Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35991085

RESUMO

The present field study evaluated the safety and 3-month preventive efficacy of a novel spot-on endectocide containing emodepside 2.04% w/v, praziquantel 8.14% w/v and tigolaner 9.79% w/v (Felpreva®, Vetoquinol) when administered at the intended commercial dose of 0.15 ml/kg body weight to privately owned cats infested by fleas (Ctenocephalides felis) and/or ticks (Ixodes ricinus, Ixodes hexagonus, Rhipicephalus spp.). The efficacy of Felpreva® to reduce the clinical signs associated with flea allergy dermatitis was also evaluated. A total of 326 cats, i.e. 120 and 206 infested by ticks and fleas respectively, from 16 different sites located in Hungary and Portugal were included on Day 0 and allocated in two Groups at a ratio of 2:1 (T1:T2). Cats of T1 were treated with Felpreva®, while cats of T2 were dosed with a commercial Control Product (Bravecto®, MSD Animal Health) licensed for the same indications. Of the 120 tick-infested cats, 79 and 41 were treated with Felpreva® and Bravecto® respectively, while of the 206 flea-infested cats, 139 were treated with Felpreva® and 67 with Bravecto®. Cats were physically examined on Days 7, 28, 56, 75 and 90; when present, fleas and ticks were counted and collected. Efficacy evaluation was based on the mean percent reduction of live parasite counts for each of five visits versus the pre-treatment count. Percent reductions of live flea and tick counts over all post-baseline periods were 99.74% (T1) versus 98.56% (T2) and 97.50% (T1) versus 98.65% (T2), respectively. Non-inferiority for the Felpreva® compared with the Bravecto® treated group was statistically demonstrated for both fleas and ticks. Three adverse events were observed and considered unlikely related to the treatment. These results show that the new topical combination product Felpreva® is safe and highly efficacious in treating flea and tick infections in cats for at least three months (90 days) with a single administration. In 16 cats that were identified with flea allergy dermatitis, the clinical signs of flea allergy dermatitis improved following treatment in both groups.

2.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35991086

RESUMO

This paper describes a multicentric field study which has evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel spot on formulation containing emodepside 2.04% w/v, praziquantel 8.14% w/v and tigolaner 9.79% w/v (Felpreva®, Vetoquinol) when administered at the intended commercial dose of 0.15 ml/kg body weight to privately owned cats infected with major intestinal nematodes (Toxocara cati, Toxascaris leonina, Ancylostoma tubaeforme, Uncinaria stenocephala) and/or cestodes (Dipylidium caninum, Taenia taeniaeformis) and/or lungworms (Aelurostrongylus abstrusus, Troglostrongylus brevior). A total of 219 cats from 26 veterinary clinics located in Albania, Greece, Hungary, Italy and Portugal were included in the study. Feces from the cats were examined on a single occasion between Study Day -7 and Day 0 (baseline) and post-treatment (i) twice between Day 7 and Day 14 (± 2) (for intestinal helminths) or (ii) twice between Day 21 (± 2) and Day 28 (± 2) (for lungworms). Cats were allocated into two groups at a ratio of 2:1 (Felpreva®: Profender®, i.e. a commercial control product containing emodepside and praziquantel). Cats infected with intestinal helminths were treated once on Day 0 (i) with Felpreva® (Group 1) or (ii) with Profender® (Group 2). Animals infected with lungworms received a second treatment with Profender® on Day 14 (± 2) regardless of group allocation. Faecal egg or larval count reduction for Felpreva® was 97.47% for intestinal nematodes and 96.80% for lungworms. No cats infected with cestodes at baseline resulted positive after treatment with Felpreva®. However, the low number of cats (n = 10) did not allow for a statistical analysis to be performed. Non-inferiority of Felpreva® compared to Profender® was statistically demonstrated for all target intestinal and respiratory parasites. No adverse events nor application site reactions were observed. These results show that the new topical combination product Felpreva® is highly safe and efficacious in treating infections caused by major species of feline intestinal nematodes, cestodes and lungworms under field conditions.

