RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely prescribed to treat gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). However, not all patients adequately respond to the treatment, and there are frequent concerns about the safety of long-term use of PPIs. Our aim was to identify the main problems/complaints of SSc patients on PPIs, as well as understand their unmet needs. METHODS: SSc patients treated with PPIs were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: We gathered 301 valid responses from 14 countries (United Kingdom 19.3% and United States 70.4%). Multiple PPIs use (two: 30% and three: 21% in series) was common. The majority (89%) reported improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms from receiving PPIs. Side effects attributed to receiving PPIs were uncommon (19%); however, most (79%) were potentially concerned. Around half (58%) had received lifestyle information, and most (85%) had searched online for information about PPIs. Only in the minority (12%) had a surgical approach been discussed; however, half (46%) indicated that they would be willing to undergo surgery to resolve their GERD symptoms but had important concerns. CONCLUSION: Despite the frequent use of PPIs in patients with SSc, there is significant heterogeneity in prescription, and combination therapy (PPIs plus other medication for acid reflux) is not uncommon (approximately 40%). Patients have significant concerns about PPIs side effects. Education about PPIs is often neglected, and patients very frequently use online sources to obtain information on drug treatment. A surgical approach is infrequently discussed, and patients fear this potential therapeutic approach.
RESUMO
Ghrelin, a circulating growth-hormone releasing peptide derived from stomach, stimulates food intake through neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons of the arcuate nucleus in the hypothalamus (ARC). We examined the effect of ghrelin microinjected into the ARC and the influence of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) pretreatment with a GHRH or NPY receptor antagonist on ghrelin-induced food intake in free-feeding male rats. Ghrelin (0.1-1 microg) stimulated food intake in a dose-dependent manner, and this effect was reduced by 55-60% by the Y(5) NPY receptor antagonist (10 microg i.c.v.), but not by the GHRH receptor antagonist MZ-4-71 (10 microg i.c.v.). We also evaluated the effects of passive ghrelin immunoneutralization by the microinjection of anti-ghrelin immunoglobulins (IgGs) intracerebroventricularly or directly into the ARC on food intake in free-feeding and fasted male rats. i.c.v. administration of anti-ghrelin IgGs decreased cumulative food intake over 24 h, whereas microinfusion of anti-ghrelin IgGs into the ARC induced only a short-lived (2 and 6 h) effect. Collectively, these data would indicate that centrally derived ghrelin has a major role in the control of food intake in rats and, in this context, blood-born ghrelin would be effective only in relation to its ability to reach the ARC, which is devoid of blood-brain barrier.