Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Asian J Surg ; 47(1): 35-42, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37704475

RESUMO

A minimally invasive approach through right mini-thoracotomy for redo mitral valve surgery may improve patients' outcomes compared to median sternotomy. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of both procedures according to the Mitral Valve Academic Research Consortium (MVARC). This systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Literature searching was performed in several databases including PubMed, EBSCOhost, Scopus, and Proquest up to 28 February 2022. Meta-analysis using proportions or means was applied. A total of 13 retrospective cohort articles were included in this study. The incidence of in-hospital mortality (3% vs 9.2%, OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.21-0.58; P ≤ 0.0001), reintervention for bleeding (3.8% vs 5.9%, OR = 0.56; 95% CI: 0.32-0.97; P = 0.04), and acute renal failure (5% vs 12%, OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.23-0.65; P = 0.0003) was significantly lower in mini-thoracotomy (MINI) group compared to median sternotomy (STER) group. The incidence of neurologic events (3.4% vs 5.5%, OR = 0.66; 95% CI: 0.4-1.08; P = 0.1) and arrhythmia (19.5% vs 25.5%, OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.38-1.09; P = 0.1) were also lower in MINI group compared to STER group but was not significant statistically. No significant differences were found in myocardial infarct (1% vs 1%, OR = 0.71; 95% CI: 0.06-8.85; P = 0.79) between MINI and STER group. A minimally invasive surgery through right mini-thoracotomy is associated with a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality, reintervention for bleeding, and acute renal failure. It is a safe alternative to median sternotomy for redo mitral valve surgery.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Humanos , Valva Mitral/cirurgia , Esternotomia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Toracotomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321260

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Aortic valve replacement with mechanical valves is the standard treatment for aortic valve disease in Indonesia. Its usage is associated with high cost, risk of endocarditis and thromboembolic event, and lifetime consumption of anticoagulants. We performed a novel replacement technique of the aortic valve using an autologous pericardium and evaluated the short-term outcomes. METHODS: From April 2017 to April 2020, 16 patients underwent aortic valve replacement with a single-strip autologous pericardium. Outcomes of the left ventricular reverse remodeling (LVRR), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity-2 (sST-2) were measured at 6 months postoperation. RESULTS: A total of 16 surgeries were performed using aortic valve replacement with single-strip pericardium without conversion to mechanical valve replacement. The patients included eight males and eight females, and the mean age was 49.63 ± 12.54 years. The most common diagnosis was mixed aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation (9 cases). Five patients underwent a concomitant coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure and 12 patients underwent either mitral or tricuspid valve repair. The mean aortic cross-clamp time was 139.88 ± 23.21 minutes and cardiopulmonary bypass time was 174.37 ± 33.53 minutes. At 6 months postoperation, there was an increase in the distance walked at the 6MWT (p = 0.006) and a decrease of the sST-2 level (p = 0.098). Echocardiogram showed two patients had LVRR. Survival and freedom from reoperation are 100% at 1 year of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Aortic valve replacement with a single strip of pericardium is a good alternative to aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve. Short-term evaluation at 6 months postoperation showed improvement in clinical status and echocardiographic parameters compared to baseline.

3.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 100: 107764, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36283131

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Primary chylopericardium is an extremely rare disease with no previous reported case in Indonesia. It may be caused by an abnormality of lymphatic drainage in the thoracic region. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 19-year-old female who presented with a chief complaint of shortness of breath and fluid accumulation in her pericardial sac. Screening for autoimmune disease, tuberculosis, and malignancy all came back negative. Lymphoscintigraphy showed suspected leakage or obstruction of lymph at the supradiaphragmatic level. The patient was diagnosed with primary chylopericardium. In a span of 1 year, she had undergone 3 pericardiocentesis procedures and declined surgical treatment. On her fourth pericardiocentesis, the cardiologists were unable to remove fluid from the pericardial sac. Thoracic duct ligation and pericardial window were eventually performed and a total of 850 ml of chylous fluid was removed. At 6 months postoperation patient showed no signs and symptoms of pericardial effusion and was in good condition. DISCUSSION: Constrictive pericarditis can occur as a complication of chronic inflammation in the pericardium due to the presence of chylopericardium and a history of multiple pericardiocenteses. However, there are no reports regarding the exact duration of chylopericardium that will lead to constrictive pericarditis. Difficulty in pericardiocentesis might be an early sign of scarring in the pericardium. CONCLUSION: Delayed surgical treatment of chylopericardium increases the risk of constrictive pericarditis and significantly reduces the patient's quality of life due to recurrent symptoms and hospitalizations.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA