. In addition to removal of etelcalcetide, ~10% of small-molecular weight biotransformed products was estimated to have been removed through hemodialysis and in urine. This model provided a quantitative approach to describe biotransformation, distribution, and elimination of etelcalcetide, a unique synthetic D-amino acid peptide, in the relevant patient population.

Population pharmacokinetics analysis of AMG 416, an allosteric activator of the calcium-sensing receptor, in subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving hemodialysis.

This study characterizes the population pharmacokinetics of AMG 416, an allosteric activator of the calcium-sensing receptor, in subjects with secondary hyperparathyroidism receiving hemodialysis. AMG 416 doses ranging from 2.5 to 60 mg were administered intravenously as single or multiple thrice weekly (TIW) doses at the end of hemodialysis during rinseback. The influence of demographics, concomitant medications, and other disease-related biomarkers on pharmacokinetic parameters was explored. The predictability of the final model was evaluated using bootstrapping and visual predictive checks. A 3-compartment linear pharmacokinetic model that accounts for the hemodialysis clearance best described the data. Plasma clearance (interindividual variability) was 0.564 L/h (14.0%CV). The hemodialysis clearance was 22.2 L/h. The volume of distribution at steady-state was approximately 624 L (82%CV). The mean time to achieve 90% steady-state predialysis concentrations with 3- and 6-hour hemodialysis TIW was 46 and 32 days, respectively. No statistically significant (P < .01) covariates effect was found on pharmacokinetic parameters. Bootstrapping and predictive checks supported model predictive ability. AMG 416 exhibits linear and stationary pharmacokinetics within the range of doses evaluated. Within the range of covariate values investigated, pharmacokinetically driven adjustments of AMG 416 dosing on the basis of these covariates were not warranted.

Bendamustine pharmacokinetic profile and exposure-response relationships in patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: The pharmacokinetic profiles of bendamustine and active metabolites were defined in patients with rituximab-refractory, relapsed indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and supported understanding of exposure-response relationships for efficacy and safety. METHODS: Bendamustine was administered as a 60-min 120 mg/m(2) intravenous infusion on days 1 and 2 of six 21-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic models were developed, with covariate assessment. Correlations between bendamustine exposure and responder status or occurrence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, and vomiting were examined. RESULTS: Following a single dose of bendamustine HCl, concentrations declined in a triphasic manner, with rapid distribution, intermediate, and slow terminal phases. The intermediate t (1/2) (40 min) was considered the pharmacologically relevant (beta elimination) t (1/2) since the initial phases accounted for 99% of the AUC. Age, sex, mild/moderate renal, or mild liver impairment did not alter pharmacokinetics. Metabolite concentrations were low relative to parent. No correlation was observed between exposure and safety or efficacy measures because of the limited range of exposures after 120 mg/m(2) administration, except bendamustine C (max) was a significant (P value = 0.013) predictor of the probability of nausea in patients, most of whom were pretreated with antiemetics. CONCLUSIONS: The BSA-based dosing regimen for bendamustine achieved the targeted exposure and was associated with a high incidence of therapeutic response. Given the short t (1/2) and low concentrations of bendamustine observed by 12 h after dosing, the single-dose profile for bendamustine described by these analyses is expected to be representative of the multiple-dose profile. The occurrence of nausea was significantly related to bendamustine exposure, with the probability of nausea increasing as bendamustine C (max) increases.

Perivascular paclitaxel wraps block arteriovenous graft stenosis in a pig model.

BACKGROUND: Haemodialysis vascular access dysfunction is currently a huge clinical problem. In an attempt to reduce the morbidity associated with haemodialysis vascular access dysfunction, we have previously developed and validated a local perivascular paclitaxel release system that has been shown to release paclitaxel for at least 3 weeks. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the in vivo use of these perivascular wraps (for both safety and efficacy) at different time points in our pig model of arteriovenous graft stenosis. METHODS: Paclitaxel-loaded ethylene vinyl acetate wraps were placed around the graft-vein anastomosis on one side, with control polymers being placed on the contralateral side in our pig model of arteriovenous graft stenosis. Animals were sacrificed at early (10-11 days), middle (23-24 days) and late (32-38 days) time points. The entire graft-vein anastomosis was removed at the time of sacrifice and assessed for the extent of luminal stenosis using histomorphometric techniques. RESULT: Graft-vein anastomoses treated with the paclitaxel-loaded polymers had an almost complete absence of luminal stenosis at the middle (23-24 days) and late (32-38 days) time points (when one would expect the development of neointimal hyperplasia) as compared with the contralateral control graft-vein anastomoses (37.90% luminal stenosis in the controls vs 0.10% in the paclitaxel group). There were minimal local side effects from this procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of paclitaxel-loaded perivascular wraps in the setting of a pig model of arteriovenous graft stenosis. We believe that such a local approach which could be easily applied at the time of surgery is ideally suited for use in the clinical setting of haemodialysis vascular access dysfunction. It is likely that this novel approach could result in a significant reduction in the huge economic and health morbidity costs currently associated with this recalcitrant clinical problem.