3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35991087

RESUMO

Feline troglostrongylosis caused by Troglostrongylus brevior is increasingly reported in European countries. Although the disease can be severe and potentially life-threatening, especially in kittens and young cats, effective treatment options are still limited. Two administrations of emodepside 2 weeks apart have shown promising results for the treatment of T. brevior infection in single cases and in a field trial. Therefore, the present study has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of two spot-on combinations containing emodepside (i.e. 2.14% w/v emodepside and 8.58% w/v praziquantel - Profender®, and 2.04% w/v emodepside, 8.14% w/v praziquantel and 9.79% w/v tigolaner - Felpreva®) in the treatment of troglostrongylosis under experimental conditions. Twenty-four cats were experimentally infected with T. brevior and randomly assigned to one of three groups of eight cats each, i.e. (i) Group 1 (G1) left untreated, (ii) Group 2 (G2) receiving Profender® on Days 28 and 44, and (iii) Group 3 (G3) receiving Felpreva® on Day 28 and Profender® on Day 44. Doses corresponded to the minimum effective dose of 0.140 and 0.148 ml/kg body weight, for Profender® and Felpreva®, respectively. The primary efficacy criterion was the number of viable adult T. brevior counted at necropsy conducted between Days 69 and 72. The fecal shedding of first-stage larvae (L1) was also assessed. L1 of T. brevior were detected in samples from all cats within 20 days post-infection. At necropsy, 4 of 8 G1 cats harbored adult T. brevior, while no adult T. brevior worms or other development stages were recovered from any of the G2 and G3 cats. The primary efficacy criterion was not evaluated as the worm counts in G1 did not meet VICH guideline requirements. After the first treatment (Day 28), most G2 and G3 cats were negative at the Baermann examination. After the second treatment (Day 44), L1 were found in two cats from G2 on Day 49 and in one G3 cat on Day 51. No adverse events occurred in G2 and G3 cats. These results indicate that two applications of emodepside spot-on given 2 weeks apart represent a safe and efficacious treatment regime against troglostrongylosis.

4.
Parasitol Res ; 105 Suppl 1: S75-81, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19575228

RESUMO

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of emodepside 2.14%/praziquantel 8.58% topical solution (Profender, Bayer) in the prevention and treatment of lactogenic Toxocara cati infections. Eight pregnant cats were orally infected with T. cati eggs during late pregnancy. Four queens were treated on day 60 post conception and four queens were left untreated. The kittens of two untreated queens were treated 28 days after birth. The two other negative control litters were left untreated. The efficacy of emodepside was determined by faecal egg counts. While faecal samples of queens and litters in the control group became positive for T. cati, egg shedding was completely prevented in all four treated queens, in their litters and in the kittens from the two litters which were treated four weeks after birth. The untreated mothers of the latter stayed also coproscopically negative, which might be explained by an oral uptake of emodepside through grooming. The treatment was well tolerated by pregnant queens as well as by four-weeks-old kittens.To our knowledge, this is the first publication that focuses on the prevention of lactogenic transmission of T. cati.


Assuntos
Anti-Helmínticos/uso terapêutico , Doenças do Gato/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças do Gato/prevenção & controle , Depsipeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Transmissão Vertical de Doenças Infecciosas/prevenção & controle , Praziquantel/uso terapêutico , Toxocaríase/tratamento farmacológico , Animais , Anti-Helmínticos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Helmínticos/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Gato/parasitologia , Gatos , Depsipeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Depsipeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Combinação de Medicamentos , Fezes/parasitologia , Feminino , Contagem de Ovos de Parasitas , Praziquantel/administração & dosagem , Praziquantel/efeitos adversos , Gravidez , Toxocara/efeitos dos fármacos , Toxocara/isolamento & purificação , Toxocaríase/prevenção & controle , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Trends Parasitol ; 21(1): 42-8, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15639740

RESUMO

Although well recognized and studied in developed countries, canine parasitic zoonoses pose a lowly prioritized public health problem in developing countries such as India, where conditions are conducive for transmission. A study of the most recent parasite survey determining prevalence and epidemiology of canine parasitic zoonoses among tea-growing communities of northeast India demonstrated the endemicity of the problem. This particular study serves as a model using conventional, as well as molecular parasitological, tools to provide novel insights into the role of dogs as mechanical transmitters of human parasites such as Ascaris and Trichuris, and discusses the risks dogs pose with regards to zoonotic transmission of hookworms and Giardia.


Assuntos
Doenças do Cão/transmissão , Enteropatias Parasitárias/transmissão , Zoonoses , Ancilostomíase/epidemiologia , Ancilostomíase/transmissão , Animais , Reservatórios de Doenças/veterinária , Doenças do Cão/epidemiologia , Cães , Equinococose/epidemiologia , Equinococose/transmissão , Giardíase/epidemiologia , Giardíase/transmissão , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Enteropatias Parasitárias/epidemiologia , Toxocaríase/epidemiologia , Toxocaríase/transmissão
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA